Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/136752

Three quality indicators were used to describe and assess the care process at audit and hospital level: the proportion of completed variables at discharge and at three months

The aim of this study was to identify which factors (facilitators and barriers) experienced by hospital staff are associated with hospital participation in a

The aim of this study was to describe the evolving procedure and results of data verification within the Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing

In my opinion, the best way to measure the quality of hip fracture care in the initial phase of an audit is to use a composite process indicator and to focus on the underlying

In the start-up phase of an audit, the preferred way of measuring the quality of hip fracture care would be the use of a composite process indicator alongside the underlying

Vervolgens wordt in het tweede gedeelte van dit hoofdstuk besproken of de DHFA in zijn huidige vorm geschikt is om de kwaliteit van de heupfractuurzorg in Nederland te evalueren.

Voeten SC, van Bodegom-Vos L, Hegeman JH, Wouters MWJM, Krijnen P, Schipper IB.. Hospital staff participation in a national hip fracture audit: facilitators

The quality of hip fracture care can be best measured using a composite process indicator, alongside the underlying individual indicators (this thesis).. The organizational context