• No results found

Allen, M.P. 1974. The Structure of Interorganizational Elite Cooptation: Interlocking Corporate Directorates.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Allen, M.P. 1974. The Structure of Interorganizational Elite Cooptation: Interlocking Corporate Directorates."

Copied!
6
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

REFERENCES

Allen, M.P. 1974. The Structure of Interorganizational Elite Cooptation: Interlocking Corporate Directorates. American Sociological Review 39:393406.

Berkowitz, S.D., Kotowitz, Y., and Waverman, L. 1976. Enterprise Structure and Corporate Concentration. Study No. 17 of the Royal Commission on Corporate Concentration. Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada.

Bezemer. P., Maassen, G.F., Van den Bosch, F.A.J. & Volberda, H.W. (2007)

Investigating the development of the internal and external service tasks of non-executive directors: The case of the Netherlands (1997-2005). Corporate governance, 15 (6), 1119 - 1129.

Bezemer. P., Maassen, G.F., Van den Bosch, F.A.J. & Volberda, H.W. (2008). De adviserende rol van commissarissen in het licht van de Code Tabaksblat. Goed Bestuur: Tijdschrift over Governance, 4 (2): 35-41.

BINT Project. 2006. The Corporate Governance of Business in the Netherlands during the 20th century; structural change and performance. Taken from: http://www.bintproject.nl/textfiles/2006_pilot-corporate-2.pdf

Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G. and Freeman, L.C. 2002. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.

Burris, V. 2005. Interlocking Directorates and Political Cohesion among Corporate Elites. American Journal of Sociology, Volume 111 Number 1 (July 2005): 249–83

Burt, R.S., Christman, K.P., and Kilburn, H.C. Jr. 1980. Testing a Structural Theory of Corporate Cooptation: Interorganizational Directorates Ties as a Strategy for Avoiding Market Constraints on Profits. American Sociological Review, Vol. 45 (October 1980):821-84

Carroll, W.K. & Fennema, M. 2002. Is there a transnational business community, International Sociology, Vol.17(3): 393-419.

Conyon, M.J. and Muldoon, M.R. 2006.The Small World of Corporate Boards. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(9) & (10), 1321–1343, November/December 2006. Davis, G.F., Mizruchi, M.S. 1999. The Money Center Cannot Hold: Commercial Banks in the U.S. System of Corporate Governance. Administrative Science Quarterly, Jun99, Vol. 44 Issue 2, p215-239

(2)

Domhoff, G.W. 1970. The Higher Circles: The Governing Class in America. New York: Random House

Domhoff, G.W. 1974. The Bohemian Grove and Other Retreats: A Study of Ruling-Class Consciousness. New York: Harper & Row

Domhoff, G.W. 1979. The Powers That Be: Processes of Ruling Class Domination in America. New York: Random House

Dooley, P.C. 1969. The Interlocking Directorate The American Economic Review, Vol. 59, No. 3. (Jun., 1969), pp. 314-323.

Emirbayer, M., and Goodwin, J. 1994. Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99: 1411-1454.

Fennema, M. 1982. International of Banks and Industry. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers Group

Fennema, M. and Heemskerk. E. 2008. Nieuwe Netwerken. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Bert Bakker, 2008.

Fennema, M. and Schijf, H. 1979. Analyzing interlocking directorates: Theory and methods” Social Networks, 1: 297-332

Freeman, L. 2006. The Development of Social Network Analysis. Vancouver: Empirical Pres, 2006

Galaskiewicz, J.,Wasserman, S., Rauschenbach, B., Bielefeld, W., Mullaney, P. 1985. The influence of corporate power, social status, and market position on corporate interlocks in a regional market. Soc. Forc. 64:403–31

Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, No. 3. (Nov., 1985), pp. 481-510. Hall, P.A. and Soskice, D. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.

Heemskerk, E.M., Mokken, R.J., and Fennema, M. 2007. Corporate-State interlocks in the Netherlands: 1969-2006. More data

Heemskerk, E. 2007. ‘Decline of the Corporate Community: Network Dynamics of the Dutch Business Elite’, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.

(3)

Heracleous, L. and Murray, J. 2001. Networks, Interlocking Directors and Strategy: Toward a Theoretical Framework. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18, 137-160 (2001).

Hezewijk, J., van. 1986. De top-elite van Nederland: Leefwijze en familierelaties,

ondernemingen en dubbelfuncties van de meest invloedrijke mensen van ons land. Balans, 1996.

Hezewijk, J., van. 2003. De Nieuwe Elite van Nederland: Het new boys netwerk op jacht naar geld, status en invloed. Balans, 2003.

Ibarra, H. and Deshpande, P. 2004. Network and Identifies: Reciprocal Influences on Career Processes and Outcomes. INSEAD, Faculty and Research.

Kadushin, Charles. 1995. "Friendship among the French Financial Elite." American Sociological Review 60 (2): 202-2 1.

Kentor, J. & Y.S.Jang. 2004.’ Yes, there is a (growing) transnational business community: a study of global interlocking directorates 1983-98, International Sociology, Vol. 19 (3): 355-368.

Kim. T-Y., Oh, H., and Swaminathan, A. 2006. Framing Interorganizational Network Change: A Network Inertia Perspective. Academy of Management Review. 2006, Vol. 31, No. 3, 704–720.

Koenig, T., Gogel, R., and Sonquist, J. 1979. Models of the Significance of Interlocking Corporate Directorates. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 38, No. 2 (April 1979).

Kono, C., Palmer, D., Friedland, R., and Zafonte, M. 1998. Lost in Space: The Geography of Corporate Interlocking Directorates, American Journal of Sociology, Volume 103 Number 4 (January 1998): 863–911

Lazear, E.P. and Oyer, P. 2003. Personnel Economics. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working paper 13480. http://www.nber.org/papers/w13480.

Lazear, E.P. and Oyer, P. 2007. Internal and External Labor Markets: A Personnel Economics Approach. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working paper 10192. http://www.nber.org/papers/w10192.

Lazear, E.P. and Shaw, K.L. 2007. Personnel Economics: The Economists Views of Human Resources. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working paper 13653. http://www.nber.org/papers/w13653.

(4)

Lester, R.H. and Cannella, A.A. 2006. Interorganizational Familiness: How Family Firms Use Interlocking Directorates to Build Community-Level Social Capital. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, November, 2006: 755-775

Mace M.L. 1971. Directors: Myth and Reality. Boston: Harvard Business School. March, J.C. and Simon, H.A. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.

Mariolis, P., Jones, M.H. 1982. Centrality in Corporate Interlock Networks: Reliability and Stability. Administrative Science Quarterly, Dec82, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p571-585

Mariolis, P. 1983. Interlocking Directorates and Financial Groups: A Peak Analysis. Sociological Spectrum, 3 (3/4): 237-252

Mills CW. 1956. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford Univ. Press

Mizruchi, M.S. and Stearns, L.B. 1988. A Longitudinal Study of the Formation of Interlocking Directorates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33 (1988): 194-210

Mizruchi, M.S. 1996. What do interlocks do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates, American Review of Sociology, 22:271-98.

Newman, M.E.J. (no date) The mathematics of Networks. Center for the Study of Complex Systems, University of Michigan

Nollert, M. 2005. Transnational corporate ties: a synopsis of theories and empirical findings, Journal of world-systems research, XI, 2, November, pp.289-314

‘Stop het strippen, stropen en slopen’. NRC Handelsblad, 26 augustus 2006. Visited on October 10, 2008.

http://www.nrc.nl/economie/article1714595.ece/Stop_het_strippen%2C_stropen_en_slopen

Ornstein, M.D. 1982. Interlocking directorates in Canada: Evidence from replacement. Social Networks, 4: 3-25

Ornstein, M.D. 1984. Interlocking directorates in Canada: Intercorporate or Class Alliance? Aministrative Science Quarterly, 29 (1984): 210-231

Palmer, D. 1983. Broken ties: Interlocking directorates and intercorporate coordination. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 40-55

(5)

Peng, M.W., Au, K.Y., and Wang, D.Y.L. 2001. Interlocking Directorates as Corporate Governance in Third World Multinationals: Theory and Evidence from Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18, 161–181, 2001

Pennings, J.M. 1980. Interlocking Directorates. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Pettigrew, A.M. 1992. On studying managerial elites. Strategic Management Journal 13:163–82

Pfeffer, J. 1972 Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its Environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 2. (Jun., 1972), pp. 218-228.

Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G.R. 1978 The External Control of Qrganizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

Reskin, B.F. “Queueing and Changing Occupational Composition.” In Barbara F. Reskin and Patricia A. Roos, eds. Job Queues, Gender Queues. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1990, pp. 29–68.

Schoorman, F.D., Bazerman, M.H., and Atkin, R.S. 1981. Interlocking Directorates: A Strategy for Reducing Environmental Uncertainty. Academy of Management Review 1981. Vol. 6, No. 2. 243-251.

Staples, C.L. 2007. Board Globalisation in the World’s Largest TNCs 1993–2005. Corporate Governance, Volume 15 Number 2 March 2007

Staples, C.L. 2008. Cross-border Acquisition and Board Globalization in the World’s Largest TNCs, 1995–2005. The Sociological Quarterly 49 (2008) 31–51

Stearns, L.B. and Mizruchi, M.S. 1986. Broken-tie reconstitution and the functions of interorganizational interlocks: A reexamination. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 522-638.

Stokman, F.N. 1986. Recrutering van de Kern van de Economische Elite: De

Netwerkspecialist Binnen het Nederlandse Bedrijfsleven. (additional information missing) Stokman, F.N., Knoop, J. van der, and Wasseur, F.W. 1984. Theoretische herinterpretatie van dubbelfuncties tussen grote bedrijven: Stabiliteit en carriere-opbouw in de periode 1960-1980, J. Dronkers and F.N. Stokman (red.), Nederlandse elites in beeld. Rekrutering, samenhang en verandering, Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus, 27-47.

(6)

Van Veen, K. and Kratzer, J. 2008. National and international interlocking directorates within Europe: corporate networks within and between 15 European countries, submitted to Journal for International Business Studies.

Van Veen, K. and Marsman, I. 2008 How International are Executive Boards of European MNCs?: Nationality Diversity in 15 European Countries, European Management Journal, (in press)

Useem, M. 1980. Corporations and the corporate elite. Annual Review of Sociology, 6: 41-77.

Useem, M. 1982. Classwide rationality in the politics of managers and directors of large corporations in the United States and Great Britain. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 199-226.

Useem, M. 1984. The Inner Circle. New York: Oxford University Press

Wasserman, S. &. Faust, K. 1994. Social Network Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Westphal, J.D., Boivie, S., Ming Chng, D.H. 2006a. The strategic impetus for social network ties: reconstituting broken ceo friendship ties. Strategic Management Journal, 27(5): 425-445

Westphal, J.D., Stern, I. 2007. Flattery will get you everywhere (especially if you are a male Caucasian): How integration boardroom behavior, and demographic minority status affect additional board appointments at US companies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2): 267-288.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Hypothesis 2 predicts a stronger positive relationship between the degree of primary stakeholder interests by non-executive directors in an organization’s board and CSR

The core of the RBV is that by using its valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-substitutable (VRIN) resources and capabilities a firm can create a sustainable

Beside the benefits for green innovating firms, this study also showed that having inbound board interlocks with a top 100 green innovating firm or firms from the KIBS-sector

Furthermore, it continues on the work of Hoflund (2012), who investigated the critical leadership tasks necessary during the formative stages of a network. By adding

From Model 2-4 it can be concluded that one female director is not enough to influence the corporate risk-taking behavior, but the dummies for at least 2 or 3 female

executive, non-executive, independent and supervisory board segments. In a wholly state-owned company, three parties are responsible for different board positions;

Given the low level of corporate governance structure and the special historical period of China, a study of interlocking directorates can not only find the impact of various

In our study, the impact of all the M&A total number variables (from the year t to t-4) on executive total compensation and cash-based compensation are positive