Conclusion

To conclude, social entrepreneurs are essential for solving the social and

environmental issues of the world today. The scaling of their social impact can result in significant changes in our society. This study proposes entrepreneurial bricolage as a valuable tool to scale the social impact of social entrepreneurs through innovative work behaviour. The problems that our existing bureaucratic systems cannot solve are more likely to be solved by forward thinking individuals, and social entrepreneurs can do so most creatively and

innovatively. If the founders of Yoni manage to succeed in a bricolage manner that will stimulate innovative work behaviour, they might actually be able to reach many women with their safe menstruation products. It will thus allow them to succeed against the odds of their resource limitations.

References

About Yoni. (n.d.) Yoni. Retrieved from https://www.yoni.care/en/about-yoni/

Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz L. (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 267 - 299). New York: Academic Press.

Adro, F., & Fernandes, C. (2021). Social entrepreneurship and social innovation: looking inside the box and moving out of it. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 34(1), 1-27.

Al-Matari, E. M., Al-Swidi, A. K., & Fadzil, F. H. B. (2014). The Measurements of Firm Performance’s Dimensions. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 6(1), 24.

Aldrich, H. E. (1999). Organizations evolving. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

Amabile, T. (2011). Componential theory of creativity. Boston: Harvard Business School.

Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). ‘Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: perceived leader support’. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 5-32.

An, W., Zhang, J., You, C., & Guo, Z. (2018). Entrepreneur’s creativity and firm-level innovation performance: bricolage as a mediator. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 30(7), 838-851.

Atalay, M., Anafarta, N., & Sarvan, F. (2013). The Relationship between Innovation and Firm Performance: An Empirical Evidence from Turkish Automotive Supplier Industry.

Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75(2), 226-235.

Bacq, S., Ofstein, L. F., Kickul, J. R., & Gundry, L. K. (2015). Bricolage in social

entrepreneurship: How creative resource mobilization fosters greater social impact.

International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 16(4), 283-289.

Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329-66.

Baker, T., Miner, A., & Eesley, M. (2003). Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competency in the founding process. Research Policy, 32(2), 255-76.

Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of management review, 32(3), 794-816.

Baron, R.M. & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personal Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free press.

Bhidé, A. (1994). How entrepreneurs craft strategies that work. Harvard Business Review, 72 (2), 46-57.

Bhidé, A. V. & Stevenson, H. (1999). Attracting Stakeholders. In W. Salman & H. Stevenson (Eds.), The Entrepreneurial Venture. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Publications.

Bradach, J. L. (2010). Scaling impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1), 26-28.

Cai, Q., Ying, Y., Liu, Y., & Wu, W. (2019). Innovating with limited resources: The antecedents and consequences of frugal innovation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(20), 1-23.

Canh, N. T., Liem, N. T., Thu, P. A., & Khuong, N. V. (2019). The impact of innovation on the firm performance and corporate social responsibility of Vietnamese manufacturing firms. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(13), 1-14.

Cannatelli, B. (2017). Exploring the Contingencies of Scaling Social Impact: A Replication and Extension of the SCALERS Model. Voluntas, 28(6), 2707-2733.

CCSE. (2001). 'Social Entrepreneurship Discussion Paper No. 1', Canadian Centre for Social Entrepreneurship http://www.bus.ualberta.ca/ccse/whats_new/ studyOl.pdf.

Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied psychological measurement, 7(3), 249-253.

Cozma, D. G., & Bocancia, M. (2020). Scientometric Perspectives on the Concepts of Social Entrepreneurship and Non-Financial Reporting. 8(2), 31-38.

Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of consulting psychology, 24(4), 349.

Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. (2010), ‘Social entrepreneurship: why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here’. The Academy of

Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37-57.

De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.

Dees, G. (2008). Developing the field of social entrepreneurship. Report from the Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship. Durham: Duke University.

Dees, J. G. (2018). The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship. Case Studies in Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 1(2), 22-30.

Demirbag, M., Tatoglu, E., Tekinus, M., & Zaim, S. (2006). An analysis of the relationship between TQM implementation and organizational performance: evidence from

Turkish SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(6), 829-847.

Desa, G., & Koch, J. (2010). Scaling social enterprise: A comparative study of Naandi and Drishtee in rural India. Paper presented to the NYU Stern Conference on Social Entrepreneurship, New York.

Desa, G., & Koch, J. L. (2014). Scaling social impact: Building sustainable social ventures at the base-of-the-pyramid. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 146-174.

Duymedjian, R., & Rüling, C. C. (2010). Towards a foundation of bricolage in organization and management theory. Organization Studies, 31(2), 133-151.

Easingwood, C. J. (1986). New product development for service companies. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 3(4), 264-275.

Ebrahim, A., & Rangan, V. K. (2014). What impact? A framework for measuring the scale and scope of social performance. California management review, 56(3), 118-141.

Elkington, J., & Hartigan, P. (2008). The power of unreasonable people: How social

entrepreneurs create markets that change the world. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

Farr, J. & Ford, C. (1990) Individual Innovation. In West, M. and Farr, J. (eds.), Managing Innovation. London: Sage.

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. New York: Sage.

Fisac-Garcia, R., Acevedo-Ruiz, M., Moreno-Romero, A., & Kreiner, T. (2013). The Role of ICT in Scaling Up the Impact of Social Enterprises. Journal of Management for Global Sustainability, 1(2), 83-105.

German, T. P., & Barrett, H. C. (2005). ‘Functional fixedness in a technologically sparse culture’. Psychological Science, 16(1), 1-5.

Gibbert, M., Hoegl, M., & Valikangas, L. (2014). Introduction to the special issue: Financial resource constraints and innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 197-201.

Groot, A., & Dankbaar, B. (2014). Does Social Innovation Require Social Entrepreneurship?

Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(12), 17-26.

Hall, J. K., Daneke, G. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2010). Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 439-448.

Harper, D. A. (1987). Working knowledge: Skill and community in a small shop. Chicago:

University of Chicago Press.

Hart, C. M., Ritchie, T. D., Hepper, E. G., & Gebauer, J. E. (2015). The balanced inventory of desirable responding short form (BIDR-16). Sage Open, 5(4), 215-824.

Hatton, E. (1989). Lévi-Strauss’s bricolage and theorizing teachers’ work. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 20, 74-96.

Heijkants, B. (2021, January 17). Bij de biologische producten van Yoni staan ‘menstruatie’

en ‘vagina’ prominent op de verpakking. Volkskrant. Retrieved from

https://www.volkskrant.nl/economie/bij-de-biologische-producten-van-yoni-staan-menstruatie-en-vagina-prominent-op-de-verpakking~b9c68ea8/

Husted, B. W., & Salazar, J. de J. (2006). Taking Friedman seriously: Maximizing profits and social performance. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 75–91.

Ireland, R. D., & Webb, J.W. (2007). Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating competitive advantage through streams of innovation. Business Horizons, 50(1), 49-59.

Islam, S. M. (2020). Towards an integrative definition of scaling social impact in social enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13(3), 2-7.

Janssen, F., Fayolle, A., & Wuilaume, A. (2018). Researching bricolage in social

entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 30(3), 450-470.

Javed, B., Naqvi, S. M. M. R., Khan, A. K., Arjoon, S., & Tayyeb, H. H. (2017). ‘Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behaviour: the role of psychological safety’.

Journal of Management & Organization, 23(1), 1-20.

Jensen, M. (2001). Value maximisation, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. European financial management, 7(3), 297-317.

Jung, D. I., Wu, A. & Chow, C. (2008). ‘Towards understanding the direct and indirect effects of CEOs’ transformational leadership on firm innovation’. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(5), 582-594.

Kirzner, I. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Koch, J., Coppock, K., Guerra, P., & Bruno, V. (2004). The global social benefit incubator:

Toward a new pedagogy for “scaling” in social benefit entrepreneurship. Nexus STS, 1(1), 44-50.

Koong, J. K., Ng, G. H., Ramayah, K., Koh, P. S., & Yoong, B. K. (2021). Early

identification of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy using indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography: A randomised controlled study. Asian Journal of Surgery, 44(3), 537-543.

Krige, K., & Silber, G. (2016). The disruptors: Social entrepreneurs reinventing business and society. Johannesburg: Bookstorm.

Lankoski, L., & Smith, N. C. (2018). Alternative Objective Functions for Firms. Organization

& Environment, 31(3), 242-262.

Lanzara, G. F. (1999). “Between Transient Constructs and Persistent Structures: Designing Systems in Action.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8(4), 331–349.

Lanzara, G. F. (1999). Between transient constructs and persistent structures: Designing systems in action. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8(4), 331-349 Levi-Strauss, C. (1967). The savage mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press

Lumpkin, G. T., Steier, L., & Wright, M. (2011). in Family Business Business and Strategic.

Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 306(1), 285-306.

Mair, J., & I. Martí. (2006). “Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight.” Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44.

March, J.G. (1978). Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. The Bell Journal of Economics 9, (2), 587-608.

Melé, D. (2008). Business ethics: Europe versus America. In F. Gabriel (Eds.), Leadership and business ethics (pp. 13-27). Dordrecht: Springer.

Menard, S. (2000). Coefficients of determination for multiple logistic regression analysis. The American Statistician, 54(1), 17-24.

Molecke, G., & Pinkse, J. (2017). Accountability for social impact: A bricolage perspective on impact measurement in social enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(5), 550-568.

Muchiri, M., McMurary, A., Nkhoma, M. & Pham, H. (2019). ‘How transformational and empowering leader behaviors enhance workplace safety: a review and research agenda’. The Journal of Developing Areas, 53(1), 257-265.

Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (2005). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations &

Production Management, 25(12), 1128-1263.

Nelson, R. R., and S. G. Winter. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change.

Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Ng, H. S., & Kee, D. M. H. (2012). The Issues and Development of Critical Success Factors for the SME Success in a Developing Country. International Business Management, 6(6), 680-691.

Nicholls, A. (2008). Social entrepreneurship: New models of sustainable social change.

Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nieuwenhuizen, C., & Kroon, J. (2003). The relationship between financing criteria and the success factors of entrepreneurs in small and medium enterprises. Development Southern Africa, 20(1), 129-142.

Omri, A., Frikha, M. A., & Bouraoui, M. A. (2015). An empirical investigation of factors affecting small business success. Journal of Management Development, 34(9), 1073-1093.

Organ, D.W. (1988) Organizational citizenship behaviour: The good soldier syndrome.

Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.

Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R.

Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). Academic Press.

Pellegrino, G., & Savona, M. (2017). No money, no honey? Financial versus knowledge and demand constraints on innovation. Research Policy, 46(2), 510-521.

Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. (2000). “Managerial Ties and Firm Performance in a Transition Economy: The Nature of a Micro- Macro Link.” Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 486–501.

Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56-65.

Perrini, F., Vurro, C., & Costanzo, L. A. (2010). A process-based view of social

entrepreneurship: From opportunity identification to scaling-up social change in the case of San Patrignano. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22, 515-534.

Perrini, F., Vurro, C., & Costanzo, L.A. (2010). A process-based view of social

entrepreneurship: from opportunity identification to scaling-up social change in the case of San Patrignano. Enterpreneurial Regional Dev., 22(6), 515–534.

Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’Regan, N., & James, P. (2015). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: A systematic review. Group & Organization

Management, 40(3), 428-461.

Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P. C., Slattery, T., & Sardessai, R. (2005). Determinants of

Innovative Work Behaviour: Development and Test of an Integrated Model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 142-150.

Rice, R., & Rogers, E. (1980). Reinvention in the Innovation Process. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization. Science Communication, 1(4), 499-514.

Richter, P.G & P. Kemter. (2000).Factors of success in small business. In M., F. Avallone &

N. Anderson (Eds.), Innovative theories, Tools and practices in work and

organizational psychology (pp. 255-270). Ashland: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.

Robinson, J., Mair, J., & Hockerts, K. (2009). International Perspectives on Social Entrepreneurship. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Rubera, G., & Kirca, A. H. (2012). Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 130–

147.

Saadaoui, S., & Belgaroui, R. (2014). Social entrepreneurship: concept clarification,

Economics & Strategic Management of Business Process, 2(2003), 36–40.

Saebi, T., Foss, N. J., & Linder, S. (2019). Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Achievements and Future Promises. Journal of Management, 45(1), 70–95.

Scheuerle, T., & Schmitz, B. (2016). Inhibiting factors of scaling up the impact of social entrepreneurial organizations - A comprehensive framework and empirical results for Germany. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 127–161

Schleimer, S. C., & Shulman, A. D. (2011). A comparison of new service versus new product development: Configurations of collaborative intensity as predictors of performance.

Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(4), 521-535.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper.

Schumpeter, J.A. (1940). The Influence of Protective Tariffs on the Industrial Development of the United States. Proceedings of the Acadamy Political Science, 19(4), 2–7.

Senyard, J., Baker, T., & Davidsson, P. (2009). Entrepreneurial bricolage: Towards systematic empirical testing. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 29(5), 5.

Senyard, J., Baker, T., Steffens, P., & Davidsson, P. (2014). Bricolage as a path to

innovativeness for resource-constrained new firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 211–230.

Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. (2020). A Call for Research on the Scaling of Organizations and the Scaling of Social Impact. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 1-14.

Shin, C. (2018). How social entrepreneurs affect performance of social enterprises in Korea:

The mediating effect of innovativeness. Journal of Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(8).

Short, J. C., Moss, T. W., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2009). Research in social entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3, 161-194.

Simon, H.A., (1957). Administrative Behaviour. New York: MacMillan.

Smith, B. R., & Stevens, C. (2010). Different forms of social entrepreneurship: The role of geography and structural embeddedness on measurement and scaling of social value.

Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(1), 575–598.

Staber, U. (2005). Entrepreneurship as a source of path dependency. In Rethinking regional innovation and change (pp. 107-126). New York: Springer.

Steffens, P., Davidsson, P. & Fitzsimmons, J. (2009). “Performance Configurations Over Time: Implications for Growth- and Profit-Oriented Strategies.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 125-148

Stevenson, H. H., Roberts, M., & Grousbeck, I. H. (1998). New business ventures and the entrepreneur. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Stöber, J., Dette, D. E., & Musch, J. (2002). Comparing continuous and dichotomous scoring of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Journal of personality

assessment, 78(2), 370-389.

Svirina, A., Zabbarova, A., & Oganisjana, K. (2016). Implementing open innovation concept in social business. Journal of Open Innovation, 2(1), 20.

Thagard, P. (2005). Mind: Introduction to Cognitive Science. Boston:MIT Press.

Thibaut, J. and Walker, L. (1975) Procedural justice: A psychological view. Hillsdale: John Wiley & Sons.

Thompson J. (2002). “The world of the social entrepreneur”. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(4-5), 412- 431.

Thornhill, S. (2006). “Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high- and low-technology regimes”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 687-703.

Tipu, S. A. A., Ryan, J. C. & Fantazy, K. A. (2012). ‘Transformational leadership in Pakistan:

an examination of the relationship of transformational leadership to organizational culture and innovation propensity’, Journal of Management & Organization, 18(4).

461-481.

Tourangeau, R. (2000). Remembering what happened: Memory errors and survey reports. The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice, 29(1), 47.

Van Lunenburg, M., Geuijen, K., & Meijer, A. (2020). How and Why Do Social and Sustainable Initiatives Scale? A Systematic Review of the Literature on Social Entrepreneurship and Grassroots Innovation. Voluntas, 31(5), 1013–1024.

Vanclay, F. (2003). International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(1), 5-12.

Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor's perspective. In J. K. R. Brockhaus (Ed.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth, 119-138. Greenwich: JAI Press.

Waldron, T. L., Fisher, G., & Pfarrer, M. (2016). How social entrepreneurs facilitate the adoption of new industry practices. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5), 821-845.

Wang, C.L. & Ahmed, P.K. (2004). “The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis”, European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 303-313.

Westley, F., Antadze, N., Riddell, D. J., Robinson, K., & Geobey, S. (2014). Five configurations for scaling up social innovation: Case examples of nonprofit

organizations from Canada. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50, 234–260.

Winkel, D., Vanevenhoven, J., Yu, A., & Bronson, J. (2013). The invisible hand in

entrepreneurial process: Bricolage in emerging economies. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 17(4–6), 214–223.

Yindong, T. & Xinxin, L. (2013). ‘How ethical leadership influence employees’ innovative work behavior: a perspective of intrinsic motivation’. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(2), 441–455.

Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519–532.

Zerbe, W. J., & Paulhus, D. L. (1987). Socially desirable responding in organizational behavior: A reconception. Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 250-264.

Zhang, J., & Luo, X. R. (2013). Dared to care: Organizational vulnerability, institutional logics, and MNCs’ social responsiveness in emerging markets. Organization Science, 24(6), 1742-1764.

Appendix A.

Survey Start of Block: Introduction

Q35 Welcome to this survey! This study is interested in social entrepreneurs and their

behaviour. You will be presented with several questions related to your behaviour as a social entrepreneur or about the social enterprise that you work at. Your responses are very

valuable to this study and please be assured that they will be kept completely confidential.

The study should take you around 5 minutes to complete. Your participation in this research is voluntary. You have the right to withdraw at any point during the study, for any reason, and without any prejudice. If you would like to get more information or have any questions

regarding the study please send an email to renee.dewit@student.uva.nl By clicking the button below, you acknowledge that your participation in the study is voluntary, you are above 18 years of age, and that you are a social entrepreneur. Your company or the company that you work at is part of Social Enterprise NL or a Certified B Corporation.

You are aware that you may choose to terminate your participation in the study at any time and for any reason. Your anonymity is safeguarded as your personal data will only be used for scientific publications and will not be passed on to third parties without your express permission. Please note that this survey will be best displayed on a laptop or desktop computer. Thank you for your collaboration!

o

I understand the text presented above and I consent. I would like to begin the study. (1) End of Block: Introduction

Start of Block: Demographics

Q4 To which gender identity do you most identify with?

o

^{Man (1)}

o

Woman (2)

o

Other (3)

o

Prefer not to say (4)

Q3 Please write your age in numbers (example: 35) ________________________________________________________________

Q29 What is the highest level of education you have completed?

o

None (9)

o

Elementary school (16)

o

Secondary school (High school) (10)

o

Mid-level vocational training (MBO) (11)

o

Associate's degree level (HBO) (12)

o

Bachelor degree level (WO) (13)

o

Masters degree level (14)

o

Doctorate degree (PhD) (15)

Q32 Which country do you consider as home?

▼ Afghanistan (1) ... Zimbabwe (1357)

Page Break

Q26

The following questions refer to the social enterprise that you work at.

At which social enterprise do you work? (voluntary)

________________________________________________________________

Q33 In which country is the social enterprise a registered business?

▼ Afghanistan (1) ... Zimbabwe (1357)

Q10 Please state how many employees work at your enterprise (example: 50). You can also give an estimate.

________________________________________________________________

Q11 In what industry does the social enterprise belong?

▼ Health-care & well-being (1) ... Other (16)

Page Break

Q12 Is the social enterprise product or service related? (choose the one most applicable)

o

Product (1)

o

Service (2)

Q28 Does the social enterprise have a social or environmental goal? (choose the one most applicable)

o

Social (1)

o

Environmental (2)

Q13 How many years has the social enterprise been in business?

o

Less than 3 years (1)

o

3 to 8 years (2)

o

9 to 15 years (3)

o

More than 15 years (4) End of Block: Demographics

Start of Block: Entrepreneurial bricolage

Q15 The following statements refer to the use of resources when dealing with work challenges.

The resources include anything that you might use to deal with challenges. Examples of

resources include materials, people, or equipment. Work challenges refer to both new problems or opportunities that occur at work.

How do the following statements represent how you never, rarely, sometimes, often, or always go about doing things for your social enterprise?

We are confident of

our ability to find workable solutions to

new challenges by using our existing resources. (1)

o

⁽¹⁾

o

⁽²⁾

o

⁽³⁾

o

^{(4) (5)}

We gladly take on a broader range of

challenges than others with our resources would be

able to. (2)

o

⁽¹⁾

o

⁽²⁾

o

⁽³⁾

o

⁽⁴⁾

o

⁽⁵⁾

We use any existing resource that seems useful to responding to a new problem or

opportunity. (3)

o

⁽¹⁾

o

⁽²⁾

o

⁽³⁾

o

⁽⁴⁾

o

⁽⁵⁾

We deal with new challenges by

applying a combination of our

existing resources and other resources

inexpensively available to us. (4)

o

⁽¹⁾

o

⁽²⁾

o

⁽³⁾

o

⁽⁴⁾

o

⁽⁵⁾

When dealing with new problems or opportunities, we take action by assuming that we will

find a workable solution. (5)

o

⁽¹⁾

o

⁽²⁾

o

⁽³⁾

o

⁽⁴⁾

o

⁽⁵⁾

By combining our existing resources, we

take on a surprising variety of new

challenges. (6)

o

⁽¹⁾

o

⁽²⁾

o

⁽³⁾

o

⁽⁴⁾

o

⁽⁵⁾

When we face new challenges, we put together workable solutions from our

existing resources. (7)

o

⁽¹⁾

o

⁽²⁾

o

³⁾

o

⁽⁴⁾

o

⁽⁵⁾

We combine resources to accomplish new challenges that the resources were not originally intended to

accomplish. (8)

o

(1)

o

⁽²⁾

o

⁽³⁾

o

⁽⁴⁾

o

⁽⁵⁾

End of Block: Entrepreneurial bricolage Start of Block: IWB

Q18 The following statements refer to the work behaviour at your social enterprise. You can respond on a scale from 'never' to 'always'.

How often do you ....

Never

(1) Rarely (2) Sometimes (3) Often (4) Always (5) ... pay attention to issues

that are not part of the daily

work? (1)

o

o

o

o

o

... wonder how things can be

improved? (2)

o

o

o

o

o

... search out new working methods, techniques or

instruments? (3)

o

o

o

o

o

... generate original

solutions for problems? (4)

o

o

o

o

o

... find new approaches to

execute tasks? (5)

o

o

o

o

o

... make important organizational members enthusiastic for innovative

ideas? (6)

o

o

o

o

o

... attempt to convince people to support an

innovative idea? (7)

o

o

o

o

o

... systematically introduce innovative ideas into work

practices? (8)

o

o

o

o

o

... contribute to the implementation of new

ideas? (9)

o

o

o

o

o

... put effort in the development of new things?

(10)

o

o

o

o

o

Q19

The following statements refer to the performance of the social enterprise that you work at.

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements from 'strongly disagree' to 'strongly agree'.

Our organization's

approach allows us to serve potentially large

groups of people. (1)

o

(1)

o

⁽²⁾

o

⁽³⁾

o

⁽⁴⁾

o

⁽⁵⁾

We are able to improve our offerings by expanding market reach (e.g., offering services to more people, adding

locations, etc.). (2)

o

(1)

o

⁽²⁾

o

⁽³⁾

o

⁽⁴⁾

o

⁽⁵⁾

We have scaled up our capabilities to address

our mission. (3)

o

(1)

o

⁽²⁾

o

⁽³⁾

o

⁽⁴⁾

o

⁽⁵⁾

We have greatly expanded the number of

individuals we serve. (4)

o

(1)

o

⁽²⁾

o

⁽³⁾

o

⁽⁴⁾

o

⁽⁵⁾

It's important that you pay attention to this

study. Please select

'somewhat disagree'. (5)

o

₍₁₎

o

⁽²⁾

o

⁽³⁾

o

⁽⁴⁾

o

⁽⁵⁾

We have substantially increased the geographic

area we serve. (6)

o

₍₁₎

o

⁽²⁾

o

⁽³⁾

o

⁽⁴⁾

o

⁽⁵⁾

Our work and approach is transferable to other

locations. (7)

o

(1)

o

⁽²⁾

o

⁽³⁾

o

⁽⁴⁾

o

⁽⁵⁾

Q25 The following statements refer to you as a person. Be reminded that your anonymity is safeguarded.

Please indicate to what extent you relate to the statements from “totally disagree” to “totally agree”.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I have not always been

honest with myself. (1)

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

I always know why I

like things. (2)

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

It's hard for me to shut off a disturbing

thought. (3)

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

I never regret my

decisions. (4)

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

I sometimes lose out on things because I can't make up my mind soon

enough. (5)

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

I am completely

rational person. (6)

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

I am very confident of

my judgments. (7)

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

I have sometimes doubted my ability as a

lover. (8)

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

I sometimes tell lies if I

have to. (9)

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

I never cover up my

mistakes. (10)

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

There have been occasions when I have

taken advantage of

someone. (11)

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

I sometimes try to get even, rather than

forgive and forget. (12)

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

I have said something bad about a friend behind his/her back.

(13)

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

When I hear people talking privately, I

avoid listening. (14)

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

I never take things that

don't belong to me. (15)

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

I don't gossip about other people's business.

(16)

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

End of Block: Social desirability

Start of Block: Debriefing

Q7 Thank you for participating in this study! The aim of this study is to further develop the understanding of the relationship between entrepreneurial bricolage behaviour within social entrepreneurship on the scaling of their social impact. If you have any further questions or would like to receive the results of this research, feel free to

contact: renee.dewit@student.uva.nl This research has been approved by the Ethics Committee Economics and Business. If you have any complaints, you can contact: secbs-abs@uva.nl

Please fill in your e-mail if you want a chance at winning a 20 euro gift card!

________________________________________________________________

End of Block: Debriefing

Appendix B.

Scales for variables

This appendix consists of the scales used in the questionnaire to measure the main variables. In the appendix, the Likert scale answer options are only displayed after the first item.

Independent variable: entrepreneurial bricolage (Senyard et al., 2014).

The following statements refer to the use of resources when dealing with work challenges.

The resources include anything that you might use to deal with challenges. Examples of resources include materials, people, or equipment. Work challenges refer to both new problems or opportunities that occur at work. The statements refer to you personally.

How do the following statements represent how you never, rarely, sometimes, often, or always go about doing things for your social enterprise?

1. We are confident of our ability to find workable solutions to new challenges by using our existing resources.

Never - Rarely - Sometimes - Often - Always

2. We gladly take on a broader range of challenges than others with our resources would be able to.

3. We use any existing resource that seems useful to responding to a new problem or opportunity.

4. We deal with new challenges by applying a combination of our existing resources and other resources inexpensively available to us.

5. When dealing with new problems or opportunities, we take action by assuming that we will find a workable solution.

6. By combining our existing resources, we take on a surprising variety of new challenges.

7. When we face new challenges, we put together workable solutions from our existing resources.

8. We combine resources to accomplish new challenges that the resources were not originally intended to accomplish.

In document Running header: SUCCEEDING AGAINST THE ODDS (pagina 49-69)