• No results found

EU-rapportage 2013-2014 op EU-regulation 1177-2010

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "EU-rapportage 2013-2014 op EU-regulation 1177-2010"

Copied!
4
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111 Office: DM28 05/057 - Tel. direct line +32 229-6 09 95 - Fax +32 229-8 65 40

Email: Jean-Louis.Colson@ec.europa.eu

Rights of passengers travelling by sea and inland waterway (Regulation (EU) N° 1177/2010)

NEBs activity reports for 2015

1) Please specify when was the enforcement body(ies) fully operational in your country Regulation 1177/2010 is implemented in the Dutch law, i.e the Wet handhaving consumentenbescherming. The Human Environment and Transport Inspectorate is the National Enforcement Body (NEB). The NEB was fully operational in the Netherlands on 18 December 2012.

2) Distribution of tasks between different NEBs (if applicable)

The Human Environment and Transport Inspectorate (the inspectorate) is the sole NEB since 18 December 2012.

3) Statistics on complaint handling at carrier/terminal operator level and at NEB level:

Carriers

Year Number of

complaints received by carriers

Reason for

complaint (e.g.

cancellation, delay, discrimination, lack of assistance, please indicate whether it is a disability related complaint):

Number of complaints rejected by the carrier and appealed

by the

passenger

Comments (if any):

From 18

December 2012–31 December 2013

unknown

From 1

January 2014

unknown

(2)

2

-31 December 2014

Terminal operators

Year Number of

complaints received by terminal operators

Reason for

complaint (e.g.

cancellation, delay, discrimination, lack of assistance, please indicate whether it is a disability related complaint):

Number of complaints rejected by the terminal operator and appealed by the passenger

Comments (if any):

From 18

December 2012–31 December 2013

unknown

From 1

January 2014 -31

December 2014

unknown

NEB(s)

Year Number of

complaints received by NEB(s)

Reason for complaint (e.g. cancellation, delay, discrimination, lack of assistance, please indicate whether it is a disability related complaint):

Comments (if any).

Please specify how many of the cases received were solved. If applicable, please indicate what happened to the unsolved cases (referral to Court, ADR alternative dispute resolution)?

From 18

December 2012–31

December 2013

No complaints

From 1 January

2014 -31

No complaints

(3)

3

December 2014

In your Member State (please underline the correct answer):

o Passengers can always submit their complaint directly to the NEB, or

o Passengers are obliged to submit their complaints to the carrier/terminal operator first, and they can only submit a complaint to an NEB if they are not satisfied with the solution offered by the carrier/terminal operator

Do you use a complaint form at national level (please underline the correct answer)?:

o No

o Yes (if yes, please provide a copy of this form to the Commission if different from the Commission template)

Did you transfer any complaints to NEBs of other Member States? If yes, how many complaints?

The inspectorate has received no complaints.

4) Information and statistics on penalties (Article 28 of the Regulation):

Enforcement did not occur in 2013 and 2014. The inspectorate has published general information concerning passenger’s rights on its website. The branche-organization representing carriers (CBRB) has also given information about the regulation (on its website).

Year Number of

penalties imposed:

Types of penalty (in case of fines, what were the amounts imposed):

Reason for imposing the penalty (which provision of the Regulation was breached) :

From 18

December 2012–31

December 2013 0

From 1 January

2014 -31

December 2014 0

Which body(ies) imposed the penalties ?

The inspectorate is the sole body which imposes penalties.

(4)

4

5) Other actions taken in order to ensure the correct application of the Regulation:

The inspectorate has published general information concerning passenger’s rights on its website. The branche-organization representing carriers (CBRB) has also given information about the regulation (on its website). Research by the CBRB has shown that:

o carriers have a system for complaints of passengers, and

o carriers have facilities to exercise the rights and duties under the Regulation

6) General information on the environment in which the Regulation is applied in your Member State:

Terminals and Merchant shipping

In the Netherlands there are three major terminals. 150 cruise ships will visit Amsterdam in 2015. 60 Cruise ships will visit Rotterdam in 2015; in IJmuiden it concerns about 40 cruise ships in 2015. The cruise market in the Netherlands is an increasing market. At this moment 14 cruise ships and 6 ferries sailing under Dutch flag fall under the scope of the regulation.

Inland waterway transport

River cruises and ferries fall under the scope of the regulation if the crew responsible for the operation of the ship is composed of more than three persons. This means that about 60 river cruise ships registered in the Netherlands fall under the scope of the regulation.

It also concerns and 6 ferries to the Dutch islands registered in the Netherlands.

Exemptions

Exemptions do not apply in the Netherlands.

7) Any other comment/information to be reported

The Inspectorate has received no complaints. This seems to be in line with the experience of the other NEB’s. In 2016 the Inspectorate will give extra attention to ensure the proper execution of the regulation by means of:

 visit all terminals and ferry-companies to actively inform them on the rights and obligations under the regulation;

 integration of the regulation in the general inspection-regime, and

 publish a complaint form at national level on its website.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

As Article 21 TFEU provides: ‘Every citizen of the Union shall have the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, subject to the limitations

Bodies that wield some form of public authority will rather quickly qualify as a part of the State, and hence have to accept that directives may be relied upon against

This research has indicated that in the always-changing and dynamic social media landscape, short-term strategies are important factors for contributing to more long-term

Figure: Model validation with (a) Measured versus modelled dimensionless mean overtopping rate and (b) Measured flow velocities and estimated ones using analytical equations and the

States shall not impose any further security or notification re- quirements on digital service providers.” Article 1(6) reads as fol- lows: “This Directive is without prejudice to

Europe.'' In particular, the draft Recommendation calls for technical work as discussed above, as well as for the design and implementation of ``an equivalent regime on invasive

“sole intended purpose”, as the criterion that a device should serve in order to fall under the definition of circumventing device according to the Information Society

The proposed solution in computer science literature is to devise ex ante measures that prevent or at least diminish the chance that the blockchain is polluted with illegal content