Editorial - Computational models of articular cartilage

Editorial - Computational models of articular cartilage

Korhonen, R. K., Julkunen, P., Li, L-P., & Donkelaar, van, C. C. (2013). Editorial - Computational models of articular cartilage. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2013, 254507-1/2. [254507]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/254507

DOI:

10.1155/2013/254507

Document status and date: Published: 01/01/2013 Document Version:

Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers) Please check the document version of this publication:

• A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website.

• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.

• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers.

Link to publication

General rights

Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain

• You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.

If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:

www.tue.nl/taverne Take down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at: openaccess@tue.nl

providing details and we will investigate your claim.

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine Volume 2013, Article ID 254507,2pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/254507

Editorial

Computational Models of Articular Cartilage

Rami K. Korhonen,

Petro Julkunen,

LePing Li,

and Corrinus C. van Donkelaar

1_{Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland} 2_{Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 1777, 70211, Kuopio, Finland} 3_{Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 1N4}

4_{Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands}

Correspondence should be addressed to Rami K. Korhonen; rami.korhonen@uef.fi Received 19 March 2013; Accepted 19 March 2013

Copyright © 2013 Rami K. Korhonen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

In osteoarthritis, articular cartilage degenerates and eventu-ally wears out, resulting in pain and disability. It is a major challenge in health care to prevent osteoarthritis or slow down the progression of the disease. The onset of osteoarthri-tis may result from an altered stress and strain state in carti-lage, for example, due to an injury of ligament, carticarti-lage, or meniscus. However, the disease progression is patient specific and can hardly be predicted. In order to assess the articular cartilage function and possible failure sites in joints, and to evaluate the onset and progression of osteoarthritis patient-specifically, computational models may become useful tools. Although there has been significant progress over the last years, these models need to be further developed before they may eventually become of direct clinical value.

For clinical, patient-specific application of a computer model, a realistic description of joint geometry, joint kine-matics, and tissue loading is ultimately required. Geometrical data can be obtained from imaging modalities, such as MRI, which become increasingly more detailed. Still, meshing of such information and running computational simula-tions of such meshes is challenging. Simulation analysis of joint kinematics is computationally expensive and requires knowledge of the kinematic constraints as a consequence of muscles and ligaments, including, for instance, pre stresses and attachment sites of ligaments. In many cases, 3D and/or kinematic simulations are still more feasible in combination with simpler material models for cartilage. More advanced material descriptions are required for a more detailed inves-tigation of mechanical conditions inside cartilage. However,

these are essential to move forward in our understanding of the relationship between mechanical loading, cartilage damage, and osteoarthritis.

A wide variety of cartilage models have been developed and employed to evaluate the mechanical behavior at the cell, tissue, and joint level. They have been used to evaluate static and dynamic tissue behavior, to explore effects of mechanical and biochemical loading, and even to predict tissue adaptation at the long time scale. The expectation is that such models may be taken to the next level, where patient-specific characteristics are incorporated in 3D kinematic joint models.

Given the composite structure of cartilage with the collagen fibril network, proteoglycan matrix, and fluid, this special issue has a focus on the development and application of fibril-reinforced models at different scales. A review of the fibril-reinforced tissue models and their application in the cell level is presented (P. Julkunen et al.). Practical considerations in modeling applications and model limitations are further discussed. A thorough review of recent advances in com-putational modeling of human knee joints is also presented (M. Kazemi et al.). Creation of knee joint models starting from imaging data (such as MRI) is summarized, clinical applications of the models are discussed, and examples are given for patient-specific evaluation of knee joint mechanics. Furthermore, influence of the altered depth-dependent prop-erties of cartilage in osteoarthritis on fluid pressurization in a knee joint is demonstrated (Y. Dabiri and L. P. Li). Since generation of computational finite element models of knee

2 Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine joints is time-consuming and model simulation times can

be relatively long, a semiautomated method is presented to study tibiofemoral contact stresses of adult subjects (D. D. Anderson et al.).

Combination of experimental measurements and model-ing is reviewed and model validation in cell, tissue, and joint level is discussed (P. Julkunen et al. and M. Kazemi et al.). Specifically, experimental results on the depth-dependent microstructural response of cartilage under directly loaded and unloaded regions are presented (A. Thambyah and N. Broom). Loading-related changes in chondron aspect ratios at different zones are also shown. These results can be used for the validation and development of computational models incorporating higher degrees of structural realism. Further, experimentally measured chondrocyte deformation behavior under mechanical loading of the tissue is presented for normal and osteoarthritic cartilage (P. Tanska et al.). Computational multiscale modeling is applied to explain differences in the cell behavior between the aforementioned groups. Finally, potential future directions in the application of multiscale models for the evaluation of cell responses and disease progression in knee joints are addressed (P. Julkunen et al.).

Recent advances in the development of computational models of articular cartilage, as partially demonstrated in this special issue, and models of joints with realistic patient-specific material descriptions and joint kinematics have brought clinical application closer. More advanced adaptation models, likely combinations of models addressing different length scales, should ultimately lead to the prediction of altered tissue properties and wear, which strongly correlate to the development of osteoarthritis. Ultimately, computa-tional modeling may become a clinical tool for identifying or optimizing patient-specific treatment strategies, such as rehabilitation and surgical interventions.

Rami K. Korhonen Petro Julkunen LePing Li Corrinus C. van Donkelaar