stratified
well- mixed
3 4 5 6 7 8
51 52 53 54
48000 50000 52000 54000 56000 58000 60000 62000 64000 66000 68000 70000 410000
415000 420000 425000
-5000 -4500 -4000 -3500 -3000 -2500 -2000 -1500 -1000 -500 0 500 1000 1500
3.9 4.0 4.1
51.7 51.8
Water depth (m)
Longitude (ºE)
Latitude (ºN)
0 10 20 30 40 50
a)
b)
30 20 10 0
Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec
Water depth (m)
O2 (
μ
mol L-1)0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●c)
d)
●
●
●
●
●
● ●
●
● ● ●
0 ●
1 2 3 4
φ (J m-3 )
pH
30 20 10 0
Water depth (m)
7.6 7.8 8.0 8.2 8.4
Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
a)
30 20 10 0
Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec
20000 40000 60000 80000
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
Water depth (m)
pCO
2(ppmv)
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
● 200
400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
c)
b)
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
0 5 10 15 20 25
Chl a
(μg L
-1)
d)
Buffer factor
●
●
●
● ● ● ●
●
●
●
●
●
−30
−20
−10 0 10
Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Process rate (mmol C m−2 d−1 )
b) 0
100 300 500
●
●
● ●
●
● ● ●
●
●
●
●
Gross primary production Respiration
●
a) −2−1 CO efflux (mmol C m d) 2
Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec 200
400
+ +
+ +
+ + +
+
pH change (d
-1)
-0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.02 -0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.02
-0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.02 -0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.02
-0.10 -0.05 0 0.05 0.10 -0.03 -0.01 0 0.01 0.03
-0.01 -0.005 0 0.005 0.01 -0.015 -0.005 0 0.005 0.015 March 1 m
May 1 m
March 25 m
May 25 m
August 1 m
November 1 m
August 25 m
November 25 m
CO
2air-sea exchange Vertical transport
Sediment fluxes
Gross primary production Respiration
Nitrification
Temperature change
Closure term (lateral transport) Net change in pH
Faculty of Geosciences Department of Earth Sciences - Geochemistry m.hagens@uu.nl
Biogeochemical processes and buffering capacity concurrently affect acidification in a seasonally hypoxic coastal marine basin
M. Hagens | C. P. Slomp | F. J. R. Meysman | D. Seitaj | J. Harlay | A. V. Borges | J. J. Middelburg
1. Introduction
Coastal areas experience more pronounced short-term fluctuations in pH than the open ocean due to higher rates of biogeochemical processes such as primary production, respiration and nitrification. These processes can mask or amplify the ocean acidification signal induced by increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO
2) [1]. Coastal acidification can be enhanced when eutrophication-induced hypoxia develops [2]. This is because the CO
2produced during respiration leads to a decrease in the buffering capacity of the hypoxic bottom water.
Research questions
• How do pH and CO
2in the Den Osse basin vary with depth and time?
• What are the driving mechanisms behind its seasonal pH variability?
2. Lake Grevelingen
Eutrophication-induced seasonal hypoxia is common in coastal waters.
Marine Lake Grevelingen, which has limited water exchange with the North Sea, experiences such hypoxia annually in its deeper basins, including the Den Osse basin.
Den Osse (34 m)
4. Process rates
Rates of primary production were determined monthly by light-dark O
2bottle incubations. Gross primary production displayed two peaks: a small peak in March, which was most clearly visible in an elevated Chl a concentration (Fig.
2d), and a major peak in summer. The dominant algae during this latter event were identified as dinoflagellates (‘red tide’). Respiration was highest in May, due to an inflow of the spring-blooming haptophyte Phaeocystis globosa from the North Sea. During most of the year, the Den Osse basin was a sink for atmospheric CO
2. Only in autumn, upon termination of water-column stratification (Fig. 1d) and transport of CO
2-rich bottom waters to the surface (Fig. 2b), CO
2was emitted to the atmosphere.
3. CO
2and pH in 2012
The Den Osse basin displayed large differences in pH and CO
2with both space and time. During stratification and hypoxia in August, pH differed by 0.75 units between the oxic surface water and the hypoxic bottom water. The buffer factor [3] correlated positively with pH and varied by a factor 2 with season and up to a factor 5 with depth. This indicates that changes in pH were less buffered when the pH of the water was low. The variability in the buffer factor was mainly driven by the uptake of CO
2in the surface water in spring and early summer and subsequent release at depth in August. This also explains the strongly negative correlation between CO
2and pH.
5. Effect of biogeochemical processes on pH
The net change in pH in the Den Osse basin was much smaller than the in- and decreases resulting from the separate processes [4]. These processes were so active that the residence time of a proton (H
+) in the basin was only 15 to 42 days. Gross primary production led to an increase in surface-water pH year-round, but its contribution varied over the year. CO
2air-sea exchange mostly impacted the pH budget in autumn. At depth, sediment fluxes and nitrification played a major role, in particular in spring and autumn. Respiration was an important process year-round and at all depths.
In August, the absolute changes in pH were much larger than in the other months. This was mainly due to high primary production in the surface water, whereas at depth the low buffer factor (Fig. 2c) was the primary cause.
Conclusions
• CO
2and pH in the Den Osse basin are strongly negatively correlated and highly variable in both space and time
• Seasonal pH dynamics in the basin are driven by temporal variability in several processes rates and modulated by the buffering capacity
Figure 1: a) Location and b) bathymetry of Lake Grevelingen; c) oxygen concentration (O2) and d) stratification parameter (φ) at the Den Osse basin in 2012.
Figure 3: a) Depth-integrated rates of gross primary production and respiration; b) calculated CO2 air-sea exchange in the Den Osse basin in 2012.
Figure 2: a) pH; b) CO2; c) buffer factor; d) chlorophyll-a (Chl a) at the Den Osse basin in 2012.
Figure 4: Den Osse pH budgets at 1 and 25 m depth for March, May, August and November 2012.
c)
References
[1] Provoost et al. (2010) Biogeosciences 7, 3869-3878 | [2] Cai et al. (2011) Nature Geosci. 4,
766–770 | [3] Hofmann et al. (2010) Mar. Chem. 121, 246-255 | [4] Hagens et al. (2015) Biogeosciences 12, 1561-1583.
CO2 release
CO2 uptake