• No results found

Computer Simulation for the Rheology of Worm-Like Micelle (WLM) Solutions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Computer Simulation for the Rheology of Worm-Like Micelle (WLM) Solutions"

Copied!
98
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

1

Computer Simulation for the Rheology of Worm-Like Micelle (WLM) Solutions

MD and Coarse Grain (DPD) Simulations- P&G Becket Ridge (Peter Koenig/Bruce Murch)

Diffusive wave spectroscopy (DWS)- P&G Mason, Ohio (Mike Weaver) Traditional Dynamic Rheology- University of Michigan (Ron Larson) Modeling of Rheology- University of Michigan (Ron Larson)

SANS- University of Cincinnati (Greg Beaucage/Karsten Vogtt)

Rheo-SANS- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, (Greg Smith/Jason Rich) Other collaborations at P&G Cincinnati and Newcastle, Jeremie Gummel

(2)

2

w rad/s

1e-2 1e-1 1e+0 1e+1 1e+2 1e+3 1e+4 1e+5 1e+6

G' G" Pa

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000

oscillatory rheology DWS microrheology

lp   d   Lc   x

le  

Lc= contour length

Le = entanglement length lp = persistence length x = mesh size

G0 = plateau modulus t0 = terminal relaxation time trep= reptation time

tbr = breakage time

G’(w), G”(w)

rheology frequency spectrum

Models that link rheology to

performance:

Physical Stability (BC810) Consumer Preferences Formulation screening MD, CG simulations

QSAR, etc empirical Other simulations

Models that link chemistry to micelle structure:

Overview:

Micelle Rheology Modeling Program

Zou-Larson simulation:

Models that link micelle structure

to rheology

P. Koenig, M&S; M. Weaver CF Analytical

Zou, W.; Larson R.G. , JOR (2014) 58 681-722

(3)

P&G Confidential 3

Surfactant/Additive System selection

How do we know our models are correct?

Validating models using multiple techniques for internal consistency

MD Simulation DLS light scatter

cryoTEM DWS microrheology,

flow birefringence cryoTEM

MD simulation (rheo SANS) SLS Light scatter

cryoTEM

freq, flow rheology Experimental Scattering Data

Application of Scatter Model:

Model Parameters:

rc, , Lc, , bK (=2lp ) and/or s

MD simulation of micelles:

parameters

Compare with Zou-Larson rheology model Simulate high -q

Scattering pattern CRYSON

output vetted micelle structure parameters

augment/compare:

(4)

4 0

20 40 60 80 100 120

2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5

lp, nm

% NaCl

SANS fit, 0.93% total surf GM fit with G" shift, 3.72% tot surf DPD simulation 3.72% tot surf SANS fit 3.72% tot surf

GM fit with G shift, 1.86% tot surf DPD simulation 1.86% tot surf SANS fit 0.23% tot surf

(5)

5

Small-Angle X-ray and Neutron Scattering

Greg Beaucage

Prof. Chemical/Materials Engineering University of Cincinnati

beaucag @uc.edu 513 556-3063

(6)

6

Small-angle scattering is used for

: 1)  disordered materials

networks, gels, ceramic aggregates (fumed silica and titania) and polymers;

2) “d-spacings” and degree of order

colloids, liquid crystals, block copolymers, and polymer lamellar crystallites;

3) orientation

BCP domains, polymer crystallites, rheosans;

4) detailed measures of structure viruses, proteins.

(7)

7

Small-Angle X-ray Scattering, (SAXS)

-Collimated Beam

-Monochromatic Beam -Coherent Beam

(-Focusing Optics Perhaps)

-Longer Distance for Lower Angle -Large Dynamic Range Detector -Evacuated Flight Path

-Extend Angle Range with Multiple SDD’s

Crystalline Reflections Can Also Be Used

We Get Intensity as A Function of Angle

(8)

8

Small-Angle X-ray Scattering at the

APS and Other User Facilities

We Get Intensity as A Function of Angle

Pinhole Cameras at: 12 ID BESSRC 5 ID DND

18 ID BIOCAT 15 ID CARS 8 ID XOR

9 ID CMC-CAT

33 ID UNICAT

ID02 ESRF (France)

}

Semi-Permanent (Easily Used)

X-ray Scattering:

CHESS Cornell Brookhaven SSRL Stanford

ESRF, ELETTRA, DAISY etc.

SANS:

NIST; IPNS; Los Alamos (ORNL HIFR & SNS)

ILL;SINQ;Julich;ISIS;Berlin etc.

(9)

9

X-ray versus Neutrons Scattering

X-rays interact with electrons Contrast is proportional to

(Dre)2

Electron density is a monotonic in atomic number

Neutrons interact with atomic nucleii Contrast is proportional to

(DS)2

Neutron cross section S is random in the periodic table and changes

With isotopes

Biggest difference is between d and H

Neutron scattering has advantages for hydrogels, single chain scattering, Biomolecules such as proteins where D2O can substitute for water.

However, neutron flux is much lower and SANS requires larger samples (1 cm diameter) and exposure time ~1 hour.

SAXS and XRD

SANS and NPD

(10)

10

The Scattering Event

I(q) is related to amount Nn2

q is related to size/distances

( )

q d 2

sin 2 4

π λ θ

π

=

= q

We can “Build” a Scattering Pattern from Structural

Components using Some Simple Scattering Laws

First we will look at scattering from a single isolated particle, Form Factor.

q

(11)

11

Scattering from Dilute, Perfect, Monodisperse Objects Yields Interference Between Internal Structures

(Form Factor)

( )

( )

⎟⎟⎠ ⎞

⎜⎜⎝ ⎛

⎟ ⎠

⎜ ⎞

= ⎛

=

⎥ ⎦

⎢ ⎤

⎡ −

=

sin 2 R 4

Rq Q

cos sin

) 3 (

2 3

2

θ λ

π Q

Q Q

Nn Q q

I

(12)

12

Polydispersity & Asymmetry Lead to Smearing

(13)

13

We can use the unified function for polydisperse

or asymmetric/oddly shaped, randomly-arranged structures.

1) Particle size distributions from small-angle scattering using global scattering functions. Beaucage G, Kammler HK, Pratsinis SE, J. Appl. Cryst. 37, 523-535 (2004).

2) Structure of flame-made silica nanoparticles by ultra-small-angle X-ray scattering. Kammler HK, Beaucage G, Mueller R, and Pratsinis SE, Langmuir 20, 1915-1921 (2004).

3) Determination of branch fraction and minimum dimension of mass-fractal aggregates. Beaucage G, Phys. Rev. E, 70, 031401 (2004).

4) Approximations leading to a unified exponential/power-law approach to small-angle scattering. Beaucage G, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 28, 717-728 (1995).

5) Small-Angle Scattering from Polymeric Mass Fractals of Arbitrary Mass-Fractal Dimension. Beaucage G, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 29, 134-146 (1996).

= ⎛ − exp 3 )

(

2 1 , 2 1

Rg

G q q

I 4

)

(q = qB

I P

S N

B

P

= 2 π ρ

e2

(14)

14

Correlation Leads to a Characteristic

Change in the Shape of the Scattering Curve (Structure Factor)

x

x  is the correlation distance (an average d-spacing)

k is the packing factor, k = 8 V

hard core

/V

available

(0 to 5.92)

1) Multiple Size-Scale Structures in Silica-Siloxane Composites Studied by Small-angle Scattering. Beaucage G, Ulibarri TA, Black EP, Schaefer DW, ACS Symposium Series 585, 97-111 (1995). See my web page for a scan of this reference.

(15)

15

Correlation Leads to a Characteristic

Change in the Shape of the Scattering Curve (500 Ang. Spheres)

x  is the correlation distance (an average d-spacing)

k is the packing factor, k = 8 V

hard core

/V

available

(0 to 5.92)

1) Multiple Size-Scale Structures in Silica-Siloxane Composites Studied by Small-angle Scattering. Beaucage G, Ulibarri TA, Black EP, Schaefer DW, ACS Symposium Series 585, 97-111 (1995). See my web page for a scan of this reference.

(16)

16

Correlation Leads to a Characteristic

Change in the Shape of the Scattering Curve

x  is the correlation distance (an average d-spacing)

k is the packing factor, k = 8 V

hard core

/V

available

(0 to 5.92)

1) Multiple Size-Scale Structures in Silica-Siloxane Composites Studied by Small-angle Scattering. Beaucage G, Ulibarri TA, Black EP, Schaefer DW, ACS Symposium Series 585, 97-111 (1995). See my web page for a scan of this reference.

(17)

17

Correlation Leads to a Characteristic

Change in the Shape of the Scattering Curve

Linear Plot may be better for correlations.

(18)

18 1) Multiple Size-Scale Structures in Silica-Siloxane Composites Studied by Small-angle Scattering. Beaucage G, Ulibarri TA, Black EP, Schaefer DW, ACS

Symposium Series 585, 97-111 (1995). See my web page for a scan of this reference.

(19)

19

Construction of A Scattering Curve

For a Mass Fractal Aggregate

with no Correlations

(20)

d

20

q = 2 π I q N d n

e

( ) d

)

2

( )

( =

N = Number Density at Size “d”

ne = Number of Electrons in “d” Particles Complex Scattering Pattern (Unified Calculation)

(21)

21

Particle with No Interface

( ) d

n d N q

I ( ) = ( )

e2

⎟ ⎟

⎜ ⎜

= ⎛ −

exp 3 )

(

2 1 , 2

1

R

g

G q q

I

6 2

2

V ~ R

N G = ρ

e

6 8 2

R

~ R R

g

Guinier’s Law

(22)

22

Spherical Particle With Interface (Porod)

Guinier and Porod Scattering

)

4

( q = q B

I

P

S N

B

P

= 2 π ρ

e2

~ R

2

S

3 2

2

I ( q ) dq N R q

Q = ∫ = ρ

e

2 3

2 R

R B

d Q

P

p

= =

π

1) Particle size distributions from small-angle scattering using global scattering functions. Beaucage G, Kammler HK, Pratsinis SE, J. Appl.

Cryst. 37, 523-535 (2004).

2) Structure of flame-made silica nanoparticles by ultra-small-angle X-ray scattering. Kammler HK, Beaucage G, Mueller R, and Pratsinis SE, Langmuir 20, 1915-1921 (2004).

(23)

23

Polydisperse Particles

Polydispersity Index, PDI

G R PDI B

P g

62 . 1

4

=

( )

ln

(

12

)

1 2

ln ⎥⎦⎤

⎢⎣⎡

=

= PDI

σ

g

σ

2 1 14

2

3

2

5

⎥ ⎥

⎢ ⎢

= ⎡

σ

e m R

g

1) Particle size distributions from small-angle scattering using global scattering functions. Beaucage G, Kammler HK, Pratsinis SE, J. Appl.

Cryst. 37, 523-535 (2004).

2) Structure of flame-made silica nanoparticles by ultra-small-angle X-ray scattering. Kammler HK, Beaucage G, Mueller R, and Pratsinis SE, Langmuir 20, 1915-1921 (2004).

Increasing Polydispersity

(24)

24

Linear Aggregates

⎟ ⎟

⎜ ⎜

= ⎛ −

exp 3 )

(

2 2 , 2

2

R

g

G q q

I

df

R R G

z G

⎟⎟⎠ ⎞

⎜⎜⎝ ⎛

=

=

1 2 1

2

df

f

q B q

I ( ) =

( ) 2

2 , 2

d f g

f

f

d

R d B G

f

Γ

=

3) Determination of branch fraction and minimum dimension of mass-fractal aggregates. Beaucage G, Phys. Rev. E, 70, 031401 (2004).

4) Approximations leading to a unified exponential/power-law approach to small-angle scattering. Beaucage G, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 28, 717-728 (1995).

5) Small-Angle Scattering from Polymeric Mass Fractals of Arbitrary Mass-Fractal Dimension. Beaucage G, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 29, 134-146 (1996).

(25)

25

( ) 2

2 ,

min

2 d f

g

f

d

R d B G

f

Γ

= Branched Aggregates

c d

R z

p R

1

1 2

min

⎟⎟⎠ =

⎜⎜⎝ ⎞

= ⎛

df

d

Br

R

R

⎟⎟⎠ ⎞

⎜⎜⎝ ⎛

=

min

1

1

2

φ

d

min

c = d

f

3) Determination of branch fraction and minimum dimension of mass-fractal aggregates. Beaucage G, Phys. Rev. E, 70, 031401 (2004).

4) Approximations leading to a unified exponential/power-law approach to small-angle scattering. Beaucage G, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 28, 717-728 (1995).

5) Small-Angle Scattering from Polymeric Mass Fractals of Arbitrary Mass-Fractal Dimension. Beaucage G, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 29, 134-146 (1996).

(26)

26

Large Scale (low-q) Agglomerates

)

4

( q = q B

I

P

(27)

27

Small-scale Crystallographic Structure

(28)

28

5mm LAT 16mm HAB Typical Branched Aggregate

dp = 5.7 nm z = 350

c = 1.5, dmin = 1.4, df = 2.1 fbr = 0.8

Branched Aggregates

Beaucage G, Determination of branch fraction and minimum dimension of fractal aggregates Phys. Rev. E 70 031401 (2004).

APS UNICAT

Silica Premixed Flames J. Appl. Phys 97 054309 Feb 2005

(29)

29

5 mm LAT

-Behavior is Similar to Simulation df drops due to branching

-Aggregate Collapse

-Entrainment High in the Flame

(30)

30

Structure of flame made silica nanoparticles by ultra-snall- angle x-ray scattering. Kammmler HK, Beaucage G,

Mueller R, Pratsinis SE Langmuir 20 1915-1921 (2004).

Particle Size, d

p

(31)

31

Particle size distributions from small-angle scattering using global scattering functions, Beaucage, Kammler, Pratsinis J. Appl. Cryst. 37 523-535 (2004).

Particle Size Distribution Curves from SAXS

PDI/Maximum Entropy/TEM Counting

(32)

32

Compatibility/Miscibility/Shelf Life for Colloidal Mixtures

(33)

33

Butadiene/Carbon Black Samples March 2015

33

(34)

34 34

(35)

35 35

(36)

36

Osmotic Approach to Reinforcing Filler Compatibility

36

(37)

37 37

(38)

38

DPD simulations and the Second Virial Coefficient

38

(39)

39 39 39

Polystyrene in d-Toluene

(40)

40 40

Organic

pigment in

aqueous

suspensio

n

(41)

41 41

(42)

42 42

(43)

43 43

Organic

pigment in

aqueous

suspensio

n

(44)

44 44

(45)

45 45

(46)

46 46

(47)

47 47

(48)

48 48

(49)

49 49

Summary

-Reinforced elastomer composites were examined using a new

application of the second virial coefficient to describe compatibility of carbon black with three different butadiene elastomers.

-It was found that this approach distinguishes compatibility changes for the three elastomers.

Ultra small-angle x-ray scattering was used to measure the scattering pattern at several concentrations of carbon black. Changes in

scattering with concentration were described with a single second virial coefficient for each elastomer using a scattering function related to the random phase approximation.

-The approach seems applicable to a wide range of nano composite materials. Values for the repulsive interaction potential parameter, “A”

in the DPD method were estimated for the three samples. These values could be used in coarse grain computer simulations of filler segregation in these elastomers.

(50)

50

Chain and Gel Structure using SAXS/SANS

(51)

51

(52)

52

Persistence is distinct from chain scaling

(53)

53

Branching has a quantifiable signature.

(54)

54

G

1

G

2

R

2

R

1

d

f

B

f

(55)

55

G

1

G

2

R

2

R

1

d

f

B

f

( ) 2

2

2 , min

f d g f

d G

R d B

f

= Γ

Branching dimensions are obtained by combining local scattering laws

(56)

56

Chain persistence

PHB = polyhydroxybutyrate (side chain = -CH3) PHV = polyhydroxyvalerate (side chain = -CH2CH3) These are short chain branching similar to branching in polyolefins

Persistence length of isotactic poly(hydroxyl butyrate) Beaucage G, Rane S, Sukumaran S, Satkowski MM, Schechtman LA, Doi Y Macromolecules 30 4158-4162 (1997).

Rheology and persistenc in polyhydroxy alkonates. Ramachrichnan R, Beaucage G, Satkowski M, Melik D in preparation J. Rheology.

(57)

57

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Persistence length, Å

20 15

10 5

0

x in C4-Cx

5 to 9 Mole Fraction Copolymer 11 to 21 Mole Fraction Copolymer

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Persistence length, Å

20 15

10 5

0

Mole Fraction Co-Monomer

C4-C5 C4-C6 ---- Proportional

Persistence length of isotactic poly(hydroxyl butyrate) Beaucage G, Rane S, Sukumaran S, Satkowski MM, Schechtman LA, Doi Y Macromolecules 30 4158-4162 (1997).

Rheology and persistenc in polyhydroxy alkonates. Ramachrichnan R, Beaucage G, Satkowski M, Melik D in preparation J. Rheology.

Chain persistence

(58)

Intrinsic and Topological Stiffness in branched polymers. Connolly R, Bellesia G, Timoshenko EG, Kuznetsov YA, Elli S, Ganazzoli G Macromolecules 38 5288-5299 (2005). 58

N = Length of Side Chain

S = Number of Flexible Spacers

Longer Side Chains Cause

Stiffer Chain (no helical structure)

(59)

59

Fractal Structure Overview

-Mass Fractal Dimension -Other Dimensions

-Calculation of Branching

-Examples

(60)

60

1)  Mass Fractal dimension, d

f

.

Nano-titania from Spray Flame df

d

p

z R ⎟ ⎟

⎜ ⎜

= ⎛ 2 α

Random aggregation (right) d

f

~ 1.8;

Randomly Branched Gaussian d

f

~ 2.5;

Self-Avoiding Walk d

f

= 5/3 Problem:

Disk d

f

= 2

Gaussian Walk d

f

=2

2R/dp = 10, a ~ 1, z ~ 220 df = ln(220)/ln(10) = 2.3

A Measure of Branching is not Given.

z is mass/DOA dp is bead size R is coil size

(61)

61

2) Fractal dimensions (d

f

, d

min

, c) and degree of aggregation (z)

-F F

-F F

R d

p

df

d

p

z R ⎟ ⎟

⎜ ⎜

~ ⎛

min

min

~

d

d

p

z R

p ⎟ ⎟

⎜ ⎜

= ⎛

~ p

c

p

df dmin

z =

d

min

should effect perturbations & dynamics.

Beaucage G, Determination of branch fraction and minimum dimension of frac. agg. Phys. Rev. E 70 031401 (2004).

Kulkarni, AS, Beaucage G, Quant. of Branching in Disor. Mats. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. 44 1395-1405 (2006).

(62)

62

Fractal aggregates are springs

Ogawa K, Vogt T., Ullmann M, Johnson S, Friedlander SK, Elastic properties of nanoparticulate chain aggregates of TiO2, Al2O3 and Fe2O3 generated by laser ablation, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 63-73 (2000).

(63)

63

A Scaling Model for Branched Structures Including Polyolefins

Beaucage G, Determination of branch fraction and minimum dimension of fractal aggregates Phys. Rev. E 70 031401 (2004).

1

1 −

1

− =

=

c

Br

z

z p φ z

Mole Fraction of Branches

66 . 64 0

= 42 =

φ

Br

(64)

64

G

1

G

2

R

2

R

1

d

f

B

f

( ) 2

2

2 , min

f d g f

d G

R d B

f

= Γ

Branching dimensions are obtained by combining local scattering laws

(65)

65

Mole Fraction of Branches

p = 24 & z = 39

fBr = (39-24)/39 = 38.5 Mole %

p = 2 & z = 6

fBr = (6-2)/6 = 66.7 Mole % p = 1 & z = 2

fBr = (2-1)/2 = 50 Mole %

(66)

66

4) Branched Polymers at Thermal Equilibrium: Model Systems for LCB

For Polymers dmin is the

Thermodynamically Relevant Dimension (5/3 = 1.67 or 2)

df = dmin c

~ thermo x branching PDI ~ 1.05

F5

“ 2D Slice”

F2

(67)

67

Mole fraction of Branches

(68)

68

4) Six Arm Polyurethane Star Polymers

Kulkarni A, Beaucage G using Data of Jeng, Lin et al App. Phys. A (2002)

PDI ~ 4

Arm Mw ~ 2,000 g/mole

(69)

69

4) Hyperbranched Polymers Phase Separation at High MW

Due to Branching

Kulkarni A, Beaucage G using data from:

Geladé ETF et al. (Mortensen), Macromolecules 34, 3552 (2001).

Data from:

E. De Luca, R. W. Richards, I. Grillo, and S. M. King, J. Polym. Sci.: Part B: Polym. Phys. 41, 1352 (2003).

PDI ~ 4-5

(70)

70

Long chain branches present !

Model hydrogenated/

deuterated Polybutadiene - Used as a linear standard for polyethylene

- There is a possibility of long chain branching through

reaction of pendent unsaturation during

butadiene polymerization prior to hydrogenation

Richter, Fetters et al. Macromol. Chem. Phys. (2000) PDI = 1.02

Mw ~ 28,000 g/mole

4) Hydrogenated Polybutadiene

(71)

71

Gel Types: A Structural View

Polymer Gels

Structural Gels

Layered silicate aqueous (clay) gels

Typically long gelation time High shear sensitivity

Non-degradable but shear thinning

Chemical Networks Radiation crosslink Chemical Crosslink

Semi-crystalline Gels

Block Co-polymer Gels (hydro-phobic/

philic, glassy domains, )

Dynamic (Entanglement)

Gels

(72)

72

Semi-crystalline gels

Relatively sharp thermally/or solvation induced gellation SANS can study development/modification of gel

structure. We have studied supercritically extracted gels with SAXS and Semi-crystalline Gels with SANS

Scattering from randomly arranged platelets displays two size scales, t and D

and a power -2 scaling regime

Nano-Structured, Semicrystalline Polymer Foams.

J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 34(17), 3063-3072 (1996).

(73)

73

Gel scattering versus dense phase scattering.

(74)

74

Lamellar Structure and Organization in Polyethylene Gels Crystallized from Supercritical Solution in Propane Ehrlich P et al. Macromolecules 24, 1439-1440 (1991)

(75)

75

SANS from gel versus SAXS from extracted gel.

In some cases structure is intransigent

(76)

76

-BCP micro phase separated structure can be determined using SAXS or SANS (Strobl, G The Physics of Polymers Springer Verlag 1997 gives a summary of this topic)

-SANS can be used to measure melt structure and enthalpy of interaction (χ-parameter or A2)

-SAXS is used to study microphase separated structure

Microphase structure will strongly effect gel properties.

Block Copolymers:

-Single Phase Structure, Thermodynamics

-Microphase separated structure

(77)

77

SAXS for microphase separated structure.

(Strobl, G The Physics of Polymers Springer Verlag 1997)

T

φΑ L

R R

S S

Homogeneous

q3 = 3 q1 For Lamellae For spheres you expect HCP

Scattering pattern

I

q

(78)

78

SANS: BCP’s Single phase and micellar structures.

PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymer micelles in aqueous electrolyte solutions:

Effect of carbonate anions and temperature on the micellar structure and

interaction Sukumaran, Beaucage, Mao, Thiyagaran Macromolecules 34 552-558 (2001).

(79)

79

High-q Helical Polymer Coils in Extended, Linear

Conformation (Variation in Helicity with Salt Concentration)

Intermediate-q Inhomogeneities in Cross-Link Density

Yield Statistical Domains of High Crosslink Density

(1µm in Size)

Mass-Fractal Network of High Cross-Link

Density Domains Gel Particles at

Lowest-q

10-14 10-12 10-10 10-8 10-6 10-4 10-2 100

10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104

q (µm)-1

-4 -2

-4

-1

SALS in Water

Saturated Salt Hydrogel A Saturated Salt Hydrogel N

Hydrogels: SALS in Water/SANS in D2O

(80)

80

Linear, Extended Chains in Swollen

State (-1)

Extended Chain Length Varies with Salt Content and Hydrogel

Type

Cross-link Density can be Calculated if Functionality is

Known

Helical Coiling may Change with Salt

Concentration

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100

0.001 2 3 4 5 6 70.01 2 3 4 5 6 7 0.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1

q ( )-1

-1

49(170=L)

66(227=L)

134(464=L) -4

Saturated Salt Hydrogel A Fit to Saturated Salt Hydrogel A Saturated Salt Hydrogel N Fit to Saturated Salt Hydrogel N 10% Salt Hydrogel N

Fit to 10% Salt Hydrogel N

Hydrogels: SANS Data in D2O

(81)

81

Orientation Studies of Nanostructure

(82)

82

We consider 3 orientations and examine HDPE /

montmorillonite

(quarternary ammonium salt modified) / maleated polyethylene cast films.

A laboratory SAXS camera was used.

(83)

83

SAXS WAXS (XRD)

(84)

84

In I(q) versus q we see two d-spacings in the SAXS regime associated with polymer lamellae and clay d-spacing.

Clay tactoids can be identified.

For XRD (WAXS) we see the clay spacing at low q, clay lateral diffraction peaks, polyethylene unit cell peaks.

Two types of clay are identified.

(85)

85

Orientation can identify the two types of clay, unmodified and modified since they orient in

different directions.

This can be seen better in a Stein/Desper plot.

(86)

86

Normals to planes are plotted using the cosine of the angle to the three priciple sample directions.

Unmodified are identified with tactoids.

Modified align normal to polymer lamellae.

(87)

87

(88)

88

1 w% SLE1

Hi salt (Branched)

Lo salt (Linear)

Sodium Laureth-1 Sulfate Surfactant (SLE1)

Anionic surfactant: model

detergent for soaps, shampoos

Ethoxy group 12-Carbon tail Headgroup

•  Zero-shear viscosity matched

•  1% and 0.25% sodium laureth-1 sulfate (SLE1) in D

2

O with NaCl

Hi salt (Branched)

1 w% SLE1, 6.13 w% NaCl

Maxwell model fit:

G ≈ 2.5 Pa, λ ≈ 1.7 s

(89)

89

Image from A.K. Gurnon, K. Xu, N. Wagner

http://sites.udel.edu/wagnergroup/files/2013/04/couetteshearcell-1.jpg

“Tangential”

“Radial”

Rheo-SANS slit

Gurnon et al., JoVE 84 (2014) e51068.

“1-2 shear cell” (NIST)

(90)

90

Prior Rheo-SANS of Branched WLMs

•  Published work

3,4

suggests branching hinders shear-

alignment

•  EHAC surfactant WLMs w/ KCl salt

•  A general trend?

•  See talk and poster by Calabrese et al.

–  Spatially-resolved LAOS

–  Thursday morning

3. Croce et al., Langmuir, 21 (2005) 6762.

4. Qi et al. J. Coll. Int. Sci. 337 (2009) 218.

Erucyl bis(hydroxyethyl) methylammonium chloride

(EHAC)

w% KCl

Zero-shear viscosity [Pa·s]

10 s 1

γ

&=

γ

&=10 s1

γ

&=10 s1

2 w% KCl 6 w% KCl 12 w% KCl

4.5 w% EHAC

1.5 w% EHAC

1-3 shear plane (“radial”) rheo-SANS patterns

for 4.5 w% EHAC at = 10 s γ &

-1

(91)

91

Radial 2-D Rheo-SANS Patterns (HFIR)

q = 0.01–0.1 Å

-1

0 s

-1

500 s

-1

1000 s

-1

0.25% SLE1, 6.13% NaCl

0 s

-1

100 s

-1

1000 s

-1

1% SLE1, 6.13% NaCl

Hi Salt (Branched)

0 s

-1

1000 s

-1

1% SLE1, 3.10% NaCl

0 s

-1

1000 s

-1

Lo Salt (Linear)

q = 0.01–0.1 Å

-1

0.25% SLE1, 3.10% NaCl HFIR rheo-SANS

commissioning

(March 2013)

(92)

92

Summary

-SAXS/SANS are useful for a wide range of problems.

-In house instrumentation can be coupled with national and international user facilities under proprietary

agreements ($1,000 range).

-SANS can compliment SAXS and microscopy when contrast enhancement is needed.

-We can categorize SAS measurements according to

classes of materials with somewhat different analysis

techniques for different classes.

(93)

93

(94)

94

Software for My Collaborators/Students

(And Me)

(95)

95

Particle Size Distribution Curves From SAXS

All Methods are available in Jan Ilavsky’s Igor Code http://www.uni.aps.anl.gov/usaxs/

Anomalous Scattering

(96)

96

Particle Size Distribution Curves From SAXS

All Methods are available in Jan Ilavsky’s Igor Code http://www.uni.aps.anl.gov/usaxs/

Unified Fit (Not all implemented)

(97)

97

Particle Size Distribution Curves From SAXS

All Methods are available in Jan Ilavsky’s Igor Code http://www.uni.aps.anl.gov/usaxs/

Sphere (or any thing you could imagine) Distributions

(98)

98

Particle Size Distribution Curves From SAXS

All Methods are available in Jan Ilavsky’s Igor Code http://www.uni.aps.anl.gov/usaxs/

Maximum Entropy/Regularization Code (Jemian)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Using a hybrid scattering function, the local structure (cylinders) and the overall structure (tortuous and/or branched network) are determined.. That is there are no limits. It

Simple to implement.. Particle size distributions from small-angle scattering using global scattering functions, Beaucage, Kammler, Pratsinis J. Particle Size Distribution Curves

1) Particle size distributions from small-angle scattering using global scattering functions. Beaucage G, Kammler HK, Pratsinis SE, J. 2) Structure of flame-made silica

Particle size distributions from small-angle scattering using global scattering functions, Beaucage, Kammler, Pratsinis J... What

Next consider a sharp smooth surface of a particle such as a sphere. The surface can be decomposed into spherical scattering elements that bisect the particle/matrix interface.

Although still a low-resolution tech- nique, the advent of high-flux synchrotron sources and the develop- ment of algorithms for the reconstruction of 3-D electron density maps from

In the previous section, ideal monodisperse systems for which the measured intensity is directly related to the single particle scattering and the aim of data analysis is to

Particle size distributions from small-angle scattering using global scattering functions, Beaucage, Kammler, Pratsinis J.. “f” Depends on Wavelength. Sintering of Ni/Al 2 O 3