GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN
Given our argumentation in this part of the article, we may expect these nominalized infinitives to appear as non-verbal cluster interrupters as well, just as participles (or
Furthermore, it seems remarkable that the xvmatekboleÊw does not seem to occur outside of the Fayum, whereas, if my readings and interpretation are correct (cf. below, ad line 3),
When using this package, artifacts and structure elements (excluding paragraphs; see below) must be marked explicitly, while marked content items will be created, marked
Finally, if 532 is correct one would certainly restore the standard formula for that year: [metå tØn Ípate¤an Fl(au¤vn) ÉOr°stou ka‹ Lampad¤ou t«n la]mprotãtvn.. These
papyrus are otherwise extinct; 51 it is dated by a system never attested in Greek papyri from the Hermopolite; it uses an invocation formula never found in Greek papyri; it is
There is no year 9 which can be identified in this period; the 9th year of Constans fell in 341/2, but a reference to this year by year 9 alone, omitting year 18 of Constantius
pointed out , documents referring to year 8=6 in fact refer not to 311-12 but to 313-14, and the document under discussion here should be added to the collection of regnal years in
In one case the era is found as a dating device in a notarial subscription at the bottom of a contract dated already by this and other elements at the start (P. Of its use in the