Engaging in politics Sun, Yu
IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.
Document Version
Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Publication date: 2018
Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database
Citation for published version (APA):
Sun, Y. (2018). Engaging in politics: Everyday political talk in online China. University of Groningen.
Copyright
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Take-down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
Bibliography
Armstrong, E. A., & Bernstein, M. (2008). Culture, power, and institutions: A multi‐ institutional politics approach to social movements. Sociological theory, 26(1), 74-99.
Amnå, E., Ekström, M., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2009). Political socialization and human agency: The development of civic engagement from adolescence to adulthood. Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift, 111(1).
Barber, B. R. (1984). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bennett, S. E., Flickinger, R. S., & Rhine, S. L. (2000). Political talk over here, over there, over time. British Journal of Political Science, 30(01), 99-119.
Benhabib, S. (1996). Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy. Democracy
and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political, 67-94. Princeton: Princeton
University Press.
Bennett, W. L. (1998). The uncivic culture: Communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politics. PS: Political Science & Politics, 31(04), 741-761.
Brown, K. (2014). China and Habermas's public sphere. Open Democracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/kerry-brown/china-and-habermass-public-sphere. Accessed 28 April 2016.
Blumer, J.C., and Gurevitch, M. (1995). The crisis of public communication. London: Sage. Blumler, J. G., and Gurevitch, M. (2001). Americanization reconsidered: UK-US campaign communication comparisons across time. In L. Bennett and R. Entman (Eds.), Mediated
Politics (pp. 380–405). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Blumler, J., McLeod, J. & Rosengren, K. (1992). An introduction to comparative
communication research. In J. Blumler, J. McLeod, & K. Rosengren (Eds.), Comparatively speaking: Communication and culture across space and time. Newbury
Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Benoit, W. L. (2007). Communication in political campaigns. New York: Peter Lang. Benoit, W. (2011). Content Analysis in Political Communication. In Bucy, E.P. and Holbert,
Balla, S. J. (2014). Health system reform and political participation on the Chinese Internet. China Information, 28(2), 214-236.
Barber, B. R. (1998). A passion for democracy: American essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768.
Chambers, S. (2009). Rhetoric and the public sphere: Has deliberative democracy abandoned mass democracy?. Political theory, 37(3), 323-350.
Chen, K. H. (2003). Civil society and Min-Jian: on political society and popular democracy.
Cultural Studies, 17(6), 877-896.
Chen, K.H. (2010). Asia as Method: Toward Deimperialization. Durham (NC), Duke University Press.
Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In Bohman, J., Rehg, W., (Eds.),
Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
1997, 67-92.
Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cohen. J. (1996). Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy. In S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, (pp. 95-115). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Coleman, S. (2007). Mediated politics and everyday life. International Journal of
Communication, 1, 49-60.
Conover, P. J., & Searing, D. D. (2005). Studying ‘everyday political talk’ in the deliberative system. Acta Politica, 40(3), 269-283.
Chan, K. M. (2010). Civil society and social capital in China. In International Encyclopedia
Chan, K., & Qiu, H. (1999). She Tuan She Hui Zi Ben Yu Zheng Jing Fa Zhan (Social organizations, Social Capital, and Political and Economic Development). She Hui Xue Yan
Jiu (Sociological Research), 4, July 20, 64-74.
CNNIC. (2017). The 40th Statistical Report on Internet Development in China. China
Internet Network Information Center. Available at
http://www.cnnic.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/
Couldry, N. (2015). The social foundations of future digital politics. In S. Coleman, & D. Freelon (Eds.), Handbook of Digital Politics (pp. 35-50).
Chen, W. and Reese, S.D. (2015). A New Agenda: Digital Media and Civic Engagement in Networked China. In W. Chen & S. D. Reese (eds.), Networked China: Global Dynamics
of Digital Media and Civic Engagement (pp.1-16). New York: Routledge.
Chen, M., Qian, X. and Zhang L. (2015). Public Participation in Environmental Management in China: Status Quo and Mode Innovation. Environmental Management, 55(3), 523-535.
Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Dahlgren, P. (1991). Introduction. In P. Dahlgren and C. Sparks (eds) Communication and
Citizenship: Journalism and the Public Sphere in the New Media Age. London: Routeledge, 1-26.
Dahlgren, P. (2002). In search of the talkative public: Media, deliberative democracy and civic culture. Javnost-The Public, 9(3), 5-25.
Dahlgren, P. (2006). Doing citizenship The cultural origins of civic agency in the public sphere. European journal of cultural studies, 9(3), 267-286.
Dahlgren, P. (2015). The internet as a civic space. S. Coleman e D. Freelon (a cura di)
Handbook of Digital Politics, 17-34.
Dahlberg, L. (2001). Extending the public sphere through cyberspace: The case of Minnesota E-Democracy. First Monday, 6(3).
Dahlberg, L. (2004). The Habermasian public sphere: A specification of the idealized conditions of democratic communication. Studies in Social and Political Thought, 10,
2-Damm, J. (2003, May). China’s e-policy: Examples of local e-government in Guangdong and Fujian. In J. Damm, & S. Thomas (Eds.), conference “China and the Internet:
Technology, Economy, and Society in Transition,” Los Angeles, May (pp. 30-31).
Damm, J. (2007). The Internet and the fragmentation of Chinese society. Critical Asian
Studies, 39(2), 273-294.
Davis, R. (1999). The Web of Politics: The Internet’s Impact on the American Political
System. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dunne, K. (2009). Cross Cutting Discussion: A form of online discussion discovered within local political online forums. Information Polity, 14(3), 219-232.
Duckett, J., & Langer, A. I. (2013). Populism versus Neoliberalism Diversity and Ideology in the Chinese Media’s Narratives of Health Care Reform. Modern China, 39(6), 653-680. Esarey, A., & Qiang, X. (2008). Political expression in the Chinese blogosphere: Below the radar. Asian Survey, 48(5), 752-772.
Esarey, A. (2015). Winning hearts and minds? Cadres as microbloggers in China. Journal
of Current Chinese Affairs, 44(2), 69-103.
Edwards, M. (2004). Civil Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Elster, J. (1997). “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory.” In Bohman, J., Rehg, W., (Eds.), Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Elster, J. (1998). Deliberative democracy (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Eriksen, E.O. and Weigard, J. (2004). Understanding Habermas: Communicative Action
and Deliberative Democracy. London: Continuum Press.
Ekman, J., and E. Amnå. (2012). Political Participation and Civic Engagement: Towards a New Typology? Human Affairs 22 (3): 283–300. doi: 10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1. Eberhardt, C. (2015). Discourse on climate change in China: A public sphere without the public. China Information, 29, 133-59 (2015). doi: 10.1177/0920203X15571261.
Ethridge, D.E. (2004). Research Methodology in Applied Economics. Publisher: Blackwell Publishing Professional.
Eysenbach, G., & Till, J. E. (2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. Bmj, 323(7321), 1103-1105.
Ess, C. and the AoIR ethics working committee (2002). Ethical decision-making and
Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee. Available
online: www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf
Esser, F. (2015). Comparative Political Communication Research: The Undiminished Relevance of the Beginnings. In S. Coleman, G. Moss, & K. Parry (Eds.), Can the Media
Serve Democracy? Essays in Honour of Jay G. Blumler. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan,
44-52.
Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic
Reform. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Fishkin, J. S. (2011). When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public
consultation. Oxford University Press.
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social text, (25/26), 56-80.
Fisher, W. R. (1989). Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of
reason, value, and action. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Fung, A. (2003). Survey article: recipes for public spheres: eight institutional design choices and their consequences. Journal of political philosophy,11(3), 338-367.
Goldman, M. and Perry, E. (2002). Introduction: Political Citizenship in Modern China. In Goldman, M. and Perry, E. (eds.) Changing Meanings of Citizenship in Modern China. London: Harvard University Press.
Guttmann, A. (1996). Democracy, Philosophy, and Justification. In S. Benhabib (ed.),
Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, (pp. 340-347).
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gimmler, A. (2001). Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the Internet.
Philosophy and Social Criticism, 27 (4), 21-39.
Graham, T. S. (2002). The public sphere needs you. Deliberating in online forums: new hope for the public sphere?. The Amsterdam School of Communications Research.
Graham, T., & Witschge, T. (2003). In search of online deliberation: Towards a new method for examining the quality of online discussions. COMMUNICATIONS-SANKT
AUGUSTIN THEN BERLIN-, 28(2), 173-204.
Graham, T. (2008). Needles in a haystack: a new approach for identifying and assessing political talk in non-political discussion forums. Javnost, 15 (2), 17-36.
Graham, T. (2009). What’s Wife Swap got to do with it? Talking politics in the net-based public sphere. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam. Available at: http://dare.uva.nl/record/314852
Graham, T. (2010a). Talking politics online within spaces of popular culture: The case of the Big Brother forum. Javnost-the Public, 17(4), 25-42.
Graham, T. (2010b, August). The use of expressives in online political talk: Impeding or facilitating the normative goals of deliberation?. In International Conference on
Electronic Participation (pp. 26-41). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Graham, T., & Hajru, A. (2011). Reality TV as a trigger of everyday political talk in the net-based public sphere. European Journal of Communication, 26(1), 18-32.
Graham, T. S. (2012). Beyond “Political” Communicative Spaces: Talking Politics on the
Wife Swap Discussion Forum. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9(1), 31 - 45.
DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2012.635961
Graham, T. (2015). 14. Everyday political talk in the Internet-based public sphere.
Handbook of digital politics, 247.
Graham, T., & Wright, S. (2014). Discursive equality and everyday talk online: The impact of “superparticipants”. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 19(3), 625-642.
Graham, T., Jackson, D., & Wright, S. (2015). From everyday conversation to political action: Talking austerity in online ‘third spaces’. European Journal of Communication,
30(6), 648-665.
Graham, T., Jackson, D., & Wright, S. (2016). ‘We need to get together and make ourselves heard’: Everyday online spaces as incubators of political action. Information,
Communication & Society, 19(10), 1373-1389.
Grano, S.A., & Zhang, Y. (2016). New channels for popular participation in China: The case of an environmental protection movement in Nanjing. China Information, 30(2),165-187.
Gleiss, M. S. (2015). Speaking up for the suffering (br)other: Weibo activism, discursive struggles, and minimal politics in China. Media, Culture & Society, 37(4), 513–529.
Han, R. (2015a). Cyber activism in China: empowerment, control, and beyond.A. B et al.,
The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics, 268-280.
Han, R. (2015b). Defending the authoritarian regime online: China's “voluntary fifty-cent army”. The China Quarterly, 224, 1006-1025.
Han, R. (2015c). Manufacturing Consent in Cyberspace: China's' Fifty-Cent Army'.
Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 44(2), 105-134.
Han, R. (2018). Withering Gongzhi: Cyber Criticism of Chinese Public Intellectuals. The
International Journal of Communication, 12, 1-22.
Han, R and Jia, L. (2018). Governing by the Internet: local governance in the digital age.
Journal of Chinese Governnance, 3(1).
Hassid, J. (2015). Chinese government responsiveness to Internet opinion: Promising but dangerous. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 44(2), 39-68.
Herold, D. K. (2011). Introduction: noise, spectacle, politics: carnival in Chinese cyberspace. In Herold, D. K. & Marolt, P. (Eds.), Online society in China: Creating,
celebrating, and instrumentalising the online carnival, (pp.1-20). London and New York:
Routledge.
He, B. (2006a). Participatory and deliberative institutions in China. In: Leib, E. J. and He, B. (Ed.). The Search for Deliberative Democracy in China. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan,175-196.
He, B. (2006b). Western Theories of Deliberative Democracy and The Chinese Practice of Complex Deliberative Governance. In: Leib, E. J. and He, B. (Ed.). The Search for
Deliberative Democracy in China. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 133-148.
He, B. (2014). Deliberative culture and politics: The persistence of authoritarian deliberation in China. Political Theory, 42(1), 58-81.
He, B., & Warren, M. E. (2011). Authoritarian deliberation: The deliberative turn in Chinese political development. Perspectives on politics, 9(02), 269-289.
Habermas, J., Lennox, S., & Lennox, F. (1974). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article (1964). New German Critique, (3), 49-55.
Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action (trans. Thomas McCarthy). (Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1987). Theory of Communicative Action (trans. Thomas McCarthy). (Vol. 2, Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason). Boston, MA: Beacon Press. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into
a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of
Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (2001). ‘From Kant’s “Ideas” of Pure Reason to the “Idealizing” Presuppositions of Communicative Action: Reflections on the Detranscendentalized “Use of Reason”’. In Rheg, W and Bohman, J(eds.), Pluralism and the Pragmatic Turn: The
Transformation of Critical Theory (pp.11-39). Minnesota, MIT Press.
Hoggett, P., & Thompson, S. (2002). Toward a Democracy of the Emotions. Constellations,
9(1), 106-126.
Huang, P. C. (1993). " Public Sphere"/" Civil Society" in China? The Third Realm between State and Society. Modern China, 19(2), 216-240.
Herold, D. K., & Marolt, P. (Eds.). (2011). Online society in China: Creating, celebrating,
and instrumentalising the online carnival (Vol. 25). Taylor & Francis.
Highfield, T. (2016). Social Media and Everyday Politics, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
He, Z. (2000). Working with a dying ideology: dissonance and its deduction in Chinese journalism. Journalism Studies, 14, 599-616.
He, Z. (2008). SMS in China: A major carrier of the nonofficial discourse universe. The
Information Society, 24(3), 182-190.
Heery, E. and Noon, M. (2008). A Dictionary of Human Resource Management (3rd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jiang, M. (2010a). Spaces of authoritarian deliberation: Online public deliberation in China. In Ethan Leib and Baogang He (Eds.), The Search for Deliberative Democracy in
China (2nd ed.), (pp. 261-287). New York, NY: Palgrave.
Jiang, M. (2010b). Authoritarian informationalism: China’s approach to Internet sovereignty. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 30 (2), 71-89.
Jiang, M. (2010c). Authoritarian deliberation on Chinese Internet. Electronic Journal of
Communication, 20 (3&4).
Jiang, M. (2016). The co-evolution of the Internet, (un)civil society and authoritarianism in China. In Jacques deLisle, Avery Goldstein, & Guobin Yang (eds.), The Internet, Social
Media, and a Changing China (pp. 28-48). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania
Press.
Jensen, J. L. (2003a). Public Spheres on the Internet: Anarchic or Government‐ Sponsored–A Comparison. Scandinavian political studies, 26(4), 349-374.
Jensen, J. L. (2003b). Virtual democratic dialogue? Bringing together citizens and politicians. Information Polity, 8(1, 2), 29-47.
Jack, R. E., Garrod, O. G., & Schyns, P. G. (2014). Dynamic facial expressions of emotion transmit an evolving hierarchy of signals over time. Current biology, 24(2), 187-192. Jankowski, N. and van Os, R. (2002). Internet-based political discourse: A case study of electronic democracy in the city of Hoogeveen. Paper presented at the Euricom colloquium: Electronic networks and democracy, 9–12 October 9–12, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Kuo, L. (2014, February 20). WeChat is nothing like WhatsApp-and that makes it even
more valuable. Quartz. Retrieved from
http://qz.com/179007/wechat-is-nothing-like-whatsapp-and-thatmakes-it-even-more-valuable/
Kim, J., Wyatt, R. O., & Katz, E. (1999). News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political communication, 16(4), 361-385. Kim, J., & Kim, E. J. (2008). Theorizing dialogic deliberation: Everyday political talk as communicative action and dialogue. Communication Theory, 18(1), 51-70.
Kalathil, S., & Boas, T. C. (2003). Open networks, closed regimes: The impact of the
King, Gary, Jennifer Pan, and Margaret E. Roberts. (2013). How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression. American Political
Science Review. 107(02), 326-343.
King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2014). Reverse-engineering censorship in China: Randomized experimentation and participant observation. Science, 345(6199), 1251722. Korolev, A. (2014). Deliberative democracy nationwide?—Evaluating deliberativeness of healthcare reform in China. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 19(2), 151-172.
Kornreich, Y., Vertinsky, I., & Potter, P. B. (2012). Consultation and deliberation in China: the making of China's health-care reform. China Journal, 68(2), 176–203.
Lewis, O. A. (2013). Net inclusion: new media’s impact on deliberative politics in China.
Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(4), 678-708.
Leibold, J. (2011). Blogging alone: China, the internet, and the democratic illusion?. The
Journal of Asian Studies, 70(04), 1023-1041.
Liu, J. (2011). Picturing a green virtual public space for social change: A study of Internet activism and Web-based environmental collective actions in China. Chinese Journal of
Communication, 4(02), 137-166.
Linde, J., & Ekman, J. (2003). Satisfaction with democracy: A note on a frequently used indicator in comparative politics. European Journal of Political Research, 42(3), 391-408. Liu, Y. (2009). Reforming China's health care: for the people, by the people?. The Lancet,
373(9660), 281-283.
Larsson, Liv. (2012). Anger, Guilt and Shame - Reclaiming Power and Choice.
Mills, C. W.(1959). The Sociological Imagination, reprinted (2000). Oxford University Press.
Mansbridge, J. (1996). Using Power? Fighting Power: The Polity. In S. Benhabib (ed.),
Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, (pp. 46-66).
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mansbridge, J. (1999). Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System. In S. Macedo (ed.),
Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, 211-239. Oxford: Oxford
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Estlund, D., Føllesdal, A., Fung, A., ... & Manin, B. (2010). The place of self‐interest and the role of power in deliberative democracy.
Journal of political philosophy, 18(1), 64-100.
Mansbridge, J. and Parkinson, J. (2012). Deliberative systems: deliberative democracy at the large scale. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., ... & Warren, M. E. (2012). A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. Deliberative
systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale, 1-26.
Ma, S. Y. (1994). The Chinese discourse on civil society. The China Quarterly, 137, 180-193.
Mouffe, C. (2000). The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso. Mouffe, C. (2005). On the Political. Milton Park: Routledge.
Marques, Â., & Maia, R. (2010). Everyday conversation in the deliberative process: An analysis of communicative exchanges in discussion groups and their contributions to civic and political socialization. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 611-635.
Min, S. J. (2014). On the westerness of deliberation research. Journal of Public
Deliberation, 10(2), 5.
Medaglia, R., & Yang, Y. (2017). Online public deliberation in China: evolution of interaction patterns and network homophily in the Tianya discussion forum. Information,
Communication & Society, 20(5), 733-753.
Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. Public Affairs. MacKinnon, R. (2011). China's" networked authoritarianism". Journal of Democracy,
22(2), 32-46.
Marolt, P. (2015). Grounding online spaces. In: Marolt, P., & Herold, D. K. (eds) China
Online: Locating Society in Online Spaces (Vol. 41). Routledge.
Meng, B. (2011). From steamed bun to grass mud horse: E Gao as alternative political discourse on the Chinese Internet. Global Media and Communication, 7(1), 33-51.
Markham, A. & Buchanan, E. (2017). Research Ethics in Context: Decision-Making in Digital Research. In Karin van Es & Mirko Tobias Schäfer (Eds.), The Datafied Society:
Studying Culture through Data Amsterdam University Press. pp. 201-209.
Marcus, M. A., Westra, H. A., Eastwood, J. D., Barnes, K. L., & Mobilizing Minds Research Group. (2012). What are young adults saying about mental health? An analysis of Internet blogs. Journal of medical Internet research, 14(1), e17.
Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1 (2).
Marcus, G.E. (2002). The Sentimental Citizen. PA: Penn State University Press.
Marques, Â. C., & Maia, R. C. (2010).Everyday conversation in the deliberative process: An analysis of communicative exchanges in discussion groups and their contributions to civic and political socialization. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 611-635.
Marcus, G.E. and MacKuen, M.B. (1993). Anxiety, enthusiasm, and the vote: the emotional underpinnings of learning and involvement during presidential campaigns. American
Political Science Review, 87(03), 672-685.
Nickerson, P. (2001). A poetics and politics of possession: Taiwanese spirit-medium cults and autonomous popular cultural space. positions: east asia cultures critique, 9(1), 187-217.
Neuendorf, K. A., & Kumar, A. (2015). Content analysis. In Gianpietro Mazzoleni (eds) The
International Encyclopedia of Political Communication. John Wiley & Sons.
Parkinson, J. (2006). Deliberating in the real world: Problems of legitimacy in
deliberative democracy. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Price, V., & Cappella, J. N. (2002). Online deliberation and its influence: The electronic dialogue project in campaign 2000. IT & Society, 1(1), 303-329.
Pearce, W. B., & Pearce, K. A. (2000). Extending the theory of the coordinated management of meaning (CMM) through a community dialogue process. Communication
Theory, 10(4), 405-423.
Pan, J. (2016). Emotional criticism as public engagement: How weibo users discuss “Peking University statues wear face-masks”. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 514-52.
Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private sphere: democracy in a digital age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. NY: Oxford University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of
democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
Pitkin, H. F. (1981). Justice: On relating private and public. Political theory, 9(3), 327-352. Pye, L. (1992). The Spirit of Chinese Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pan, J., & Xu, Y. (2018). China’s ideological spectrum. The Journal of Politics, 80(1), 000-000.
Qiu, J. L. (1999). Virtual censorship in China: Keeping the gate between the cyberspaces. International Journal of Communications Law and Policy, 4(1), 25.
Rosen, S. (2010). China Media Colloquium Is the Internet a Positive Force in the Development of Civil Society, a Public Sphere and Democratization in China?.
International Journal of Communication, 4, 8.
Reinard, J. (2007). Introduction to Communication Research, 4th Edition. London: McGraw-Hill Education - Europe.
Roberts, L. D. (2015) Ethical Issues in Conducting Qualitative Research in Online Communities, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12:3, 314-325, DOI:10.1080/14780887.2015.1008909
Rosenberg, S. W. (2004). Reconstructing the concept of democratic deliberation. Center
for the Study of Democracy.
Rosenberg, S. (2006). Human nature, communication, and culture: Rethinking democratic deliberation in China and the West. In The search for deliberative democracy
in China (pp. 77-111). Palgrave Macmillan US.
Rauchfleisch, A., & Schäfer, M. S. (2015). Multiple public spheres of Weibo: A typology of forms and potentials of online public spheres in China. Information, Communication &
Ramesh, M., Wu, X., & He, A. J. (2013). Health governance and healthcare reforms in China. Health policy and planning, 29(6), 663-672.
Ringen, S., & Ngok, K. (2013). What kind of welfare state is emerging in China?. UNRISD. Schlesinger, P. (1997). From cultural defence to political culture: media, politics and collective identity in the European Union. Media, Culture & Society, 19(3), 369-391. Sass, J., & Dryzek, J. S. (2014). Deliberative cultures. Political Theory, 42(1), 3-25. Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic. com 2.0. Princeton University Press.
Song, Y., Dai, X. Y., & Wang, J. (2016). Not all emotions are created equal: Expressive behavior of the networked public on China's social media site. Computers in Human
Behavior, 60, 525-533.
Schlæger, J., & Jiang, M. (2014). Official microblogging and social management by local governments in China. China Information, 28(2), 189-213.
Sun, W. (2012). Subalternity with Chinese characteristics: Rural migrants, cultural activism, and digital video filmmaking. Javnost-The Public, 19(2), 83-99.
Skocpol, T. (2013). Diminished democracy: From membership to management in
American civic life (Vol. 8). University of Oklahoma press.
Schudson, M. (2006). The varieties of civic experience. Citizenship studies, 10(5), 591-606. Sullivan, J. (2014). China’s Weibo: Is faster different?. New Media & Society, 16(1), 24-37. Sima, Y. (2011). Grassroots environmental activism and the Internet: Constructing a green public sphere in China. Asian Studies Review, 35(4), 477-497.
Semetko, H. A., et al. 1991. The formation of campaign agendas: A comparative analysis
of party and media agendas in American and British elections. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Stromer-Galley, J. (2007). Measuring deliberation's content: A coding scheme. Journal of
public deliberation, 3(1).
Schneider, Steven. 1997. Expanding the public sphere through computermediated communication: Political discussion about abortion in a Usenet newsgroup. PhD. diss., Department of Political Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Streck, J. M. (1998). Pulling the plug on electronic town meetings: Participatory democracy and the reality of the Usenet. In C. Toulouse & T. W. Luke (Eds.), The politics
of cyberspace: A new political science reader (pp. 18-48). New York: Routledge.
Sanders, Lynn. (1997). Against Deliberation. Political Theory, 25(3), 347-376.
The 40th Statistical Report on Internet Development in China. China Internet Network
Information Center, August 3, 2017. Available at http://www.cnnic.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/
Tully, J. (2002). The unfreedom of the moderns in comparison to their ideals of constitutional democracy. The Modern Law Review, 65(2), 204-228.
Tong, J. (2015). The formation of an agonistic public sphere: Emotions, the Internet and news media in China. China Information, 29(3), 333-351.
Tang, M., & Huhe, N. (2014). Alternative framing: The effect of the Internet on political support in authoritarian China. International Political Science Review, 35(5), 559-576.
Tai, Z. (2006). The Internet in China: Cyberspace and Civil Society. London: Routledge.
Thimm, C., Dang-Anh, M., & Einspänner, J. (2014). Mediatized Politics—Structures and Strategies of Discursive Participation and Online Deliberation on Twitter. In Mediatized
Worlds (pp. 253-270). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Taubman, G. (1998). A not-so World Wide Web: The Internet, China, and the challenges to nondemocratic rule. Political Communication, 15(2): 255-272.
T, Zhang. (2016). Quotable: Taisu Zhang on ideological trends in China. Public Democracy Council. http://www.publicdiplomacycouncil.org/commentaries/03-25-16/quotable-taisu-zhang-ideological-trends-china. Accessed 9 June, 2017.
van S.G., Westra, I. & Schaefer, M.T. (2017). Get Your Hands Dirty: Emerging Data Practices as Challenge for Research Integrity. In Karin van Es & Mirko Tobias Schäfer (Eds.), The Datafied Society: Studying Culture through Data Amsterdam University Press. pp. 183-200.
Van Zoonen, L. (2007). Audience reactions to Hollywood politics. Media, Culture &
Society, 29(4), 531-547.
Wong, R. B. (1999). Citizenship in Chinese History, in Hanagan, M. P., & Tilly, C. eds.,
Extending citizenship, reconfiguring states. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield
Publishers.
Wakeman Jr, F. (1993). The civil society and public sphere debate: Western reflections on Chinese political culture. Modern China, 19(2), 108-138.
Wyatt, R. O., Katz, E., & Kim, J. (2000). Bridging the spheres: Political and personal conversation in public and private spaces. Journal of communication, 50(1), 71-92. Wu, J. (2011). Enlightenment or entertainment: The nurturance of an aesthetic public sphere through a popular talent show in China. The Communication Review, 14(1), 46-67. Wilhelm, A. G. (2000). Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political life in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge.
Wright, S. (2012a). Politics as usual? Revolution, normalization and a new agenda for online deliberation. New Media & Society, 14(2), 244-261.
Wright S (2012b) From “third place” to “third space”: Everyday political talk in non-political online spaces. javnost-the public, 19(3): 5-20.
Wright, J. (2014). Regional variation in Chinese internet filtering. Information,
Communication & Society, 17(1), 121-141.
Wang, Jing (2011). 网络空间中传播主体的生产行为研究——基于人民网强国论坛新闻事件 传播的虚拟民族志观察[User-generated content in cyberspace: A virtual ethnographical observation on how media events are disseminated on People.cn BBS].《新闻学论集第 27 辑》.
Wright, S. Graham, T. , Sun, Y., Yang Wang, W., Luo, X., & Carson, A. (2016). Analysing Everyday Online Political Talk in China: Theoretical and Methodological Reflections.
Communication, Politics & Culture, 49(1), 41-61.
WHO. (2007). Everybody’s Business: Strengthening Health Systems to Improve Health
Xu, J. (2015). Online weiguan in Web 2.0 China: Historical origins, characteristics, platforms and consequences. Guobin Yang (Ed.), China’s Contested Internet. Copenhagen, Denmark NIAS Press, pp. 257-282.
Xing, G. (2012). Online Activism and Counter-Public Spheres: A Case Study of Migrant Labour Resistance. Javnost-The Public, 19(2), 63-82.
Xinhua. (2012). “Full Text of Hu Jintao’s Report at 18th Party Congress.” November 17. <http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/special/18cpcnc/2012-11/17/c_131981259.htm>. Xin, X. (2010). The impact of “citizen journalism” on Chinese media and society.
Journalism Practice, 4(3), 333-344.
Yu, H. (2007a). Blogging everyday life in Chinese Internet culture. Asian Studies Review, 31(4), 423-433.
Young, I. M. (1990a). The Ideal of Impartiality and the Civic Public. In Justice and the
Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press.
Young, I. M. (1990b). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Young, I. M. (1994). Gender as seriality: Thinking about women as a social collective.
Signs: journal of women in culture and society, 19(3), 713-738.
Young, Iris Marion. (1996). Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy. In Seyla Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the
Boundaries of the Political (pp.120-35). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Young, Iris Marion. (2002). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Yang, G. (2003a). Weaving a Green Web: The Internet and Environmental Activism in
China. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
Yang, G. (2003b). The co-evolution of the Internet and civil society in China. Asian Survey, 43(3), 405-422.
Yang, G. (2005). Environmental NGOs and institutional dynamics in China. The China
Quarterly, 181, 46-66.
Yang, G. (2007). How do Chinese civic associations respond to the internet? Findings from a survey. The China Quarterly, 189(1), 122-143.
Yang, G. (2009). The Power of the Internet in China: Citizen Activism Online, New York: Columbia. University Press.
Yang, G. (2014). Political contestation in Chinese digital spaces: Deepening the critical inquiry. China Information, 28(2), 135-144.
Yang, G., & Calhoun, C. (2007). Media, civil society, and the rise of a green public sphere in China. China Information, 21(2), 211-236.
Yuan, E. J. (2015). The new political of mediated activism in China: A critical review. In W. Chen & S. D. Reese (eds.), Networked China: Global Dynamics of Digital Media and
Civic Engagement (pp.215-231). New York: Routledge.
Yan, W., Sivakumar, G., & Xenos, M. A. (2017). It’s not cricket: examining political discussion in nonpolitical online space. Information, Communication & Society, 1-17.
Zhang, N. (2014). Web-based backpacking communities and online activism in China: Movement without marching. China Information, 28(2), 276-296.
Zheng, Y., & Yu, A. (2016). Affordances of social media in collective action: the case of Free Lunch for Children in China. Information Systems Journal, 26(3), 289-313.
Zhang, W. (2010). TECHNICAL CAPITAL AND PARTICIPATORY INEQUALITY IN EDELIBERATION: An actor–network analysis. Information, Communication & Society,
13(7), 1019-1039.
Zhang, W., & Chang, L. (2014). Perceived speech conditions and disagreement of everyday talk: A proceduralist perspective of citizen deliberation. Communication Theory, 24(2), 124-145.
Zhao, Y. (2008). Communication in China: Political Economy, Power, and Conflict. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Zheng, Y., & Wu, G. (2005). Information technology, public space, and collective action in China. Comparative Political Studies, 38(5), 507-536.
Zhou, X., Chan, Y. Y., & Peng, Z. M. (2008). Deliberativeness of online political discussion: A content analysis of the Guangzhou Daily website. Journalism Studies, 9(5), 759-770.
Zhang, W. (2005). Are online discussions deliberate? A case study of a Chinese Online Discussion Board. Paper presented at the III International Conference on Communication and Reality. Digital Utopia in the Media: From Discourses to Facts. A Balance.
Zhou, X. (2009). The political blogosphere in China: A content analysis of the blogs regarding the dismissal of Shanghai leader Chen Liangyu. New Media & Society, 11(6), 1003-1022.
Zhang, W. (2006). Constructing and disseminating subaltern public discourses in China.
Javnost-The Public, 13(2), 41-64.
Zhang, W. (2010). TECHNICAL CAPITAL AND PARTICIPATORY INEQUALITY IN DELIBERATION: An actor–network analysis. Information, Communication & Society,
13(7), 1019-1039.
Zheng, Y. (2008). Technological Empowerment: The Internet, State, and Society in China. Stanford, CT: Stanford University Press.
Zhang, Y., & Maclean, M. (2012). Rolling back of the state in child care? Evidence from urban China. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32(11/12), 664-681.
