Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/43990
Hele tekst
GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN
Hence, we tagged different components of Nrf2, p53 and UPR signaling with Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) to be able to follow stress response activation
The endpoints from the different quantitative features of each reporter (see Figure 3) were collected for each reference compound concentration range and subjected
Since the reference control compounds in this group are quite reactive and cytotoxic (e.g. iodoacetamide, ethacrynic acid, carmustine, sodium arsenite, rotenone, oligomycin,
Next, a large set of drugs with known DILI liability were tested in these six 3D GFP reporters in single 48 hr treatment or 6 day repeated treatment at five different
Pathway components indicated with a green circle are tagged with Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP). Standard deviations are shown for three independent replicates. response
siPSMC3, siOTUD7B, siMSL2, siZNF217 and siRBPSUHL caused an increase in Nrf2-GFP levels compared to untransfected control (figure 6A). Interestingly, the ten enhancers
The past decade there has been a strong incentive to test adaptive stress response activation in toxicity screening, initiated by the report of the National
A correlation between the in vitro drug toxicity of drugs to cell lines that express human p450s and their propensity to cause liver injury in humans.. Drug levels: