• No results found

Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/57990 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation Author: Groot, B.M. Title: Selling cultural heritage? Issue Date: 2017-09-26

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/57990 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation Author: Groot, B.M. Title: Selling cultural heritage? Issue Date: 2017-09-26"

Copied!
6
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Cover Page

The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/57990 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Author: Groot, B.M.

Title: Selling cultural heritage?

Issue Date: 2017-09-26

(2)

SELLING CULTURAL HERITAGE?

Brittany M. Groot

(3)
(4)

Selling Cultural Heritage?

Private-sector partnerships and the value of cultural heritage

Proefschrift ter verkrijging van

de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden

op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. mr. C.J.J.M. Stolker, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties

te verdedigen op dinsdag 26 september 2017 klokke 11:15 uur

door

Brittany Marguerite Groot geboren te Wahroonga (Australia)

in 1985

(5)

Promotor

Prof. dr. J.C.A. Kolen

Co- promotor

Dr. M.H. van den Dries

Promotiecommissie

Prof. Dr. C.L. Hofman, decaan Faculteit der Archeologie (voorzitter) Prof. Dr. M.E.R.G.N. Jansen (secretaris)

Prof. Dr. I. Lilley Dr. S.W.J. Luning Dr. L.R. Egberts

(6)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

At this point, I should also thank colleagues and staff at the Turkish Studies Department of Leiden University, the International Institute of Social History, which

The results derived from these textual and discursive practices will be identified in the hegemonic analysis of the two military intervention processes, with a special focus on the

The static character, theoretical limitations, and geographical dependency of Mardin’s center- periphery analysis are overcome by Gramscian hegemony’s analytical and theoretical depth

The Rio Tinto guide claims that cultural heritage is fundamental to the corporation and its operations due to the direct impact on local communities.. However, this emphasis

Key instruments of the past decades include the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights in 1966; the Convention concerning the Protection of the World

As argued in this thesis, the breadth of industries using cultural heritage for the creation of corporate and brand image and identity (both within corporate responsibility

Corporate responsibility for cultural heritage: conservation, sustainable development and corporate reputation.. Contemporary Museum Practice in

Cultural heritage is a powerful tool in the construction of identities, and including in the construction of ‘corporate’ and ‘brand’ narratives and perceived corporate and