• No results found

Strategies for optimal suppression of rheumatoid arthritis Kooij, S.M. van der

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Strategies for optimal suppression of rheumatoid arthritis Kooij, S.M. van der"

Copied!
13
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Strategies for optimal suppression of rheumatoid arthritis

Kooij, S.M. van der

Citation

Kooij, S. M. van der. (2009, January 22). Strategies for optimal suppression of rheumatoid arthritis. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/13425

Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the

University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/13425

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if

applicable).

(2)



-'

(3)

 

;LMK:<M

*NKIHL>.A>

@B>L

,><>GML

BG@

*:MB>GML :G=

MA>

MK>:MF>GML F>GML

;BG:MBHGL .A>

:<<NK:M>ER

=BL<HGMBGN:MBHG

-NFF:KR:KER

:M :G=

K>FBLLBHG MBHG

#GGHO:MBO>

I:MB>GML

(4)



#GMKH=N<MBHG

.A>

BG

',L

<EN=BG@

BG@

:G=

MA>

<HGMKHE MA>BK

@B>L

:KER

.A>

LBL

>G<>

,

BKLM G><>LL:KR IKH<>>=

<HGMKB;NM>L

=B??>K>GMB:M>=

IKHIHL>=

PBMA

*E:<>;H MAKBMBL PBMA M>KB:



IHLBMBO>

,>LIHGL>=KBO>G

.A>

=>O>EHIF>GM F:BGLM:R MHE>K:;BEBMR

?NG<MBHG F>GM NLBG@

K>LNEM MBL LBHG PBMA

<AEHKHJNBG>

(5)

 

MA>K:IR BG MA>K:IR MKHE

<:K>

<HNGML

<HGMKHE BG@

MBHGL LMN=R

=><BLBHGL

MK>:MF>GM FHGMAL BG MK>:M>=

R>:KL

#M EBD>EBAHH=

I:K>=

<E>:K

?HEEHPNI

.K:=BMBHG:E

@EN<H<HKMB<HB=L

0:KBHNL MA>

LMK:M>@R

"+

.A>

LN;<NM:G>HNL MA>

>QIE:BG>=

MBHGL :KF :M>=

>O>KR

  HK MK>:M>=

<:GMER

?:BENK>

'.2 I:MB>GML

;>G>–M

(6)



;>>G I:MB>GML :?M>K

NKHI>:G P>K>

==BMBHG

<HF;BG:MBHG MK>:M>=

R>:K MA>

Table 1. Overview of studies in early rheumatoid arthritis (symptom duration <2 years) investigating differ- ent treatment strategies with remission as treatment outcome.

Study design Patients (n)

Follow-up duration

Remission definition

Treatment strategy Remission percentage Mottonen

et al. [12]

Open randomized

195 2 years Modified ACR 1981 (Pinals) criteria

SSA + prednisone (‘single’) vs MTX + SSA + HCQ pred- nisone (’combi’)

21% (single) vs 37% (combi)

Grigor et al. [2]

Open randomized

110 18 months DAS(44) <1.6 Routine vs intensive treat- ment (step-up strategy of SSA, then SSA + MTX + HCQ, then SSA + MTX + HCQ + prednisone)

16% (routine) vs 65% (intensive)

Verstappen et al. [13**]

Open randomized

299 2 years No swollen joints and 2 out of 3: TJC

≤3; ESR ≤20;

VASGH ≤20

Routine vs intensive treat- ment (strategy of MTX, then subcutaneous MTX, then MTX + CSA

37% (routine) vs 50% (intensive)

Proudman et al. [14]

Prospective cohort

61 3 years DAS28 <2.6 Response-driven treatment with MTX + SSA + HCQ

54% of all patients Goekoop-

Ruiterman et al. [15*]

Single blind randomized

508 2 years DAS(44) <1.6 Response-driven treat- ment strategies: (1) sequential monotherapy vs (2) step-up combination vs (3) initial combination with prednisone vs (4) initial combination with infliximab

46% (group 1) vs 38% (group 2) vs 41% (group 3) vs 42% (group 4)

Choy et al.

[16]

Double blind randomized

467 2 years DAS28 <2.6 (1) MTX vs (2) MTX + CSA vs (3) MTX + prednisone vs (4) MTX + CSA + prednisone

18% (group 1) vs 10% (group 2) vs 20% (group 3) vs 28% (group 4) Hetland et

al. [17** ]

Double blind randomized

160 2 years DAS28 <2.6 MTX + intraarticular betamethasone (‘mono’) vs MTX + CSA + intraarticular betamethasone (‘combi’)

50% (mono) vs 51% (combi)

Emery et al.

[18]

Double blind randomized

542 1 years DAS28 <2.6 MTX vs MTX + etanercept 28% (single) vs 50% (combi) ACR, American College of Rheumatology; DAS, disease activity score; CSA, cyclosporin A; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; MTX, methotrexate; SSA, sulfasalazine; TJC, tender joint count; VASGH, visual analog scale global health.

(7)

 

<:K=BHO:L<NE:K

?:<MHK E:K '>MAHMK>Q:M-M>KHB=

MA:M H?

:@>

BHEH@B<:EL

.A>

K:=BH@K:IAB<

7

>O>G EBSBG@

.A>

-

:G=

K>FBLLBHG



BGBMB:E

-

F:KD:;ER FHGMAL K>FBLLBHG BGBMB:E

-:?>MR

-HF>

EB@G:G<B>L BG—BQBF:;

M>KF AHLIBM:EBS:MBHG

?HNG=

:IR H?

57 AHP>O>K BG MK>:M>=

?HK

/&, H?

.ABL FB@AM

(8)



57

>:KER IKHEHG@>=

-MK:M>@B>L G><KHLBL

HK .(

>O>K

?:BENK>

HG=

:G=

F:R F:;

G>O>K BG PAH F>:G K>E:M>=

AHKM MBF>

57 BG<HFIE>M>

MA:G IKHO>

:G=

<HGMKHEE>=

(>P>K

HK

;EH<D>KL ,BMNQBF:;

P:RL :GMB.(

MKB:EL BGAB;BM :G=

A:L :<<HFIEBLA>L .(

:GMB.(



;NM

(9)

 

;BHEH@B<:EL ,

MA>L>

*HLBMBHGBG@

.A>

:G=

MA>L>

F:QBFBS>

:L

;BHEH@B<:EL MA>

MA>

K>JNBK>

MM>FIML IK>L>G<>

:G=

B<:E

=B<MBO>

MA>

MH FHGMAL 57 :LLH<B:MBHG K>LIHGL>



,

LBO>

E>—NGHFB=>

P>

M:BGMR

G

;BHEH@B<:E LBHG MBGN:MBHG MA>K:IR BGBMB:E

=B:G

?HK LN@@>LM BG—BQBF:;

5 7

),,)(

:?M>K

(10)



HG<ENLBHG

-M:KMBG@

>:L>

LB;E>

PBEE K>LIHG=

H?

:L

>O>K NG=>KMK>:MF>GM FHLM

;BHEH@B<:EL

(11)

 



>M MK>:MF>GM :KMAKBMBL

JL@JALAK

 LMK:M>@R .#),

MKB:E

 M>KF LBHG ,@=ME

 HIIHKMNGBMR

 M:MBHG I:MB>GML F:MHEH@BLML



NMH:GMB;H=B>L IKH@K>LLBHG NG=B??>K>GMB:M>=

JL@JALAK

 IK>=B<MBHG HGL>M MK>:MF>GM .A>

:LLBLM

?HKF :KMAKBMBL :G BG MA>

 HMK>Q:M>

:KMAKBMBL

MKB:E

#G

IHG>=

I:MB>GML ,:=BH@K:IAB<

K>M:K=>=

HMK>Q:M>



=>I>G=>GM :GMBKA>NF:MB<

LAGF9D



:G<AHK MBL



M>F:MB<

BMR

<HGMKHEE>=



I:KBLHG BG LJA9D



MK>:MF>GM MBL

9JDQ LJA9D

#GM>GLBO>

=HL>

MH MK>:MF>GM LMN=R IK>=>–G>=

>?–<:<R LMK:M>@R



<HF;BG:MBHG BG@

BG

<HB=

JL@JALAK



>M F:MHB=

 

.A>



=KN@L MH LMK:M>@B>L IK>=GBLHG>

:<AB>O>



<HGMKHEE>=

>:L>

,@=ME



LBO>

BGC><MBHGL :KMAKBMBL .A>

.A>

BGM>GLBO>

LM>KHB=

K>FBLLBHG P:L F>GM :G=

NL>?NE KA>NF:MHB=



C><ML H?

>M:G>K<>IM

JL@JALAK



F:G :?M>K HGL>M :<MBOBMR

 O>KLNL :GMBKA>NF:MB<

:

  



:IR MA:G MBL

?KHF

FF



<HFI:KBLHG HMK>Q:M>

>:KER



MBHG

HNG<BE





<HB=L

G;@J9F=



:G=

MBHG;:L>=

.ABL

;NM

>QIHL>=

=BHO:L<NE:K



LNK>

.A>L>

BGM>K:<M

>O>GML ,>?>K>G<>L













(12)





LHG KA>NF:MHB=



*,'#,

;EBG=

FNF:;

:=:EBFNF:;

F:MHB=

MK>:MF>GM



G:MBHG KA>NF:MHB=

JL@JALAK



K:=BH@K:IAB<

BFF>=B:M>

HG@HBG@

>:KER

 :E F>GM :KMAKBMBL

 



MNFHK

;:<M>KB:E :KMAKBMBL

#G

KB:E LM:KM>=

PBMA

<HKMB<HB=

=>I>G=>GM K>LNEML BG=N<>



BG<K>:L>

-P>=BLA ,@=ME



?HEEHPBG@

I:MB>GML IK>MBG@

 

,>LNEML L>KBHNL .(



;H=R HNL F>M::G:ERLBL MKHEE>=



:KMAKBMBL /-



&:K@>

F>GM

;NM G:G<B>L L:?>MR MA:M

<:G<>K



BG<B=>G<>

F:MHB=

?:<MHK ,A>NF:MHEH@R

 

.A>

MK>:MF>GM BG HK '#

LIHG=>KL

IARLBHEH@R H?M>G

=><BLBHGL

<:K=BHO:L<NE:K



LPBM<ABG@

BG

 



"NFBK:

HG=:KR

>M:G>K<>IM

%:KHEBGLD:





G><KHLBL

FF

 L>KNF

;>EE>=

GHGK>LIHG=>KL ,@=ME



EBQBF:;

I:MB>GML





EBGB<:E :=:EBFNF:;

<>GMK:MBHGL





I:MB>GML F:;





LPBM<ABG@

:@>GM BG /%

.ABL

:GMB.(

LMN=B>L HG



MH K>LNEML ,@=ME



<HE BG—BQBF:;

HIIHLBM>

.ABL

=HFBS>=

.(

?KHF

<HFI:K>=

:G LMN=R LMN=B>L



MK>:MF>GM



.ABL

F><A:GBLFL PAB<A KBMNQBF:;

:@>GML F>MAHMK>Q:M>

BL :L



FHK>

G><KHLBL BG:=>JN:M>

JL@JALAK

















(13)

 

.ABL

;BHEH@B<:E BG:=>JN:M>

LN@@>LM GB–<:GMER JN:M>

LAHNE=

:GMB.(



H?

EHPBG@

:KMAKBMBL

FF

 MBFNE:MBHG :<MBO>

K:G=HFBL>=



?:<MHKL :KMAKBMBL

MA>K:I>NMB<

@EN<H<HKMB<HB=L



E>O>EL

@K:IAB<

K>LNEML

 

.ABL

M:GM

 P>K>

BG@

I:MB>GML



IK>=B<M :KMAKBMBL F:KD>KL

.ABL

MA>BK LI><B–<

M>EHI>IMB=>

IK>=B<MBHG F:KD>KL MBHG



IA:KF:<H@>G>MB<

HMK>Q:M>

MBL

.ABL

MK>:MF>GM MB?R PBMA

;:L>EBG>

LRLM>FL F>GM



BMR MA>K:IR

JL@JALAK



<RMHDBG>

:KMAKBMBL



:M BG—N>G<>L :KMAKBMBL



G><KHLBL I>NMB<

:KMAKBMBL

)P>GJ<



:EEHIKHM>BG:L>L I:MB>GML F:;

 LMK:

MA>K:IR LAK

.A>

LMN=R F>MAHMK>Q:M>

MBHG :<AB>O>=

-N<A

<HLML



>–M BGAB;BMHK 5:;LMK:<M7









Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Significance between variables was tested by Student t test for normally distributed continuous variables; Mann-Whitney U test for non-nor- mally distributed variables; χ 2 test

Improvement throughout 2 years in functional ability (MACTAR), health related quality of life (physical and mental component summary scales of the SF-36), and VAS measurements

Cumulative probability distribu- tion of total Sharp-van der Heijde Score over 4 years of treatment with sequential monotherapy, step-up combination ther- apy, initial

Radiographic progression greater than the smallest detectable change SDC after 3 years, and IFX discontinuation 2 years after the start of MTX + IFX in the initial and delayed MTX +

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the. University

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the. University

Alle onderzoeksverpleegkundigen die hebben meegewerkt aan de BeSt studie in de verschillende ziekenhuizen, voor het uitvoeren van de gewrichtsscores en het samen met de

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the. University