• No results found

Cover Page The handle https://hdl.handle.net/1887/3134560

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Cover Page The handle https://hdl.handle.net/1887/3134560"

Copied!
3
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Cover Page

The handle https://hdl.handle.net/1887/3134560 holds various files of this Leiden

University dissertation.

Author: Afandi, F.

Title: Maintaining order: Public prosecutors in post-authoritarian countries, the case of

Indonesia

(2)

MI

362

Maintaining Order: Public Prosecutors in Post-Authoritarian Countries, the case of Indonesia

F. Afandi

This book gives a comprehensive account of the public prosecutor’s role in post-authoritarian Indonesia, both in promoting the rule of law and in maintaining the political status quo. It traces the development of the Indonesian prosecution service, historically and politically, exploring what and who influences its performance, as well as how public prosecutors work in practice.

The case of Indonesia constitutes an example of the way in which prosecution services evolve in countries marked by authoritarian tendencies. It shows how various regimes position public prosecutors as ‘justice postmen’, who deliver cases based on the government’s interests, as well as on the interests of other powerful actors, such as political parties, companies, or the police force. Such situations are commonly seen in authoritarian countries, where the executive dominates political power, and public prosecutors have become tools of the government in maintaining political order.

Maintaining Order: Public Prosecutors in Post-Authoritarian Countries, the Case of Indonesia is a socio-legal study of the criminal justice system. It contributes to a number of broader debates about post-authoritarian public prosecutors and their role in promoting the rule of law. By combining criminal law, criminology, political science and anthropological theory, it provides an important framework for the analysis and critique of conditions for, impacts of, and possibilities for prosecution services in post-authoritarian countries.

This is a volume in the series of the Meijers Research Institute and Graduate School of the Leiden Law School of Leiden University. This study is part of the Law School’s research programme ‘Effective Protection of Fundamental Rights in a pluralist world’ and ‘Criminal Justice: Legitimacy, Accountability and Effectivity’.

F. AFANDI

Maintaining Order

Public Prosecutors in

Post-Authoritarian Countries,

the case of Indonesia

E.M. MEIJERS INSTITUUT INSTITUUT VOOR RECHTSWETENSCHAPPELIJK ONDERZOEK E.M. MEIJERS INSTITUUT INSTITUUT VOOR RECHTSWETENSCHAPPELIJK ONDERZOEK

Cover_Maintaining Order - Public Prosecutors_DEF.indd Alle pagina's

(3)

MI

362

Maintaining Order: Public Prosecutors in Post-Authoritarian Countries, the case of Indonesia

F. Afandi

This book gives a comprehensive account of the public prosecutor’s role in post-authoritarian Indonesia, both in promoting the rule of law and in maintaining the political status quo. It traces the development of the Indonesian prosecution service, historically and politically, exploring what and who influences its performance, as well as how public prosecutors work in practice.

The case of Indonesia constitutes an example of the way in which prosecution services evolve in countries marked by authoritarian tendencies. It shows how various regimes position public prosecutors as ‘justice postmen’, who deliver cases based on the government’s interests, as well as on the interests of other powerful actors, such as political parties, companies, or the police force. Such situations are commonly seen in authoritarian countries, where the executive dominates political power, and public prosecutors have become tools of the government in maintaining political order.

Maintaining Order: Public Prosecutors in Post-Authoritarian Countries, the Case of Indonesia is a socio-legal study of the criminal justice system. It contributes to a number of broader debates about post-authoritarian public prosecutors and their role in promoting the rule of law. By combining criminal law, criminology, political science and anthropological theory, it provides an important framework for the analysis and critique of conditions for, impacts of, and possibilities for prosecution services in post-authoritarian countries.

This is a volume in the series of the Meijers Research Institute and Graduate School of the Leiden Law School of Leiden University. This study is part of the Law School’s research programme ‘Effective Protection of Fundamental Rights in a pluralist world’ and ‘Criminal Justice: Legitimacy, Accountability and Effectivity’.

F. AFANDI

Maintaining Order

Public Prosecutors in

Post-Authoritarian Countries,

the case of Indonesia

E.M. MEIJERS INSTITUUT INSTITUUT VOOR RECHTSWETENSCHAPPELIJK ONDERZOEK E.M. MEIJERS INSTITUUT INSTITUUT VOOR RECHTSWETENSCHAPPELIJK ONDERZOEK

Cover_Maintaining Order - Public Prosecutors_DEF.indd Alle pagina's

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

The real challenge with cybercrime lies in criminal procedural law and mutual legal assistance matters, so that became the focus of my research.. Criminal procedural law

As applied in this study, desk research consists of scrutinising available scien tific literature concerning the following five topics: (a) cybercrime, (b) the application

The analysis showed that law enforcement officials use the following digital investigative methods to gather evidence based on these two leads: (a) gathering publicly available

Negative and positive obligations can further be relevant in the context of another treaty concept invoked by the ECtHR, namely extraterritorial obligations. Based on

However, the privacy interference that takes place when the investiga- tive methods discussed above are applied can generally be placed at the low end of the scale of gravity

The Dutch legal framework for the manual gathering of publicly available online information is not considered foreseeable, due to its ambiguity with regard to how data

Nevertheless, the Dutch legal framework for data production orders cannot be considered foreseeable for data production orders that are issued to online service providers with

However, Dutch law enforcement officials were able to contact a mod- erator of the online drug-trading forum. In doing so, they presumably used the special investigative power