• No results found

o B2: Questionnaire “Assessment Instrument”

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "o B2: Questionnaire “Assessment Instrument” "

Copied!
21
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Appendices

• Appendix A; The Pilot Study and Evaluation of Programme of Requirements o A1: Covering Letter

o A2: Questionnaire “Pilot Study”

• Appendix B: The Assessment Instrument o B1: Assessment Instrument Sheet

o B2: Questionnaire “Assessment Instrument”

o B3: Tables 1-5

• Appendix C: The Refined Assessment Instrument o C1: Operating Procedure

o C2: Refined Assessment Instrument

(2)

Appendix A1: Covering Letter

10 March, 2007

Dear Mr. Viljoen,

Many thanks for agreeing to provide some feedback on the instrument mentioned above.

The objective of my research is to enable Lumus to assess and select buyer organisations on their level of SCM development. This will enable Lumus to more effective and more efficient market the Lumus Standard and apply the accompanying consulting services. The assumption is that the higher the buyers’ level in SCM development is, the better the performance in this area and the better the chances are that the buyer succeeds in adopting a new supply chain practice like the Lumus Standard. Therefore, I have developed a “SCM Maturity Assessment Instrument” with which Lumus can get an indication of an organisation’s ability to implement the Standard properly.

A SCM maturity assessment works as follows. The buyer will be able to self-administer the assessment. A buyer receives a questionnaire, 5 tables, and a SCM maturity assessment sheet. Together these three components cover the assessment instrument. The tables can be used to answer the questions of the questionnaire. The numbers of the questions relate to the numbers of the relating indicators on the sheet. The answers can be filled in on the SCM maturity assessment sheet. Subsequently, an average of each criterion can be determined. The overall score is with the lowest average criterion, as the criteria should be in-alignment. The performance of the organisation in SCM is

therefore as high as the weakest criterion.

In order to improve the assessment instrument’s format, clarity, and intelligibility a pilot study will be performed. Your completion of the pilot study questionnaire (Enclosure 1) will contribute significantly to this goal.

Apart from the pilot study questionnaire, I enclosed the following documents for you to refer to:

• Enclosure 2: SCM Maturity Assessment Questionnaire

• Enclosure 3: SCM Maturity Assessment Sheet

• Enclosure 4: SCM Maturity Assessment Tables 1- 5

If possible, I would like to finalise the assessment instrument and my research end of March. Therefore, I would be grateful if you could complete the pilot study questionnaire, and return it by email or skype within one week. My email address is charlotte.plattel@gmail.com. Any responses, even if incomplete, would be highly appreciated.

I appreciate your time and assistance in my research process. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions at +31-641054567, by email: charlotte.plattel@gmail.com, or by using skype.

Again, thank you very much.

Sincerely, Charlotte Plattel

What do you think of the enclosed SCM Maturity Assessment Instrument?

(3)

Appendix A2: Pilot Study Questions

Questionnaire

¾ If not, which questions you do not understand?

Tables

¾ Do you feel that the formulated characteristics of the indicators match the suggested maturity level?

Criteria and Indicators

¾ Would you like to drop one or more criteri(a)(on)?

¾ If not, would you like to drop one or more indicators?

Maturity Levels

¾ Would you change one or more descriptions of levels to make them more appropriate?

Overall Assessment Instrument

¾ Do you have a suggestion for an additional answer?

¾ Are the questions clear to you? (Language)

¾ If not, which questions are not clear?

¾ Are the questions intelligible to you? (Knowledge of indicators)

¾ Will indicators you are unfamiliar with become intelligible with the help of the tables?

¾ Which indicators are not understood after reading the tables?

¾ Are the indicators with which you already are familiar correctly characterised for each maturity level?

¾ Do you feel that the five criteria cover for the domain of SCM?

¾ Would you like to add one or more criteri(a)(on)?

¾ Do you feel that the indicators capture the domain of the criteria?

¾ If not, would you like to add one or more indicators?

¾ Do the five maturity levels capture the full spectrum of SCM development levels?

¾ If not, would you add or drop a level to have the full spectrum of maturity levels?

¾ To what extent do you view the complete assessment instrument (questionnaire, sheet, tables) as clear and intelligible?

¾ What do you think of the presentation of the complete assessment instrument?

(4)

Appendix B1: SCM Maturity Assessment Sheet

Maturity Level Indicators Maturity Criteria Indicators

1 2 3 4 5

Average Criteria

Score

1

Vision on supply chain

2

Management support

3

SCM’s role in

corporate strategy

4

The prioritization of SCM

projects

5

Strategy framing

Collaborative Enterprise

6

Strategy towards suppliers

7

Process structures

8

Management of the SCM-

organisation relationship

9

Continuous process

improvement

Operations Management &

Business Process Management

10

Business Process Management discipline

11

Cultural support

12

Attitude

13

Change readiness

14

Organisational structure

Organisational Behaviour

15

SCM jobs

16

Information policies

17

Primary systems

18

Standards

19

Architectural integration

Information & Communication

Management

20

Management of the IT- SCM-organisation

21

Scope of measures

22

Process measures

23

Measurement and

management of suppliers

24

Benchmarking of best

practices

Performance

Measurement/Management &

Decision Support

25

Facilitation of decision making

Overall SCM Maturity Score:

(5)

Appendix B2: Questionnaire SCM Maturity Assessment Instrument

The following 25 questions relate to 25 indicators with which SCM Maturity can be assessed. For each indicator a certain maturity level should be determined. There are 5 possible maturity levels that can be chosen. These maturity levels will be described now.

Maturity Level 1 or Ad-Hoc

Processes are unstructured and ill-defined. Process measures are not in place and the jobs and organizational structures are based upon the traditional functions, not horizontal processes.

Individual heroics and ‘working around the system’ are what makes things happen.

Maturity Level 2 or Defined

Basic procedures are defined and documented. Changes to these processes must now go through a formal procedure. Jobs and organizational structures include a process aspect, but remain traditional. Representatives from functions meet regularly to coordinate with each other concerning process activities, but only as representatives of their traditional functions.

Maturity Level 3 or Linked

The breakthrough level. Managers employ process management with strategic intent. Broad process jobs and structures are put in place outside of traditional functions. Cooperation between intra-company functions, vendors and customers takes the form of teams that share common process measures and goals.

Maturity Level 4 or Integrated

The company, its vendors and suppliers, take cooperation to the process level. Organizational structures and jobs are based on process, and traditional functions, as they relate to the supply chain, begin to disappear altogether. Process measures and management systems are deeply embedded in the organisation. Advanced process management practices take shape.

Maturity Level 5 or Extended

Competition is based upon multi-firm networks. Collaboration between legal entities is routine to the point where advanced process practices that allow transfer of responsibility without legal ownership are in place. Trust and mutual dependency are the glue holding the extended network together. A horizontal, customer-focused, collaborative culture is firmly in place.

The answers on the questions can be filled in on the SCM Maturity Assessment Sheet. As can be

seen in the sheet, the answers should be either 1, 2, 3, 4,or 5, corresponding to the described

maturity levels above. To help you identify the maturity level for each indicator, the enclosed

tables 1-5 describe the characteristics of each maturity level for each indicator. For example,

question 1 relates to question 1, vison on supply chain and can be identified with the help of

Table 1: The Collaborative Enterprise. Each table representing one criteria. Table 1 represents

criterion 1, table 2 represents criteria 2 and so on.

(6)

Enterprise Collaboration

1) Which level of maturity best describes visibility of the supply chain in your organisation?

2) Which level of maturity best describes managerial support in your organisation?

3) Which level of importance best describes your organisation regarding the role that SCM plays in planning the corporate strategy?

4) Which level of maturity best describes the prioritisation of SCM projects in your organisation?

5) What description of strategy framing best reflects the way the strategy in your organisation is framed?

6) Which level of strategy maturity towards suppliers’ best describes your organisation?

Operations Management & Business Process Management

7) Which level of maturity best describes the process structure in your organisation?

8) Which level of relationship maturity between SCM and senior management (or possible partners) best describes your organisation?

9) Which level of maturity best describes (continuous) process re-design activities in your organisation?

10) To what extent does your organisation use the concept of BPO/BPM in the process of re- engineering activities?

Organisational Behavior

11) Which level of maturity best describes the cultural support apparent in your organisation?

12) Which level of maturity in attitude towards suppliers’ best describes your organisation?

13) Which level of maturity best describes change readiness in your organisation, looking at the available HRM tools?

14) Which level of maturity as regards organisational structure best describes your organisation?

15) Which level of maturity best describes the SCM jobs used in your organisation?

(7)

Information & Communication Management

16) Which level of maturity best describes the sharing of information in your organisation?

17) Which level of SCM maturity best matches the role of primary IT systems in your organisation?

18) Which level of maturity in architectural integration, looking at whom initiates alignment efforts and the reward system, best describes your organisation?

19) Which level of maturity best describes the Standards used in your organisation?

20) Which level of maturity best describes management of the relationship between SCM, IT, and the organisation in your organisation?

Performance Measurement/Management & Decision Support

21) Which level of maturity applies to the scope of measures used in your organisation?

22) Which level of maturity best describes the management of measurement results in your organisation?

23) Which level of maturity best describes the measurement and management of suppliers in your organisation?

24) Which level of maturity best describes the active benchmarking of best practices in your organisation?

25) Which level of maturity best describes the facilitation of decision making in your

organisation?

(8)

Appendix B3: Table 1 - The Collaborative Enterprise

Ad-Hoc Defined Linked Integrated Extended

Vision on supply chain

Blurred vision on supply chain,

focus on piecemeal implementation

The organisation forms a view of

the intra- company supply

chain.

Reasonable visibility of one tier up and down

the chain

Organisation forms a total view of the supply chain.

Vision that aims for total integration, exchange of vision on the supply chain with partners

Sharp focus on the ultimate

consumer, linkage with strategy and consequently

the need for measurable

goals to determine supply chain

efforts

Vision of competition based upon multi-firm networks

Management support

Ignorance. No apparent motivators.

Project management not considered

important

Insufficient motivation to take authority away from functional managers, little

support, willingness exists to address

internal issues

Organisation must undertake major important projects in order

to survive, projects are

linked to strategy

Project management

efficiently perceived to be closely linked to organisational success, centers

of excellence to pursue improvements

The organisational

strategy is heavily dependent on

projects.

Examples include new products, supply

chain design, capital investment

SCM’s role in

corporate strategy planning

Not involved Some SCM input and cross- functional planning.

Enables business processes

SCM and organisation jointly determine the SCM strategy

planning.

SCM drives business processes

The integrated organisation determines the

SCM strategy planning

Partners priorities are

considered

The prioritisation of

SCM projects

React to organisational or

SCM need

Determined by

SCM function Determined by

organisation Mutually

determined Partners priorities are

considered

Strategy framing

Strategies framed in terms

of functions

Strategies framed in terms

of integrated processes

Strategies framed around

core competences

Emphasis on relationships, extended processes/

outsourcing

Strategies framed in collaborative terms, value chain goals with

plans for achievement

Strategy

towards suppliers

Clerical and reactive

Commercial and elimination of

transactional activities

Savings and proactive and

top management

support

Supplier integration

Customer value and core competencies

based

(9)

Appendix B3: Table 2 - Operations Management and Business Process Management/

Engineering

Ad-Hoc Defined Linked Integrated Extended

Process structures

Functional supply chain

processes

Start with cross functional SC planning and source team

Basic process structure, discrete supply chain processes

are well understood and

documented

Integrated Companywide infrastructure Partners along the supply chain

start to collaborate,

common processes occur

Multicompany business

process alignment/

Outsourcing

Management of the SCM- organisation

relationship

SCM- organisation relationship is not managed/

Managed on an ad hoc basis

Processes exist but not always

followed

Processes exist and complied

with

Processes are continuously

improved

SCM processes are managed by organisation and

(multiple) partner(s)

Continuous process improvement

Heavy emphasis on lead time

mentality Customer satisfaction is

low

Basic SCM processes are

defined and documented.

Customer satisfaction has improved but is

still low

Continuous improvement

efforts take place focused on root cause elimination and

performance improvements.

Customers are included in

process improvement

efforts

Process improvement goals are set by

the teams and achieved with confidence.

Customer satisfaction

becomes a competitive advantage

Emphasis on responsiveness.

joint investments in

improving the system are shared, as are

the returns

Business Process Management

discipline

Occasional use of BPM methodology initiated at lower

levels

Concerted effort to use BPM.

Cost and schedule controls are

used

Single, informal approach used on all types of

projects

Company looks outside for

upgrading management of

business processes

Changes are made to organisations

own BPM management

processes

(10)

Appendix B3: Table 3 - Organisational Behaviour

Ad-Hoc Defined Linked Integrated Extended

Cultural support

None.

Functional orientation.

Unaware of the need for management

support.

Awareness exists for need of management

support. Little senior management

support.

Willingness exists to address

internal issues.

Management culture is compliant to

SCM development

role.

Management teams are

active, accepting, participating.

Cultural barriers are eliminated.

Individuals are aware of the need

for improving SCM processes.

Project teams are formed to address inter- organisational

issues

Cultural compatibility

between supply partners.

Attitude towards buyers and

suppliers

Clerical or commercial oriented, buyer

& function oriented

Contract oriented on

buyer

Training and skills development &

sell procurement function in own

organisation

Buyer and planner coordination &

cross functional teams & career path development

programs

Customer service driven

Change readiness

Tend to resist change

Change readiness programs emerging/

Programs in place at functional level

Programs emerging at corporate level

Programs in place at corporate level

Leading organisations

invest in the skills of channel partners

Organisational structure

Teaming within functions rarely occur, functional

managers are obsessed with local optimums

Occasionally occur between

functions.

Senior management emphasizes the

need for cross- functional

teaming

Regularly occur for function management.

Emphasis in inter-firm relationships is on collaboration

Inter-functional teaming regularly occur at all levels throughout the organisation and

partner employees take

place in these teams as well

Teaming is regularly inter- organisational.

More formal commitments

between partners originate

SCM jobs

Jobs are not based on horizontal supply chain

processes

Jobs and organisation basically remain

traditional

Broad SCM jobs are put in place

on top of traditional functions.

Personnel policies that stress resourcefulness

Multi-firm SCM jobs take

shape

(11)

Appendix B3: Table 4 - Information and Communication Management

Ad-Hoc Defined Linked Integrated Extended

Information policies

Information policies that feature strict

security

Unidirectional flow of information from buyer to supplier

Information policies that allow for information sharing with chain members.

Bidirectional information

flows.

Focus on exchanging- sharing data among partners.

Customers feedback is considered highly important

Policies that allow members

of the value chain to collaborate in the design and development of products and other forms of value chain

planning

Primary

systems

Cost of doing

business Becoming an

asset Enables future organisational

activity

Drives future organisational

activity

Partner with business in creating value

Architectural integration

IT takes all the risks, receives

no reward

IT takes most risks with little

reward

IT, SCM, organisation start sharing risks, rewards

Risks, rewards always shared

Managers incented to take

risks

Standards

Not involved Enables organisational

processes

Drives organisational

processes

Enables or drives organisational

strategy

IT, organisation adapt quickly to

change

Management of the IT-SCM- organisation relationship

SCM-IT- organisation relationship is not managed/

Managed on an ad hoc basis

Processes exist but not always

followed

Processes exist and are in

general complied with

Processes are complied with and shared

goals are stressed

Processes are continuously

improved

(12)

Appendix B3: Table 5 - Performance Measurement/ Management and Decision Support

Ad-Hoc Defined Linked Integrated Extended

Scope of measures

No metrics/

Individual metrics based

on functional areas.There is no evidence of the recognition

of the key business processes

Employs process-oriented

performance measures to ensure that

individual business activities and

tasks are co-ordinated effective and

efficient

Adopt measures that clarify critical value- added processes

across functional boundaries.

Adopt measures that truly promote collaboration.

Adopt measures that clarify critical value- added processes

across functional and organisational boundaries

(customer service, new

product introduction,

speed)

Evaluation of overall (chain)

performance and participating

members’

performance is possible

(overall examples are net profit, cash

flows, ROI, market growth,

market share)

Management

of measures

Process measures are

not in place.

Process performance is

unpredictable

Process performance is

more predictable.

Targets are defined but often missed

Continuous improvement

efforts take place focused on

performance improvements.

Process improvement goals are set by

the teams and achieved with

confidence

Process performance and reliability of

the extended system are

measured

Measurement and management

of suppliers

Control of purchase expenditure

Supplier base

management Contracting &

translation of corporate targets in procurement

targets

Performance based contracts

& define key performance indicators (KPI’s)

Service level agreements enterprise wide

& supplier his added value and risk evaluation &

customer service level agreements

Benchmarking

of best practices

Seldom or never Sometimes benchmark informally

May benchmark formally, seldom act to address

specific problems or weaknesses

Routinely benchmark,

usually act

Routinely benchmark, act on, and measure

results

Facilitation of decision

making

Basic SCM information practices (understanding

seasonality, buying patterns)

Basic information

systems, methods and

discipline) constructed for a

functional silo organisational

structure (performance measurement of

suppliers and buyers)

Advanced information

systems practices

Supplier and customer focused tools and techniques

(performance management of

suppliers and buyers)

Business Intelligence systems for analyzing information drawn from the

entire value chain

(13)

Appendix C1: Refined SCM Maturity Assessment Questionnaire

The following 25 questions relate to 25 indicators with which SCM Maturity can be assessed. For each indicator a certain maturity level should be determined. There are 5 possible maturity levels that can be chosen. These maturity levels will be described first.

Maturity Level 1 or Ad-Hoc

Processes are unstructured and ill-defined. Process measures are not in place and the jobs and organizational structures are based upon the traditional functions, not horizontal processes. Individual heroics and ‘working around the system’ are what makes things happen.

Maturity Level 2 or Defined

Basic procedures are defined and documented. Changes to these processes must now go through a formal procedure. Jobs and organizational structures include a process aspect, but remain traditional.

Representatives from functions meet regularly to coordinate with each other concerning process activities, but only as representatives of their traditional functions.

Maturity Level 3 or Linked

The breakthrough level. Managers employ process management with strategic intent. Broad process jobs and structures are put in place outside of traditional functions. Cooperation between intra-company functions, vendors and customers takes the form of teams that share common process measures and goals.

Maturity Level 4 or Integrated

The company, its vendors and suppliers, take cooperation to the process level. Organizational structures and jobs are based on process, and traditional functions, as they relate to the supply chain, begin to disappear altogether. Process measures and management systems are deeply embedded in the organisation. Advanced process management practices take shape.

Maturity Level 5 or Extended

Competition is based upon multi-firm networks. Collaboration between legal entities is routine to the point where advanced process practices that allow transfer of responsibility without legal ownership are in place.

Trust and mutual dependency are the glue holding the extended network together. A horizontal, customer- focused, collaborative culture is firmly in place.

The answers on the questions can be filled in on the SCM Maturity Assessment Sheet. As can be seen in the sheet, the answers should be either 1, 2, 3, 4,or 5, corresponding to the described maturity levels above. To help you identify the appropriate maturity level for each indicator, the characteristics of each indicator for each maturity level are included in the sheet as well.

For example, question 1, corresponds with indicator 1 (vision on the supply chain) in the SCM

Maturity Sheet. On this sheet, five different visions on the supply chain are described

corresponding to the five maturity levels described above. In the empty colomn on the right, you

write down the appropriate vision present in your organisation.

(14)

Enterprise Collaboration

1) Which level of SCM maturity best describes top managements vision on visibility of the supply chain in your organisation?

2) Which level of SCM maturity best describes the managerial support for SCM in your organisation?

3) Which level of SCM maturity, regarding the significance of the role of SCM in the formulation of corporate strategy best describes your organisation?

4) Which level of SCM maturity best describes the prioritisation of SCM projects in your organisation?

5) Which level of SCM maturity best describes the way the corporate strategy is phrased (framed)?

6) Which level of SCM maturity in strategy towards suppliers’ best describes your organisation?

Operations Management & Business Process Management

7) Which level of SCM maturity best describes the process structure in your organisation?

8) Which level of relationship maturity between SCM and top management (or possible partners) best describes your organisation?

9) Which level of SCM maturity best describes (continuous) process re-design activities in your organisation?

10) To what extent (which maturity level) does your organisation use the concept of BPO/BPM (Business Process Orientation/ Business Process Management) in the process of streamlining and re-designing the organisation?

Organisational Behavior

11) Which level of SCM maturity as regards a SCM supportive culture best describes the culture present in your organisation?

12) Which level of SCM maturity best describes your organisation’s attitude towards buyers and suppliers’?

13) Which level of SCM maturity best describes change readiness in your organisation, looking at the available HRM tools and historical change management practices?

14) Which level of SCM maturity regarding teamwork behaviour in the organisational structure best describes your organisation?

15) Which level of SCM maturity best describes the SCM positions designated in your

organisation?

(15)

Information & Communication Management

16) Which level of SCM maturity best describes the sharing of information in your organisation?

17) Which level of SCM maturity best matches the role of IT systems in your organisation?

18) Which level of SCM maturity best describes the use of standards (o.g. ISO 2001) in your organisation?

19) Which level of SCM maturity in architectural integration of IT systems, looking at whom initiates alignment and integration efforts and who receives the credits, best describes your organisation?

20) Which level of SCM maturity best characterises relationship management between SCM, IT, and top management in your organisation?

Performance Measurement/Management & Decision Support

21) Which level of SCM maturity relates to the scope of measures used in your organisation?

22) Which level of SCM maturity best describes the management of measurement results in your organisation?

23) Which level of SCM maturity best describes the measurement and management of suppliers by your organisation?

24) Which level of SCM maturity best describes the active benchmarking of best practices in SCM in your organisation?

25) Which level of SCM maturity best describes the facilitation of decision making in your

organisation?

(16)

Appendix C2: Refined SCM Maturity Assessment Sheet Maturity Level Indicators Maturity Criteria Indicators

Ad-Hoc (1)

Defined (2)

Linked (3)

Integrated (4)

Extended (5)

Score

(1 - 5)

1

Vision on supply chain

Blurred vision on supply chain, focus on

piecemeal implementation

The organisation forms a view of the intra- company supply chain.

Reasonable visibility of one tier up and down

the chain

Organisation forms a total view of the supply

chain. Vision that aims for total integration, exchange of vision on the supply chain with partners

Sharp focus on the ultimate consumer, linkage with strategy and consequently the need for measurable goals to determine supply chain efforts

Vision of competition based upon multi-firm

networks

2

Management support

Ignorance. No apparent motivators.

Project management not considered

important

Insufficient motivation to take authority away

from functional managers, little support, willingness

exists to address internal issues

Organisation must undertake major important projects in

order to survive, projects are linked to

strategy

Project management efficiently perceived to

be closely linked to organisational success, centers of excellence to pursue

improvements

The organisational strategy is heavily dependent on projects.

Examples include new products, supply chain

design, capital investment

3

SCM’s role in corporate strategy

planning

Not involved

Some SCM input and cross-functional planning. Enables business processes

SCM and organisation jointly determine the SCM strategy planning.

SCM drives business processes

The integrated organisation determines the SCM

strategy planning

Partners priorities are

considered

4

The prioritization of SCM

projects React to organisational

or SCM need Determined by SCM

function Determined by

organisation Mutually determined Partners priorities are

considered

5

Strategy phrasing Strategies framed in terms of functions

Strategies framed in terms of integrated

processes

Strategies framed around core competences

Emphasis on relationships, extended processes/

outsourcing

Strategies framed in collaborative terms, value chain goals with

plans for achievement

6

Strategy towards

suppliers Clerical and reactive Commercial and elimination of transactional activities

Savings and proactive and top management

support Supplier integration Customer value and core competencies

based

Collaborative

Enterprise

(17)

Maturity Level Indicators Maturity Criteria Indicators

Ad-Hoc (1)

Defined (2)

Linked (3)

Integrated (4)

Extended (5)

Score

(1 - 5)

7

Process structure Supply chain processes within the

SCM department

Start with cross functional SC planning

and source team

Basic process structure throughout

the organisation, discrete supply chain

processes are well understood and

documented

Integrated Companywide infrastructure Partners along the supply chain start to collaborate,

basic inter-firm processes occur

Multicompany business process

alignment/

Outsourcing

8

Management of the SCM-organisation

relationship

SCM-organisation relationship is not managed/ Managed

on an ad hoc basis

Processes exist but not

always followed Processes exist and

are complied with Processes are continuously improved

SCM processes are managed by organisation and

(multiple) partner(s)

9

Continuous process improvement

Heavy emphasis on lead time mentality Focus on customer satisfaction is low

Basic SCM processes are defined and

documented.

Customer satisfaction focus has improved

but is still low

Continuous improvement efforts take place focused on root cause elimination and performance

improvements.

Customers are included in process improvement efforts

Process improvement goals are set by the teams and achieved with confidence.

Customer satisfaction becomes a competitive

advantage

Emphasis on responsiveness. joint

investments in improving the system are shared, as are the

returns

10

Business Process Management discipline

Occasional use of BPM methodology initiated

at lower levels

Concerted effort to use BPM. Cost and schedule controls are

used

Single, informal approach used on all

types of projects

Company looks outside for upgrading management of business processes

Changes are made to organisations own BPM management

processes

Operations Management &

Business Process Management/

Engineering

Average Criterion Score …

(18)

Maturity Level Indicators Maturity Criteria Indicators

Ad-Hoc

(1) Defined

(2) Linked

(3) Integrated

(4) Extended

(5)

Score

(1 - 5)

11

Cultural support

None. Functional orientation. Unaware

of the need for top management support.

Awareness exists for need of top management support.

Little senior management support.

They are willing to address internal

issues.

Management culture regard SCM as

strateguically important.

Management teams are active, accepting,

participating.

Cultural barriers are eliminated.

Individuals are aware of the need for improving SCM processes. Project teams are formed to

address inter- organisational issues

Cultural compatibility between supply

partners.

12

Attitude towards buyers

and suppliers Clerical or commercial

oriented Contract oriented on buyer and supplier

Training and skills development & sell procurement function

in own organisation

Buyer and supplier coordination & cross

functional teams &

career path development programs

Customer service driven, value chain

oriented

13

Change readiness (looking at HRM and

historical practices)

Tend to resist change

Change readiness programs emerging/

Programs in place at functional level

Change programs emerge at corporate

level

Change programs in place at corporate

level

Leading organisations invest in the skills of

channel partners

14

Teamwork behaviour

Teamwork within departments rarely

occur, functional managers are occupied with achievind local

optimums

Occasionally occur between departments.

Senior management emphasizes the need for cross-functional

teamwork

Regularly occur for function management.

Emphasis in inter-firm relationships is on

collaboration

Inter-functional teamwork regularly

occur at all levels throughout the organisation and partner employees participate in these teams as well

Teamwork is regularly inter-organisational.

More formal commitments between

partners originate

regarding coopeartion

15

SCM positions Positions are not based on horizontal supply chain processes

Positions and organisation basically

remain traditional

Broad SCM positions are put in place on top of traditional functions.

Personnel policies stress the importance

of commemorate qualified and experience staff in the

respective SCM positions

Multi-firm SCM

functions take shape

Organisational Behaviour

Average Criterion Score …

(19)

Maturity Level Indicators Maturity Criteria Indicators

Ad-Hoc (1)

Defined (2)

Linked (3)

Integrated (4)

Extended (5)

Score

(1 - 5)

16

Information policies Information policies that feature strict

security

Unidirectional flow of information from buyer

to supplier

Information policies that allow for information sharing with chain members.

Bidirectional information flows.

Focus on exchanging- sharing data among partners. Customers feedback is considered

highly important

Policies that allow members of the value chain to collaborate in

the design and development of products and other forms of value chain

planning

17

IT systems Cost of doing business Becoming an asset Geared to future operational improvement

Drives future organisational transformation

Partner with business partners in creating

value

18

Architectural integration

of IT systems IT takes all the risks,

receives no reward IT takes most risks with little reward

IT, SCM, organisation start sharing risks,

rewards

Risks, rewards always

shared Managers incentivised

to take risks

19

Standards Not involved Documents

organisational processes

Organisational processes are embedded in standards

Influences or drives

organisational strategy IT, organisation adapt

quickly to change

20

Management of the IT- SCM- top management

relationship

SCM-IT-top management relationship is not managed/ Managed on an ad hoc basis by

the financial function

Processes exist but not always followed

Processes exist and are mostly complied

with

Processes are complied with and

shared goals are defined and communicated

Processes are continuously improved

upun through collaborative

measurement

Information &

Communication Management

Average Criterion Score …

(20)

Maturity Level Indicators Maturity Criteria Indicators

Ad-Hoc (1)

Defined (2)

Linked (3)

Integrated (4)

Extended (5)

Score

(1 - 5)

21

Scope of performance measures

No metrics/ Individual metrics based on functional areas. There

is no evidence of the recognition of the key business processes

Employ process- oriented performance

measures to ensure that individual business activities and tasks are co-ordinated effective, and efficient

Adopt measures that clarify critical value-

added processes across functional boundaries. Adopt measures that truly promote collaboration.

Adopt measures that clarify critical value-

added processes across functional and

organisational boundaries (customer

service, new product introduction, speed)

Evaluation of overall (chain) performance and participating

members’

performance is possible (overall

measurement examples are net profit, cash flows, ROI)

22

Process measures

Process measures are not in place. Process

performance is unpredictable

Process performance is more predictable.

Targets are defined but often missed

Continuous improvement efforts take place focused on

performance improvements.

Process improvement goals are set by the teams and pursued with confidence

Process performance and reliability of the extended system are

measured

23

Measurement and management of

suppliers

Control of purchase expenditure

Supplier base is managed and

maintained

Contracting &

translation of corporate targets in procurement targets

Performance based contracts & define key performance indicators (KPI’s) in all supplier

contracts

Enterprise wide Service level agreements & supplier

added value and risk evaluation & customer

service level agreements in place

24

Benchmarking of best

SCM practices Seldom or never done Sometimes benchmark informally based on

sample quotes

May benchmark formally, seldom act to

address specific problems or weaknesses

Routinely benchmark, usually act

Routinely benchmark, act on, and measure

results

25

Facilitation of decision making

Basic SCM information practices (understanding seasonality, buying

patterns)

Basic information systems, methods and discipline) constructed for a functional silo

organisational structure (performance

measurement of suppliers and buyers)

Advanced information systems practices

Collaboration between supplier and buyer.

Supplier and customer focused tools and

techniques (performance management of suppliers and buyers)

Business Intelligence systems for analyzing information drawn from the entire value

chain. System integration with buyers

and suppliers

Performance Measurement/

Management &

Decision Support

Average Criterion Score …

(21)

Appendix D: List of Abbreviations and Glossary

BPO = Business Process Orientation BPM = Business Process Management cdm = conceptual diagnosis model SC = Supply Chain

SCM = Supply Chain Management

Business Process is a collection of activities that takes one or more kinds of input and creates an output that is of value to the customer. Business processes are for example customer relationship management, procurement, and product development (Romano: 2003: 120).

Business Process Orientation/ Managemement is the structural ability of managing extended processes within and beyond the single organisation’s boundaries with the objective to optimally design and manage these extended business processes in order to concurrently and seamlessly design, manufacture and deliver the products (eliminating waste).

Buyers are in practice not just the big organisations. Actually even a very small SME can have many suppliers and should be called a buyer. In this research, the definition of a buyer is set by the Lumus management and refers to buyer organisations and larger supplier organisations in target market segments.

Commonality is a shared feature or attribute.

Lumus Standard is the Lumus product in all its applications. In this research most likely the Lumus Standard is meant as a buyer application. The Standard belongs to the category of supply chain intelligence systems and can be used in the field of supply chain integration practices. Specifically in the procurement function.

Supply Chain Management Maturity is a level of development achieved in supply chain management. The assessment instrument measures this development level.

Supply Chain Collaboration is often defined as two or more chain members working together to create a competitive advantage through sharing information, making joint decisions, and sharing benefits which result from greater profitability of satisfying end customer needs than acting alone (Simatupang e.a., 2002)

Supply Chain Management is the collaborative effort of multiple channel members to design, implement, and manage seamless value-added processes to meet the real needs of the end customer. The development and integration of people and technological resources as well as the coordinated management of materials, information, and financial flows underlie successful supply chain integration.

Readiness means that a buyer has achieved an appropriate level in supply chain management. It indicates if an organisation is ready to commence the Lumus Standard initiative. In this research, readiness will be measured as the alignment between the minimum requirements of Lumus and maturity extend of the buyer.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

By providing a holistic overview of the influence of the negotiation factors of Tactics, Trust and Process in B2B settings, hopefully, professionals (buyers and

Another important factor is the time frame as in the Bologna Declaration only a general goal of a European Higher Education Area till 2010 has been set, the countries

While it is assumed that the code is outdated, it does not mean that its objectives are different from the objectives of the HR department to „construct a

By means of a case study, I tested the proposition and it was supported that the higher organisational distance is present between the sender and receiver unit in

Chapter 5 is a discussion of both the theoretical and practical findings, as to which findings were remarkable or unexpected, differences with relation to the national culture of

The second part abstracts our research findings and highlights eight partly connected typical aspects of organizational crime: massiveness, collectivity, multiplicity, dynamics,

As explained in section 1.2, the necessities for an organisation to (1) embrace the need of the practice of change management in knowledge sharing

To achieve this goal, this study relies on a longitudinal cross-unit dataset, which allows studying the impact of turnover on objective performance data for two similar tasks with