• No results found

Give Peas a Chance

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Give Peas a Chance"

Copied!
16
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Give Peas a Chance

(2)

Problem

statement &

Research question

Meat eating norm in western culture

Consumption of meat is rising

Negative effect on global warming

(3)

Dynamic norms

(4)

Dynamic norms

vs. Static norms

Dynamic: That means that, in recent years, 3 in 10

people have changed their behaviour and begun to eat less meat than they otherwise would.

Static: That means that 3 in 10 people eat less meat than they otherwise would.

Why do dynamic norms work?

▪ Anticipation of a changed future world

(5)

How to convey

norms

Tankard and Palluck (2016):

Public behaviour of others

▪ Summary information

(6)

Hypotheses

Individuals will more often choose a plant-based

product, instead of a meat product, when they observe a growing minority of individuals choosing a plant-based product (dynamic norm), compared to individuals who do not observe this growing minority.

Letting individuals observe a dynamic norm will have a larger effect on their behaviour than letting these

(7)

Method

Two participant groups: Dynamic norm and Static norm

Artificial setting

Ten decision rounds and ten summaries

Summaries differed per participant group

(8)
(9)
(10)

Statistical

analysis

Dependent variable: Participant choice rounds nine and ten

Independent variable: Norm condition

Covariates: Habit, Meat-preference, prior choices

Additional measures: Age and gender

(11)

Results

Minority-model

Hypotheses were not confirmed

Power: 36%

Significant covariates: Gender, Meat-preference and Prior choice

▪ Women are 56.8% less likely than males to choose the plant-based product in rounds 9/10.

▪ If meat-preference goes up by one unit, the probability of choosing the plant-based product decreases with 24.1%

(12)

Minority-Predict

Trainingsdataset: 75% training, 25% prediction

Power: 8.9%

Significant IV: Meat-preference

(13)

Discussion

Consistency effect?

▪ Individuals have a preference for consistency

Heuristics?

▪ Mental shortcuts to ease decision making

Morality?

(14)

Future research

Future research:

▪ Eliminate consistency within experiment

▪ Nonmoral decision (two chocolate brands)

(15)

Implications

Observing dynamic norms does not influence conusmer behaviour

▪ But, low power of 36%

▪ Gender, Meat-preference and prior choices do have an influence

Take into account:

▪ Heuristics

▪ Need for consistency

(16)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

The paper 1 is an exercise in a neo-Austrian based economic analysis of product liability. After a short historical introduction, we take two of the basic premises of

The test was significant (p-value < 0.01), which indicates that participants in the dynamic norm condition (those who were led to believe that the amount of fellow

Technology Management 2008/2009 | Research Design 26 of 84 Scientific literature was mainly used for the determination of the framework of ideas, decision variables

In their article, they proposed a material selection method based on life-cycle engineering (LCE), which they defined as a decision making tool that considers

Our findings suggest that in a high technologically turbulent environment, some management practices have more impact on product platform competency, such as the important role of

To test the routing rules we designed in Chapter 4, we build a simulation model in the Plant Simulation software of Siemens. Just like the nodes we use to model our beamline,

This will conclude that the problem, for Intraco, is not really knowing where the target market is searching for.. This in combination with the lack of communication with the

The objective of the assignment was to determine which market could be the best to introduce the Equiplite products and after that, set requirements and find out how products