• No results found

Family and Family Law in Asia and the Middle East

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Family and Family Law in Asia and the Middle East"

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Wo r ks h o p Re po r t

The workshop on 'Family and Family Law in Asia and

the Middle East', convened by ISIM and the Working

Group Modernity and Islam (30 June – 1 July 2000) at

the Institute for Islamic Studies, Free University of

Berlin, aimed at creating a network of scholars and

scholar-activists currently based in the West, who

employ a social science methodology and

perspec-tive in the study of family law, its history, its regional

developments and its interpretation by courts.

Family and Family Law

in Asia and the Middle East

The two-day workshop was divided into a series of roundtable discussions, each ses-sion assigned to participants, who used their own research questions and findings as well as pre-circulated reading material to enable a comparative and interdisciplinary debate.

The first theme was devoted to 'Western Historiography of Family Law in the Middle East'. Bettina Dennerlein expounded three major paradigms that stand out in Western literature on family law in the Middle East, and contrasted them with discourses about family law in the region itself. The three par-adigms reflect the development of the com-plex relationship between the state and the family, varying from a

patriarchal-national-ist, to a contractual-individualized ap-proach. These developments are visible, for instance, in the shifting definitions of mar-riage and the effects on the position of women and their active participation as so-cial actors.

The second theme concentrated on the 'Marriage Contract and its Registration'. Léon Buskens approached the topic from three different perspectives: fiqh, state leg-islation and practice, with the example of Morocco. The radical shift from oral to writ-ten marriage contracts, and the legislative measures towards homogenization and central registration of the contracts, as illus-trated by the most recent version of the Mu-dawwana, are clear manifestations of the in-creasing control that the state exerts over the family. However, people still find space for their own perception of the rules and practices regarding marriage.

Annelies Moors discussed the increased practice of registering token dowers in the marriage contract among urban and rural Palestinian women, whose motives and ef-fects vary according to time, setting, level of education, profession, and so on. The prac-tice is further closely inter-linked with socio-economic developments and the changing view on what a 'good' marriage involves, with an increasing emphasis on the conju-gal aspect of the marital relationship. An-other important feature of the token dower is its symbolic meaning regarding a woman's autonomy, which can be seen as an important sign of modernity.

The third session covered the issue of marital offences and violence in the family. Tazeen Murshid argued that acts of domes-tic violence against women in South Asia are usually linked to the male perception of

'possessing' the female body, and embed-ded in conceptions about honour and prop-erty relations. Occurrences of violence can, moreover, gain ground because they are often sustained by public institutions such as the law, the courts, and the police. The discussion evolved around questions such as: what constitutes illegal cq. illegitimate forms of violence in the family? How can legislation ensure the protection of women? What is the link between private and public violence? Do court verdicts reflect the of-fence or put the women on trial?

The fourth theme was related to illegiti-macy, the topic of research and professional concern of Jamily Bargash. The Sunni fiqh literature shows a large degree of elasticity in arguing around the possible status of an illegitimate birth. Although the erasure of natal descent and the fiction of parenthood is not allowed, in practice this was solved by employing hiyal (legal devices), such as the kafala (lit.: gift of care), through which a child could attain an accepted social status. The codification of Maliki law and the com-pulsory registration of marriages and births have, however, created gaps between law and social practice. For instance, through the fixation of a specific period for pregnan-cy, no room is left for the fiction of the 'sleeping child', thus generating an un-precedented social stigma for both the 'ille-gitimate' child and its mother.

The final theme on divorce, legal activism and reform was jointly presented by Lynn Welchmann, Abdellahi An-Naim, and Ziba Mir-Hosseini, scholars who combine their academic approach from an 'insiders' per-spective with effectively partaking in legal reform programmes, especially in Palestine, Iran, and Egypt.

By the example of practices of talaq (di-vorce) in Palestine, Welchman illustrated that codified law and the institutionaliza-tion of courts can also positively affect women's position, e.g. by making certain apprehensible (makruh) moral duties legally enforceable on men, or conversely by apply-ing administrative measures to discourage men from divorce.

Mir-Hosseini explained how the various re-codifications of civil and family law in the 20th century have constantly challenged Iranian judges to reconcile in their decisions between fiqh, popular sharica, and the codes, and how women equally make use of sharica in their strategies before the court. Her co-directed film 'Divorce Iranian Style', a vivid illustration of her argument, was shown to a larger audience at the conclu-sion of the workshop.

Illustrated by a field study about the initi-ation, trajectory, and debates around the latest Egyptian Family Code, carried out for his 'Islamic Family Law Project', An-Naim also confirmed that no sustainable social change can take place without addressing the issue of sharica. How then to harmonize sharica with the official codes, on the one hand, and social reality on the other? What does this imply for the nature of Islamic family law (Can it still be called sharica? Who determines it?), and for the conception of the state (Does it act autonomously or as an agent of other social forces?)?

These questions will be further explored in the second Islamic Family Law workshop which will take place in March 2001 in Flo-rence, Italy. ◆

Laila al-Zwaini is projects officer at the ISIM. Annelies Moors

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Chapters 5 and 6 present profession- als’ and parents’ perceptions of the Family House and the following dialogue sessions and then a discussion in relation to concepts of modernity,

But eager to ensure that temporary la- bour migration remained just that, they instituted family reunification rights in only limited cases.. In South Korea and

This is a suggestion that must be taken seriously, despite the fact that Poliakov attributes what he interprets as cultural stasis to the arrested capitalist development of the

The shock of the Crusades naturally opposed Christianity and Islam but it also placed face to face the Chris- tians of the East and Christians of the West, who had little in

On the one hand, even though this did not apply to the Rightly Guided Caliphs (632–61), there is nothing to prevent a legislative assembly from being elected. On the other hand,

The theme of the class was ‘vi- sions of modernity in the Islamic Middle East.’ The objective of the class was to gain an understanding of the quest for the elusive concept

Conflicts law and public policy in Egyptian family law: Islamic law through the backdoor..

The second workshop, organized by Abdullahi an-N a c im and Laila al-Zwaini (ISIM, 'Rights-at-Home') at the annual Euro- pean Institute Meeting in Florence (March 2001),