The drive to control : how affect and motivation regulate cognitive control
2
0
0
Hele tekst
(2)
GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN
The rationale presented in the previous section suggests that affective valence (i.e., whether affect is positive or negative) may be an important determinant of cogni- tive control
This observation is in keeping with the assumption that (a) response conflict may be experienced as an aversive event that signals the need for adaptive control (Botvinick,
However, there is no evidence yet that conflict in correct responses triggers a similar adaptation (Egner & Hirsch, 2005). Using the motion VEP as an index of
In that study, both negative and positive IAPS pictures were shown to produce pupil dilation, a response reflecting emotional arousal which is associated with increased
We predicted stronger conflict-driven adaptation effects (i.e., reductions of flanker-induced interference after conflict trials) for participants with low pleasure levels
In order to reveal modulating effects of pleasure on the conflict trials preceding adaptation, we ran a second model that included regressors for incompatible
Brinkmann & Gendolla, 2007) and after negative mood inductions (Gendolla, 2000; van Steenbergen et al., 2010), and neural evidence suggesting potentiated
In order to test differential effort mobilization effects on the Stroop versus the flanker task, we analyzed pupil dilation during test trials as a function of congru-
