• No results found

Meaning-Construction in warring states philosophical discourse : a discussion of the palaeographic materials from Tomb Guōdiàn One

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Meaning-Construction in warring states philosophical discourse : a discussion of the palaeographic materials from Tomb Guōdiàn One"

Copied!
3
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Meaning-Construction in warring states philosophical discourse : a discussion of the palaeographic materials from Tomb Guōdiàn One

Meyer, D.

Citation

Meyer, D. (2008, May 29). Meaning-Construction in warring states philosophical discourse : a discussion of the palaeographic materials from Tomb Guōdiàn One. Retrieved from

https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12872

Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown)

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12872

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

Acknowledgments



First and foremost, I want to express my deepest gratitude to the Research School for Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies (CNWS), Leiden University. CNWS and all of its members have provided a great environment and exceptionable support during the three years in which I have had the pleasure of being affiliated with this institution as a PhD student. I would also like to thank other institutions such as the International Institute for Asian Studies (IIAS), the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), and the Leiden University Funds (LUF) for providing financial support. This enabled me not only to go abroad on different occasions, but also to hold an international workshop series during my wonderful years in Leiden.

The present study would not have been possible without a number of scholars and friends.

Professor Jeff Jacobs provided unconditional support for the idea of holding an international workshop series on Old Chinese Phonology in Leiden. William H. Baxter immediately accepted my invitation. Three years in a row he took the trouble to come to Leiden, and I owe all my knowledge of reconstructing Old Chinese to him. Edward L.

Shaughnessy was so kind as to invite me to a workshop on Chinese Paleography in Chicago, taught by Qiú Xīguī 求錫圭 and Chén Jiàn 陳劍. Chén Jiàn later also accepted my invitation to come to Leiden to teach a workshop on Old Chinese together with William Baxter.

(3)

14 Meaning-Construction in Warring States Philosophical Discourse

Discussions with friends and colleagues helped to shape my views on the materials from Guōdiàn One. I would like to give very special thanks to Wolfgang Behr for providing valuable comments on my work.

My deepest thanks go to the two teachers and friends, whom the statutes of Leiden University forbid me to mention at this place, but also to my parents and to Catrin Braun for supporting me during all these years of working and travelling.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

with reference to the history of the two texts. We know that the Shànghǎi “Xìng qíng lùn” was bought from tomb looters on an antique market in Hong Kong, which cut the manuscript

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden. Downloaded

Instead of generating a systematic analysis of a given philosophic concern by integrating the various units of thought into larger coherent wholes, by which a

Many scholars argue that the “Tài yī shēng shuǐ” displays a considerable overlap of ideas with some units of thought of the received Lǎozǐ (and also with some units collected in

This chapter provides a summary of the preceding discussion on reading and writing in Warring States intellectual environment as seen from the two ideal types of texts

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden. Downloaded

楛 ‘to decay’ (*[g] ˤaʔ) share the same phonophoric and fulfil the criteria for phonetic similarity in Old Chinese for loan characters and phonetic components as

Canto one of the “Qióng dá yǐ shí” contains four sub-cantos: Sub-canto one is the introduction to the larger question as discussed in the text; sub-canto two