• No results found

Quiz 9 Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics March 28, 2019

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Quiz 9 Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics March 28, 2019"

Copied!
4
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

1 Quiz 9

Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics March 28, 2019

a) The fugacity and fugacity coefficient are defined by equation 9.22,

Use the Arrhenius equation to explain the meaning of the fugacity in terms of a probability.

Determine the fugacity (MPa) for octane at (1) 450 K and 0.1 MPa and (2) 450 K and 0.8 MPa using the virial equation and the shortcut vapor pressure method. Put your answers in the chart on page 2 below. (Show your work, i.e. write the equations with values, units and answers.)

Tc =569 K, Pc =2.49 MPa, Vc =755 cm3/mol, w = 0.396, R=8.31 J/(mol K) or cm3MPa/(mol K) b) For condition (1) determine if the short-cut method is appropriate.

Calculate the vapor pressure.

Determine the state of matter at this condition.

c) For condition (1) determine if the virial equation is appropriate.

Calculate the fugacity.

d) For condition (2) determine if the short-cut method is appropriate.

Calculate the vapor pressure.

Determine the state of matter at this condition.

e) For condition (2) calculate the fugacity.

Test to see if the virial equation works for fsat. In case the viral equation is not appropriate do the calculation using the virial equation and compare the result with the “correct”

result from PREOS.xls of fsat = 0.888 Psat. Use your calculated value of fsat if it is within 10% of the “correct” result.

(2)

2

Part (1) Part (2)

T, K 450 450

P, MPa 0.1 0.8

Tr

Pr

Psat, MPa fsat, MPa

State of Matter f, MPa

(3)

3 ANSWERS: Quiz 9

Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics March 28, 2019 a) The Arrhenius Equation is:

Probability = exp(-Ea/RT) for a thermally activated process.

Ea is the molar activation energy for an event whose probability of occurrence is calculated.

For fugacity equation 9.22 can be rearranged to:

f = f/P = exp((G-Gig)/RT)

Where f expresses the probability of a molecule escaping from the phase whose Gibbs energy is (G-Gig). G = H – TS where H reflects the cohesive energy which opposes escape and TS reflects the thermal energy driving escape. Lower f means a lower probability of escape. This means the phase is more stable.

Part (1) Part (2)

T, K 450 450

P, MPa 0.1 0.8

Tr 0.791 0.791

Pr 0.0402 0.321

Psat, MPa 0.343 0.343

fsat, MPa 0.306 0.306

State of

Matter Vapor Liquid

f, MPa 0.0967 0.322

b) Is Tr > 0.5? Yes Tr = 0.791 so SCM works.

Psat = Pc 10^(7/3 (1 + w)(1 – 1/Tr)) = 2.49 MPa 10^(7/3 (1 + 0.396)(1 – 1/0.791)) = 0.343 MPa P = 0.1 MPa so this is a Vapor.

c) Does Virial Eqn. Work?

Tr = 0.745 > 0.686 + 0.439Pr = 0.686 + (0.439) 0.0402 = 0.704 Yes it works B0 = 0.083 – 0.422/Tr1.6 = -0.531

B1 = 0.139 – 0.172/Tr4.2 = -0.321

B = (B0 + wB1)RTc/Pc = -1250 cm3/mole

f = P1 exp(-1250 cm3/mole 0.1 MPa/(8.31 cm3MPa/(K mole) 450K)) = 0.0967 MPa

(4)

4 d) Same as b, 0.791>0.5 so Yes SCM is OK.

Same T so P2sat is same 0.343 MPa P= 0.8 MPa so this is a Liquid

e) For a liquid calculate fsat then use the Poynting Method to get f.

Get fsat = Psat exp(BPsat/(RTsat)) if Does Virial Eqn. Work?

Tr = 0.745 > 0.686 + 0.439Prsat= 0.686 + (0.439) 0.343MPa/2.49MPa = 0.837 This doesn’t work also; Vrsat = Vsat/Vc = 419 cm3/mole/755 cm3/mole = 0.555 < 2 so it doesn’t work by the volume test either.

Do the virial calculation which shouldn’t work and compare with PREOS.xls solution.

fsat = 0.343 MPa exp(-1250cm3/mole 0.343 MPa/(8.31 MPa cm3/(mole K) 450K)) = 0.306 MPa The PREOS.xls result would be fsat = 0.888 (0.343 MPa) = 0.305 MPa so the result is well within 10%, use fsat = 0.306 MPa.

VsatL = Vc Zc^(1-Tr)^(0.2857) = 755 cm3/mole 0.398^(1-0.791)^0.2857 = 419 cm3/mole Zc = Pc Vc/(RTc) = 2.49 MPa 755 cm3/mole/(8.31 MPa cm3/(mole K) 569K) = 0.398 f = fsat exp(VsatL(P-Psat)/RT)

= 0.306 MPa exp(419 cm3/mole (0.8 MPa – 0.343 MPa)/(8.31 MPa cm3/(mole K) 450K))

= 0.322 MPa

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

You can use the steam tables or the chart (recommended). Compare it with that of the steam turbine. Are the listed conditions possible? Why?.. d) Plot the points 1, 2’, and 2 on

Based on the program Allprops, Center for Applied Thermodynamic Studies, University

This can lead to a pressure if a barrier for salt that allows free passage of water (a semipermeable membrane) connects a salt water bath to a fresh water bath. For our purposes

Consider a simplified steam turbine/condenser/boiler/superheater for production of electricity shown in the schematic below. Using the attached steam table, fill in the table below

In Homework Problem 8.14 an isolated chamber was considered with rigid walls that is divided into two compartments of equal volume with one compartment under a perfect

Consider a simplified steam turbine/condenser/boiler/superheater for production of electricity shown in the schematic below. Using the attached steam table, fill in the table below

Answer Sheet (use more pages if you want but put your numerical answers here.. 6 e) The LL phase separation occurs much faster than crystallization since in crystallization the

One proposed solution is to use steam reforming to produce a combination of natural gas (CH 4 ) and syn-gas (CO and H 2 ). The natural gas can then be used to offset the