• No results found

Between politics and administration : compliance with EU Law in Central and Eastern Europe

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Between politics and administration : compliance with EU Law in Central and Eastern Europe"

Copied!
3
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Between politics and administration : compliance with EU Law in Central and Eastern Europe

Toshkov, D.D.

Citation

Toshkov, D. D. (2009, March 25). Between politics and administration : compliance with EU Law in Central and Eastern Europe. Between politics and administration: Compliance with EU law in Central and Eastern Europe. Retrieved from

https://hdl.handle.net/1887/13701

Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown)

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/13701

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

APPENDIX I APPENDIX I APPENDIX I APPENDIX I

EC DIRECTIVES: LEGAL BACKGROUND EC DIRECTIVES: LEGAL BACKGROUND EC DIRECTIVES: LEGAL BACKGROUND EC DIRECTIVES: LEGAL BACKGROUND

This book focuses on compliance with directives. A directive is binding, as to the result to be achieved, upon each member state to which it is addressed, but leaves to the national authorities the choice of forms and methods (EC Treaty, Art. 259, third para.). Unlike regulations, directives are not directly applicable in member states’ domestic legal systems.

They obtain their full legislation status only after they have been implemented in national law (Lenaerts and van Nuffel, 2005). Directives are an appropriate means of introducing Community rules which call for existing national provisions to be amended or fleshed out before the new rules can be applied (Lenaerts and van Nuffel, 2005). The provisions of directives must be implemented with unquestionable binding force, and the specificity, precisions and clarity necessary to satisfy the requirements of legal certainty. The member states must make sure that there is a clear legal framework, even where there is no practice in the member state which is incompatible with the directive in questions. It is also not sufficient to make a general reference to the applicable Community provisions and to the primacy of Community law (Lenaerts and van Nuffel, 2005). On the other hand, transposition of a directive does not necessarily require that its provisions are incorporated formally and verbatim. Directives do not have horizontal direct effect, but may have vertical direct effect, meaning that an individual may invoke directly effective provisions of a directive only against a member state which either failed to implement the directive within the prescribed period or implemented it incorrectly.

Harmonization and approximation are related legal concepts which are often informally used in the sense of transposition, and national adaptation to EU law more generally, but which have a specific meaning in the context of EC law. Specific Treaty provisions empower the Community to bring divergent national laws more in line with each other even though they are completely compatible with Community law, where the disparities between the legislation results in market participants being placed in different positions from the point of view of competition (Lenaerts and van Nuffel, 2005, 5-207).

The Treaty supplements the provisions on free movement of goods, persons, services

(3)

Appendix I

and capital by providing a legal basis for harmonization, co-ordination, approximation and mutual recognition of national legislation or administrative provisions.

Another term often used throughout the book is acquis communautaire. The acquis communautaire or Community acquis is the body of common rights and obligations which bind all the Member States together within the European Union. It covers the content, principles and political objectives of the Treaties, the legislation adopted in application of the treaties and the case law of the Court of Justice, measures relating to the common foreign and security policy and justice and home affairs, as well as international agreements concluded by the Community and those concluded by the Member States between themselves in the field of the Union's activities. Hence, the concept of Community acquis is broader than Community law in the strict sense, as it includes all acts adopted under the second and third pillars of the European Union and the common objectives laid down in the Treaties.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

The formulas present the policy position and the time used for transposition as a function of the distance of the EU policy x 1 from the ideal point x 0 and the two

Support for the EU, experience with civil service legislation, and government ideological diversity are all related to the number of non-transposed directives in CEE in

Figure 6.7 plots the predicted probabilities for internal market and environment directives being transposed on time for a different combination of parties in government

The indicator (A) will provide more valid estimates than indicator (B) if the Commission is more likely to (1) start an infringement procedure in case of notified measures but no

On the other hand, ambitious plans in the nature protection field did not lead to delay in the absence of problems with administrative capacity, since a lot of support

Curiously, some of the experience of Bulgaria and Romania in the specific policy areas of information society and nature protection fit quite well the picture

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden. Downloaded

The observations are clustered with respect to the directive/country level (the entries on the transposition of one directive in one country form a cluster) in order