• No results found

Self-Protection for Helicopters

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Self-Protection for Helicopters"

Copied!
23
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Bernard HEPP

EW Strategic Marketing Manager THALES SYSTEMES AEROPORTES

bernard.hepp@fr. thalesgroup. com

Aeronautique

30th European Rotorcraft Forum

14-16 September 2004

Marseille - France

®

TH/.\LES

Securing your future

Self-Protection for Helicopters

Thales- France

TH

A

LES

30th European Rotorcraft Forum Summary Print

(2)

AGENDA

@

~¢~---

~

~

•Helicopter Self-protection requirements

•THALES helicopter self-protection systems

•VIP helicopter self-protection

•Advanced self-protection concepts

(3)

HELICOPTERS GROWING IMPORTANCE

(f)

~¢~

.

---

~

3 Aeronautique

I

VARIED MISSIONS

I

V

ARIED F

ll.

IG

I+IiT

PROFI

IL

E

e

ANTI-TANK I SUPPORT I SEAD I ESCORT

e

ANTI-HELOS I UAV-UCAV

e

TRANSPORT I ASSAULT I SPEC. FORCES

e

HUMAN HELP I SURVEY I MEDIVAC

e

SEARCH AND RESCUE

(4)

A THREATENING ENVIRONMENT

@

~¢~---

~

~

Air to Air Missiles

] Radar Controlled i !! ~

i

Air Defense ~ 0 ~

Anti Aircraft Artillery IR Guided SAMs

Laser Guided Air Defense

(5)

HELICOPTERS GROWING SELF-PROTECTION REQUIREMENT

@

~¢~---

~

~

HELOS BECOME HIGH VALUE ASSEmS ~

~---~

1

LARGE RADAR CROSS SECliiON

J

~---~ ~ ~

~---~ ~

PROXIMITY l E~POSl!JRE TO TliiREAliS

I

I

8

~---~ ~

, MORE ILEJiHAL RADARliRI:A.AAI:LASER TlfiREATS

i

~--~ ~---~ ~ 0

~

• RADAR WARNING: ACCURATE REAL TIME SITUATION AWARENESS

e

MISSILE WARNING: FAST RELIABLE DEPENDABLE WARNING

j ~ ~ ; ~ ~

e

LASER WARNING : IMMEDIATE DETECTION & IDENTIFICATION

e

DECOYING: AUTOMATIC, EFFECTIVE AGAINST ALL THREATS

e

RF JAMMING: SMART MULTI-THREAT DIGITAL JAMMING

NOT DETECTED _... NOT TRACKED _... NOT DESTROYED

2 0 -6

j

,., ~ a 2 Q. .!! ~

i

~ l" 1!1 ~ g g

J

~ s Aeronautique

TH

A

LES

(6)

HELICOPTER SELF-PROTECTION REQUIREMENT

@

6 Aeronautique IMMEDIATE ACCURATE SITUATION AWARENESS

Three types of critical aspects

for the equipment:

• Installation

• Size, weight critical aspects

• platform electronic system integration

• Operation of the equipment

• Easy to operate equipment far away from usual support bases

• Easy maintenance concept required • Automatic , to minimize crew workload

• Performance

• Multi-sensor (radar,laser,missile) • Very dense EM environment

• Low to very-low altitude flight profile • lntervisibility with radars not always

ensured

• Reliable instantaneous unambiguous threat declaration

(7)

AGENDA

@

~¢~---

~

~

•Helicopter Self-protection requirements

•THALES helicopter self-protection systems

•VIP helicopter self-protection

•Advanced self-protection concepts

(8)

~

dHALES

SELF-PROTECTION ON-BOARD HELICOPTER

~

~

SA 342 Gazelle AS 332 S Puma I AS 532 COUGAR EC 725 Cougar

AS 565 Panther NH 90 EC 665 Tiger

AS 555 Fennec Lynx, Ml24, Sokol EH 101 Merlin WAH 640 APACHE

(9)

TIGER I NH 90 ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEM

(f)

~¢~---

~

~----~

~

MULTI-SPECTRAL EWS

OPTIMISED FOR

INTEGRATION ONBOARD

TIGER

&

NH-90 HELICOPTER

TWE

• High performance wide band radar and

laser warning

• EW system management

• Single processing unit

• Glass cockpit compatible design

• Standard packaging

• Integrated modular design

• Compact, low weight & easy maintenance

9 Aeronautique TWE RLM MLD CFD EWS

Threat Warning Equipment Radar Laser Missile warning Missile Launch Detector

Chaffs & Flares Dispenser System

Electronic Warfare System

EADS I THALES

EUROPEAN COOPERATION

~

(10)

COUGAR SAR SELF-PROTECTION SYSTEM

(f)

MWS-20 •Missile Approach Warning RALM01 •Laser Warning Receiver 10 Aeronautique 77108 SHERLOC-SF •Instantaneous Wide Band Receiver •System Management ELIPS NG •Chaff and Flares

Dispenser VLCD Colour Display System control "--IePage .,.,,

TH

A

LES

(11)

MWS-20 MISSILE WARNING SYSTEM

@

~¢~---

~

~

COMPACT

ALL WEATHER I CONDITIONS

11 Aeronautique

EFFECTIVE

• Installed on C130, PUMA, COUGAR • Validated in live firing conditions

RELIABLE • In operational use

OPTIMIZED FOR INSTALLATION ON

BOARD HELICOPTERS AND WIDE BODY AIRCRAFT

PROVIDES ACCURATE MISSILE APPROACH WARNING DATA

(12)

MWS-20 - AN EFFECTIVE SOLUTION

@

~¢~---

~

Active Approach Missile Warning System based on

Pulse Doppler RADAR principles

~

Detection of missile body

Measurement of missile closing velocity

Measurement of Missile Range

Measurement of Sector Of Arrival

12 Aeronautique

....

....

....

....

Detection Reliability

1

Rejection of non threatening j

objects - False Alarm i

reduction

l

~

j

~

Real time estimation of Time ~

to Impact

1

~

a

2

Optimization of counter-measures actions

(Time and Direction) __

Q. .!! ~

i

~ l" 1!1 ~ g g

J

~

TH

A

LES

(13)

MWS-20: KEY FEATURES

(f)

~¢~---

~

• Detection of incoming missiles by coherent radar processing (Digital Fast Fourrier Transform and Radar Cross Section detection)

• Continuous detection during all missile flight phases (including post-burnout)

• Range/velocity coherency algorithms (low false alarm rate)

• Fast reaction time

• Real time estimation of Time To Impact (TTl)

• Optimized ECM triggering (programmable TTl for automatic dispensing )

• Multi-threat (simultaneous missiles detection capability) • No need for missile signature data

• Nominal performance above all kinds of terrain, in all weather conditions

MWS-20 is a key asset for VIP/HOS aircraft Protection combining detection effectiveness and very low false alarm rate

~

(14)

AGENDA

@

~¢~---

~

~

•Helicopter Self-protection requirements

•THALES helicopter self-protection systems

•VIP helicopter self-protection

•Advanced self-protection concepts

(15)

Real Danger for HOSNIP Aircraft

®

~¢~---

~

• Worldwide Increase of Terrorism

• IR SAM are cheap , easy to operate and proliferating (SA-7, SA-16, SA-18 ... )

• Can be operated by uncontrolled military or terrorist groups

• Vulnerability of Head Of State I VIP helicopter during low/medium altitude flight phases

1s Aeronautique

~

(16)

HOS/VIP A/C PROTECTION

@

~¢~---

~

Protection of HOSNIP Platform is necessary during

I

critical phases and requires :

• Detection

,

tracking and assessment of the threats

• Triggering the most appropriate reaction at the right time

• Automatic operations

• High reliability and extremely low false alarm rate

• Proven effective safe counter-measures

• Civil aviation authorities certification

Fundamentals

of

HOSNIP

Protection

16 Aeronautique

1 - Detection of approaching threats 2 - Estimation of Time To Impact

3 - Measurement of Sector of Arrival 4 - Appropriate CM actions triggering 5 - False alarm rate optimization

(17)

Example of WIPPS Configuration for HOS

®

~¢~---

~

~ 11 Aeronautique AAR-60 MILOS Ultraviolet Missile Warning ALE-47 TACOS Threat Adaptive Dispenser ~ .. . ., ·_ 1-... ~...,..,~l L .. -=.~::....

=>

••

MWS-20 Pulsed Doppler EWCS/MFO Electronic Warfare Processor/Display I N C O R P O R A T E D

Radar Missile Warning

IR Decoys

MJU-51 & 53 Advanced Threat Safe Decoys

(18)

AGENDA

@

~¢~---

~

~

•Helicopter Self-protection requirements

•THALES helicopter self-protection systems

•VIP helicopter self-protection

•Advanced self-protection concepts

(19)

OPERATIONAL CONCEPT OF NEW EW FUNCTIONS

(f)

Phase 1

TACTICAL FONCTIONS

• Long range covert detection -identification, data fusion • Localisation : 30 AIS EOB*

Phase 2

EOB:Eiectronic Order of Battle TACTICAL FONCTIONS

• Threat danger level evaluation • Tactical digital radar jamming ·Opportunity localisation/ avoidance/evasion/designatio

JAMMING USE DURING SHORT AND RELEVANT OPERATIONAL PHASES

(20)

STANDARD GEO-LOCATION PRINCIPLES

®

~¢~---

~

• PSEUDO RANGE (Received power level) : extremely poor accuracy

~

•INTERFEROMETRY & TRIANGULATION ..;

(/)

i

j

Performances linked to an le rate ~

~~--~---~~---~-~ ~ ~

20 Aeronautique

© Operational

© Robust

®

Not adapted for helicopters

(antenna array installation, platform velocity)

*DOA: Direction Of Arrival

~ ~ "!; 8 !! ~ :II

i

~ 0 ~

1

t ~ "' ; ~ ~ 2 0 -5

j

,., ~ a 2 Q. .!! ~

i

~ l" l!i ~ g g

J

~

TH

A

LES

(21)

PASSIVE FAST GEO-LOCATION

(f)

~¢~---

~

•Phase change rate interferometry •Standard Radar Warning Antenna

•Algorithms adapted to helicopters flight I I ~

Performances class

5 °/o of range accuracy

within seconds

+I- SOOm at 1 0 km

+/- 2Km at 40 km

Threat lethal range Threat Avoidance __.... E ..:.::: ~ X ,---r----T----, ---r----,---r----T-- -I .&. 1 0 - ... ---I ~----I ~I ---·---I I ~---1---I I ~----~----I -·----I l -(b I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5 - r I I I I I I I I ,---r----T----, ---r----,--- -- -[!] ' I I I I I 0 -&---5 -.. -I -10 _,_ ____ _, _____ ,_ -1 5 I I 0 5 1 0 1 5 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Y (k m)

FASTER ACQUISITION I WEAPON DELIVERY

BETTER USE OF PROTECTION FUNCTIONS

~

(22)

CATS MULTI-FUNCTION EWS

@

¢

Compact Airborne Threat Surveyor (CATS) family

• Dedicated to the self-protection in all types of mission and theater

• Provides advanced situation awareness and threat geo-location for avoidance, evasion or destruction

• Broad band digital receiver for smart RF signal interception, deinterleaving and analysis

• Latest THALES EW modular family of equipment designed to be the core system of comprehensive EW defensive suites • Modular, Small, Compact & Lightweight

ANTENNA UNITS DIGITAL RECEPTION UNIT Wide Band IFM Broadband Super-heterodyne Receiver RW/ ESM processing Geo-locat•on processing EW System Management ---· '--'---~--- ---' 22 Aeronautique Display Control AJC Interface EW system interl'ace

TH

A

LES

(23)

CATS

I COFEUX NETWORK CENTRIC OPERATION

AND TACTICAL SITUATION MANAGEMENT

AEW

---

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

A new array signal processing technique, called as CAF-DF, is proposed for the estimation of multipath channel parameters in- cluding the path amplitude, delay, Doppler shift

In addition, the probability of false-alarm in the pres- ence of optimal additive noise is investigated for the max-sum criterion, and upper and lower bounds on detection

Although the optimal cost allocation problem is studied for the single parameter estimation case in [13], and the signal recovery based on linear minimum mean-squared-error

To alleviate these problems, by using expectation maximization (EM) iterations, we propose a fully automated pre-processing technique which identifies and transforms TFSs of

As a novel way of integrating both TV penalty and phase error into the cost function of the sparse SAR image reconstruction problem, the proposed technique improves the

We introduce a sequential LC sampling algorithm asymptotically achieving the performance of the best LC sampling method which can choose both its LC sampling levels (from a large

In our simulations, we observe that using the EG algorithm to train the mixture weights yields better perfor- mance compared to using the LMS algorithm or the EGU algorithm to train

Recovery percentage, rMSE and rMSE of detected multipath components of OMP and PSO–OMP number of EM iterations is 1 and number of particles is 2, for various sparsity levels and