• No results found

success in the VUCA age

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "success in the VUCA age"

Copied!
15
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Leading for public sector success in the VUCA age

Paul ‘t Hart Utrecht University

Netherlands School of Public Administration Australia New Zealand School of Government

This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No694266)

(2)

Succes (I)

Agency institutionalisation

cycle

(3)

The anatomy of

successful public agencies

(Goodsell, 2011)

(4)

Institution-building:

Leadership Practices

(Boin and Christensen, 2008)

S 1: Orient the organisation towards a core purpose

S 2: Facilitate trial-and-error processes in the pursuit of effective practices.

S 3: Closely monitor the process by which norms emerge

S 4: Play an active role when it comes to the embedding of accepted norms within an organization.

S 5: Continuously adapt the organization without compromising its identity.

Example: Amsterdam Child Protection

(5)

Success (II):

High-Reliability Organising

HRO = Enhanced capacity for sustained performance in complex, dynamic environments through early problem detection & intelligent improvisation to contain emerging problems

(6)

High-reliability organizing…

(Weick and Sutcliffe, 2007)

….Prevents problems through disciplined attention & rich feedback streams

S Pre-occupation with failure

S Reluctance to simplify interpretations

S Sensitivity to operations

…..Keeps incidents small through flexible & smart response

S Capacity for resilience

S Expertise above rank in operational decision-making

(7)

HRO: on the march?

S From nuclear and petrochemical plants, aircraft carriers….

S ... to cockpits, air traffic control systems and power grids....

S ... to hospital ER’s/IC’s,... to C3I in policing / emergency services?

S …. to science labs and cybersecurity protection…

S …. to real-time human services frontlines & high- stakes regulatory oversight?

(8)

HRO:

Leadership Practices

(Weick and Sutcliffe, 2007)

S Integrate ’reliability’ into mission and quality/performance indicators

S Create a culture of embracing error (mistake-makers, mistake-callers)

S Create a culture of alertness through continuous self- monitoring

S Resist temptation to micro-manage operations; empower the front-line to exercise professional judgment

S Prevent complacence and groupthink by creating space for difference and disagreement

(9)

Success (III):

Collaborative Governance

(10)

Making Collaboration Work

(11)

Collaboration:

‘facilitative’ leadership

The work The role

Boundary-spanning: forging links;

exploring interdependencies; creating goodwill

AMBASSADOR

(Re)framing: challenging conventions; systems thinking;

mobilizing new knowledge

CATALYST

Seduction: convening, protecting &

maintaining collaborative forums STEWARD

Process management:

orchestrating & channeling multilateral dialogue

MEDIATOR

Consolidation: capacity-building,

incentivizing continuation GOVERNOR

(12)

Enter: the VUCA age

S Volatility: liquid societies, 4th industrial revolution, return of geopolitics

S Uncertainty: about ’operating environment’, about

‘rules of the game’, about ‘what works’

S Complexity: ‘wicked problems’, interactivity, tightly coupled systems

S Ambiguity: of values, preferences, meaning-making

(13)

The changing PS operating environment

Age of modernity

S Parties and program politics

S Power of analysis, numbers, coalition-building

S Robust institutions providing input legitimacy

S Interest groups and lobbies

S Citizen: voter, client, subject

S National government

S Hierarchies & Markets

Age of VUCA

S Personalities and symbolic politics

S Power of drama, emotions and immediacy

S Challenged institutions needing to ‘deliver’

S Web communities, crowds, self- governance cooperatives

S Citizen: co-creator, monitor

S Multi-level governance

S Hybrids & Networks

(14)

Coping with VUCA:

PS capacities required

S Responsiveness: to citizens, partners

S Reliability: effective public service provision

S Reform: capacity to change and innovate

S Resilience: improvising and bouncing back

S Reputation: preserving institutional legitimacy

S Reason: stewardship of systemic values

S Reflexivity: double-loop learning

(15)

Beacons of hope

S The rise of public value management & new public governance

S The rise of the behavioral state: from EBP to BIT’s

S The rise of design thinking and experimentalist governance

S The rise of innovation from below: municipalities & regions as ‘labs’

S The good news: Denmark is ‘on the ball’ in all domains

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no

“The project leading to this application has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 723375”. TUD:

“The project leading to this application has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 723375”.. TUD:

Wat ook niet helpt is wanneer de effectiviteit van stedelijke natuur wordt gemeten met bestaande indicatoren die zijn ontwikkeld voor grijze infrastructuur, omdat andere

The Parties shall endeavour, through appropriate partnership dialogue, to build strategic coalitions on a number of global issues, in particular as regards

This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and 1.. innovation programme (grant

This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement

This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement