• No results found

Near-field imaging of coupled photonic-crystal microcavities

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Near-field imaging of coupled photonic-crystal microcavities"

Copied!
4
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Near-field imaging of coupled photonic-crystal microcavities

Citation for published version (APA):

Vignolini, S., Intonti, F., Zani, M., Riboli, F., Wiersma, D. S., Li, L., Balet, L. P., Francardi, M., Gerardino, A., Fiore, A., & Gurioli, M. (2009). Near-field imaging of coupled photonic-crystal microcavities. Applied Physics Letters, 94(15), 151103-1/3. [151103]. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3107269

DOI:

10.1063/1.3107269 Document status and date: Published: 01/01/2009

Document Version:

Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers)

Please check the document version of this publication:

• A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website.

• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.

• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers.

Link to publication

General rights

Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain

• You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.

If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:

www.tue.nl/taverne

Take down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at:

openaccess@tue.nl

providing details and we will investigate your claim.

(2)

Near-field imaging of coupled photonic-crystal microcavities

Silvia Vignolini,1 Francesca Intonti,2,a兲 Margherita Zani,2 Francesco Riboli,1 Diederik S. Wiersma,1Lianhe H. Li,3Laurent Balet,3Marco Francardi,4 Annamaria Gerardino,4Andrea Fiore,5and Massimo Gurioli2

1LENS and INFM-BEC, Via Nello Carrara 1, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy

2CNISM, Department of Physics and LENS, University of Florence, Via Nello Carrara 1, 50019 Sesto

Fiorentino, Italy

3

EPFL, Institute of Photonics and Quantum Electronics, Station 3, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

4

Institute of Photonics and Nanotechnology, CNR, via del Cineto Romano 42, 00156 Roma, Italy

5

COBRA Research Institute, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands 共Received 22 January 2009; accepted 6 March 2009; published online 14 April 2009兲

We report by means of near-field microscopy on the coupling between two adjacent photonic crystal microcavities. Clear-cut experimental evidence of the spatial delocalization of coupled-cavity optical modes is obtained by imaging the electromagnetic local density of states. We also demonstrate that it is possible to design photonic structures with selective coupling between different modes having orthogonal spatial extensions © 2009 American Institute of Physics. 关DOI:10.1063/1.3107269兴

Coupling between two spatially separated photonic crystal micro-cavity 共PC-MC兲 modes has been recently proposed for application in quantum information and communication.1,2 The cavity coupling of microresonators has been demonstrated in different systems such as microdisks,3pillar cavities,4,5and in PC-MCs,6and recently the idea has been used for applications in photonic devices such as lasers,7optical waveguides,8and memories.9Similar to the case of electronic states, in the ideal case of identical cavities and under the main prerequisites of frequency matching and spatial overlap, the coupling results in an en-ergy splitting of the modes and in the formation of delocal-ized “symmetric” and “antisymmetric” coupled modes. However, in real samples the presence of a double peak in the spectrum can be the signature either of cavity coupling or of fabrication induced dielectric disorder. In order to inves-tigate the cavity coupling conditions, one has to add infor-mation about the spatial distribution of the electric field. Coupled-cavity modes are delocalized over the two cavities, while in the uncoupled situation the field distribution results localized to either one of the two cavities.

In this letter, we study the coupling of PC-MCs by means of scanning near field microscopy 共SNOM兲, whose resolution is well below both the diffraction limit and the mode spatial extension.10–13 It has been recently shown that the near-field tip induced spectral shift map gives a direct and high fidelity mapping of the electromagnetic local den-sity of states 共LDOS兲.14 By imaging the LDOS we obtain clear-cut experimental evidences either of the spatial delocal-ization of modes over the two coupled PC-MCs or of the localization of the modes on a single PC-MCs in the case of large frequency mismatch.

We use a GaAs based heterostructure: three layers of high-density InAs QDs emitting at 1300 nm are grown by molecular beam epitaxy at the center of a 320-nm-thick GaAs membrane.15 The structure under consideration con-sists of a two-dimensional triangular lattice of air holes with lattice parameter a = 311 nm and filling fraction f = 35%,

where the cavity is formed by four missing holes organized in a diamond-like geometry共denominated D2 cavity, see in-set共I兲 in Fig.1where the topographic map is reported兲. Here we study both spectrally and spatially the coupling regime

a兲Electronic mail: intonti@lens.unifi.it.

FIG. 1. 共Color online兲 共a兲 Near-field spectrum of the single D2 PC-MC 共averaged on a region of 2⫻2 ␮m2兲. 关共b兲–共d兲兴 PL intensity maps associated to the M1-M3 modes; the holes surrounding the D2 defect are reported as white circles.关共e兲–共g兲兴 Spectral shift maps associated to the M1-M3 modes; in particular the maximum spectral shift in共e兲 and 共f兲 is 0.2 nm, while in 共g兲 is 0.5 nm. 关共h兲–共j兲兴 Calculated electric field distribution of the M1-M3 modes at 30 nm above the photonic membrane. 共i兲 Topographic map as obtained during the SNOM scan. All the maps in 共b兲–共j兲 have the same spatial extension共1.3⫻1.6␮m2兲.

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS 94, 151103共2009兲

0003-6951/2009/94共15兲/151103/3/$25.00 94, 151103-1 © 2009 American Institute of Physics

(3)

for two different coupled systems. Henceforth we will refer to vertically 共horizontally兲 aligned D2 cavities if the major 共minor兲 diagonals of the two adjacent D2 cavities lie along the same line. In both cases the coupled cavities have a single-hole barrier. A room temperature commercial SNOM 共Twinsnom, OMICRON兲 is used in an illumination-collection geometry. The sample is excited with light from a diode laser 共780 nm兲 coupled into a chemically etched opti-cal fiber, which allows us to have a direct measurement of the LDOS through the spectral shift map.14 Photolumines-cence共PL兲 spectra from the sample were collected at each tip position through the same probe and the PL signal dispersed by a spectrometer was detected by a liquid nitrogen cooled InGaAs array with a low 共high兲 spectral resolution of 1 nm 共0.1 nm兲. Numerical calculations were performed with a commercial three-dimensional finite-difference time domain code 共CrystalWave, Photond兲. The calculations are per-formed using the nominal parameters of the structure, not including the effects of fabrication-induced disorder, with a refractive index of 3.48 and a grid of 25 nm. As excitation sources we employed randomly placed dipoles with different orientations.

In order to better understand the effects of the coupling, the main properties of a single D2 cavity are summarized in Fig.1. Figure1共a兲reports the spectrum and, in inset共I兲, the topographic map and a共x,y兲 reference system in the PC-MC plane with the vertical y 共horizontal x兲 axis aligned to the principal 共secondary兲 diagonals of the D2 cavity. Three peaks are observed in the spectrum, corresponding to three PC-MC modes 共labeled M1, M2, and M3兲. For each mode we report three spatial distributions: the PL intensity maps 关Figs. 1共b兲–1共d兲兴, the tip induced spectral shift maps 关Figs. 1共e兲–1共g兲兴, and the simulated LDOS maps 关Figs. 1共h兲–1共j兲兴 associated to each peak. The spectral shift reproduce the LDOS with much better fidelity than the PL intensity maps,14 as clearly shown in Fig.1. Note that the spatial resolution in the determination of the LDOS共measured by the full width at half maximum of the more confined lobe in the experi-mental spectral shift map兲 is of the order of 80 nm 共corre-sponding to the quite striking value of␭/16兲. The M1 mode is elongated along the y direction, the M2 mode is preva-lently elongated along the x direction, while the M3 mode is mainly distributed at the vertexes of a square. In the follow-ing discussion of the two coupled D2 cavities, we will con-centrate only on the M1 and M2 modes.

The coupled-cavity system can be generally described by two linearly coupled oscillators 共the modes of each iso-lated cavity in our case兲 obtaining the formula of the photo-nic splitting for coupled-cavity modes ⍀=

冑⌬

2+ 4g2 共where

⌬ is the disorder induced energy detuning and g is the cou-pling energy of the modes of each isolated cavity兲.6

Only for ⌬=0 that the photonic splitting ⍀ is a direct measurement of the coupling energy g; in the case ⌬Ⰷg the system is un-coupled and ⍀⬇⌬. In our case, the M1 and M2 modes of the D2 cavity have very distinct LDOS and are expected to show different coupling constants g in the horizontal and vertical coupling design.

In Fig.2the experimental results for horizontally共along x兲 coupled PC-MCs are compared with the calculated electric field intensity. The PL maps indicate that P1 and P2 are localized on a single cavity, and more precisely the PL signal associated to P1 is concentrated on the left cavity关Fig.2共b兲兴,

while the PL signal associated to P2 is concentrated on the right cavity关Fig.2共c兲兴. On the contrary the PL signal related to P3 and P4 is delocalized on the entire system 关Figs.2共d兲 and 2共e兲兴. The spectral shift maps permit to gain more in-sights into the nature of the different modes and to correlate them with the modes of a single D2 cavity. Both P1 and P2 resemble very closely the M1 mode of a single D2 cavity 关Fig.1共e兲兴, demonstrating that the coupling energy g for the M1 modes of the two horizontally aligned D2 cavities is very small, if any. This means that the spectral splitting of 2.6 meV between P1 and P2 has to be ascribed to the energy detuning ⌬ due to structural disorder in the cavity realiza-tion. A different situation occurs for P3 and P4 resonances. Their spectral shift maps strongly suggest that P3 and P4 are the two coupled-cavity modes originating from the M2 modes of the two D2 cavities. This is clearly demonstrated by the comparison of the experimental data for P3关Fig.2共h兲兴 with the corresponding simulated map of the LDOS, as re-ported in Fig.2共j兲. The spatial distribution of both the experi-mental and theoretical P3 LDOS is extended over the whole coupled system and is very similar to the electric field dis-tribution of two M2 modes关Fig.1共i兲兴 each centered at one of the two D2 cavities forming the horizontal coupled system. Analogous results are obtained for P4 关Figs.2共i兲 and2共k兲兴. Therefore the large splitting of P3 and P4 resonances is at-tributed to their electromagnetic coupling, but still we have to consider that the two D2 cavities are not identical. Only by joining the information obtained for the two M1 and M2 modes of the D2 cavity that we can extract the coupling energy g. Indeed, from a statistical analysis of several single D2 cavities we have found that even if the absolute position of the M1 and M2 modes shifts up to 9 meV due to structural disorder, their energy separation varies only up to 1 meV. Therefore we can assume that the 2.6 meV energy splitting between P1 and P2 is also an estimation of the cavity detun-ing ⌬ for the two M2 modes. Therefore by using ⍀ =

⌬2+ 4g2we obtain a coupling parameter g = 5.9 meV for

FIG. 2. 共Color online兲 共a兲 Near-field spectrum of the horizontally coupled D2 PC-MCs共averaged on a region of 2⫻3 ␮m2兲. Inset 共i兲: topographic map as obtained during the SNOM scan.关共b兲–共e兲兴 PL intensity maps asso-ciated to the peak P1-P4.关共f兲–共i兲兴 Spectral shift maps associated to the peak P1-P4; in particular the maximum spectral shift in共f兲 and 共g兲 is 0.3 nm, in 共h兲 is 0.5 nm, and in 共i兲 is 0.2 nm. 关共j兲 and 共k兲兴 Calculated electric field distribution of P3 and P4 at 30 nm above the photonic membrane. All the maps have the same spatial extension共2.4⫻2.0␮m2兲.

151103-2 Vignolini et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 151103共2009兲

(4)

the M2 modes in the horizontal共along x兲 geometry.

In Fig.3the experimental results for vertically共along y兲 coupled PC-MCs are compared with the calculated electric field intensity. The PL maps indicate that P1 and P2 are delocalized over the entire system 关Figs.3共b兲 and3共c兲兴, and from the spectral shift maps 关Figs. 3共f兲 and 3共g兲兴, we at-tribute them to the two coupled-cavity modes originating from the M1 mode of a single D2 cavity with an overall photonic splitting ⍀=11.7 meV. This attribution is clearly validated by the comparison of the experimental data 关Fig. 3共f兲兴 with the simulated map of the LDOS for P1, as reported in Fig.3共j兲. The spatial distribution of both the experimental and theoretical LDOS is extended over the whole coupled system and is very similar to the electric field distribution of two M1 modes关Fig.1共h兲兴 each centered at one of the two D2 cavities forming the vertical coupled system. Similar results are obtained for P2关Figs.3共g兲and3共k兲兴. P3 and P4 show a very small splitting 共0.8 meV兲, which, however, cannot be attributed to structural disorder. As demonstrated previously for P1 and P2 in the case of horizontally coupling, the fin-gerprint of frequency mismatch induced by disorder is the

localization of the LDOS over each single D2 cavity. The experimental near field maps of P3 and P4关Figs.3共d兲,3共e兲, 3共h兲, and3共i兲兴 are instead extended over the whole coupled system, demonstrating that these two modes are the symmet-ric and the antisymmetsymmet-ric coupled-cavity modes originating from the M2 mode of the two single D2 cavities. Therefore, in this particular sample and following the argument dis-cussed previously, the matching condition between the two independent D2 cavity modes is very well satisfied and the disorder induced detuning ⌬ is very small 共much less than 0.8 meV兲. The experimental splittings for both P1-P2 and P3-P4 are therefore a direct measurement of the coupling energy g, which turns out to be g = 5.9 meV for the M1 mode and g = 0.4 meV for the M2 mode. Finally, numerical simulations of the coupled systems give a mode splitting in agreement with the experimental findings and the theoretical values are g = 5.3 meV 共g=5.1 meV兲 for the vertical 共hori-zontal兲 alignment.

In summary, we addressed the photonic coupling of two closely spaced PC-MCs and by means of near field imaging, we demonstrated that it is possible to discriminate between the mode splitting due either to structural disorder or to mode coupling.

The authors thank Marco Prevedelli for helping in the automation of mask design. Financial support is acknowl-edged from the Swiss National Science Foundation.

1A. D. Greentree, C. Tahan, J. H. Cole, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, Nat. Phys.

2, 856共2006兲.

2D. Englund, A. Faraon, B. Zhang, Y. Yamamoto, and J. Vučković,Opt.

Express 15, 5550共2007兲.

3S. Ishii, A. Nakagawa, and T. Baba,IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.

12, 71共2006兲.

4M. Bayer, T. Gutbrod, J. P. Reithmaier, A. Forchel, T. L. Reinecke, P. A. Knipp, A. A. Dremin, and V. D. Kulakovskii,Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2582

共1998兲.

5M. Ghulinyan, C. J. Oton, G. Bonetti, Z. Gaburro, and L. Pavesi,J. Appl.

Phys. 93, 9724共2003兲.

6K. A. Atlasov, K. F. Karlsson, A. Rudra, B. Dwir, and E. Kapon, Opt.

Express 16, 16255共2008兲.

7S. V. Zhukovsky, D. N. Chigrin, A. V. Lavrinenko, and J. Kroha,Phys.

Rev. Lett. 99, 073902共2007兲.

8S. Mookherjea and A. Yariv,IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 8, 448 共2002兲.

9M. T. Hill, H. J. S. Dorren, T. De Vries, X. J. M. Leijtens, J. H. Den Besten, B. Smalbrugge, Y. S. Oel, H. Binsma, G. D. Khoe, and M. K. Smit,Nature共London兲 432, 206共2004兲.

10N. Louvion, D. Gérard, J. Mouette, F. de Fornel, C. Seassal, X. Letartre, A. Rahmani, and S. Callard,Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 113907共2005兲.

11P. Kramper, M. Kafesaki, C. M. Soukoulis, A. Birner, F. Müller, U. Gösele, R. B. Wehrspohn, J. Mlynek, and V. Sandoghdar,Opt. Lett. 29,

174共2004兲.

12S. I. Bozhevolnyi and L. Kuipers,Semicond. Sci. Technol.21, R1共2006兲. 13S. Vignolini, F. Riboli, F. Intonti, M. Belotti, M. Gurioli, Y. Chen, M. Colocci, L. C. Andreani, and D. S. Wiersma,Phys. Rev. E 78, 045603

共2008兲.

14F. Intonti, S. Vignolini, F. Riboli, A. Vinattieri, D. S. Wiersma, M. Colocci, L. Balet, C. Monat, C. Zinoni, L. H. Li, R. Houdré, M. Francardi, A. Gerardino, A. Fiore, and M. Gurioli, Phys. Rev. B 78, 041401共R兲

共2008兲.

15M. Francardi, L. Balet, A. Gerardino, C. Monat, C. Zinoni, L. H. Li, B. Alloing, N. Le Thomas, R. Houdré, and A. Fiore, Phys. Status Solidi C 3, 3693共2006兲.

FIG. 3. 共Color online兲 共a兲 Near-field spectrum of the vertically coupled D2 PC-MCs 共averaged on a region of 1.5⫻3.5 ␮m2兲. Inset 共i兲: topographic map as obtained during the SNOM scan. Inset共ii兲: near-field high resolution spectrum that resolves the contributions of P3 and P4.关共b兲–共e兲兴 PL intensity maps associated to the peak P1-P4.关共f兲–共i兲兴 Spectral shift maps associated to peak P1-P4; in particular the maximum spectral shift in共f兲 and 共g兲 is 0.15 nm, in共h兲 is 0.2 nm, and in 共i兲 is 0.1 nm. 关共j兲 and 共k兲兴 Calculated electric field distribution of P1 and P2 at 30 nm above the photonic membrane. All the maps have the same spatial extension共1.5⫻3.5 ␮m2兲.

151103-3 Vignolini et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 151103共2009兲

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

These disturbances could be suppressed by addition of 0.3 % of hydroxyethylcellulose (Polysciences, Warrington, Pa., U.S.A.), also purified by using a mixed-bed ion

A pull-out model such as the one used in the current study, where a group of children are taken out of their classroom for deliberate language stimulation on a

Dynamic spectrum management (DSM) aims to optimally al- locate per-user transmit spectra so that the effect of multi- user interference (crosstalk) is minimized and the capabili-

In Figure 2, the results of model M1 are compared with the ROC of the Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) 7 and the ROC of an old logistic regression model by Timmerman et al 9 applied

Figure 3 shows, in the last column, the spatial distribu- tion of the PL signal associated to mode M2 for three differ- ent polarization configurations 共 ␪ = 0 ° , 90° , 45°

These considerations not only explain the blueshift of the mode but, like for the case of a pure dielectric tip, by mapping the shift induced by the magnetic nano-object it is