• No results found

Better regulation in the European Union : lost in translation or full stream ahead? : the transposition of EU transport directives across member states

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Better regulation in the European Union : lost in translation or full stream ahead? : the transposition of EU transport directives across member states"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Better regulation in the European Union : lost in translation or full stream ahead? : the transposition of

EU transport directives across member states

Kaeding, M.

Citation

Kaeding, M. (2007, October 25). Better regulation in the European Union : lost in translation or full stream ahead? : the transposition of

EU transport directives across member states. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12391

Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded

from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12391

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

MI

131

Michael Kaeding

Better regula tion in the European Union

Better regulation in the European Union cannot be achieved without serious atten- tion to transposition of EU law into national legislation. As a matter of fact EU member states breach EU law – perpetuately.Why do member states miss deadlines when transposing EU internal market directives? What factors determine delays when transposing EU directives? How do these factors influence the timeliness of the national transposition processes? And under what conditions are transpositions of directives delayed? This study analyses the timeliness of national transposition processes across nine member states of the 2004 EU transport acquis.

Based on a truly mixed-method approach – a new quantitative data set with further insights gleaned from four controlled case studies and a concluding fuzzy set analy- sis - this study shows that the European Union has a serious transposition problem.

Almost 70 percent of all national legal measures transposing the transport acquis cause problems, either because they are transposed too late, risking the opening of an infringement proceeding, or because they are too early, risking warping effects on the regulatory environment for business and citizens in the EU (gold-plating) alike. Furthermore, this book provides some progress regarding the conditions under which transposition performance of member states could be improved.

Seven potential European and national drivers and constrainers for timely transpo- sition can be identified with different effects on the lengths of transposition delays.

Distinguishing between three outcomes of transposition process (on time, short and long delay) it is the specific features of European directives that account for short term delays, whereas serious time lags of more than six months are a result of domestic factors. Furthermore, the timing of general elections in a member state and policy sector-related crises retard or rather accelerate national transposition processes just as political priority represents a significant necessary condition for timeliness.

This is a volume in the series of the E.M. Meijers Institute of Legal Studies of Leiden University.This publication has been realized within the ‘Analyzing EU Policies:The Transposition of Directives’ research program of the Depart- ment of Public Administration at the Leiden Faculty of Social Sciences and is closely linked to the Law Faculty research program ‘Securing the Rule of Law in a World of Multilevel Jurisdiction’.

Michael Kaeding

Better regulation in the

European Union:

Lost in Translation

or Full Steam Ahead?

The transposition of EU transport directives

across member states

INSTITUUT VOOR RECHTSWETENSCHAPPELIJK

ONDERZOEK

E.M.

MEIJERS INSTITUUT

INSTITUUT VOOR RECHTSWETENSCHAPPELIJK

ONDERZOEK

E.M.

MEIJERS INSTITUUT

789087 280260 9

ISBN 978-90-8728-026-0

LEIDEN UNIVERSITY PRESS

LUP

Omslag Better regulations-def 07-08-2007 09:50 Pagina 1

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Although a handful of scholars have argued that successful implementation depends on the fit between European policy requirements and existing in- stitutions at the national

Directive 2001/13 (amending 95/18) establishes common rules for railway licensing Dir 2001/14 (replacing 95/19) establishes principles to gov- ern non-discriminatory alloca- tion

To determine the outcome of the game (when and who ends the game?) it is necessary to determine the players’ expected pay- offs, i.e. the difference between benefits and costs. Then,

The EU transport transposition data set covers the period of 1995-2004 and includes information on the first 367 national implementing measures in nine member states covering 67

In addition, the difference in mean and median values, which vary signifi- cantly across member states and policy sub-sectors, uncover three groups, namely: national

Dinstinct from the EU packages of directives, however, in most cases, national transposition packages are the re- sult of member states deciding to transpose a number of single

Plotting the deviance residuals for the statistical model against the transposi- tion delay for all 361 national implementing cases, we can see that they differ according to the

Member states, the Commission, and the EP agreed on a 18 months transpo- sition deadline (5 February 2004), which was the average transposition time guaranteed to all EU