• No results found

TOO MORAL TOO BE TRUE

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "TOO MORAL TOO BE TRUE"

Copied!
12
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

TOO MORAL TOO BE TRUE

THE EFFECTS OF CORPORATE MORAL HYPOCRISY ON MORAL OUTRAGE AND

RETRIBUTIVE BEHAVIOUR IN DIFFERENT INDUSTRIES

Bouwman, Tim

(2)

INTRODUCTION (1)

➔ 

Companies are increasingly using CSR to enhance financial and reputational

benefits

➔ 

However, media are constantly informing consumers about corporate misdonduct

and wrongdoing

➔ 

Leading to an increase in scepticism towards CSR

◆  Decreasing equity

◆  Negative word-of-mouth

(3)

INTRODUCTION (2)

➔ 

Hypocrisy arises when there is perceived inconsitency between the perception of a

company and the way a company frame their actions

➔  Company perception:

◆  Companies are judged alonside the dimensions of competence and morality

➔  Company framing

(4)

DIFFERENT TYPES OF HYPOCRISY

Campaign Framing

Pragmatic Moral

Company Perception Moral 2. Non-moral hypocrisy 3. No hypocrisy

Competent 3. No hypocrisy 1. Moral hypocrisy

RQ: “What will be the effects of different types of hypocrisy on moral outrage and

(5)

HYPOTHESIS 1:

Inconsistencies between the framing of a company and the perception of a company by consumers (hypocrisy) will lead to moral outrage with a stronger effect for moral hypocrisy than non-moral hypocrisy on moral outrage.

HYPOTHESIS 2:

Inconsistencies between the framing of a company and the perception of a company by consumers (hypocrisy) will lead to retributive behaviour with a stronger effect for moral hypocrisy t h a n n o n - m o r a l h y p o c r i s y o n retributive behaviour.

➔  Existing literature found that consumers will feel negative emotions when confronted with norm-violating behaviour and hypocrisy → moral outrage

◆  Angry ◆  Disgusted ◆  Annoyed

➔  Consumers who feel mistreated want retaliation i.e. they want to get back at the company

◆  Retributive behaviour

➔  Hypocritical crimes are punished harder

(6)

HYPOTHESIS 3:

Except for the direct effect of hypocrisy on retributive behaviour we also expect an indirect effect of hypocrisy on retributive behaviour through moral outrage

HYPOTHESIS 4:

The effects of different kinds of hypocrisy on retributive behaviour and moral outrage will be stronger for c o m p a n i e s c o m p e t i n g i n t h e environmental sensitive industries compared to companies competing in non-environmental sensitive industries

➔  Moral outrage and negative emotions will also lead to an increase in punishment (retributive behaviour)

➔  Therefore, we also expect an indirect effect of hypocrisy on retributive behaviour through moral outrage

➔  Companies can be perceived differently, but could industries also be perceived differently?

(7)
(8)

RESULTS

HYPOTHESIS 1:

PARTIALLY SUPPORTED

HYPOTHESIS 2:

PARTIALLY SUPPORTED

➔  As expected no effect for the consisstent conditions ➔  Moral hypocrisy did lead to an increase in moral outrage

◆  F(1, 347) = 37.143, p = 0.000, η2 = 0.097

➔  However, also no effect for non-moral hypocrisy

◆  F(1, 347) = 0.247, p = 0.619, η2 = 0.001

➔  As expected no effect for the consisstent conditions ➔  Moral hypocrisy did lead to an increase in retributive

behaviour

◆  F(1, 347) = 61.757, p = 0.000, η2 = 0.151

➔  However, also no effect for non-moral hypocrisy

(9)

HYPOTHESIS 3:

PARTIALLY SUPPORTED

HYPOTHESIS 4:

NOT SUPPORTED

➔  Direct effect was significant

◆  Moral behaviour, t = 2.8412, p = 0.0048, CI [0.1232, 0.6777] and competent behaviour, t = -4.7123, p = 0.0000, CI [-0.9711, -0.3991]

➔  Also, significant effect of the interaction on the mediator (moral outrage)

◆  b = -0.8930, t(347) = -3.8731, p = 0.0001, CI [-1.3465, -0.4395].

➔  Also significant effect of moral outrage on retributive behaviour

◆  b = 0.5173, t(346) = 11.2930, p = 0.0000, CI [0.4272, 0.6074]

➔  However, only a significant indirect effect for moral hypocrisy CI [-0.7319,

-0.3709], not for non-moral hypocrisy CI [-0.2399, 0.0591].

➔  Total interaction effects were not significant at all ◆  Moral outrage: F(1, 343) = 0.20, p = 0.888

(10)

DISCUSSION

➔  Companies will suffer from moral windowdressing

◆  Consumers will feel moral outrage and participate in retributive behaviour

◆  Also through the indirect effect

➔  However, there is no effect for non-moral hypocrisy

(11)

CONTRIBUTION

➔  Our results show companies are perceived differently and will therefore face different

consequences for their actions

➔  We have taken moral hypocrisy from a personal level to a corporate level

(12)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Als de beschikking is afgegeven en de startdatum duidelijk is worden de overeenkomsten tussen cliënt en ZZP’ers ingevuld en ondertekend, waar nodig door bewindvoerder en

Les instigateurs de ces discours pensent que l’on doit être prudent dans le travail avec les «assistants techniques» et en affaires avec les capitalistes

organisation/company to paying 25% of the rental price as a deposit 10 working days after receiving the invoice from BelExpo and the balance, being 75% of the rental price, at

Knowing about these two changes of object can help a chemist to be intelligible while using chemical language in the communication with non-chemi sts... gaat het helemaal

Het bestemmingsplan wordt aangepast in die zin dat de strook gelegen tussen de voorgevels van de geprojecteerde woningen en de bestemming Groen wordt bestemd als Tuin.. In

Bij het opnemen van de maximale emissie per bedrijf, moet worden opgemerkt dat deze regeling weliswaar is opgesteld om vooral de milieueffecten op de natuur zo te

Block copolymer micelles differ from miceUes formed by small amphiphiles in terms of size (polymeric micelles being larger) and degree of segregation between the

However, some major differences are discemable: (i) the cmc depends differently on Z due to different descriptions (free energy terms) of the system, (ii) compared for the