• No results found

Adamus P.R. (2002) Methods for evaluating wetland condition: Biological Assessment Methods for Birds. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Adamus P.R. (2002) Methods for evaluating wetland condition: Biological Assessment Methods for Birds. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. "

Copied!
40
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

150

References

Adamus P.R. (2002) Methods for evaluating wetland condition: Biological Assessment Methods for Birds. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

Alberti M., Marzluff J.M., Shulenberger E., Bradley G., Ryan C. & Zumbrunnen C. (2003) Integrating humans into ecology: Opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience 53, 1169-1179

Anon. (2004) GS+ Geostatistics for the Sciences. Version 7. 457E, Bridge Str, Box 201, Plainwell, Mitchigan, Gamma Design Software, LLC.

Begon M., Harper J.L. & Townsend C.R. (1996) Ecology: Individuals, populations and communities, 3 edn. Blackwell Science Ltd.

Beissinger S.R. & Osborne D.R. (1982) Effects of urbanization on avian community organization. Condor 84, 75-83

Bibby C.J., Burgess N.D. & Hill D.A. (1993) Bird Census Techniques. Harcourt Brace &

Company, London.

Borgmann K.L. & Rodewald A.D. (2004) Nest predation in an urbanizing landscape: The role of exotic shrubs. Ecological Applications 14, 1757-1765

Brand L.A., White G.C. & Noon B.R. (2008) Factors influencing species richness and community composition of breeding birds in a desert riparian corridor. Condor 110, 199-210

Chace J.F. & Walsh J.J. (2006) Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landscape and Urban Planning 74, 46-69

Chamberlain D.E., Cannon A.R., Toms M.P., Leech D.I., Hatchwell B.J. & Gaston K.J. (2009) Avian productivity in urban landscapes: a review and meta-analysis. Ibis 151, 1-18

Chen X.W., Li B.L., Scott T.A., Tennant T., Rotenberry J.T. & Allen M.F. (2005) Spatial structure of multispecies distributions in southern California, USA. Biological Conservation 124, 169-175

Chouteau P. (2006) Influences of the season and the habitat structure on the foraging ecology of two Coua species in the western dry forest of Madagascar. Comptes Rendus Biologies 329, 691-701

Cilliers S.S. & Bredenkamp G.J. (1999) Ruderal and degraded natural vegetation on vacant lots in the Potchefstroom Municipal Area, North West Province, South Africa. South African Journal of Botany 65, 163-173

Cilliers S.S., Schoeman L.L. & Bredenkamp G.J. (1998) Wetland plant communities in the Potchefstroom Municipal Area, North-West, South Africa. Bothalia 28, 213-229

Clarke K.R. & Gorley R.N. (2006) Primer 5 software. Version 5.2.9. PRIMER Enterprises (PRIMER-E Ltd). Plymouth Marine Laboratory (PML).

Cody M.L. (1985) Habitat Selection in Birds. Academic Press INC. LTD., London.

DeGraaf R.M. & Wentworth J.M. (1981) Urban bird communities and habitats in New

England. Transactions of the North American Wildlife Conference 46, 396-413

(2)

151 Deschenes M., Belanger L. & Giroux J.F. (2003) Use of farmland riparian strips by declining and crop damaging birds. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 95, 567-577

Devereux C.L., Vickery J.A., Fernandez-Juricic E., Krebs J.R. & Whittingham M.J. (2006) Does sward density affect prey availability for grassland birds? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 117, 57-62

Diaz L. (2006) Influences of forest type and forest structure on bird communities in oak and pine woodlands in Spain. Forest Ecology and Management 223, 54-65

Doherty M., Kearns A., Barnett G., Sarre A., Hochuli D., Gibb H. & Dickman C. (2000) The interaction between habitat conditions, ecosystem processes and terrestrial biodiversity - a review. Australia State of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra.

Dugatkin L.A. (2003) Principles of Animal Behaviour. W.W.Norton & Company, New York, London.

Dunajewski A. (1938) Freshwater fauna of Poland, Birds (Aves). Kasa im, Mianowskiego, Warszawa.

Edwards D. (1983) A broad-scale structural classification of vegetation for practical purposes.

Bothalia 14, 705-712

Gentry D.J., Swanson D.L. & Carlisle J.D. (2006) Species richness and nesting success of migrant forest birds in natural river corridors and anthropogenic woodlands in South-Eastern South Dakota. Condor 108, 140-153

Green D.A. & Baker M.G. (2003) Urbanization impacts on habitat and bird communities in a Sonoran desert ecosystem. Landscape and Urban Planning 63, 225-239

Green R.E., Tyler G.A. & Bowden C.G.R. (2000) Habitat selection, ranging behaviour and diet of the Stone Curlew (Burhinus oedicnemus) in Southern England. Journal of Zoology 250, 161-183

Gregory S.V., Swanson F.J., Mckee W.A. & Cummins K.W. (1991) An Ecosystem Perspective of Riparian Zones. Bioscience 41, 540-551

Henningsen J.C. & Best L.B. (2005) Grassland bird use of riparian filter strips in Southeast Iowa. Journal of Wildlife Management 69, 198-210

Hockey P.A.R., Dean W.R.J. & Ryan P.G. (2005) Roberts Birds of Southern Africa, 7 edn.

The Trustees of the John Voelcker Bird Book Fund, Cape Town.

Hostetler M. (1999) Scale, birds, and human decisions: a potential for integrative research in urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning 45, 15-19

Idzelis R.L., Jankaite A., Oskinis V., Pakalnis R., Venckus Z. & Virbickas T. (2008)

Assessment of the state of natural environment in Vilnius City. Environmental Engineering 7th International Conference, 154-162

Johnson M.D. & Sherry T.W. (2001) Effects of food availability on the distribution of migratory warblers among habitats in Jamaica. Journal of Animal Ecology 70, 546-560

Karakatsoulis J., Paul S., Osborne R., Ortner C. & Anderson M. (2005) Skeetchestn Indian

Band: Research and Development in Riparian Zone Management. Advanced Technology

Centre: University College of the Cariboo/Thompson Rivers University.

(3)

152 Kelcey J.G. & Rheinwald G. (2005) Birds in European Cities. GINGSTER Verlag, St.

Katharinen, Germany.

Knopf F.L., Johnson R.R., Rich T., Samson F.B. & Szaro C. (1988) Conservation of Riparian Ecosystems in the United States. Wilson Bull 100, 272-284

Knopf F.L. & Samson F.B. (1994) Scale perspectives on avian diversity in western riparian ecosystems. Conservation Biology 8, 669-676

Kotler B.P., Dickman C.R. & Brown J.S. (1998) The effects of water on patch use by two Simpson Desert granivores (Corvus coronoides and Pseudomys hermannsburgensis).

Australian Journal of Ecology 23, 574-578

Lachavanne J.B. & Juge R. (1997) Biodiversity in land-inland water ecotones. The Parthenon Publishing Group Inc, New York, USA & Lancs, UK.

Maclean G.L. (1993) Roberts Birds of Southern Africa, 6 edn. The Trustees of the John Voelcker Bird Book Fund, Cape Town.

MacMillen R.E. (1990) Water economy of granivore birds: A predictive model. Condor 92, 379-392

Maestas J.D., Knight R.L. & Gilgert W.C. (2003) Biodiversity across a Rural Land-Use Gradient. Conservation Biology 17, 1425-1434

Magurran A.E. (2008) Ecological Diversity and its Measurements. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

Malan G., Meyer E. & Panagos M.D. (2007) Riparian-zone rehabilitation in pine plantations:

Grassland vs woodland for plants and birds? South African Journal of Wildlife Research 37, 159-178

Martin T.E. (1993) Nest predation among vegetation layers and habitat types: Revising the dogmas. American Society of Naturalists 141, 897-913

Martin T.G., McIntyre S., Catterall C.P. & Possingham H.P. (2006) Is landscape context important for riparian conservation? Birds in grassy woodland. Biological Conservation 127, 201-214

McCune B. & Grace J.B. (2002) Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Sotware Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA.

McCune B. & Mefford M.J. (1999a) Pc-Ord, Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. (Version 5). MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, U.S.A.

McCune B. & Mefford M.J. (1999b) Pc-Ord, Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data: User's Guide, Version 4. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA.

Meffe G.K. & Carroll A.L. (1997) Principles of Conservation Biology, 2 edn.

Mensing D.M., Galatowitsch S.M. & Tester J.R. (1998) Anthropogenic effects on the

biodiversity of riparian wetlands of a northern temperate landscape. Journal of Environmental Management 53, 349-377

Miller J.R. & Hobbs N.T. (2000) Recreational trails, human activity, and nest predation in

lowland riparian areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 50, 227-236

(4)

153 Mucina L. & Rutherford M.C. (2006) The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland.

Strelitzia 19. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.

Murakami M. & Nakano S. (2001) Species-specific foraging behaviour of birds in a riparian forest. Ecological Research 16, 913-923

Naiman R.J., Bilby R.E. & Bisson P.A. (2000) Riparian Ecology and Management in the Pacific Coastal Rain Forest. Bioscience 50, 996-1011

Naiman R.J. & Decamps H. (1997) The Ecology of interfaces: Riparian Zones. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 28, 621-658

Naiman R.J., Decamps H. & Pollock M. (1993) The Role of Riparian Corridors in Maintaining Regional Biodiversity. Ecological Applications 3, 209-212

O'Halloran J., Walsh P.M., Giller P.S. & Kelly T.C. (2002) Forestry and Bird Diversity in Ireland: A Management and Planning Guide. Coford, Dublin.

Palmer G.C. & Bennett A.F. (2006) Riparian zones provide for distinct bird assemblages in forest mosaics of Southeast Australia. Biological Conservation 130, 447-457

Pejchar L., Pringle R.M., Ranganathan J., Zook J.R., Duran G., Oviedo F. & Daily G.C. (2008) Birds as agents of seed dispersal in a human-dominated landscape in southern Costa Rica.

Biological Conservation 141, 536-544

Pennington D.N., Hansel J. & Blair R.B. (2008) The conservation value of urban riparian areas for landbirds during spring migration: Land cover, scale, and vegetation effects.

Biological Conservation 141, 1235-1248

Posa M.R.C. & Sodhi N.S. (2006) Effects of anthropogenic land use on forest birds and butterflies in Subic Bay, Philippines. Biological Conservation 129, 256-270

Powell B.F. & Steidl R.J. (2000) Nesting habitat and reproductive success of southwestern riparian birds. Condor 102, 823-831

Primack R. (2002) Essentials of Conservation Biology, 3 edn.

Rosenberg D.K., Noon B.R. & Meslow E.C. (1997) Biological Corridors: Form, function and efficacy. Bioscience 47, 677-687

Rottenborn S.C. (1999) Predicting the impacts of urbanization on riparian bird communities.

Biological Conservation 88, 289-299

Saab V. (1999) Importance of spatial scale to habitat use by breeding birds in riparian forests:

A hierarchical analysis. Ecological Applications 9, 135-151

Seoane J., Bustamante J. & Diaz-Delgado R. (2004) Competing roles for landscape, vegetation, topography and climate in predictive models of bird distribution. Ecological Modelling 171, 209-222

Shochat E., Warren P.S., Faeth S.H., McIntyre N.E. & Hope D. (2006) From patterns to

emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21, 186-

191

(5)

154 Simons T.R., Shriner S.A. & Farnsworth G.L. (2006) Comparison of breeding bird and

vegetation communities in primary and secondary forests of Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Biological Conservation 129, 302-311

Skagen S.K., Kelly J.F., Van Riper C., Hutto R.L., Finch D.M., Krueper D.J. & Melcher C.P.

(2005) Geography of spring landbird migration through riparian habitats in southwestern North America. Condor 107, 212-227

Smith C.M. & Wachob D.G. (2006) Trends associated with residential development in riparian breeding bird habitat along the Snake River in Jackson Hole, WY, USA: Implications for conservation planning. Biological Conservation 128, 431-446

Smith T.A., Osmond D.L., Moorman C.E., Stucky J.M. & Gilliam J.W. (2008) Effect of vegetation management on bird habitat in Riparian buffer zones. Southeastern Naturalist 7, 277-288

Steyn P. (1996) Nesting Birds: The breeding habits of Southern African birds, 1 edn.

Fernwood Press, Cape Town.

Tainton N. (1999) Veld Management in South Africa, 1 edn. University of Natal Press, Pietermaritzburg.

Van der Haegen W.M. & DeGraaf R.M. (1996) Predation on artificial nests in forested riparian buffer strips. Journal of Wildlife Management 60, 542-550

Vidaurre M., Pacheco L.F. & Roldan A.I. (2006) Composition and abundance of birds in Andean alder (Alnus acuminata) patches with past and present harvest in Bolivia. Biological Conservation 132, 12-21

Wakeley J.S., Antrobus T.J., Barrow W.C., Guilfoyle M.P., Fischer R.A. & Hamel P.B. (2007) Ordination of breeding birds in relation to environmental gradients in three southeastern United States floodplain forests. Wetlands Ecology Management 15, 417-439

Walker J.S., Balling R.C., Briggs J.M., Katti M., Warren P.S. & Wentz E.A. (2008) Birds of a feather: Interpolating distribution patterns of urban birds. Computers Environment and Urban Systems 32, 19-28

Whitaker D.M., Carroll A.L. & Montevecchi W.A. (2000) Elevated numbers of flying insects and insectivorous birds in riparian buffer strips. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne de Zoologie 78, 740-747

Wiens J.A. (1989a) The Ecology of Bird Communities: Foundations and Patterns. Cambridge, University Press.

Wiens J.A. (1989b) The Ecology of Bird Communities: Processes and Variations. Cambridge, University Press.

Woinarski J.C.Z., Brock C., Armstrong M., Hempel C., Cheal D. & Brennan K. (2000) Bird

distribution in riparian vegetation in the extensive natural landscape of Australia's tropical

savanna: a broad-scale survey and analysis of a distributional database. Journal of

Biogeography 27, 843-868

(6)

155

Appendix A

1. River ecological profiles of each transect

The different height and cover percentages (as seen in Tables 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3) of the vegetation classes are presented in these river ecological profiles.

In these river ecological profiles:

The height classes are illustrated on the Y-axis

The five different bands of the cross-section in Figure 3.6 are represented on the X-axis

The cover percentages of the different vegetation types are illustrated on the river ecological profile graphs by means of the keys in Figure A1. For instance, three shrubs on the graphs indicate that it had a cover percentage between 25 and 11%.

Figure A1 Keys to the different cover percentages

(7)

156

The graphs on the left illustrate the summer vegetation structures, and those on the right illustrate the winter vegetation structures of the different transects. Therefore, the graphs on the left list the avian abundances (N), species richness (S), and relatively avian densities (RAD – N/1.8ha) of the summer months, as well as the summer CAH in which the transect was clustered in. The graphs on the right list the values of these three parameters during the winter months.

1.1 River ecological profiles of Spitskop Spruit

(8)

157

(9)

158

(10)

159

(11)

160

(12)

161

(13)

162

1.2 River ecological profiles of Wasgoed Spruit

(14)

163

(15)

164

(16)

165

(17)

166

1.3 River ecological profiles of the Mooi River

(18)

167

(19)

168

(20)

169

(21)

170

(22)

171

(23)

172

(24)

173

(25)

174

(26)

175

(27)

176

(28)

177

(29)

178

(30)

179

(31)

180

(32)

181

(33)

182

(34)

183

Appendix B

1. Distributions maps of the summer CAHs

Figure B1 Distributions of G/R (grass and reeds) in the study area. Located in Sectors A, E, F, H, and M.

Figure B2 Distributions of HSG (herbs, shrubs, and grass) in the study area.

Located in Sectors B, C, D, and F.

502509 505072 507636 510199

1 0 0

Herbs, shrubs and grass (HSG), Spitskop- and Wasgoed Spruit

Herbs, shrubs and grass (HSG), Mooi River

502509 505072 507636 510199

1 0 0

Grass and reeds (G/R), Mooi River

7040038 7043241 7046444 7049646

1 0 0 Grass and

reeds (G/R),

Spitskop-

and

Wasgoed

Spruit

(35)

184

5 0 2 5 0 9 5 0 5 0 7 2 5 0 7 6 3 6 5 1 0 1 9 9

2 1 -1

Concrete surface and in

residential area (C/R), Spitskop- and Wasgoed Spruit

Concrete surface and in residential area (C/R), Mooi River

7040038 7043241 7046444 7049646

1 1 0

Shrubs and reeds (S/R), Spitskop- and Wasgoed Spruit

Shrubs and reeds (S/R), Mooi River

Figure B3 Distributions of C/R (concrete riverbed in residential area) in the study area. Located in Sector G.

Figure B4 Distributions of S/R (shrubs and reeds) in the study area. Located

in Sectors I, J, and L.

(36)

185

7040038 7043241 7046444 7049646

1 1 0

Trees and grass (T/G), Spitskop- and Wasgoed Spruit

Trees and grass (T/G), Mooi River

Trees, shrubs and reeds (TSR), Spitskop- and Wasgoed Spruit

Trees, shrubs and reeds (TSR), Mooi River

7040038 7043241 7046444 7049646

1 1 0

502509 505072 507636 510199

1 0 0

Figure B5 Distributions of T/G (trees and grass) in the study area. Located in Sectors K and M.

Figure B6 Distributions of TSR (trees, shrubs, and reeds) in the study area.

Located in Sectors F, N, O, and Q.

(37)

186

502509 505072 507636 510199

1.0 0.5 0.0

7040038 7043241 7046444 7049646

> 0.3

> -0.1 Drainage pipe

(Dpi), Spitskop- and Wasgoed Spruit

Drainage pipe (Dpi), Mooi River

7040038 7043241 7046444 7049646

> 0.3

> 0.0

502509 505072 507636 510199

> 0.5

> 0.0

Foot-path (Fpa), Mooi River

Foot-path (Fpa), Spitskop- and Wasgoed Spruit

2. Distribution maps of the anthropogenic CAHs

Figure B7 Distributions of Dpi (drainage pipes) in the study area. Located in Sectors A and N.

Figure B8 Distributions of Fpa (footpaths) in the study area. Located in

Sectors A, F, and M.

(38)

187

502509 505072 507636 510199

> 0.4

> 0.0

Dirt-road &

Electrical pylon (DrE), Mooi River

Dirt-road &

Electrical pylon (DrE), Spitskop- and Wasgoed Spruit

7040038 7043241 7046444 7049646

> 0.4

> 0.0

502509 505072 507636 510199

> 0.4

> 0.0

Informal settlers (InS), Mooi River

Informal settlers (InS), Spitskop- and Wasgoed Spruit

Figure B9 Distributions of DrE (dirt roads and electrical pylons) in the study area. Located in Sectors B, C and D.

Figure B10 Distributions of the InS (informal settlers) in the study area.

Located in Sectors H, M and N.

(39)

188

502509 505072 507636 510199

> 0.5

> -1.0

Concrete surface in residential area (C/R), Mooi River

Concrete surface in residential area (C/R), Spitskop- and Wasgoed Spruit

7040038 7043241 7046444 7049646

> 0.4

> 0.0 Foot-path

bridge (FpB), Mooi River

Foot-path bridge (FpB), Spitskop- and Wasgoed Spruit

Figure B11 Distributions of C/R (concrete riverbed in residential area) in the study area. located in Sector G.

Figure B12 Distributions of FpB (footpath bridges) in the study area. Located

in Sectors I, J, K, and M.

(40)

189

7040038 7043241 7046444 7049646

> 0.5

> 0.0

502509 505072 507636 510199

> 0.5

> -0.1 Tar road &

Tar road bridge (TrB), Mooi River

Tar road & Tar road bridge (TrB), Spitskop- and Wasgoed Spruit

7040038 7043241 7046444 7049646

> 0.4

> -0.1

502509 505072 507636 510199

> 0.48

> -0.05

Residential houses (Hou), Spitskop- and Wasgoed Spruit

Residential houses (Hou), Mooi River

Figure B13 Distributions of TrB (roads, road/train bridges) in the study area.

Located in Sectors D, F, I, J, K, L, M, O and P.

Figure B14 Distributions of Hou (houses) in the study area. Located in

Sectors G, I, J and K.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Die probleme wat deur damesuitrusters ondervind word, word.

Compared to current rating curve construction practice, our new method clearly reduced a systematic error in water balance and thereby provided more consistent rating curves for the

Op 16 oktober resulteerden de behandelingen met middelen x, y en z (alleen object I eenmaal extra behandeld op 14 augustus) in significant minder schade aan de

The study has examined the effect of social media marketing activities on customer equity and purchase intention regarding hedonic products, specifically fine art, highlighting

The concrete case that we discuss is based on the collab- orative research project Trader of the Embedded Systems Institute (ESI) with NXP and other academic and industrial..

• Business demanding to interconnect systems directly where B2B relationships exist • The need to have good network connectivity and access to all organisations with whom.. you

Hulle verteenwoordig 87 persent van die totale getal dogters en verskaf 96 persent van die stoetramme en 89,8 persent van alle ramme (stoet- en kudderamme) deur die