• No results found

Developing teacher leadership and its impact in schools - Preface

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Developing teacher leadership and its impact in schools - Preface"

Copied!
3
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Developing teacher leadership and its impact in schools

Snoek, M.

Publication date

2014

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):

Snoek, M. (2014). Developing teacher leadership and its impact in schools.

General rights

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s)

and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open

content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please

let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material

inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter

to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You

will be contacted as soon as possible.

(2)

13

Preface

This doctoral dissertation focuses on teachers and teacher leadership. One might complain, ‘Not again! Some outsider who does not belong to the teaching profession, talking about what teachers must be and should do!’ This complaint reflects one of the key problems faced by the teaching profession: the debate on teaching appears to be dominated by all types of experts except for the teachers themselves. ‘There has been an increase of discourse about teachers

(…) but teachers were not the main authors of this discourse, in a sense, they have seen their territory occupied by other groups.’ (Novoa, 2007).

The absence of teachers in debates about teachers is for many a cause for worry, as it threatens to de-professionalize the profession and to reduce the teacher to a mere technician, teaching curricula that have been defined by politicians and using methodologies designed by ‘educational specialists’. However, as a teacher educator, I cannot avoid talking about teachers, as that is a main part of my job: preparing and supporting (student) teachers for their (future) jobs, making curriculum decisions about the essential elements that constitute the teaching profession, and determining how student teachers will best master these elements. In addition, as a teacher educator, I consider myself a teacher, albeit a special type of teacher, which lends me some legitimacy in discussing teachers.

As a teacher educator, I have always felt myself part of a profession—in my case, the profession of teacher educators. This feeling of being part of a profession creates a feeling of power: I am not on my own, and together we can shape our profession and influence policies. I am fortunate that the profession of teacher educators is formally organized, with a professional association of teacher educators (the VELON) which takes responsibility for the development of the knowledge base underlying the education of teachers, defines quality standards for teacher educators, and supports members of the profession in meeting these standards through registration. Through this professional body, teacher educators have a voice and are able to exert their agency. ‘Teacher educators matter!’, the policy statement that I wrote together with Johan van der Sande and other members of the VELON board in 2006 (VELON, 2006), powerfully verbalizes this ambition and the self-awareness of the profession. It is my hope that every teacher will feel a similar ambition and

self-awareness as part of a powerful profession and that teachers collectively will raise their voice and exert their agency and leadership accordingly. Through my involvement as a teacher educator in the Bachelor’s, Honor’s,

(3)

14 Developing Teacher Leadership and its Impact in Schools

and Master’s programs of the University of Applied Sciences Hogeschool van Amsterdam HvA, I am able to support teachers and student teachers in developing knowledge and competences to strengthen their voice, agency, and leadership. As a researcher at the Center for Applied Research in Education

(Kenniscentrum Onderwijs en Opvoeding) of the HvA, I may contribute by

studying how the development of these leadership competences actually contribute to leadership roles within schools and by clarifying conditions within schools that facilitate leadership among teachers.

Through the research project presented in this dissertation, I have been able to combine the two roles of teacher educator and researcher by working with teachers in academic development schools and Master’s programs. Through this dissertation, I hope to contribute to teachers’ voice and agency. Meanwhile, this dissertation would never have been possible without the inspiration, ambitions, and voices of the teachers involved.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

I would also like to thank my committee, including Hans Bennis, Angeliek van Hout, Peter Jordens, Frank Weerman and Frank Wijnen.. Hans Bennis was my first-year syntax instructor

We assume that the role of cognitive development directly impacts the ability of the child to use general discourse constraints during the earliest stages of language

Balkenende (1995) argues that indirect objects can, in fact, be deleted, but as with subjects and direct objects, dropping first and second person personal pronouns is

Studies of object drop in child Dutch focus on four major factors: the dropping of objects from sentence-initial position, object drop rates in optionally and obligatorily

A second factor we look at, to provide some context in terms of object drop in child Dutch, is the number of dropped objects from optionally transitive verbs compared to

If perfectivity plays a role in object drop, we expect that the perfective clauses will undergo higher rates, overall, of object drop than other verbs, regardless of

We expect particle verbs to undergo high rates of object drop and other telic predicates with specific direct objects to undergo comparable rates of object drop..

The topic drop hypothesis predicted higher rates of object drop with finite clauses, while the perfectivity hypothesis predicted higher rates in nonfinite clauses (§3.3.3, 3.3.5)..