• No results found

University of Groningen Symptom network models in depression research van Borkulo, Claudia Debora

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen Symptom network models in depression research van Borkulo, Claudia Debora"

Copied!
3
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

Symptom network models in depression research van Borkulo, Claudia Debora

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2018

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

van Borkulo, C. D. (2018). Symptom network models in depression research: From methodological exploration to clinical application. University of Groningen.

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

Propositions

Accompanying the PhD thesis

Symptom network models in depression research

From methodological exploration to clinical application Claudia D. van Borkulo, 17 January 2018

1. Network analysis should not be limited to intra-individual data.

2. To study potential causal relationships, cross-sectional designs are indispensable.

3. To reveal the dynamic nature of depression, future studies should focus on tracking symptoms daily for at least one year. 4. The observation that patients with persistent depression have a more strongly connected network (compared to those with remitted depression), seems to be robust.

5. Eyeballing is not enough; a tool to test for differences between networks is necessary to investigate differences between groups.

6. Future studies should investigate effectiveness of therapy informed by networks.

(3)

Stellingen

Behorende bij het proefschrift

Symptom network models in depression research

From methodological exploration to clinical application Claudia D. van Borkulo, 17 januari 2018

1. Netwerkanalyse zou niet moeten worden beperkt tot intra-individuele data.

2. Om potentiële causale relaties te onderzoeken, zijn cross-sectionele designs onmisbaar.

3. Om de dynamische aard van depressie te onderzoeken, zou toekomstig onderzoek zich moeten focussen op het dagelijks meten van symptomen voor minstens een jaar.

4. De bevinding dat patiënten met een persisterende depressie een sterker verbonden netwerk hebben (vergeleken met degenen die zijn opgeknapt), lijkt een robuust fenomeen. 5. Staren is niet genoeg; een instrument om verschillen tussen

netwerken te toetsen is noodzakelijk om verschillen tussen groepen te onderzoeken.

6. De effectiviteit van door netwerk-geïnformeerde therapie zou in toekomstig onderzoek bekeken moeten worden.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Table 8.1 displays the results from univariable logistic regression analyses which showed that loss of interest/pleasure, depressed mood, fatigue and concentration problems (i.e.,

The contact process model can be viewed as an undirected network (see Figure 9.1 for a graphical representation) and is characterized by two independent Poisson processes: one

That is, for weakly connected symptom networks, negative external conditions (i.e., stressful events) lead to a gradual increase in symptoms, whereas for strongly connected

Methodological development can range from building on existing methods (e.g., including symptom thresholds in comparing network structures), to developing new estimation methods

To establish which of the variables in the data are neighbors of a given variable, and which are not, we used ` 1 - regularized logistic regression (Mein- shausen & Bühlmann,

It follows from Figure C.2, that the Fisher information variance is not a good estimate or the variance across all conditions (results for networks with 50% and 100% replacement

The connections in the latter network have the highest probability of being true positives: they are still present, while being estimated with a high value of γ (i.e., a high

Reference distributions of two of the three test statistics based on the VATSPUD data: the maximum difference in edge strength (left panel) and the difference in global strength