• No results found

Appendix A: Black’s (1974) Phonological Reconstruction

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Appendix A: Black’s (1974) Phonological Reconstruction"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Appendix A: Black’s (1974) Phonological Reconstruction

Paul Black (1974) has proposed a phonological reconstruction of the Lowland East Cushitic

languages, which will be used in the following sections as a basis for the reconstruction of the

morphology of plural gender. The following table presents the sound correspondences and

their origins in Proto-Lowland-East-Cushitic, as proposed by Black (1974: 279-284):

Lowland East Cushitic Languages

PLEC

Oromoid Languages Western Omo-Tana Languages PO Oromo Konsoid Languages PWOT Arbore Dhaasanac Elmolo

PK Konso Diraytata *b *b b *b̂ p p _C > f *b b Ø #/r_ / _# > b p #_ > ɓ _n > m p’1 *d *d d _stop > r *d̂ t t *d d/z z __ > dd t #_ > ɗ _b > *b̂ p p _g > *ĝ k k *t *t t *t̂ t š *t t t _i > c t _# > ʔ _(a)# > t y_ > s __ > *d̂d̂ tt tt b/g_ > d d *d̂ t t *ɗ *ɗ ɗ *ɗ ɗ ɗ *ɗ ɗ/d z ɗ #_ > ɗ _# > t *ɗ1 c’ ɗ *g *g g *ĝ _ʕ > *k̂ k x k h *g g/k’ Ø #/r_/_# > g k #_ > ɠ _e/i > j _ʕ > k’ *k *k k *k̂ x h *k k/c k/g/c k _i/u / #_e > k _i/e > s r_ > *ĝ k k r_ > g __ > *ĝĝ kk kk n_ > *g g *ĝ k k *q *q _i/e > c’ k’ *q q k’ *q ɠ k’/k Ø V_C > Ø *f *f f *f f f *f f f f u_ > h *s *s f *s s s *s s s s #_a/e > s __ > ss i/y_V > *š s *š š š i_ > š i/y_V > yy *ħ *ħ h *ħ t_ > *t̂ h h *ħ h/Ø Ø h/Ø C_V > V l/m_ > Ø _# > Ø t š V_C > *V V V V V *ʕ *ʕ ʔ *ʕ ʔ/Ø r/m_ / #_ > Ø ʔ/h *ʕ Ø/ʔ Ø Ø r_ > ɗ m_ > ɓ #_ > Ø C_V > V s_ > s s s #_ > Ø k_ > k̂ x h V_C V *V V V #_ / _# > ʔ *ʕ1/2 *ʕ Ø *ʕ Ø Ø *ʕ ʔ Ø

(2)

*h Ø h? h? #_ > Ø #_ > Ø *ʔ w h Ø *m *m m *m m m *m m m m _t > n *n *n n *n n _g > ŋ n *n n n n *l *l l *l l l *l l l r/l _e > j *r *r r *r r r *r r r r _t > d̂ t t _k > ĝ k k *w *w w *w w w *w w w/ʔ V_V > Ø _C > f? _aC > Ø Ø Ø *y *y y *y y y V_V > Ø a_C > e *a *a a *a a a *a a/e a a _mb/wC > o _# > Ø e 2 o12 _ɗ?/y > e w_ > *o o o *e3 e/a e e _Ci > i *e *e a *e e e *e e e e #_/_(C(C))_e > e _# > i _ħ/ʕ > i? *i *i i *i i i *i i i i _# > *e e e a *e e e e/u i i/u *o *o o *o o o *o o o o _# > u _# > u *u *u u *u u u *u u u u ʕ_ > i4 ħ_m/n > a _ħ/ʕ > *o o o

2 In assimilation to preceding vowels 3 In words containing pharyngeals 4 Dialectal

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Indeed, a great deal of initiation in the field of Public Administration consists in learning the flaws of the politics-administration dichotomy: “Presumably, even the

I have argued that the dichotomy is deeply rooted in the tradition of constitutional thought, but formulated only after the establishment of the

Apart from their objections to the dichotomy itself (see Chapter Four), they have doubted, qualified, and denied that the classics endorsed the dichotomy between politics

It is reflected, for instance, in the definition the Public Administration Dictionary gives of the politics-administration dichotomy: “The view that public administration should

“The complementarity of politics and administration holds that the relationship between elected officials and administrators is characterized by interdependency,

Further, it is clear that from the viewpoint of constitutionalism the third solution takes precedence over the other two: after it is established that public administration as an

Therefore, if a dilemma occurred in which disentangling politics and administration could serve the promotion of a constitutional value such as liberty but at the cost

This takes us back to the paradox that if we want to see why politics and administration should be separated in government we should specifically not separate political