• No results found

Organized crime in the Netherlands Report of the WODC-monitor on organized crime

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Organized crime in the Netherlands Report of the WODC-monitor on organized crime"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

S u m m a r y

Organized crime in the Netherlands

R e p o r t o f t h e W O D C - m o n i t o r o n o r g a n i z e d c r i m e

In 1994 the Dutch Parliamentary Inquiry Committee into Criminal Investigation Methods concluded that an accurate description of organized crime in the Nether-lands was lacking. Therefore, the Inquiry Committee appointed an external research group chaired by professor Cyrille Fijnaut to make enquiries into the nature, serious-ness and scale of organized crime in the Netherlands. After the publication of the report of the Fijnaut research group in 1996, the Minister of Justice promised the Dutch Parliament to report biennially on the nature of organized crime in the Netherlands. Consequently, the Research and Documentation Centre started the ‘WODC-monitor on organized crime’, a two-yearly systematic analysis of closed investigations of criminal groups. The aim of the research project was to increase the learning capacity of the criminal justice system and to construct a sound basis for preventive and repressive policy.

Chapter 1 of this first report of theWODC-monitor deals with the background, the research questions and the research methods of this study. For this study data have been collected on closed investigations of criminal groups in the period 1996-1997. Furthermore, use has been made of public and confidential reports on organized crime, crime analysis reports and interviews with key figures and experts on organ-ized crime.

Chapter 2 elaborates upon the theoretical basis of the report and the nature of crimi-nal groups: the way they are organized; the role of social relations; ethnic homo-geneity; the dynamics of criminal groups; and the degree of specialization in certain criminal activities. The central issues of chapter 3 and 4 are the interactions between criminal groups and their social environment. The environment has a Janus face: on the one hand society facilitates organized crime in various ways, on the other it threatens the existence of criminal groups. Chapter 3 deals with the opportunities for criminal groups and the way in which criminal groups take advantage of these opportunities (‘the environment as an ally’). Chapter 4 highlights the risks for crimi-nal groups and the way in which these groups cope with these risks (‘the environ-ment as a risk factor’). Chapter 5 summarizes the most important findings of this study and explores the implications for public policy.

(2)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Second phase, the actual writing of the report with the emphasis on the factual information [including statistics] from Russian periodicals (journals and newspapers),

After publication of the report of the Fijnaut research group in 1996, the Minister of Justice promised the Parliament to report periodically on the nature of organized crime in

The nature of organized crime might be more fittingly described as transit crime – criminal groups are primarily involved in international illegal trade, using the same

Although an early start is fairly standard, especially for people with a long criminal career, only twenty-five per cent of all offenders come into contact with the Dutch

When AQIM governed parts of north Mali, from summer 2012 until Operation Serval, its relationship with the local population changed from mutual acquies- cence to control.. In a

Information was retrieved from the five operational specialized police undercover units with regard to all 37 Dutch 38 criminal investigations in 2004 39 during which an undercover

Data on the potential indicators and the degree of (organized) crime and subversion in the industrial area were aggregated and then merged if necessary, after which we

This would also mean that the hierarchical initialisation will result in a higher average of colleagues per agent (one group has more connections than two seperate groups of the