• No results found

An Effective Analysis of the Size and Value Effect With A European Stress Test of the Fama and French Three-Factor Model Appendices for:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "An Effective Analysis of the Size and Value Effect With A European Stress Test of the Fama and French Three-Factor Model Appendices for:"

Copied!
11
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Appendices for:

An Effective Analysis of the Size and Value Effect

With

A European Stress Test of the Fama and French Three-Factor Model

July 2007

(2)

Appendix

Appendix A: Data Selection and excess returns

Country lists and elimination triggers for non-ordinary stock

Datastream list / menomic Firms in list Left after elimination steps

Belgium FBEL 167 113

Belgium dead DEADBD 608 71

Netherlands FHOL 302 137

Netherlands dead DEADNL 382 140

Germany FGER 1 / 2 1248 582

Germany dead DEADBD 1546 231

France FFRA 1083 702

France dead DEADFR 1585 471

United Kingdom LFTALLSH0101 5546 579

United Kingdom dead DEADUK 4781 1566

LISTED 2113

DEAD 2479

TOTAL 4592

Country lists and number of firms

This table describes the number of firms that are in the Datastream lists and the number of firms that is left over after the elimination steps (a to d) that are described in the data section (3.4) are executed. For the average number of firms used, see table 6 and figure 3.

Table A: Country (Datastream) data lists and number of firms in sample.

International ●‘adr’ signals American Depository Receipts; All countries ●‘b’/ ‘c’/ ’d’ ; Class ‘B’ ,‘C’ or ’D’ share,

● Cert; certificate, in some cases these will and in other cases these will not be eliminated,

● (eas) ; EASDAQ share,

● Pf./pref./pref/prf; preferred share, ● (xsq); SEAQ share,

● Dup./dupl../dupl.; Duplicate share, ● % / $; warrant or convertible, ● Wts; warrant,

● Expy/expired/expid/expire/expires; signals a derivative quote, ● (bru)/(par)/(ham)(dus)(stu)(mun)(ber)(xet)/(ams)/(lse); indicate listing outside home country/market Country specific

Belgium vvpr, strip, div, afv, cap, exp. Netherlands rts, div., scripts

Germany .gsh

France rights., adp, ope, op, limited data, ltd data (ex sfi) ex spie)

United Kingdom nrfd, new fully, 1p, warrants arabic number+'p', nrfd, rfd, pp, redeemable shares, red. shares, new nil paid, fully paid, (vxx), br., 'br', pfd

Elimination triggers

This table shows some of the selection criteria and elimination triggers, which were used to divide ordinary form non-ordinary stock. This list is based to a large extent on a similar list in the dissertation by DeMoor (2005). Note that these lists are not extensive and may exlcude some selection criteria.

(3)

Excess returns for the 25 size-B/M ratio sorted portfolios.

Book-to-Market Equity Quintiles

Size

Quintiles

Low

2

3

4

High

Low

2

3

4

High

Average Excess Portfolio Return

Standard deviation

Small

-2,59%

-1,66%

-1,15%

-0,70%

0,13%

5,6%

5,1%

4,8%

4,4%

4,8%

2

-1,93%

-1,31%

-0,82%

-0,27%

0,29%

5,6%

5,0%

4,3%

4,2%

4,6%

3

-1,36%

-0,65%

-0,38%

0,09%

0,60%

6,0%

4,8%

4,4%

4,0%

4,1%

4

-0,80%

-0,32%

0,01%

0,32%

0,82%

5,5%

4,7%

4,4%

4,5%

4,5%

Big

0,00%

-0,11%

0,22%

0,46%

1,04%

4,3%

4,6%

5,4%

5,2%

5,5%

Minimum Value weighted Return

Maximum Value weighted return

Small

-20,24%

-20,49%

-20,55%

-15,65%

-16,06%

16,27%

12,30%

12,53%

10,32%

15,33%

2

-22,29%

-23,26%

-17,12%

-17,61%

-19,26%

17,45%

9,75%

10,42%

8,32%

14,56%

3

-24,81%

-17,78%

-19,64%

-17,25%

-15,29%

19,55%

9,16%

10,49%

11,61%

12,67%

4

-21,69%

-19,67%

-18,69%

-16,39%

-14,95%

15,84%

8,52%

11,26%

12,74%

14,07%

Big

-14,09%

-18,46%

-31,86%

-17,94%

-18,51%

11,79%

9,41%

14,82%

15,87%

15,62%

Median

Small

-2,20%

-1,62%

-0,72%

-0,23%

0,02%

2

-1,38%

-0,71%

-0,46%

-0,09%

0,64%

3

-0,44%

-0,17%

-0,03%

0,40%

1,00%

4

-0,24%

0,50%

0,33%

0,89%

1,31%

Big

0,72%

0,91%

1,07%

1,04%

1,29%

These are the descriptive statistics for the excess market returns. In essence this is the same table as table 11, the

difference here is that the riskfree rate is subtracted to come to the excess return values. All values are motnhly

averages for the 192 month period

(4)

Appendix B: Robustness tests

Dependent and independent returns for the different time periods

1990-1997

premium

1998-2005

premium

1990-2005

premium

Low

2

3

4

High

Low

2

3

4

High

Low

2

3

4

High

Small

-1,36%

-0,42%

-0,18%

-0,04%

0,70%

2,07%

-3,06%

-2,14%

-1,37%

-0,61%

0,31%

3,37%

-2,21%

-1,28%

-0,77%

-0,33%

0,51%

2,72%

2

-0,58%

-0,23%

-0,10%

0,18%

0,69%

1,27%

-2,53%

-1,65%

-0,78%

0,03%

0,64%

3,17%

-1,55%

-0,94%

-0,44%

0,10%

0,67%

2,22%

3

-0,13%

0,21%

0,22%

0,43%

0,73%

0,85%

-1,84%

-0,75%

-0,24%

0,51%

1,22%

3,06%

-0,98%

-0,27%

-0,01%

0,47%

0,97%

1,96%

4

-0,04%

0,40%

0,32%

0,59%

1,06%

1,10%

-0,80%

-0,29%

0,46%

0,81%

1,33%

2,13%

-0,42%

0,06%

0,39%

0,70%

1,19%

1,62%

Big

0,50%

0,62%

0,67%

1,05%

1,51%

1,01%

0,25%

-0,08%

0,51%

0,61%

1,31%

1,07%

0,37%

0,27%

0,59%

0,83%

1,41%

1,04%

premium

1,86%

1,03%

0,86%

1,10%

0,81%

premium

3,31%

2,07%

1,88%

1,22%

1,00%

premium

2,59%

1,55%

1,37%

1,16%

0,91%

This table shows the value weighted portfolio returns for the first and second half of the original 16 year period, that is 1990-1997 and 1998-2005. Also the returns for the whole 16 year period are shown

for comparison.

Table D: Value weighted monthly portfolio returns for different time periods.

1990-1997 1998-2005 1990-2005

Minimum Maximum Mean St Dev Median Minimum Maximum Mean St Dev Median MinimumMaximumMean St Dev Median

SmB S = (SL+SN+SH)/3 -10,92% 9,93% 0,15% 3,30% 0,10% -17,76% 7,63% -0,64% 5,20% 0,64% -17,76% 9,93% -0,24% 4,36% 0,19% B = (BL+BN+BH)/3 -12,10% 7,96% 0,78% 3,51% 1,38% -17,12% 11,15% 0,43% 5,30% 1,52% -17,12% 11,15% 0,60% 4,49% 1,42% S - B -5,62% 5,64% -0,63% 2,06% -0,96% -8,63% 6,64% -1,06% 2,69% -0,75% -8,63% 6,64% -0,85% 2,40% -0,94% HmL H = (SH+BH)/2 -10,75% 11,25% 0,89% 3,65% 0,96% -16,09% 12,86% 0,87% 4,88% 1,93% -16,09% 12,86% 0,88% 4,29% 1,45% L = (SL+BL)/2 -11,15% 7,02% 0,09% 2,91% 0,66% -16,90% 13,09% -0,93% 5,67% -0,12% -16,90% 13,09% -0,42% 4,53% 0,43% H - L -2,25% 5,92% 0,80% 1,47% 0,62% -14,02% 8,79% 1,80% 3,29% 1,72% -14,02% 8,79% 1,30% 2,59% 0,68%

This table describes the independent returns for the Size (SMB) and Book-to-Market (HmL) factors for the first and second half of the original 16 year period, that is 1990-1997 and 1998-2005. Also the returns for the whole 16 year period are shown for comparison. SmB is the Portfolio formed by the difference between simple average return of the three small market value (MV) portfolios and the three Big (MV) portfolios. HmL is the difference between the simple average return of the two High book-to-market ratio (BM) portfolios and the two low BM portfolios.

(5)

Dependent and independent returns for the sample without UK firms and UK firms only

No UK

premium

With UK

premium

UK Only

premium

Low

2

3

4

High

Low

2

3

4

High

Low

2

3

4

High

Returns

Returns

Returns

Small

-1,33%

-0,97%

-0,43%

-0,03%

0,34%

1,67%

-2,21%

-1,28%

-0,77%

-0,33%

0,51%

2,72%

-0,90%

-0,32%

-0,33%

-0,29%

0,17%

1,07%

2

-1,03%

-0,69%

-0,30%

0,17%

0,54%

1,57%

-1,55%

-0,94%

-0,44%

0,10%

0,67%

2,22%

-0,52%

-0,25%

-0,14%

-0,06%

0,15%

0,67%

3

-0,90%

-0,37%

-0,04%

0,35%

0,55%

1,45%

-0,98%

-0,27%

-0,01%

0,47%

0,97%

1,96%

-0,09%

0,09%

0,04%

0,12%

0,42%

0,51%

4

-0,53%

-0,09%

0,25%

0,43%

0,70%

1,23%

-0,42%

0,06%

0,39%

0,70%

1,19%

1,62%

0,10%

0,14%

0,14%

0,27%

0,50%

0,40%

Big

-0,03%

0,07%

0,42%

0,66%

0,79%

0,82%

0,37%

0,27%

0,59%

0,83%

1,41%

1,04%

0,41%

0,20%

0,18%

0,19%

0,63%

0,22%

premium

1,29%

1,03%

0,85%

0,69%

0,44%

2,59%

1,55%

1,37%

1,16%

0,91%

1,31%

0,52%

0,52%

0,49%

0,46%

standard deviation

standard deviation

standard deviation

Small

4,12%

3,94%

3,51%

2,99%

3,28%

5,56%

5,08%

4,77%

4,39%

4,78%

2,77%

2,51%

2,32%

2,33%

2,68%

2

4,04%

3,77%

2,94%

2,83%

3,02%

5,62%

5,01%

4,23%

4,19%

4,60%

2,54%

2,04%

1,98%

2,07%

2,40%

3

3,96%

3,31%

2,84%

2,28%

2,26%

6,01%

4,78%

4,43%

3,99%

4,06%

2,80%

1,99%

2,08%

2,09%

2,43%

4

3,53%

2,72%

2,54%

2,33%

2,65%

5,51%

4,69%

4,37%

4,43%

4,49%

2,55%

2,32%

2,18%

2,48%

2,55%

Big

2,68%

2,97%

3,47%

3,79%

2,82%

4,28%

4,59%

5,42%

5,15%

5,49%

2,13%

2,10%

2,63%

1,96%

3,77%

This table shows the value weighted portfolio returns and standard deviations for the original sample with the UK (middle), without the UK (left) and with the UK firms only (right). Below are the standard

deviations for the portfolio returns. The returns are averages for the monthly returns over the 192 month period from 1990-2005

Table F: Value weighted portfolio returns and standard deviations for the sample with and without the UK

No UK

With UK

UK only

Minimum Maximum Mean

St Dev

Median

Minimum Maximum Mean

St Dev

Median

Minimum

Maximum Mean

St Dev

Median

SmB

S = (SL+SN+SH)/3

-17.76%

7.63%

-0.64%

5.20%

0.64%

-17.76%

9.93%

-0.24%

4.36%

0.19%

-13.99%

6.20%

-0.23%

2.89%

0.21%

B = (BL+BN+BH)/3

-17.12%

11.15%

0.43%

5.30%

1.52%

-17.12%

11.15%

0.60%

4.49%

1.42%

-9.35%

6.87%

0.28%

2.72%

0.62%

S - B

-8.63%

6.64%

-1.06%

2.69%

-0.75%

-8.63%

6.64%

-0.85%

2.40%

-0.94%

-6.52%

5.30%

-0.51%

1.89%

-0.46%

HmL

H = (SH+BH)/2

-16.09%

12.86%

0.87%

4.88%

1.93%

-16.09%

12.86%

0.88%

4.29%

1.45%

-11.11%

9.67%

0.47%

2.41%

0.43%

L = (SL+BL)/2

-16.90%

13.09%

-0.93%

5.67%

-0.12%

-16.90%

13.09%

-0.42%

4.53%

0.43%

-11.23%

10.43%

-0.48%

3.10%

0.07%

H - L

-14.02%

8.79%

1.80%

3.29%

1.72%

-14.02%

8.79%

1.30%

2.59%

0.68%

-9.26%

10.50%

0.94%

2.14%

0.70%

This table describes the independent returns for the Size (SMB) and Book-to-Market (HmL) factors for the sample without the UK (left), with the UK (middle) and for the UK only (right). The values are all

averages for the 192 month period from 1990-2005. SmB is the portfolio formed by the difference between simple average return of the three small market value (MV) portfolios and the three Big (MV)

portfolios. HmL is the difference between the simple average return of the two High book-to-market ratio (BM) portfolios and the two low BM portfolios.

(6)

Regression three factor model for the sample without UK firms and UK firms only

Ri – Rf = α + βi (Rm - Rf) + sSmB + hHmL + ε Ri – Rf = α + βi (Rm - Rf) + sSmB + hHmL + ε

No UK Book-to-Market Ratio Quintiles UK only Book-to-Market Ratio Quintiles

Size

Quintiles Low 2 3 4 High Low 2 3 4 High

Size

Quintiles Low 2 3 4 High Low 2 3 4 High

α t-statistic α t-statistic Small -1.02% -0.77% -0.59% -0.35% -0.19% -4,32** -3,98** -3,39** -2,21* -1.19 Small -1.22% -0.62% -0.67% -0.60% -0.16% -8.17** -4.4** -5.46** -5.48** -1.34 2 -0.57% -0.58% -0.59% -0.36% -0.13% -3,52** -3,79** -5,18** -3,2** -1 2 -0.84% -0.59% -0.49% -0.49% -0.31% -7.03** -6.42** -5.18** -5.21** -2.94** 3 -0.50% -0.46% -0.50% -0.33% -0.10% -3,56** -3,63** -4,62** -3,19** -0.93 3 -0.47% -0.29% -0.36% -0.34% -0.07% -3** -3.03** -3.77** -3.48** -0.59 4 -0.39% -0.39% -0.41% -0.35% -0.11% -2,63** -3,47** -3,6** -3,33** -0.86 4 -0.38% -0.34% -0.37% -0.29% -0.10% -2.89** -3.08** -3.59** -2.48* -0.71 Big -0.36% -0.39% -0.48% -0.42% -0.03% -3,83** -3,6** -3,96** -2,99** -0.21 Big -0.09% -0.37% -0.41% -0.44% -0.30% -0.83 -3.57** -2.73** -4.25** -1.41 β t-statistic β t-statistic Small 0.43 0.54 0.52 0.45 0.52 8,73** 13,19** 14,29** 13,54** 15,37** Small 0.35 0.28 0.29 0.32 0.38 10.51** 9.04** 10.86** 13.41** 14.5** 2 0.55 0.61 0.53 0.53 0.53 16,13** 19,06** 21,86** 22,74** 19,73** 2 0.39 0.32 0.29 0.31 0.35 14.64** 15.85** 13.86** 14.94** 15** 3 0.58 0.59 0.55 0.43 0.41 19,75** 22,52** 24,47** 19,73** 18,62** 3 0.44 0.34 0.37 0.36 0.37 12.6** 16.24** 17.41** 16.46** 13.52** 4 0.54 0.51 0.49 0.44 0.48 17,34** 21,64** 20,54** 19,64** 18,05** 4 0.44 0.41 0.39 0.43 0.37 15.24** 16.48** 17.32** 16.42** 12.19** Big 0.43 0.55 0.68 0.75 0.47 21,56** 24,26** 26,6** 25,49** 14,93** Big 0.36 0.34 0.38 0.27 0.39 15.26** 14.69** 11.39** 11.62** 8.26** s t-statistic s t-statistic Small 1.03 1.08 1.20 0.97 1.08 8,38** 10,63** 13,28** 11,87** 12,89** Small 1.22 1.15 1.04 1.16 1.31 10.43** 10.34** 10.91** 13.57** 13.89** 2 1.07 1.08 1.02 0.90 0.95 12,71** 13,59** 17,02** 15,5** 14,17** 2 1.17 0.91 0.90 0.90 1.00 12.47** 12.59** 12.11** 12.3** 11.99** 3 0.78 0.85 0.80 0.49 0.58 10,57** 13,03** 14,27** 9,01** 10,63** 3 0.60 0.58 0.65 0.58 0.67 4.86** 7.73** 8.68** 7.6** 6.77** 4 0.50 0.55 0.43 0.23 0.41 6,51** 9,3** 7,21** 4,12** 6,11** 4 0.24 0.37 0.29 0.27 0.26 2.3* 4.2** 3.62** 2.85** 2.43* Big -0.26 -0.04 -0.08 0.02 0.11 -5,34** -0.71 -1.26 0.23 1.44 Big -0.13 -0.15 0.10 -0.06 0.11 -1.59 -1.81 0.83 -0.76 0.67 h t-statistic h t-statistic Small -0.53 -0.41 0.17 0.29 0.64 -4,09** -3,8** 1,81 3,4** 7,19** Small 0.55 0.49 0.47 0.47 0.58 5.06** 4.81** 5.31** 5.89** 6.62** 2 -0.82 -0.35 0.24 0.48 0.71 -9,2** -4,12** 3,83** 7,81** 10** 2 0.41 0.33 0.39 0.56 0.68 4.72** 4.96** 5.68** 8.39** 8.78** 3 -0.97 -0.22 0.29 0.46 0.51 -12,51** -3,25** 4,88** 8,13** 8,85** 3 0.01 0.12 0.18 0.34 0.47 0.06 1.74 2.62** 4.75** 5.21** 4 -0.76 -0.08 0.35 0.41 0.55 -9,34** -1.35 5,55** 7,08** 7,87** 4 -0.07 0.12 0.13 0.22 0.37 -0.76 1.43 1.76 2.56* 3.71** Big -0.58 -0.32 0.19 0.45 0.37 -11,21** -5,42** 2,82** 5,92** 4,39** Big -0.25 -0.03 0.19 0.30 1.13 -3.29** -0.4 1.71 3.96** 7.37** Adjusted R² Adjusted R² Small 47.10% 60.74% 61.48% 56.79% 62.24% Small 50.05% 46.02% 52.05% 62.04% 64.91% 2 74.58% 73.95% 76.18% 75.89% 71.56% 2 62.06% 64.72% 60.80% 65.78% 66.07% 3 79.94% 77.27% 77.44% 68.23% 67.08% 3 45.70% 59.81% 63.71% 62.65% 54.94% 4 72.13% 73.22% 68.83% 67.62% 64.10% 4 55.20% 59.76% 62.54% 60.97% 48.59% Big 80.49% 79.26% 80.59% 78.81% 55.06% Big 57.81% 57.35% 43.65% 50.64% 44.99%

This table shows the results of the 25 independent regressions for the sample without UK firms and the sample with UK firms only (right) in the 192 month period from January 1990 to December 2005. The dependent variable is the value weighted average stock return of the portfolio sorted by size and book-to-market ratio minus the riskfree interest rate in the period. Size, as measured by market value of the stock, is valued at the beginning of the month and is adjusted each month. The market value is the value of ordinary common stock outstanding (price x amount). The Book/Market ratio is the book value of equity divided by the market value of equity and is changed at the beginning of july each year t to the end of year value of t-1.The riskfree rate is the three month German treasury-bill rate. The independent variables are the market factor, the size factor and the book/market factor. The market factor is the monthly market return of the MSCI Europe Index minus the riskfree rate. The index was shown to have the largest correlation with the total value weighted return of all the firms in the sample. The size factor, SmB, is the average of the returns of the three small size-book/market sorted portfolios minus the average of the three big portfolios.The book/market factor is the difference between the average return in the two large book/market portoflios and the two low book/market portfolios. The

differences are all calulated monthly. β, s and h are the coefficients of the market, size and book/market factor respectively.The intercepts α and the Adjusted R² give an indication of the degree in which the risk factors are able to explain the variation in excess stock returns and whether the factors in the model are able to capture the variance in portoflio returns. The * and **

show a significance (two-tailed) at the 5% and 1% level respectively. The main significance level to see whether the values are significantly different from zero is 5%.

(7)

Dependent and independent returns for the sample of listed firms only

Listed Only premium Listed and dead firms premium

Low 2 3 4 High Low 2 3 4 High

Returns Returns Small -1,21% -0,52% -0,37% 0,22% 0,79% 2,00% -2,21% -1,28% -0,77% -0,33% 0,51% 2,72% 2 -0,86% -0,51% -0,30% 0,43% 0,79% 1,65% -1,55% -0,94% -0,44% 0,10% 0,67% 2,22% 3 -0,71% -0,16% 0,29% 0,47% 1,02% 1,73% -0,98% -0,27% -0,01% 0,47% 0,97% 1,96% 4 -0,16% 0,27% 0,42% 0,69% 1,07% 1,23% -0,42% 0,06% 0,39% 0,70% 1,19% 1,62% Big 0,53% 0,36% 0,58% 0,78% 1,46% 0,93% 0,37% 0,27% 0,59% 0,83% 1,41% 1,04% premium 1,74% 0,88% 0,95% 0,57% 0,67% 2,59% 1,55% 1,37% 1,16% 0,91%

standard deviation standard deviation

Small 5,37% 5,50% 4,65% 4,40% 4,89% 5,56% 5,08% 4,77% 4,39% 4,78% 2 6,26% 5,38% 4,70% 4,38% 4,45% 5,62% 5,01% 4,23% 4,19% 4,60% 3 6,01% 5,11% 4,49% 4,31% 3,89% 6,01% 4,78% 4,43% 3,99% 4,06% 4 5,96% 5,03% 4,45% 4,35% 4,35% 5,51% 4,69% 4,37% 4,43% 4,49% Big 4,47% 4,61% 5,74% 5,36% 5,73% 4,28% 4,59% 5,42% 5,15% 5,49% This table shows the value weighted portfolio returns and standard deviations for the original sample with inlisted firms (right),

and with the listed firms only (left). Below are the standard deviations for the portfolio returns. The returns are averages for the monthly returns over the 192 month period from 1990-2005

Table I: Value weighted portfolio returns and standard deviations for the sample with and without the UK

Listed only Listed and dead firms

Minimum Maximum Mean St Dev Median Minimum Maximum Mean St Dev Median SmB S = (SL+SN+SH)/3 -18,73% 8,52% 0,00% 4,38% 0,60% -17,76% 7,63% -0,64% 5,20% 0,64% B = (BL+BN+BH)/3 -18,11% 11,57% 0,62% 4,60% 1,55% -17,12% 11,15% 0,43% 5,30% 1,52% S - B -8,24% 6,16% -0,62% 2,27% -0,59% -8,63% 6,64% -1,06% 2,69% -0,75% HmL H = (SH+BH)/2 -16,06% 14,80% -0,15% 4,69% 0,65% -16,09% 12,86% 0,87% 4,88% 1,93% L = (SL+BL)/2 -17,78% 13,18% 0,87% 4,25% 1,38% -16,90% 13,09% -0,93% 5,67% -0,12% H - L -14,69% 9,78% 1,02% 2,81% 0,64% -14,02% 8,79% 1,80% 3,29% 1,72% This table describes the independent returns for the Size (SMB) and Book-to-Market (HmL) factors for the sample without dead firms (left and the original sample (right) for comparison. The values are all averages for the 192 month period from 1990-2005. SmB is the portfolio formed by the difference between simple average return of the three small market value (MV) portfolios and the three Big (MV) portfolios. HmL is the difference between the simple average return of the two High book-to-market ratio (BM) portfolios and the two low BM portfolios.

(8)

Regression three factor model for the sample of listed firms only

Ri – Rf = α + βi (Rm - Rf) + sSmB + hHmL + ε

Book-to-Market Ratio Quintiles

Size

Quintiles

Low

2

3

4

High

Low

2

3

4

High

α

t-statistic

Small

-1,07%

-0,44%

-0,70%

-0,30%

-0,04%

-3,5**

-1,63

-3,15**

-1,47

-0,17

2

-0,27%

-0,46%

-0,65%

-0,26%

-0,18%

-1

-2,17*

-3,74**

-1,66

-1

3

-0,59%

-0,46%

-0,38%

-0,47%

0,11%

-2,62**

-2,35*

-2,19*

-2,74**

0,63

4

-0,23%

-0,26%

-0,42%

-0,29%

0,01%

-0,89

-1,26

-2,41*

-1,58

0,03

Big

-0,09%

-0,36%

-0,48%

-0,37%

0,01%

-0,56

-2,12*

-2,23*

-1,98*

0,04

β

t-statistic

Small

0,73

0,91

0,84

0,82

0,91

10,77**

15,33**

17,18**

17,95**

18,01**

2

0,96

1,00

0,96

0,94

0,91

16,29**

21,13**

25,06**

27,53**

23,4**

3

1,11

1,02

0,94

0,88

0,75

22,04**

23,49**

24,7**

23,09**

18,88**

4

1,06

1,00

0,92

0,86

0,86

18,4**

21,76**

23,74**

21,18**

21,64**

Big

0,79

0,89

1,09

1,05

1,01

23,66**

23,78**

22,72**

25,16**

16,57**

s

t-statistic

Small

1,11

1,05

1,20

1,08

1,15

7,77**

8,37**

11,57**

11,14**

10,7**

2

1,16

1,14

1,15

1,02

0,93

9,36**

11,43**

14,2**

14,11**

11,38**

3

0,91

0,85

0,70

0,61

0,55

8,57**

9,28**

8,66**

7,51**

6,58**

4

0,65

0,65

0,54

0,34

0,36

5,35**

6,72**

6,63**

3,91**

4,22**

Big

-0,29

0,04

-0,13

-0,02

0,33

-4,16**

0,46

-1,32

-0,24

2,54*

h

t-statistic

Small

-0,19

-0,26

0,27

0,39

0,69

-1,75

-2,71**

3,37**

5,29**

8,42**

2

-0,72

-0,21

0,21

0,46

0,69

-7,54**

-2,8**

3,31**

8,35**

11,07**

3

-0,47

-0,05

0,25

0,49

0,49

-5,78**

-0,7

4,04**

7,9**

7,56**

4

-0,42

0,07

0,34

0,37

0,47

-4,48**

0,87

5,35**

5,67**

7,26**

Big

-0,33

-0,08

0,06

0,24

0,75

-6,08**

-1,32

0,8

3,55**

7,62**

Adjusted R²

Small

46,44%

61,32%

63,14%

63,99%

64,38%

47,29%

61,93%

63,72%

64,55%

64,94%

2

70,76%

74,39%

77,84%

80,08%

75,03%

64,94%

74,79%

78,19%

80,39%

75,42%

3

76,86%

75,89%

76,23%

73,92%

65,68%

77,22%

76,27%

76,61%

74,33%

66,22%

4

69,01%

72,09%

74,89%

71,22%

72,35%

69,50%

72,53%

75,28%

71,68%

72,79%

Big

81,46%

78,03%

77,03%

79,75%

62,44%

81,75%

78,38%

77,39%

80,07%

63,03%

This table shows the results of the 25 independent regressions in the 192 month period from January 1990 to

December 2005 for the listed firms only. The dependent variable is the value weighted average stock return of the

portfolio sorted by size and book-to-market ratio minus the riskfree interest rate in the period. Size, as measured by

market value of the stock, is valued at the beginning of the month and is adjusted each month. The market value is

the value of ordinary common stock outstanding (price x amount). The Book/Market ratio is the book value of equity

divided by the market value of equity and is changed at the beginning of july each year t to the end of year value of

t-1.The riskfree rate is the three month German treasury-bill rate. The independent variables are the market factor, the

size factor and the book/market factor. The market factor is the monthly market return of the MSCI Europe Index

minus the riskfree rate. The index was shown to have the largest correlation with the total value weighted return of

all the firms in the sample. The size factor, SmB, is the average of the returns of the three small size-book/market sorted portfolios minus the average of the three big portfolios.The book/market

factor is the difference between the average return in the two large book/market portoflios and the two low

book/market portfolios. The differences are all calulated monthly. β, s and h are the coefficients of the market,

size and book/market factor respectively.The intercepts α and the Adjusted R² give an indication of the degree

in which the risk factors are able to explain the variation excess stock returns and whether the factors in the

model are able to capture the variance in portoflio returns. The * and ** show a significance (two-tailed) at the 5%

and 1% level respectively. The main significance level to see whether the values are significantly different

from zero is 5%.

(9)

No Extreme Market Values

No extreme Market Values

With extreme Market Values

Minimum Maximum Mean

St Dev

Median

Minimum Maximum Mean

St Dev

Median

SmB

S = (SL+SN+SH)/3

-17,80%

9,98%

-0,23%

4,37%

0,20%

-17,76%

7,63%

-0,64%

5,20%

0,64%

B = (BL+BN+BH)/3

-17,92%

9,52%

0,54%

4,25%

1,06%

-17,12%

11,15%

0,43%

5,30%

1,52%

S - B

-6,81%

7,24%

-0,77%

1,97%

-0,75%

-8,63%

6,64%

-1,06%

2,69%

-0,75%

HmL

H = (SH+BH)/2

-19,00%

14,82%

-0,53%

4,84%

0,19%

-16,09%

12,86%

0,87%

4,88%

1,93%

L = (SL+BL)/2

-16,83%

12,33%

0,91%

4,19%

1,16%

-16,90%

13,09%

-0,93%

5,67%

-0,12%

H - L

-15,26%

14,83%

1,45%

2,99%

1,13%

-14,02%

8,79%

1,80%

3,29%

1,72%

This table describes the independent returns for the Size (SMB) and Book-to-Market (HmL) factors for the sample with a lower limit and a upper

limit for the market values. The values are all averages for the 192 month period from 1990-2005. SmB is the portfolio formed by the difference

between simple average return of the three small market value (MV) portfolios and the three Big (MV) portfolios. HmL is the difference between

the simple average return of the two High book-to-market ratio (BM) portfolios and the two low BM portfolios.

(10)

January Effect;

jan feb march april may june july aug sep oct nov dec feb-dec January 'Premium'

Portfolio 1 2,09% -0,5% -3,1% -2,1% -0,7% -3,3% -4,2% -2,4% -5,6% -4,1% -2,2% -0,4% -2,6% 4,70% 2 1,84% -0,5% -2,6% 0,6% -1,6% -1,6% -1,6% -1,4% -4,4% -1,6% -1,8% -0,6% -1,6% 3,41% Small 3 3,59% 0,5% -1,8% -0,7% -0,1% -1,7% -2,3% -1,0% -3,2% -1,4% -0,3% -0,9% -1,2% 4,76% 4 3,15% 0,6% -1,3% 1,6% 1,3% -1,5% -0,9% -1,4% -2,5% -1,4% -0,5% -0,9% -0,6% 3,79% 5 4,32% 1,9% 0,4% 2,6% 2,1% -0,8% -1,4% -0,6% -2,9% 0,2% 0,3% 0,0% 0,2% 4,16% average 3,00% 0,4% -1,7% 0,4% 0,2% -1,8% -2,1% -1,4% -3,7% -1,7% -0,9% -0,6% -1,2% 4,16% 6 2,65% -0,1% -3,0% -1,0% -0,7% -3,7% -2,9% -1,9% -4,6% -1,6% -1,7% 0,0% -1,9% 4,58% 7 2,04% -0,3% -1,4% 0,6% 0,0% -1,4% -1,8% -1,8% -4,3% -1,1% -1,5% -0,3% -1,2% 3,25% 8 2,89% 0,2% -0,5% 1,3% 1,0% -1,3% -1,6% -1,7% -3,3% -0,9% -0,7% -0,6% -0,7% 3,63% 9 2,22% 1,0% 0,5% 2,0% 0,9% -0,8% -1,2% -0,8% -3,0% 0,3% 0,3% -0,3% -0,1% 2,31% 10 3,73% 2,1% 0,3% 2,4% 1,5% -0,2% -0,4% -0,1% -2,5% 0,4% 0,6% 0,1% 0,4% 3,34% average 2,70% 0,6% -0,8% 1,1% 0,5% -1,5% -1,6% -1,3% -3,6% -0,6% -0,6% -0,2% -0,7% 3,42% 11 1,71% 0,4% -2,0% 0,1% -0,5% -2,2% -2,6% -1,7% -4,7% -0,5% -0,2% 0,5% -1,2% 2,94% 12 2,75% 0,5% -0,7% 0,8% 0,5% -1,4% -1,2% -1,0% -4,1% 0,0% 0,2% 0,3% -0,5% 3,30% medium 13 2,57% 0,5% 0,2% 1,6% 1,1% -1,4% -1,4% -1,0% -3,4% 0,6% -0,3% 0,8% -0,2% 2,81% 14 1,83% 1,7% 0,5% 2,3% 2,0% -0,2% -0,6% -0,5% -3,1% 0,1% 0,5% 1,1% 0,3% 1,49% 15 2,96% 1,2% 1,1% 3,0% 1,6% 0,1% -0,2% -0,3% -1,7% 1,2% 1,5% 1,2% 0,8% 2,17% average 2,37% 0,9% -0,2% 1,6% 0,9% -1,0% -1,2% -0,9% -3,4% 0,3% 0,4% 0,8% -0,2% 2,54% 16 2,24% 0,5% -2,0% 0,9% 0,1% -2,2% -1,2% -1,1% -4,4% 0,6% 0,3% 1,3% -0,7% 2,91% 17 2,61% 1,0% 0,2% 1,7% 0,9% -1,1% -1,0% -0,9% -4,0% 0,9% -0,2% 0,6% -0,2% 2,78% 18 2,27% 1,9% 0,7% 2,3% 1,6% -0,6% -0,4% -1,2% -3,7% 0,2% 0,6% 0,9% 0,2% 2,05% 19 2,23% 1,9% 0,9% 2,4% 2,0% -0,7% -0,6% -1,2% -3,0% 0,9% 2,0% 1,5% 0,6% 1,67% 20 2,75% 2,3% 1,5% 3,3% 1,9% 0,0% 0,1% 0,0% -2,0% 1,2% 2,0% 1,3% 1,1% 1,70% average 2,42% 1,5% 0,2% 2,1% 1,3% -0,9% -0,6% -0,9% -3,4% 0,8% 0,9% 1,1% 0,2% 2,22% 21 0,36% 1,3% -0,8% 2,0% 1,3% 0,0% -0,8% -0,7% -3,1% 1,3% 1,5% 2,1% 0,4% -0,01% 22 0,68% 0,7% 0,7% 1,7% 1,1% -0,6% -1,3% -0,6% -3,4% 1,3% 1,5% 1,5% 0,2% 0,44% Big 23 1,04% 0,5% 0,5% 2,7% 1,6% 0,2% 0,1% -1,6% -5,1% 3,0% 2,4% 1,7% 0,6% 0,49% 24 2,21% 1,0% 0,5% 2,5% 1,2% -0,4% 0,8% -1,0% -3,7% 3,3% 2,4% 1,1% 0,7% 1,50% 25 4,04% 1,7% 0,8% 1,4% 1,8% -0,7% 1,4% 0,2% -1,4% 2,8% 4,0% 1,0% 1,2% 2,87% average 1,67% 1,0% 0,3% 2,1% 1,4% -0,3% 0,0% -0,7% -3,3% 2,3% 2,4% 1,5% 0,6% 1,06% Jan Feb-Dec

Independent Factors SmB small3 0,83% -0,51%

big3 0,92% 0,53%

-0,08% -1,04%

HmL hi2 1,31% 0,68%

lo2 0,62% -0,59%

0,69% 1,27%

This table shows the value weighted returns of the 25 portfolios sorted by size and B/M ratio for the different months. The values are monthly averages for the 192 month period from 1990-2005. Below are the return values for the independent returns for the Size (SMB) and Book-to-Market (HmL) factors for January and February till December. SmB is the portfolio formed by the difference between simple average return of the three small market value (MV) portfolios and the three Big (MV) portfolios. HmL is the difference between the simple average return of the two High book-to-market ratio (BM) portfolios and the two low BM portfolios.

(11)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Studying implementation fidelity of OHL-interventions, their moderators, including barriers and facilitators affecting implementation, and long-term outcomes, are

The t-statistics for the book return on equity and the historic market cost of equity are all significantly negative, indicating that smaller firms of all

These three factors are the Market factor; measured as the return of the market portfolio over the risk-free rate, the Size factor; measured as the difference between the

- A list and critique of existing small business definitions used by public and private sectors.. - An analysis of alternative definitions of small business such as

By allocating stocks into portfolios based on the cash flows between investors and companies, the FF5 model can explain the cross- sectional variation in returns and identify

momentum portfolio (WML) for various sizes of the number of stocks in the Winner and Loser portfolio based on a momentum strategy with evaluation period J=6 and holding period

(e.g., a portfolio with maximum included rank 70 with size 40 includes the worst (loser) and best (winner) ranked stocks at the end of the ranking period between rank 30 and 70)...

Het onderzoek van 2010 bracht bovendien de complexiteit van de vallei van de Molenbeek aan het licht: een oorspronkelijk vrij sterk hellend terrein met een dik pakket