• No results found

Between politics and administration : compliance with EU Law in Central and Eastern Europe

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Between politics and administration : compliance with EU Law in Central and Eastern Europe"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Between politics and administration : compliance with EU Law in Central and Eastern Europe

Toshkov, D.D.

Citation

Toshkov, D. D. (2009, March 25). Between politics and administration : compliance with EU Law in Central and Eastern Europe. Between politics and administration: Compliance with EU law in Central and Eastern Europe. Retrieved from

https://hdl.handle.net/1887/13701

Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown)

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/13701

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

Stellingen behorende bij het proefschrift

Between Politics and Administration:

Between Politics and Administration:

Between Politics and Administration:

Between Politics and Administration:

Compliance with EU Law in Central and Eastern Europe Compliance with EU Law in Central and Eastern Europe Compliance with EU Law in Central and Eastern Europe Compliance with EU Law in Central and Eastern Europe

van Dimiter D. Toshkov

1. The EU enforcement efforts are very influential for the timing and extent of compliance in Central and Eastern Europe.

2. Low administrative capacity does not always lead to implementation delays: often, it only leads to less ambition in interpreting the European directive.

3. Increasing domestic policy-making capacity can delay transposition as more time is spent on adapting the EU directive to the national context.

4. Despite the overwhelming pressure of EU conditionality, government preferences in the new member states have been translated into the implementation outcomes.

5. Implementation problems in the ‘new’ member states are not of a different type and scale compared to the ‘old’ member states.

6. Mixed-method research designs are not a panacea.

7. Transposition within the deadline is only a necessary, but not a sufficient condition for compliance with EU law.

8. It is impossible to identify one best way to co-ordinate EU affairs at the national level.

9. Normative considerations drive the choice of a research topic but should be kept at bay from the analysis.

10. One learns most by teaching.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

The formulas present the policy position and the time used for transposition as a function of the distance of the EU policy x 1 from the ideal point x 0 and the two

Support for the EU, experience with civil service legislation, and government ideological diversity are all related to the number of non-transposed directives in CEE in

Figure 6.7 plots the predicted probabilities for internal market and environment directives being transposed on time for a different combination of parties in government

The indicator (A) will provide more valid estimates than indicator (B) if the Commission is more likely to (1) start an infringement procedure in case of notified measures but no

On the other hand, ambitious plans in the nature protection field did not lead to delay in the absence of problems with administrative capacity, since a lot of support

Curiously, some of the experience of Bulgaria and Romania in the specific policy areas of information society and nature protection fit quite well the picture

Specific Treaty provisions empower the Community to bring divergent national laws more in line with each other even though they are completely compatible with

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden. Downloaded