• No results found

Political parties and the democratic mandate : comparing collective mandate fulfilment in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Political parties and the democratic mandate : comparing collective mandate fulfilment in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Political parties and the democratic mandate : comparing collective mandate fulfilment in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands

Louwerse, T.P.

Citation

Louwerse, T. P. (2011, June 22). Political parties and the democratic mandate : comparing collective mandate fulfilment in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/17723

Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown)

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden Downloaded

from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/17723

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

Tom Louw erse Political P arties and the Democratic Mandate

Political Parties and the Democratic Mandate

Comparing Collective Mandate Fulfilment in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands

Tom Louwerse

Do political parties fulfil their election mandates? This study provides an empirical analysis of a question many people feel they already have an answer to. The extent to which parties talk about similar issues and take similar positions before and after elections is studied in the context of the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. The main question is whether the different institutional structures in these countries lead to differences in mandate fulfilment.

To answer this question, this book provides an analysis of parties' election manifestos and parliamentary debates. It shows how the political competition changes after elections. It analyses differences between government and opposition and the impact of issue saliency and policy position extremism.

Moreover, it provides an overview of mandate fulfilment since the 1950s: has party mandate fulfilment declined?

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Although Wordfish can estimate parties’ positions on a single dimen- sion using the whole document, this study assumes that party competition might be different between issues:

The small Christian parties were positioned in a small group on the bottom-right side of the space: they share a right-wing position of the government on Economy, Health Care

In addition, the marginal effect of manifesto issue saliency on parliamentary issue saliency is significantly higher for opposition parties than for governing parties when the

The gap between high topic concentration in manifestos and low topic concentration in parliamentary debates partly explains the relatively low levels of issue saliency congruence in

However, parties with more extreme positions on specific issues are inclined to show higher levels of (relative) issue position congruence between election and parliament.

In terms of the enactment of pledges by government parties, majoritarian democracies tend to fare better, but the broader perspective of the current study shows that man-

Wordfish is based on a simple model of how parties use words: it is assumed that word usage is primarily motivated by parties’ policy preferences.. While the model based on

Political parties and the democratic mandate : comparing collective mandate fulfilment in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.. Retrieved