• No results found

University of Groningen Essays in Comparative International Entrepreneurship Research Kleinhempel, Johannes

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen Essays in Comparative International Entrepreneurship Research Kleinhempel, Johannes"

Copied!
15
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

Essays in Comparative International Entrepreneurship Research Kleinhempel, Johannes

DOI:

10.33612/diss.111582628

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2020

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Kleinhempel, J. (2020). Essays in Comparative International Entrepreneurship Research. University of Groningen, SOM research school. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.111582628

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

Essays in Comparative International

Entrepreneurship Research

(3)

Publisher: University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

Printer: Ipskamp Printing, P.O. Box 333, 7500 AH Enschede, The Netherlands

ISBN: 978-94-034-2279-4 (Paperback) / 978-94-034-2280-0 (eBook)

© 2019 Johannes Kleinhempel

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system of any nature, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, now known or hereafter invented, included photocopying or recording, without prior written permission of the publisher.

(4)

Essays in Comparative International

Entrepreneurship Research

PhD thesis

to obtain the degree of PhD at the University of Groningen

on the authority of the

Rector Magnificus Prof. C. Wijmenga and in accordance with the decision by the College of Deans. This thesis will be defended in public on Thursday 9 January 2020 at 16.15 hours

by

Johannes Kleinhempel

born on 20 July 1990 in Chemnitz, Germany

(5)

Supervisor

Prof. S. Beugelsdijk

Co-supervisor

Dr. M.J. Klasing

Assessment Committee

Prof. S. Estrin Prof. J.H. Garretsen Prof. U. Stephan

(6)

Acknowledgements

I am immensely grateful to the many people who have contributed to this thesis and the experience of writing it. To them, I would like to devote these first pages. First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisors Sjoerd Beugelsdijk and Mariko Klasing. Sjoerd, thank you for your expert guidance, your constant support in all matters, academic and otherwise, and your contagious enthusiasm that has been a steady source of inspiration and motivation (and eased the process of “killing my darlings” in the manuscript). It has been a privilege to be your student. Mariko, thank you for sharing your deep knowledge and your keen eye for detail. Your persistent efforts have elevated this thesis and made me grow. It has been a pleasure to learn from both of you in these past three years; this thesis would not have come into existence without your insights and backing.

I am very grateful to Saul Estrin for intellectual guidance and many stimulating discussions. Your critical yet always constructive feedback, your continued support and encouragement, and the numerous learning opportunities you have awarded me have been –and continue to be– of invaluable importance.

I would like to express my gratitude to the committee members: Saul Estrin, Harry Garretsen, and Ute Stephan. I highly appreciate your time and willingness to evaluate this thesis as well as your suggestions and guidance for the future. Thank you for your career support in the last stages of the PhD, Harry, and thank you for the engaging and though-provoking conversations, Ute.

The collaborative and stimulating environment at the University of Groningen has been a fantastic place to learn. In particular, I would like to thank Viola Angelini, Arjan Fredericks, Samuele Murtinu, Robbert Maseland, Milena Nikolova, Florian Noseleit, Andreas Rauch, Christopher Schlägel, and Michael Wyrwich for interesting conversations, helpful feedback, and practical input. You have not only strengthened this thesis substantially but also made the process of writing it more fun. I am also grateful for the administrative support of Arthur, Ellen, Kristian, and Rina and the practical backing of the GEMMIES Astrid, Herma, Jenny, and Sylvia.

Writing this PhD would not have been the same without the fantastic group of friends with whom I shared this experience. Juliette, we have been together in this journey for the last five years, since ‘day zero’ of the Research Master, and I am grateful for your friendship. Your kindness, empathy, and enduring support have been invaluable and I have learned a lot from you. While I will always miss having you in the same office, I am looking forward to many years ahead. I would like to express my gratitude to Maite, for being quintessentially a cool person, for caring so deeply about others, and for bringing ‘Team GEM’ closer together; to Tobi for many conversations, light-hearted and serious, and for generally being a rockstar; to Daan for your uncanny humour and Stata wisdom; to Nick

(7)

for being both a volleyball and econometrics hero; to Jos for brightening any conversation; to Stefan, Ferdinand, and Nikos for sharing rather particular music tastes and being awesome in general; and to team sports: I am both saddened and relieved –as I am sure you are– that I won’t be seeing the volleyball field anytime soon. Thank you, Christian, Daniel, Duc, Fred, Gianmaria, Joeri, Mart, Romina, Sarah, Timon, Vincent, the 9th floor, and

the GEM PhDs: It has been as much of a pleasure to be able to ‘talk shop’ with you as it has been to do exactly the opposite. I also want to thank Marianna for having been the best office mate one could have wished for.

I would like to extend my heartfelt gratitude to my family and friends:

To my friends, you know who you are and how important you are to me. I am grateful for your friendship and I am looking forward to sharing scrambled eggs, curry-potatoes, proper Amatriciana, and Reudnitz’ finest with you.

To my family, for there is no place like home because of you. Ich bin euch unendlich dankbar fur eure –wortwörtlich– grenzenlose Unterstützung. Meinen Eltern Jan und Anett, meiner Lieblingsschwester Isa, und meinen Großeltern Horst und Uschi und Siegfried und Erika ist diese Arbeit gewidmet.

Last but not least, to Laura, for sharing all the highs and lows, not just during this academic journey, but –more importantly– in life. Your positivity, calmness, and dangerously witty humour brighten any day and I am looking forward to the future with you.

(8)

I

Table of contents

Chapter 1 Introduction 1

1.1. Introduction 2

1.2. Entrepreneurship 7

1.3. Comparative international entrepreneurship research 10

1.4. Overview of this thesis and reading guide 12

Chapter 2 The changing role of social capital during the venture creation process: A

multi-level study 21

2.1. Introduction 23

2.2. Theory and hypotheses 28

2.2.1. The venture creation process 28

2.2.2. Social capital at the regional level 31

2.2.3. Regional social capital and the venture creation process 34

2.3. Data and methodology 38

2.3.1. Empirical strategy 38 2.3.2. Sample 39 2.3.3. Dependent variables 40 2.3.4. Independent variables 42 2.3.5. Control variables 45 2.3.6. Methodology 47 2.4. Results 48

2.4.1. Intra-class correlation coefficients 48

2.4.2. Estimation results 52 2.4.3. Robustness checks 56 2.5. Discussion 61 2.5.1. Contributions 62 2.5.2. Limitations 64 2.5.3. Implications 65 2.6. Conclusion 66

Chapter 3 Cultural roots of entrepreneurship: Evidence from second-generation

immigrants 69

3.1. Introduction 71

3.2. Theory and hypotheses 75

3.2.1. Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial culture 75

3.2.2. Identifying the impact of culture on entrepreneurship 78

3.3. Data and methodology 83

3.3.1. Empirical strategy 83

3.3.2. Sample and dependent variables 84

3.3.3. Alternative database: Second-generation Europeans 87

(9)

II

3.3.5. Control variables 89

3.3.6. Methodology 92

3.4. Results 96

3.4.1. Differences in entrepreneurship propensities across ancestral groups 98

3.4.2. The positive effect of revealed entrepreneurial culture 98

3.4.3. The positive effect of revealed entrepreneurial culture observed in

second-generation immigrants in a different context 102

3.5. Extensions and robustness checks 104

3.5.1. Different forms of entrepreneurship 104

3.5.2. Accounting for alternative explanations 106

3.6. Discussion 113

3.6.1. Contributions 113

3.6.2. Limitations and future research 114

3.7. Conclusion 116

Chapter 4 How does culture influence entrepreneurship? Evidence from the aggregate traits perspective 119

4.1. Introduction 121

4.2. Theory and hypotheses 125

4.2.1. Theories of culture and entrepreneurship 125

4.2.2. Identifying the impact of culture on entrepreneurship from the aggregate

traits perspective 131

4.2.3. Aggregate entrepreneurial traits and entrepreneurship 133

4.3. Data and methodology 136

4.3.1. Empirical strategy 136

4.3.2. Sample and dependent variable 136

4.3.3. Predictor variables at the country-of-ancestry level: Aggregate

entrepreneurial traits 138

4.3.4. Control variables 141

4.3.5. Methodology 143

4.4. Results 144

4.4.1. Main findings 149

4.4.2. Accounting for alternative perspectives – Does our approach isolate the

aggregate traits perspective? 152

4.4.3. Robustness checks 155

4.4.4. Extensions 156

4.5. Discussion and conclusion 160

Supplementary results appendices 167

Supplementary results Chapter 2 168

Supplementary results Chapter 3 171

Alternative indicators of country-of-ancestry entrepreneurship 175

Alternative samples 178

Additional control variables 179

(10)

III

Supplementary results Chapter 4 183

Does our cultural argument hold for different types of self-employment? 184

Are the results driven by non-cultural effects? 186

Further empirical robustness checks 191

Data appendices 197

Appendices Chapter 3 198

Further information on the American sample 198

Further information on the European sample 200

Further information on additional variables 202

Appendices Chapter 4 205

Derivation of the independent variables based on WVS data 205

Deriving the measure of socially supportive culture 208

Further information on the GSS sample 209

References 213

English summary 241

(11)

IV

List of Tables

Table 2.1: Summary statistics 49

Table 2.2: Individual-level correlation table 50

Table 2.3: Regional-level correlation table 50

Table 2.4 Intra-class correlation coefficients 51

Table 2.5: Multi-level logistic regression on the likelihood of transitioning through the

venture creation process 54

Table 2.6: Multi-level logistic regression on the likelihood of transitioning through the

venture creation process for different kinds of social capital 55

Table 2.7: Robustness analyses 59

Table 3.1: Descriptive statistics and definitions of variables 95

Table 3.2: Individual-level correlation table 97

Table 3.3: Aggregate-level correlation table 97

Table 3.4: Multi-level logistic regressions on second-generation immigrants'

individual-level entrepreneurship status 101

Table 3.5: Multi-level logistic regressions – Alternative measure of entrepreneurial

culture 103

Table 3.6: Multi-level logistic regressions – Alternative types of entrepreneurship 105 Table 3.7: Multi-level logistic regressions – Assessing robustness to alternative

explanations 108

Table 3.8: Multi-level logistic regressions – Falsification check 112

Table 4.1: Theoretical channels through which culture influences entrepreneurship 127

Table 4.2: Descriptive statistics and definitions of variables 145

Table 4.3: Sample break down and country-of-ancestry scores for aggregate

entrepreneurial traits 147

Table 4.4: Individual-level correlation table 148

Table 4.5: Aggregate-level correlation table 148

Table 4.6: Multi-level logistic regressions on second-generation immigrants'

individual-level entrepreneurship status – Aggregate entrepreneurial traits 150

Table 4.7: Multi-level logistic regressions – Assessing the robustness to alternative

perspectives on culture and entrepreneurship 154

(12)

V

List of Figures

Figure 1.1: Self-employment rates across countries 3

Figure 1.2: Persistent differences in self-employment rates across countries 3

Figure 1.3: Within- and across-country variation in current self-employment rates in

Europe 4

Figure 1.4: Persistent differences in self-employment rates across European sub-national

regions 5

Figure 1.5: Differences in current self-employment rates across immigrant groups 6

Figure 1.6: Persistent differences in self-employment rates across immigrant groups 6

Figure 2.1: The venture creation process 38

Figure 2.2: Modeling the transitions of the venture creation process 42

Figure 2.3: Regional social capital in the European regions 43

Figure 3.1: Conceptual challenges in studying the macro-level determinants of

entrepreneurship 79

Figure 3.2: Empirical approach of alternative identification strategy 94

Figure 3.3: Estimated country-of-ancestry effects (marginal effects) 99

(13)

VI

List of Appendices

Supplementary Results Table R1: Sequential logit model – Likelihood of transitioning

through the venture creation process 168

Supplementary Results Table R2: Sequential logit model – Connected and isolated

regional social capital 169

Supplementary Results Table R3: Sequential logit model – Robustness checks 170

Supplementary Results Table R4: Variance partition coefficients / intra-class correlation

coefficients 171

Supplementary Results Table R5: Country fixed effects 172

Supplementary Results Table R6: Alternative random term structure to account for

nesting 174

Supplementary Results Table R7: Robustness checks on baseline 176

Supplementary Results Table R8: Variance partition coefficients / intra-class correlation

coefficients 183

Supplementary Results Table R9: Different types of entrepreneurship: Incorporated and

unincorporated self-employment 185

Supplementary Results Table R10: Assessing the robustness to non-cultural effects and

ancestral-group level (dis)advantages 189

Supplementary Results Table R11: Empirical robustness checks 193

Data Appendix Table D1: Country of ancestry breakdown 198

Data Appendix Table D2: Country of ancestry descriptive statistics 198

Data Appendix Table D3: European Social Survey summary statistic and variable

overview 201

Data Appendix Table D4: Additional variables 202

Data Appendix Table D5: Second-order factor solution of cultural descriptive norms 209

(14)
(15)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

The goal within a MLM system is to create a self confident and independent network of representatives, which will grow even when the representative itself is not there.”

Empirical evidence from firms located in BRIC countries 63 that only having foreign subsidiaries is significant on the percentage of FIDs in a BOD.. The other two variables were

Overall, nascent entrepreneurship is positively influenced by individualism as well as restraint. However, formally established entrepreneurship is not influenced by any of the

In the paper I argue that the British and Dutch DBFs that follow hybrid business models, which combine elements of both high- risk and low-risk innovation, do so for

Based on the societal-level mechanisms of social capital theory and the individual-level mechanisms of process theory, we propose that the effect of societal social capital

In het bijzonder zou het positieve effect van maatschappelijk sociaal kapitaal het grootst moeten zijn wanneer individuen die ondernemer willen worden, proberen om

Disentangling the various channels through which culture influences entrepreneurship –by shaping individuals’ values and traits, what is considered to be legitimate behavior, and how

Het niet aanbieden van produkten/diensten via de traditio­ nele distributiekanalen heeft echter als nadeel dat de contactkans met de consument laag is (hierbij dient men zich ook