• No results found

The Adult Attachment Interview: coherence & validation in adolescents

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The Adult Attachment Interview: coherence & validation in adolescents"

Copied!
9
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

The Adult Attachment Interview: coherence & validation in adolescents

Beijersbergen, M.D.

Citation

Beijersbergen, M. D. (2008, April 10). The Adult Attachment Interview: coherence &

validation in adolescents. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12691

Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown)

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12691

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

The Adult Attachment Interview

Coherence & Validation in Adolescents

Mariëlle Beijersbergen

(3)

Printed by Universal Press, Veenendaal Cover design by Universal Press, Veenendaal

© 2007, Mariëlle Beijersbergen, Leiden University

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, by photocopy, by recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the author.

(4)

The Adult Attachment Interview

Coherence & Validation in Adolescents

Proefschrift

ter verkrijging van

de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden,

op gezag van Rector Magnificus prof.mr. P.F. van der Heijden, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties

te verdedigen op donderdag 10 april 2008 klokke 15.00 uur

door

Mariëlle Dominique Beijersbergen

geboren te Delft

in 1980

(5)

Promotiecommissie

Promotores

Prof. dr. M.H. van IJzendoorn

Prof. dr. M.J. Bakermans-Kranenburg

Referent

Prof. dr. C. Schuengel (Vrije Universiteit te Amsterdam)

Overige leden

Prof. dr. F. Juffer

Prof. dr. R. van der Veer

Prof. dr. J. Wolf (UMC St Radboud te Nijmegen) Dr. F.B.A. Naber

Dr. W. Tieman

(6)

Voor mijn ouders

(7)
(8)

Contents

Chapter 1

General Introduction

9

Chapter 2

The Concept of Coherence in Attachment Interviews:

19

Comparing Attachment Experts, Linguists, and Non-experts

Chapter 3

Validity of the Adult Attachment Interview in Adolescents:

43

Associations with Conflict Interactions, Emotional Investment,

and Relational Support

Chapter 4

Stress Regulation in Adolescents: Physiological Reactivity

63

during the Adult Attachment Interview and Conflict Interaction

Chapter 5

Summary and Dicussion

89

References

101

Samenvatting (Summary in Dutch)

123

Dankwoord (Acknowledgements)

135

Curriculum Vitae

139

(9)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

When examining the differences between attachment experts and each of the three other groups separately, we found that (1) attachment experts had higher scores on quality and

The Adult Attachment Interview (AAI; George, Kaplan, & Main, 1996; Hesse, 1999; Main, Goldwyn, & Hesse, 2003) was developed to derive an adult’s overall state of mind

When examining the differences between attachment experts and each of the three other groups separately, we found that (1) attachment experts had higher scores on quality and

Construct validity of the AAI was apparent from the following: (1) during a conflict interaction task secure adolescents displayed more autonomy than dismissing adolescents,

The AAI was developed with the aim of differentiating mental representations of attachment- related experiences in parents whose infants had been judged to differ in patterns

In this respect, it should be noted that autonomous and insecure parents dit- fer m caregivmg behavior, and caregiving behavior can be considercd a kind of altruistic, that is,

In recent years, the development of the Adult Attachment Interview (George, Kaplan, & Main, 1985)-an Instrument to assess adults' mental representations of

An initial attempt to deal with some of these psychometric issues ( Bakermans-Kranenburg & Van IJzendoorn, 1993 ) revealed that the reliability of AAI classifications among