• No results found

University of Groningen Valuing variability Lesonen, Sirkku

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen Valuing variability Lesonen, Sirkku"

Copied!
5
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Valuing variability Lesonen, Sirkku

DOI:

10.33612/diss.124923644

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2020

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Lesonen, S. (2020). Valuing variability: Dynamic usage-based principles in the L2 development of four Finnish language learners. University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.124923644

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

APPENDICES

APPENDIX 1

GLOSSING.

ACC accusative

ADE adessive (‘at, on’) ALL allative (‘to’) COND conditional ELAT elative (‘out of’) GEN genitive (possession) ILL illative (‘into’)

INE inessive (‘in’) INF infinitive NEG negation

PAR partitive (partitiveness) PL plural PST past tense PPC past participle Q interrogative SG singular 1 1st person ending 2 2nd person ending 3 3rd person ending

(3)
(4)

APPENDIX 2

Tasks used in data collection.

Week Type of data Task

1 w Write about yourself

2 s, dialogue Interview your partner and tell about yourself

3 w Introduction to your blog (write about yourself)

4 s, dialogue Talk with your partner. Pictures of various kinds used as

inspiration.

5 w Write about yourself

6 s, monologue Look at the cartoon strip and talk about Martti’s day.

7 w Write a story of a person in a picture.

8 s, monologue Describe yourself to your partner.

9 w What are you going to do this week?

10 s, dialogue Talk about Jyväskylä with your partner.

11 w Write a text about Finland.

12 s, monologue Look at the cartoon strip and talk about Martti’s day.

13 w What did you do last weekend?

14 s, dialogue Which one do you prefer …?

Various pairs: car or train. holiday in Lapland or in a warm place. laptop or iPad.

15 w What did you do whenever (last week. last weekend. last

summer)?

16 s, group

conversation Which one do you prefer …?

17 w Write an email to your teacher.

18 s, dialogue How was your autumn term in Finland?

19 w Write an email to your teacher.

20 s, dialogue Tell us about people in the pictures.

21 w What did you do in the Christmas holiday?

22 s, dialogue How was your holiday?

23 w Write an invitation to your birthday party.

24 s, monologue What is important for you in your life?

25 w You wake up because you hear some awful noise. What do

you do?

26 s, dialogue Reaction exercises. Questions Lena was asked: Could I

borrow your bike? Do you have a skiing holiday?

27 w What do you do if you are tired or depressed?

28 s, monologue Look at the cartoon strip and talk about Martti’s day.

29 w What is different between Finland and your home

country?

(5)

32 s, group

conversation Talk about your home city.

33 w What did you do in the Easter holiday?

34 s, dialogue What would you do if you had 5000 euros?

35 w What are you going to do next summer?

36 s, dialogue Reflect on your Finnish learning

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

For that amount of money, many more lives could have been saved through providing drugs and vaccines for other diseases, let alone better health systems and improved

One major finding of this study is that the different linguistic means that learners use to express evaluation, namely verbal and adjectival constructions, are in

Voidaankin siis todeta, että kilpailu ja kielessä esiintyvä vaihtelu ovat yleisiä kehittyvän toisen kielen piirteitä, sillä niitä on pystytty tunnistamaan, kun kieltä

Dynamic systems theory and a usage-based approach to second language development. Lowie (eds.) A dynamic approach to second language

Valuing variability: Dynamic usage-based principles in the L2 development of four Finnish language

Because our interest was in finding out whether our participants’ constructions develop from lexically specific to productive patterns, we calculated the number of different forms

Valuing variability: Dynamic usage-based principles in the L2 development of four Finnish language learners.. University

A particular link between both passages is the mention of the '(wooden) platform', ßriia.22 Beside the reading of the Law in the 7th month this element, together with Esra being