• No results found

Research ethics and research integrity scenario competition To enrich The

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Research ethics and research integrity scenario competition To enrich The"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Research ethics and research integrity scenario competition

To enrich The Embassy of Good Science’s collection of scenarios and encourage community ownership, we invite you to share your fictional research integrity scenarios on the Embassy.

Complete submissions will be published on the Embassy website and candidates will receive a certificate for participation. The top two submissions will receive a cash prize to the value of

€500 and will be offered the chance to present their scenario during the final conference.

What is a scenario?

A scenario describes a story in a research setting (e.g., laboratory) with actors (e.g., three PhD researchers and two supervisors) and one or more ethical issues (e.g., bias) that may be due to a conflict of values/norms or personal tensions. Scenarios prompt learning objectives with questions that may be suitable for different stakeholders. Click here for a sample scenario.

Who can participate?

Students, researchers, research ethics and integrity experts and those who have collaborated in academic projects in other capacities (e.g., technical, administrative, managerial).

How to participate?

Use the provided template and submit your fictional scenarios to info@embassy.science before 15 October 2021.

• Scenarios should be submitted in English and be shorter than 800 words (excluding questions). Please do not include any information that could be used to identify real persons, labs, institutions, or current/historical incidents.

• Scenarios should include questions targeted at one or several of the following stakeholders: researchers, research administrators, research ethics and research integrity experts.

• Scenarios should focus on one of the eight research contexts provided by the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (ECCRI), including 1) Research Environment, 2) Training, Supervision and Mentoring, 3) Research procedures, 4) Safeguards, 5) Data Practices and Management, 6) Collaborative Working, 7) Publication and Dissemination, 8) Reviewing, Evaluating and Editing.

Assessment criteria

Scenarios are assessed by a panel of experts (Mohammad Hosseini, Bert Gordijn, Ružica Tokalić, Kris Dierickx, Samuel Bruton and Diana Adela Martin) based on:

1) Accessibility: Scenarios should be understandable for anyone with an undergraduate degree.

2) Shades of grey: Scenarios will score highly if they highlight grey areas or problems that are not clearly covered by codes of conduct and guidelines.

3) Comprehensiveness: Interdisciplinary issues and international settings are desirable.

Scenarios will score highly if they cover several norms within the ECCRI’s eight contexts.

4) Questions’ quality: It is important to formulate thought-/discussion-provoking questions.

The above four criteria are rated on a scale 1-5. If there is a tie, a discussion between members of the jury will clarify the winner.

(2)

Personal information

Scenario Title:

Research area(s) discussed in the scenario:

ECCRI context(s) discussed in the scenario:

Narrative (maximum 800 words):

Keywords (these will be used for tagging purposes):

References:

Suggestions for further readings:

Questions (you may formulate several questions for one, two, or all three stakeholders)

Questions for researchers:

Questions for research administrators:

Questions for research ethics committees and research integrity offices:

First and last name ORCID Institution Position

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

To evaluate the performance of the different refrigerants and develop evaporator and condenser inside heat transfer coefficients, the separated-HPHE shown in Section 5, Figure 27

Despite the widely held belief that the future cash flow of the oil related companies is highly dependent on risks and uncertainties pertaining to unstable oil price and volatility

iteratively with both NCR and RiverCare stakeholders through several user tests and feedback sessions. Based on the type of knowledge Tina and Alex want to access, search,

User profiling is the starting point for the user requirement analysis, limiting the research to particular users (Delikostidis, van Elzakker, & Kraak, 2016). Based

In this study, a solution in the form of an uncertainty quantification and management flowchart was developed to quantify and manage energy efficiency savings

The execution of the process being carried out by SmartPM can be interrupted by the monitor procedure when a mis- alignment between the virtual and the physical reality is

The thesis contributes a novel technique to specify the behavior of distributed systems with scenarios in the flexible style of LSCs, to model systems with scenarios by

The initial goal of writing the scenarios aligns with the results, because all interviewees confirmed out- of-the-box thinking resulted from the process. Entrepreneurs, also the