Does marketing effectiveness differ for healthy versus unhealthy
food?
A study on demand patterns and marketing mix effectiveness of
brands that differ in levels of healthiness
Student:
Irene Kools - S2362759
Supervisor Second Supervisor
Table of Content
1. Problem Statement
2. Research Objectives
3. Conceptual Model
4. Methodology
5. Results & Discussion
Problem Statement (1)
Food marketers are:
ü
Accused of adding to the obesity epidemicü
Need to prove and improve their marketing investments Marketing effectiveness:ü
Fluctuates over timeProblem Statement (2)
The “research gap”
What do we know about healthy versus unhealthy product marketing effectiveness?
Research Objectives
Systematic comparison of products with different levels of healthiness on:
Q1. Intrayear category demand cycle (category level)
Q2. Marketing effectiveness of advertising and price (brand level) Q3. Intrayear demand influence on marketing effectiveness
advertising & price (brand level)
Q4. Advertising & price cycles comovement with intrayear demand cycle (brand level)
Conceptual Model
Intrayear Category Demand Cycle Brand Sales Brand Actions Advertising Price Competitor Actions Advertising PriceMethodology (1)
Dataset: 4 years – week 29 1994 through week 28 1998
I created 3 overarching categories that differ in levels of healthiness from the non-alcoholic beverage class
Methodology (2)
Christiano Fitzgerald Filter – Intrayear demand / pricing / advertising cycles
Q1. Intrayear demand cycle:
1) Model free insights 2) Pearson correlation 3) Granger causality
Q2/Q3. Marketing effectiveness:
1) Error correction model 2) Added Z method
Q4. Advertising & price cycle – comovement intrayear demand cycle:
Results & Discussion (1)
Results & Discussion (2)
Q2. 1) Advertising effectiveness is limited 2) Pricing sensitivity is high
Q3. 1) Limited impact of intrayear demand on advertising 2) Omit interaction with price due to multicollinearity
Managerial Implications
Healthy sellers need to: