• No results found

Addressing the Intentional Destruction of the Environment during Warfare under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Addressing the Intentional Destruction of the Environment during Warfare under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court"

Copied!
6
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

ADDR ESSING THE

INTENTIONAL DESTRUCTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT DUR ING WAR FAR E UNDER THE ROME STATUTE OF THE

INTER NATIONAL CR IMINAL COURT

Steven Freeland

Cambridge – Antwerp – Portland

(2)

Addressing the Intentional Destruction of the Environment during Warfare under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

Steven Freeland

© 2015 Intersentia

Cambridge – Antwerp – Portland

www.intersentia.com | www.intersentia.co.uk

Cover illustration: Francisco de Goya (1746-1828), Etching, Plate 41 from ‘Los desastres de la guerra’

ISBN 978-1-78068-314-0 D/2015/7849/54

NUR 824

British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.

No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, photoprint, microfi lm or any other means, without written permission from the publisher.

Distribution for the UK:

NBN International

Airport Business Centre, 10 Th ornbury Road Plymouth, PL6 7 PP

United Kingdom

Tel.: +44 1752 202 301 | Fax: +44 1752 202 331 Email: orders@nbninternational.com

Distribution for the USA and Canada:

International Specialized Book Services 920 NE 58th Ave. Suite 300

Portland, OR 97213 USA

Tel.: +1 800 944 6190 (toll free) Email: info@isbs.com

Distribution for Austria:

Neuer Wissenschaft licher Verlag Argentinierstraße 42/6

1040 Wien Austria

Tel.: +43 1 535 61 03 24 Email: offi ce@nwv.at

Distribution for other countries:

Intersentia Publishing nv Groenstraat 31

2640 Mortsel Belgium

Tel.: +32 3 680 15 50 Email: mail@intersentia.be Intersentia Ltd

Sheraton House | Castle Park

Cambridge | CB3 0AX | United Kingdom

Tel.: +44 1223 370 170 | Email: mail@intersentia.co.uk

(3)

Intersentia v

CONTENTS

Introduction . . . 1

Chapter One Th e Imperative to Regulate the Intentional Destruction of the Environment during Warfare under International Criminal Law . . . 5

1.1. Introduction – Intentional Environmental Destruction as a part of Warfare . . . 5

1.2. Impact of Environmental Destruction on Human Security and Confl ict . . . 8

1.3. Intentional Targeting of the Environment during Warfare and the Development of International Criminal Justice . . . 14

1.4. Th e Need for Legal Regulation . . . 23

1.4.1. National Law . . . 25

1.4.2. Regional Law . . . 27

1.4.3. International Law, Armed Confl ict and the Environment . . . 29

1.5. International Criminal Law as a Regulatory Mechanism . . . 34

1.6. Could State Criminal Responsibility Apply? . . . 36

1.6.1. State Criminal Responsibility? . . . 37

1.6.2. Individual Criminal Responsibility . . . 43

1.7. Key Questions . . . 45

Chapter Two Regulation of the Intentional Destruction of the Environment during Warfare under Treaty Law . . . 47

2.1. Introduction – Treaties under International Law . . . 47

2.2. International Humanitarian Law (Jus in Bello) – Relevant Treaty Provisions . . . 49

2.2.1. 1868 St. Petersburg Declaration . . . 59

2.2.2. 1899 Hague Conference Conventions and Declarations . . . 60

2.2.3. 1907 Hague Convention IV Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land . . . 62

2.2.4. 1925 Geneva Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous and Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare . . . 65

(4)

Contents

2.2.5. 1949 Geneva Conventions . . . 68

2.2.6. 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Confl ict . . . 73

2.2.7. 1972 Biological Weapons Convention . . . 74

2.2.8. 1976 Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modifi cation Techniques . . . 76

2.2.9. 1977 Additional Protocol I . . . 81

2.2.10. 1981 Certain Conventional Weapons Convention . . . 92

2.2.11. 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention . . . 96

2.2.12. 1997 Ottawa Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on Th eir Destruction . . . 98

2.2.13. 1999 Second Protocol to the Hague Convention of 1954 for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Confl ict . . . 100

2.3. Applicability of International Environmental Law Treaties . . . 101

2.3.1. Development of International Environmental Law Treaties . . . . 102

2.3.2. Applicability during Warfare? . . . 105

2.3.3. Liability and State Responsibility rather than Criminal Responsibility . . . 111

2.4. Conclusion . . . 115

Chapter Th ree Regulation of the Intentional Destruction of the Environment during Warfare under Customary International Law . . . 119

3.1. Introduction – Customary International Law within International Law . . . 119

3.2. Fundamental Customary Rules of the Jus in Bello . . . 130

3.2.1. Principle of Military Necessity . . . 131

3.2.2. Principle of Distinction . . . 141

3.2.3. Principle of Proportionality . . . 150

3.2.4. Th e Fundamental Customary Jus in Bello Rules are Important but Insuffi cient . . . 159

3.3. Additional Protection? ICRC Study – Rules Relating to ‘Th e Natural Environment’ . . . 160

3.3.1. ICRC Study – Rule 43 . . . 163

3.3.2. ICRC Study – Rule 44 . . . 164

3.3.3. ICRC Study – Rule 45 . . . 168

3.4. A General Customary Obligation to Take Account of the Environment during Armed Confl ict? . . . 171

3.5. Conclusion . . . 175

(5)

Contents

Intersentia vii

Chapter Four

Regulation of the Intentional Destruction of the Environment during

Warfare under the Existing Rome Statute Regime . . . 177

4.1. Introduction – Th e Core International Crimes in the Rome Statute . . . . 177

4.2. Finalization of the Rome Statute and Establishment of the ICC . . . 180

4.3. Jurisdiction of the Court – A Brief Overview . . . 185

4.4. Applicability of the Rome Statute to the Intentional Destruction of the Environment during Warfare . . . 189

4.4.1. Intentional Destruction of the Environment as Genocide? . . . 190

4.4.2. Intentional Destruction of the Environment as a Crime against Humanity? . . . 199

4.4.3. Intentional Destruction of the Environment as a War Crime? . . 204

4.4.3.1. Article 8(2)(b)(iv) . . . 204

4.4.3.2. Other War Crimes within Article 8 of the Rome Statute 213 4.5. Conclusion . . . 215

Chapter Five Incorporating Crimes against the Environment into the Rome Statute . . . . 219

5.1. Th e Need for a Sui Generis Crime of Crimes against the Environment . . 219

5.1.1. Revisiting the Imperative to more eff ectively Address the Intentional Destruction of the Environment during Warfare under International Criminal Law . . . 219

5.1.2. A Sui Generis Crime – Crimes against the Environment . . . 226

5.1.2.1. Why a Stand-Alone Crime? . . . 226

5.1.2.2. Why ‘During Armed Confl ict’? . . . 228

5.2. Crimes against the Environment – An International Crime? . . . 234

5.3. Crimes against the Environment – A Defi nition for the Rome Statute . . 239

5.3.1. Th e Applicable Approach to Defi ning Crimes against the Environment . . . 239

5.3.2. Defi nition of Crimes against the Environment . . . 245

5.3.2.1. Proposed article 8 ter of the Rome Statute . . . 245

5.3.2.1.1. Discussion . . . 246

5.3.2.1.1.1. Paragraph 1 (article 8 ter(1)) . . . 246

5.3.2.1.1.2. Paragraph 2 (article 8 ter(2)) . . . 274

5.3.2.2. Associated Amendments to the Rome Statute . . . 279

5.3.2.3. Associated Amendments to the Elements of Crimes . . . 279

5.3.2.3.1. Amendment to the Explanatory Note . . . 279

5.3.2.3.1.1. Discussion . . . 280

5.3.2.3.2. Proposed Elements of Crimes for Crimes against the Environment . . . 280

5.3.2.3.2.1. Discussion . . . 281

(6)

Contents

5.4. Comparison with article 8(2)(b)(iv) – ‘Righting the Wrongs’ . . . 282

5.5. Procedure for Amending the Rome Statute and the Elements of Crimes . . . 283

5.6. Final Refl ections – A ‘Work in Progress’ . . . 285

Appendix I . . . 289

5.3.2.2. Associated Amendments to the Rome Statute . . . 289

5.3.2.2.1. Amendment to article 5(1) . . . 289

5.3.2.2.2. Amendment to article 8(2)(b)(iv) and the Associated Elements of Crimes . . . 289

5.3.2.2.3. Amendment to article 9(1) . . . 290

5.3.2.2.4. Inclusion of article 15 quater . . . 290

5.3.2.2.5. Amendment to article 20(3) . . . 291

Appendix II . . . 293

5.3.3. Paragraph 3 – Not Included in Final Version of article 8 ter . . 293

5.3.3.1. Discussion . . . 293

Bibliography . . . 297

Curriculum Vitae . . . 353

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

The International Criminal Court has territorial jurisdiction for crimes committed in occupied Cyprus as territory of the Republic of Cyprus, under Article 12(2)(a) Rome Statute.

The aim of the study is to find the effects of state ownership structure on promoting firms’ innovation capabilities and to see whether the effects are different on condition that

Which forms of proactive Environment Fit behavior lead to value creation during an M&A?. Master in Management Studies - Strategy Track

[r]

Volgens Verhoeven kan de site ook dienst doen om protocollen rond andere infectieziekten als Mexicaanse griep of hepatitis C inzichtelijk te

The Bureau produced a report on co-operation 3 with draft recommendations to states in areas such as diplomatic and public support, support of analysis, in- vestigations,

Een gelijkaardige structuur, deze maal echter volledig ongeschonden, werd aangetroffen in de kwadraten 11S/6-7E.. De doormeter bedraagt niet meer dan

40 The previous chapter has expounded that scholars can study the legitimacy perceptions and assumptions of African states about the Court by analysing their actions