An institutional analysis of Organic Development Strategies: The case of Woldwijk, Ten Boer, the Netherlands

(1)

An institutional analysis of Organic Development

Strategies: The case of Woldwijk, Ten Boer, the

Netherlands

(2)

2

(3)

3

(4)

4

(5)

5

(6)

6

(7)

7 9 11 12 14

15 15 17 20 23 31

33 33 34

43 46 47

61 62 64

65

66

69

(8)

8

(9)

9

(10)

10

(11)

11 1)

2)

3)

4)

(12)

12

(13)

13

Figure 3: The landscape of Woldwijk

(14)

14

(15)

15

(16)

16

(17)

17

(18)

18

(19)

19

(20)

20

(21)

21

(22)

22

(23)

23

(24)

24

1 Originally the action situation was enclosed within an action arena, which also included the set of actors as a separate component.

However, since the capabilities of actions can be attributed to the effect of the position rules defined below, Ostrom (2010) recommends abandoning this distinction between action situation and arena (McGinnis, 2011).

(25)

25

(26)

26 (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(27)

27

(28)

28

(29)

29

(30)

30

(31)

31

(32)

32

(33)

33

(34)

34

(35)

35

(36)

36

(37)

37

(38)

38

(39)

39

(40)

40

(41)

41

(42)

42

(43)

43

(44)

44

(45)

45

(46)

46

(47)

47

(48)

48

(49)

49

(50)

50

(51)

51

(52)

52

(53)

53

(54)

54

(55)

55

(56)

56

(57)

57

(58)

58

(59)

59

1 2 3 4 5 6

- - - 1

2

3

4

5 6

-

- -

-

- - -

-

1

2 3

- - -

-

(60)

60

4 5

6 7

-

- -

-

(61)

61

(62)

62

(63)

63

(64)

64

(65)

65

(66)

66

(67)

67

(68)

68

(69)

69

(70)

70

(71)

71

(72)

72

(73)

73

(74)

74

(75)

75

(76)

76

Codeerschema

Hoofdthema Subthema Examples Interview

Woldwijk General

Strength/weakness of Woldwijk

Problems in Woldwijk

Experiences in Woldwijk project in general

Positive / negative experiences

Community attributes Goals of involved actor(s) in Woldwijk Goal(s) of Woldwijk as a whole

IAD Framework Position rules Experiences of different roles &

positions

Experience regarding cooperation between different parties

Future perspectives/ideas regarding (changing) positions

Choice rules Which party has which responsibility Who is allowed to do what

Scope rules Physical possibilities in Woldwijk:

location of initiatives / timeframe License application: what is allowed and where?

License application: process

Possibilities current rules compared to desires of initiators

Aggregation rules Who decides about what

Experiences decision-making process Control/influence of involved parties / should this be changed

Procedures to be followed + eperiences Information rules Accessability of information

Experiences regarding

communication/sharing information Communication with other parties/

between initiators

Pay-off rules Ideas about who bears the costs and who gets the proceeds

(77)

77

Tensions Experienced tensions Community attributes:

Trust issues

Lack of common understanding

Relationship between initiators Dilemmas Savini

Intervention dilemma

Regulation dilemma

Investment dilemma Other

How to deal with tensions

Reflective Reflection Woldwijk so far What went well/what can be done better

Lessons for future perspectives

Best aspects of Woldwijk Innovative/creative/new/exciting

Are the right means available to make Woldwijk work

Yes / no / which

Future perspective of Woldwijk

Success or failure ?

(78)

78

-

- -

-

- -

(79)

79



(80)

80



(81)

81



(82)

82

(83)

83



(84)

84



(85)

85

(86)

86

(87)

87

(88)