• No results found

Gradability in the nominal domain Constantinescu, C.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Gradability in the nominal domain Constantinescu, C."

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Gradability in the nominal domain

Constantinescu, C.

Citation

Constantinescu, C. (2011, December 14). Gradability in the nominal domain. LOT dissertation series. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/18248

Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown)

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/18248

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

Stellingen

behorend bij het proefschrift

Gradability in the Nominal Domain

van

Camelia Constantinescu

1. "Gradability" in the nominal and in the adjectival domain cannot be reduced to the same syntactic and semantic primitives.

2. The restrictions on the distribution of expressions in the small clause complement of the verb seem follow from factors having to do with epistemicity and evidentiality, not gradability (whether at the lexical or syntactic level).

3. The so-called "degree such" is not a degree operator but an expression that picks out salient sub-kinds identifiable by natural consequences.

4. Size adjectives are always interpreted as modifying size, even when they apply to abstract objects, such as (instances of) properties, as in enormous generosity, or to individuals defined in terms of such objects, as in big idiot.

5. All things being equal, an account which makes use of general mechanisms that are independently needed and motivated is preferable to one which relies on particular mechanisms that are specifically formulated for the cases at hand.

6. Linguistic phenomena that seem to affect different syntactic categories are best examined by a combination of a cross-categorial perspective with careful intra- categorial investigation.

7. Different grammatical mechanisms applying to different syntactic categories may nevertheless give rise to similar interpretations.

8. In the course of the syntactic derivation nouns may acquire the type of semantic structure that adjectives are lexically endowed with (cf. more idiots vs. *a more idiot vs. more intelligent).

9. "Evaluation" is a multifaceted notion.

10. Nominal gradability is more of an illusion than a grammatical reality.

11. Big eaters can be small.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

To conclude, this section has shown that quite an N constructions are different from internal such in terms of distribution and interpretation. They also differ from

In addition, there are no expressions performing the type of semantic operations familiar from degree modification in the adjectival domain that would indicate the existence of

I want to thank her for guiding me, for showing affection and confidence in me, for all the inspiring discussions, for the nice chats, for putting a tremendous amount of work,

Even in those cases which at first sight seem to provide most reliable indications of the gradable nature of nouns, such as the type of modification seen in a big idiot, the facts

In sum, the investigation of modified N 1 s has shown that, when an adjective can license a noun in this position, which otherwise would not be able to occur here, the sufficient

b. He is such an idiot that no one will hire him. However, it needs to do this relying solely on the lexical meaning of the noun in correlation with the result clause. In the case

We would like to propose, therefore, that the analysis in terms of abstract size suggested for case like the mess was huge can be extended to cases like big idiot once one

Three diffuse classes consist of (2) fundamentally intransitive verbs causatives of which are attested from early Vedic onwards (weak-diffuse intransitives); (3)