• No results found

University of Groningen The interactional accomplishment of action Seuren, Lucas

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen The interactional accomplishment of action Seuren, Lucas"

Copied!
3
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

The interactional accomplishment of action

Seuren, Lucas

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2018

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Seuren, L. (2018). The interactional accomplishment of action. LOT/Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

Biography

Lucas M. Seuren pursued a bachelor in Astronomy before switching to Com-munication and Information Sciences in 2009. He finished his bachelor in 2011 and subsequently received a master’s degrees in Communication and Informa-tion Sciences (cum laude) in 2012 and in Linguistics (cum laude) in 2013. After graduating he worked as a lecturer in Communication at the University of Groningen before starting a PhD in Linguistics in March of 2014.

During his PhD he spent time as an associate in the linguistics department at the University of York from January until May of 2015 and as a visiting graduate student at the Center for Language, Interaction, and Culture at the University of California Los Angeles from September 2016 until March 2017. Lucas is currently affiliated with the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen as a postdoctoral researcher, where he examines decision making between medical specialists with the aim of improving health outcomes for elderly patients in the Emergency Department.

(3)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

These assessments are used to adopt a deontic stance towards the answer.2 The deontic authority of participants concerns their rights and obligations to determine their own and

The analyses of the different positions in which YNDs and YNIs are used and the import of that position for the action these YNDs and YNIs implement (chapters 2–5) has shown that

Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell. Topic Orientation Markers. The form and function of questions in informal dyadic

Ten tweede kunnen sprekers een kandidaatsoordeel van het nieuws geven; daarmee claimen ze eve- neens te weten dat de recipiënt nieuws te vertellen heeft, maar niet of het nieuws goed

tional cognitive modeling studies on reference processing in Dutch and

We have argued that in producing such a response, the recipient (i) accepts the terms of the prior, informing turn—the action it implements and the information it conveys, (ii)

The methods by which participants re-find each other in social interaction show a remarkable level of other-attentiveness (ch. 3 in this dissertation).. Participants

The two biggest and most important of these developments is the distinction between MarkWrite Marker (lecturer side of the interface) and MarkWrite Student. As mentioned in