• No results found

A phonetic and phonological study of the nominal piece in Adangme.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "A phonetic and phonological study of the nominal piece in Adangme."

Copied!
365
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)if* > A PHONETIC AND PHONOLOGICAL STUDY OP THE NOMINAL PIECE IN ADANGME. T hesis subm itted f o r the Decree of Doctor of P hilosophy of th e U n iv e rsity of London. by. ERIC. OPOE. >. APRONTI. k School of O rien ta l and A frican S tu d ie s, June,. 1967..

(2) ProQuest Number: 10752695. All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is d e p e n d e n t upon the quality of the copy subm itted. In the unlikely e v e n t that the a u thor did not send a c o m p le te m anuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if m aterial had to be rem oved, a n o te will ind ica te the deletion.. uest ProQuest 10752695 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). C opyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C o d e M icroform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 4 8 1 0 6 - 1346.

(3) 2 ABSTRACT. Chapter 1 p ro v id es a background of th e Adangme-speaking a re a , review s p rev io u s l i n g u i s t i c work on Adangme and d e fin e s th e scope o f the p re s e n t stu d y . C hapters 2 and 3 are concerned with th e grammatical d e s c rip tio n o f th e Nominal P la c e :. th e form er deals w ith a d e f in itio n of th e. Nominal P iece and w ith th e w o rd -classes o f which th e Nominal P iece i s composed;. th e l a t t e r d e sc rib e s th e relev an ce o f th e C ateg o ries. o f Person and o f Number to the Nominal P ie c e . C hapter 4 p re s e n ts a d e ta ile d d e s c rip tio n o f th e vowel and consonant sounds o f Adangme.. The d e s c rip tio n draws as w ell on. k in a e s th e tic evidence as on th e fo llo w in g in stru m e n ta l d ata, a l l o f which c o n trib u te an a d d itio n a l dimension to th e phonetic des­ c rip tio n :. p alato g ram s, kymograms and spectrogram s.. The r e s t of th e th e s is (namely Chapters 5, 6 and 7) d e sc rib e s th e phonology of th e Nominal P ie c e .. Chapter 5 p ro v id es a prosodic. a n a ly s is o f th e s y lla b le s tr u c tu re of Adangme and review s some lo a n ­ words in Adan^ne.. In Chapter 6 i s p rese n ted a p ro so d ic statem ent. on n a s a liz a tio n in v a rio u s nominal c o n s tru c tio n s . F in a lly and by re fe re n c e to tonograms o f s e le c te d u tte ra n c e s , C hapter 7 d eals w ith P itc h , Tone and In to n a tio n in words o f vary ing s y lla b ic ty p e s, in c e r ta in g ram m atically -d elim ited Nominal P iece ty p e s , and in Sentences com prising a Nominal P iece and a Verbal P ie c e . A b ib lio g ra p h y o f works quoted and o f some o f th e works c o n su lte d appears a t the end..

(4) 3 ACKNOTOroraiiTOTS. Work on t h i s th e s is was made p o ssib le by a P o st-g ra d u ate Award of th e U n iv e rsity of Ghana, supplemented in th e second year by a Grant from th e West A frican L in g u is tic S o c ie ty .. I am g r a te f u l. to both bodies f o r t h e i r f in a n c ia l support. I should a ls o l i k e to ex p ress my deep g r a titu d e to ny Super­ v is o r ,. Jack Camoehan, fo r th e in v alu ab le encouragem ent, advice. ^nd c r itic is m s he so r e a d ily provided a t a l l sta g e s of t h i s work. Of g re a t h e lo , to o , were th e le c tu r e s and t u t o r i a l s given by members o f th e s t a f f of th e Department of General L in g u istics and P h o n e tic s.. T would lik e to thank Mr A.W. S tone, C hief T echnician. o f th e School, f o r p ro v id ing the experim ental m a te ria l used in th e th e s is . I am th an k fu l to Dr A .J. Fouroin of th e P h o n etics Department o f U n iv e rsity C ollege who gave me th e b e n e fit of h is advice on many m a tte rs r e la te d to A coustic P h o n etics. I should f i n a l l y li k e to thank my wife Eleanor f o r being an in d e fa tig a b le inform ant a t th e i n i t i a l stag es o f th e re se a rc h , and f o r th e encouragement she gave during the w ritin g of th e th e s is ..

(5) TABLE 0? CONTENTS. A bstract. *. „. ,. Acknowledgements. *. •. •. •. Table of C ontents. •. «. •. .. I. A bbreviations. -. *. •. ». 5. L is t o f Palatogram s •. .. .. L i s t o f Kymograms. *. L is t o f Spectrogram s L is t of Tono grams. .. 2. 3. 6. •. ,. .. 7. .. *. •. s. .. #. 10. Chapter One:. The Adangme Language and People. •. ft. C hapter Two:. D e fin itio n of th e Nominal P iece. ,. 20. Chapter T hroe:. C ateg o ries of th e Nominal P iece. .. C hapter Four:. The Vowel and Consonant Sounds of Adsr gme. C hapter F iv e:. The S y lla b le S tru c tu re of JLiangme. •. 25 125 20+. C hanter S ix :. N a s a lis a tio n in the Nominal P iece. ♦. 225. Chapter Seven:. P itc h , Tone and In to n a tio n. *. 200. B iblio g rap h y :. 212.

(6) AB^FEVTATTONS. D irect P alato p ram (s) P alato g ro m (s) Speetrogram (a ). Tonograa(s ) Kymogram(s ) Larynx tr a c in g Mouth tr a c in g Nasal tra o in g Nominal Piecofj) Cent!seconds compare H erts, cy cles p e r second WlA®- VWr tz. . F i r s t formant Second formant T h ird formant Fourth formant Low tone High tone V erbal P ie c e (s ) I n te r n a tio n a l Phonatio A lphabet adverb re fe -r. to.

(7) 6 r j s r o? paultograiis. 1.. D?7.. T]m?5. o•. hi. 18.. lb. 3.. hh. 19.. 13. 4.. ni. 20.. si. 5.. hi. 21.. z6. 6.. mri. 22.. t/o. 7.. ti. 23.. d35. 8-. t£. 24.. J&. 25.. ^6. 9. 1 0 .’ DIO.. kS. 26.. 36. D ll.. *6. 27.. n ra. D12.. kp6. 28.. zki. D13.. *b<$ ✓. 29.. Z^rti. 14.. 30.. /A. 15.. / n?. 31.. Jirfi. Dl6.. Q&. 32.. t4 66. 33.. n&.

(8) 7 IT ST Cv KTOOfHUMS. tx ttf. 2•. m.{. 26.. ak. 3.. 27.. 4.. WP / ?!. 23.. dkde \ v*. 5.. *. 29.. k!. t.. 30.. 7.. ti % r*. 31.. s* \ itt. 8.. ta. 32.. e*. 9*. £b&. 33.. kp4. 34. 35.. 1 ? . k*>. 36.. £b& \\ g h tt. 13.. 37.. t5.K^b&. %% 14. m&n!>. 33.. t£ ,V:bb. 3 r . tf>. 39.. 16. e p i ar o. 40.. nvf. I"7, bunuktf. 41.. 18. t/t t N\ 19. ^ftnO \ 20. k!L. 42.. nh. /. 44.. N 21 • 6 &kp5r}6. 45.. 22. rjmbr)ini. 46,. 23. dpi. 47. 1* 48. u. .. ✓ 11. ikMG. ro -r. 9* t. 28.. _; O •. 1 • mt. %. sbqb \. 43.. rynS N \h * i.

(9) 8 LIST 0? KYW00HAM3 (Continued). 49.. e p lo o. 68.. kfct/4. 50.. e b io o. 69.. kb 136. 70.. JriroCm. 71.. we. 72.. gbi. 73.. kpt. 74.. X s/ j6 jrb 6 \ \ /. 51. 52.. VOTJU. 53. 54.. z6. 55* 5^.. too. 75.. 57.. aw*. 75a.. 59.. Kb&ib. 76.. sksle. 59.. n ra. 77.. b6 0. 60.. t/o. 78.. 6 l.. t/ro. 79.. b$ S \ x wX nX? Xgb6. 62. d3r4. 80.. wX nX:gb6. 63. PrS. 81.. 64.. b sll;£. 82.. nXnc 4 \ N/ n&nll. 65.. f l£. 83.. n3 5. 65a. b f l i. 84.. n ra. 66.. 85.. saaj. hX. 67. kt>5hl&.

(10) 9 LI3T OF SPSCT70GRAM3. 1.. h i:. la .. T l^ L. 2.. 22.. It*. 23.. L iii. hi :. 24.. A'rCO. 2a .. i [SJ, i [> } , i. 25.. M. J7 •. he:. 26.. ik p i. 4.. hZ:. 27.. A ^b£. 4a.. * c > ] ,:. % \j \. 28.. 5.. h«:. ^00>t. 5a.. e t^ ]. 50.. \ m:& \ n. 6.. hS:. 31.. J l:i. ■i7•. ha:. 37.. rj :S. 8.. ho:. 35.. 9.. h3:. 34.. a p. 10.. ho:. 35.. h 11. 11.. hu:. 36.. J iff. 12.. h(3I:. 37.. 2l vA. n J7•. i b lc p i ta&fl. 38.. A sA. 14.. i hi* <131 k&ff. 39.. Asi. 15.. i nfi hlo p i. 40.. ih l. 16.. i nfl hlb p i 7. 41.. it/d. 17.. si. 47.. 18.. si. 43.. 19.. V^bAi. 44.. 20.. ip 41. 45.. 21.. :8. a jc. la i,. 13,1.

(11) 10. t o n o s r a m s. 1 .. mi. 1 6 .. ml 1. 2 .. b k p l. 1 7 .. ml 1. 3 .. tlb l. M CD .. Liar or. bkpb o. V .. ml. 1 9 .. ml 1. 3 .. p a li. 2 0 .. ml no. 6 .. s ln t. 2 1 .. p e l l no. 7 .. m&. 2 2 .. tld L3 l pfep&l. 8 .. 6n b. CM. bkpl o l l. 9 .. hi f t. 2V .. b k p b. o. 1 0 .. nttnlo n in e. 2 5 .. & kp &. o d3l. 1 1 .. h i. 1 2 .. A. m3mb. 1 3 .. 6. w o rn £. I V. t a. /. 1 5 .. m. 2 6 .. 2 7 .. m f. b tl. .. .. sh. f l l k. l. i. n l. m b. ba. b fc p b. o. l&bb no o.

(12) ii 1.. *. THIS ADANGME LANGUAGE AND PEOPLE 1. *. 1 .1 .. ADANGME i s a tone language th a t belongs to th e KWA. sub-group o f th e NIGER-CONGO fam ily (see Greenberg 1963, p . 8; V oegelin 19&4, PP* 14-15)*. As th e map facin g p . 12. shows, i t. i s spoken m ainly in so u th -e a ste rn Ghana in an area bounded roughly by a lin e drawn from th e c o a s ta l town of Kpone eastw ards along th e c o a s t to Ada, th en up n o rth along th e oourse o f th e V olta R iver to Kpong, then north-w estw ards to B isa and along th e fo o t of th e Akwapim mountains to Dodowa, and th en down south again to Xpone. O utside Ghana, th e re i s an enclave of Adangme speakers in c e n tra l Togo who have been mentioned by w rite rs such as C h r i s t a l l e r (1887, p . 165 and 1933P* xi*)». Rapp (1943);. Westermann and Bryan. (195?,. p . 82),. and whose presence has been r e c e n tly a t te s t e d by Miss Mary. E sth er. Kropp •. Puplampu (1953, pp. 2 ? f f . ) p o s tu la te s I 65O as th e. date o f th e m ig ratio n of th e se Adary^me-speaking people to an area in Togo through which th e main body of Adangme3 had come to Ghana during t h e i r m ig ratio n from a p lace e a s t of N ig e ria .. In Togo, t h i s. Adangme-speaking community i s e n t i r e l y surrounded by Ewe-speakers b u t t h e i r language has remained d i s t i n c t l y Adangme. In Ghana, Adangme i s l i n g u i s t i c a l l y bounded on th e e a s t by Ewe, on th e n o rth by Akwapim Twi and on th e west by Ga. 1 . Also s p e lt ADANGBE, DANGBE and DANGME. 2. P erso n al communication.. Adangme-1and.

(13)

(14) 12 covers th e seven t r a d i t i o n a l areas of Kpone, Prampram, Ningo, Ada, Osudoku, Krobo and Shai which were a s s o c ia te d with th e nowmoribund Dangme C u ltu ra l S o ciety o f th e 1940s and 1950s.. C onsiderable. confusion has been caused in the p a s t by th e la ck o f a stan d ard la b e l f o r th e a re a and by th e frequency w ith which a d m in is tra tiv e d e s ig ­ n a tio n s have been changed.. Thus one o fte n h ears of "Dangbe-Shai". which i s ta u to lo g o u s sin ce Shai i s but one of seven Dangme sub­ d iv is io n s ;. "Ga-Adangbe" which denotes an eth n ic c l u s t e r com prising. th e Ga and th e Adangme, each w ith i t s own language and s o c ia l o rg a n iz a tio n ;. ”Ca-Dangbe-8hai" which i s th e ponderous d esig n atio n. of a Local Council Area th a t covers an area which i s p a r tly Ga and p a r t l y Adangme.. e tc .. P a rt o f th e confusion stems from inadequate li n g u i s t i c in fo rm a tio n . r e la te d ;. I t i s tru e t h a t Ga and Adangbe are v ery c lo s e ly. b u t sin ce th ey a re not m utually i n t e l l i g i b l e th e y are. b e t t e r co n sid ered as two se p a ra te languages.. T his p o s itio n did. not become c le a r u n t i l se rio u s lin g u i s tic a t te n t io n was focused on th e area in th e e a r ly 1940s.. About two c e n tu r ie s ago, incoming. m is sio n a rie s s e ttle d in Ga-speaking Accra and devised an o rth o ­ graphy f o r Ga.. This language became the v e h ic le f o r e d u c atio n al. and m issio n ary work, and a grammar of Ga was p u b lish ed as e a r ly as 1^64 by a Danish soholar c a lle d P ro tte n . Then came many hypotheses about th e r e l a t i o n of Ga to Adangme. Zimmerman (1858, pp. 395-6) c a l l s Adangme 1i ul m i't "the raotherd ia le o t o f Ga" and l a t e r m entions "the Adangme d ia le o t of th e Ga.

(15) Language".. One reason he g iv es f o r th e m is s io n a r ie s ' choice of. Ga r a th e r th a n Adangme as th e language to be oho sen f o r m issio n ary work and to be w ritte n was **the moral and p o l i t i c a l supremacy o f th e proper Ga t r i b e oyer th e Adangme as w ell as th e o th er t r i b e s around** — an in te r e s tin g re a so n , b u t one th a t need not d e ta in us* Zimmerman*'* view th a t Ga and Adangme were one language seems to have been adopted by Westermann (1927, p . 4;. a ls o Westermann and. Bryan, 1952, p . 82), by C h r i s t a l l e r (1933* p . x iv ) and by Ward (1945, p p . 6 5 f f ) .. Ward f e l t th a t. and Adangme are f a i r l y. c lo s e ly r e la te d d ia le c ts of one language** b u t, s ig n i f ic a n t ly , she suggested t h a t th e y were d if f e r e n t enough to w arrant th e production of se p a ra te l i n g u i s t i c m a te ria ls f o r an impending l i t e r a c y campaign. As soon as th e d e fic ie n c y in th e amount o f l i n g u i s t i c inform ation on Adangme was rem edied by th e work o f P ro fe ss o r Jack B erry and o th e rs ( e .g . Rapp, 1943, P . 8 ), i t became c le a r th a t Ga and Adangme were se p a ra te lan g u ag es. p assim ).. Berry says as much (1950* p . 69;. 1952. Although Greenberg did n o t se p arate th e two in th e 1955. e d itio n o f S tudies in A frioan L in g u istic C la a a lf io a tio n . h is l a t e r work Languages of A frio a (1963) li® ts them as two lan g u ag es.. In. V oegelin (1964, pp. 14-15) th ey are l i s t e d as two lan g u ag es.. As. m entioned above, Ga and Adangme a re not m utually i n t e l l i g i b l e :. most. Adangmes understand Ga because i t i s th e only v e rn a c u la r th ey le a rn to re a d and w rite a t school;. and th o se Gas who have had no ex ten siv e. commercial or o th e r c o n ta c t w ith Adangme-speakers can , a t b e s t, only make rough guesses a t th e meaning o f Adangme u tte ra n c e s ..

(16) 14. The main o ccupations o f th e peonle liv in g in th e Adangme a re a are farm in g , f is h in g , animal husbandry and s a l t - c o l l e c t i o n . ( S a lt- c o lle c tio n i s done a t the Songaw [sbqb] lagoon n ear Ada, The s a l t i s g ath ered during the dry harm attan season from a f l a t a re a b o rd erin g th e se a, so "s a lt-m in in g ” would be an in a p p ro p ria te d e s ig n a tio n .). Owing to poor employment o p p o rtu n itie s in th e area. and to th e a r i d i t y of a l o t of th e la n d , many c o a s ta l Adangmes have ventured o u tsid e t h e i r home towns to seek employment elsew here, o fte n in o th e r Adangme-speaking a re a s to the n o rth but a t o th e r tim es to p la c e s such as t h e Tw i-speaking cocoa-farm ing areas f a r t h e r n o r th .. I t i s n o t only farm ers th a t have moved;. and o th e r o ccu p atio n al groups have moved to o .. te a c h e rs , tr a d e r s My f a th e r , fo r. in s ta n c e , h a ils from Ada (as does my mother to o ) but has been •4! a s s o c ia te d f o r over t h i r t y y e a rs , f i r s t as a stu d e n t and l a t e r as & te a c h e r, w ith a Secondary School th a t was e s ta b lis h e d a t Ewe-speaking Adi dome, moved to Ada in l%-2 and th en f i n a l l y moved to Dodowa in 1945*. I was f iv e when we moved to Dodowa and I went to school th e re. co n tin u o u sly u n til I was sev en teen ,. I a lso spent in te r m itte n t. p e rio d s th e re in th e follow ing s ix y e a rs , pending my d ep artu re f o r B r ita in .. My v i s i t s to my home town Ada have, on th e whole, been. sh o rt and in fre q u e n t. Dodowa i s a sm all town b is e c te d by a small seaso n al stream b ea rin g th e same name and e a s t o f which liv e Adangme-speaking (Shai d ia le c t) and Ha usa-speaking com munities.. To the west o f th e stream are to. be found a heterogeneous m ixture o f Yoruba-, Ga-, Ewe-, Twi- and.

(17) Adangme-speaking com munities.. The indigenous Shai people are. alm ost e n t i r e l y confined to th e e a s te rn sid e of th e stream .. My. fam ily liv e d in a house owned by an Ada fam ily th a t had s e ttle d a t Dodowa some y ea rs p re v io u sly ; fa m ily .. among our c o -te n a n ts were a Yoruba. We o h ild re n mixed a l o t , but my f a th e r was a t p ain s to. ensure th a t we d id not lo se our Ada ac ce n t.. Thus, although I have. spent only a few sh o rt h o lid ay s a t Ada i t s e l f , my speech m ain tains more f e a tu re s of th e Ada d ia le c t than of th e Shai o r any o th er d ia le c t of Adangme.. I t is w ith the Ada d ia le c t th a t t h i s th e s is. i s p rim a rily conoerned. The l a t e s t Census f ig u re s. 3. in d ic a te th a t th e re are about. 290,000 Adangmes, in clu d in g 50,000 Adas.. The fig u re f o r Gas i s. 236,000.. The Adangme t o t a l i s almost c e r ta in ly a co n serv ativ e if e s tim a te , sin ce both Zimmermann and Ward (19^5, P»65) agree th a t Adarypnes outnumber Gas by f a r and since i t i s known th a t enum eration in r u ra l a re a s such as Adangrae-land i s fa r l e s s thorough than i t i s in urbah c e n tre s such as Accra where most Gas l i v e .. I t i s very. doubtful i f th e re has been enough m igration from Adangme area s to 5 reduce th e p re -1 % 5 r a t i o of about A Adangmes to 1 Ga to the o v e ra ll margin re p re se n te d by the p rese n t f ig u r e s . 3. Ghana. Govt.. A c la s s ic example. (19 6 c), p . x x ii.. if. Zimmermann (1858, p . 385): n a tio n th an th e Ga.". "Adangme i s spoken by a f a r more numerous. 5. Ward, ib id , quotes the pre-1945 fig u re s as 90 ono t—r— Adangmes as a g a in st 20, 0 00 Ca8..

(18) of th e im p recisio n o f th e ru ra l count i s given by Puplaapu (1955, p * 8 .) who r e j e c t s th e 19^8 Census t o t a l o f 250,000 Adangmes and suggests n f ig u r e o f 500,000 f o r th a t :/ear.. 1*2.. P~cvion3 S tudies o f Adangmc 6. Ximmerman's I have seen*. i s the e a r l i e s t ex tan t A n a l y s i s of Adangme th a t. Along with h is b r i e f , tr a d it io n a l ly - o r ie n te d a n a ly s is. go a few te x ts o f Adangme from which he e x tr a c ts v ario u s gram m atical c o n s tru c tio n s f o r tr a n s la tio n and fo r comparison with Ga,. He uses. th e Ga s c r ip t o f those days which was c h a ra c te ris e d by th e presence o f many d i a c r i t i c s . The second a n a ly s is o f Adangme must have been a work o f Puplampu (I9*f5?) which Ward ( l 9^-5) said was ready fo r p r in tin g a t th e tim e. I cannot tr a c e i t , but i t appears to have been th e p recu rso r o f h is l a t e r tw o -p art Dangbe Manner o f Speech which was pub lish ed in 1953* The l a t t e r work i s c a s t in th e form of a classroom d isc u ssio n in which a te a o h e r t e l l s h is c la s s th e h is to r y of th e Adangme p eo p le, te a c h e s them same Adangme p h o n etics, and t e l l s them something about th e type of orthography th a t he would recommend f o r th e language. P a rt 3 o f t h i s work i s r e f e r r e d to on page 93 of P a rt 2 but i t does not appear to have been p u b lish ed . oare o f P ro fe sso r B erry;. The M3, of P a rt 3 i® in th e. i t was not p o s s ib le to c o n s u lt i t during. 6. o p . c i t , , pp. 3 8 5 ff, W-5ff*.

(19) th e course o f th e p re s e n t study* Puplanpu i s to he commended f o r th e energy and a s s id u ity he brought to h is s u b je c t:. he once took a frequency count a t th re e. m arkets so as to determ ine whioh speech sounds he should in tro d u ce f i r s t in h is i n f a n t s ' te x t books. The pedagogical grounds f o r 7 t h i s approach are q u ite ahaky , but th a t is not th e p o in t at issu e h e re .. In th e face o f heavy odds and d e sp ite the je a lo u s o p p o sitio n. o f many Adangmes, he took p ain s to analyse Adangme speech as r ig o ro u s ly as he c o u ld , and sought a l l a lo n g — a p p a re n tly without r e a liz in g th e lim ita tio n s o f such an approach — to s t r i k e a balance between th e d if f e r e n t Adangme d ia le c ts so as to f a c i l i t a t e th e acceptance o f h is orthography and o f h is te x t-b o o k s. T his attem pt a t compromise at a l l c o s ts o ften le d him to recommend as norms u tte ra n c e s th a t were q u ite a r t i f i c i a l , in th a t th e y were not th e n a tu r a l speech o f speakers o f any one o f the seven d ia le c ts ;. examples of th ese abound in h is school te x t-b o o k s .. a ls o , u n fo rtu n a te ly , sought to p e rp e tu a te. He. o b so le sce n t forms of th e. language f o r th e purpose of developing Standard Adangme, o f c re a tin g one speech community and o f sm othering d ia le c ta l d iffe re n c e s (Puplampu, 19^3, p . 63).. In t h i s attem p t, p r e d ic ta b ly , he f a i l e d .. But th e. 7, See O.C. Irw in (1^57), from which i t would appear t h a t a b e t te r approach would be to grade th e sounds by p la ce of a r tic u la t io n r a th e r than by th e frequency of t h e i r occurrence in a d u lt speech..

(20) problem of th e la c k o f any lo c a lly -re c o g n iz e d sta n d ard or C en tral d ia le c t i s bound to a r is e again i f and when an attem p t i s made to produoe te x t books f o r th e area and to make Adangme th e medium of in s tr u c tio n in th e e a r ly stag es of elem entary school ed u catio n . Indeed, a tr a n s la tio n o f th e B ible in to Adangme on which work i s re p o rte d to have s ta r t e d under th e d ir e o tio n of P ro fe ss o r Rapp i s alm ost c e r t a in ly going to be b e d e v ille d by t h i s problem . P uplanpu's aw areness of th e need f o r to le ra n c e in th e a p p li­ c a tio n o f h is orthography (1953, PP. 35, 37) i s o fte n fo rg o tte n when he comes to la y down r u le s f o r s p e llin g .. For in sta n c e he. recommends ( p .38) th e omission o f oonsonants th a t ten d to be dropped in speech but in th e same b re a th opposes th e om ission o f vowels th a t are s im ila rly dropped because "the language g ain s from our re p la c in g th e om itted vowels’*.. He o fte n in d u lg es to o in an. an tiq u arian ism th a t runs oounter to th e s p i r i t of modern l i n g u i s t i c s . Of th e Osudoku d ia l e c t , he says (1953, p .2 6 .) th a t i t Hi s th e p u re st form, com paratively speaking.. Because of i t s p o s itio n , i t has been. p ro te c te d from th e c o rru p tin g (ray i t a l i c s ) in flu e n c e s o f G-a, Twi, Ewe. ". T his i s a p a te n t value judgment which, as such, i s o f. l i t t l e use to se rio u s l i n g u i s t i c d is c u s s io n !.. In a d d itio n , he. o fte n invokes etymology to condemn forms t h a t a re , in f a c t , c u rre n t in contem porary speech (1953, PP. 50-51). Puplampu's a n a ly sis i s , on th e whole, q u ite v alu ab le and i s c e r ta in ly th e most d e ta ile d ever to have been p u b lish e d .. Since he. also spoke th e Ada d i a l e c t , any d iffe re n c e s in view point th a t are.

(21) 19. co n sid ered w orth r e f e r r in g to w ill be noted in th e re le v a n t se c tio n s o f th e t h e s i s .. He died about te n y ea rs ago.. P ro fe ss o r Ida Ward devoted some a tte n tio n to Adangme and worked 8 w ith Puplaopu when th e l a t t e r was a t t h i s School in th e 1940s. She p u b lish ed a schematic to n a l a n a ly sis o f two Adangme verbs in 9 a paper on Tonal A nalysis of West A frican Languages . A nother in v e s tig a to r w ith whom Puplampu worked and whom he c a l l s h is Ht u t o r , f rie n d and co n stan t companion** (Puplaopu, 1953, p . i i i . ) i s P ro fe sso r Jack B erry.. The l e t t e r ' s q u ite e x te n siv e. study of Adangme and of Ga f i r s t appeared in p r in t when he c o n t r i­ b uted an o u tlin e of Ga and Adangme s tru c tu re to Manoukian (1950 p . 69^. N ext, h is Ph.D. T h esis (Berry, 1952), c a ita in e d a b r i e f. a n a ly s is o f Adangme alongside analyses o f o th e r V o lta R iver Languages. He has sin ce p u b lish ed a p ap er on Krobo p h o n etio s (Berry, 1957) in which he d e a ls w ith th e q u estio n of s tr e s s in Adangme, and a lso a paper on Ada P ersonal Nomenclature (Berry, I9 6 0 ).. A p ro je c te d. d ic tio n a ry which P ro fe sso r B erry once mentioned does not appear to have been p u b lish e d y et (see B erry, 1958, p . 7 6 l. ). A c o n trib u tio n to Adangme sc h o larsh ip came from Miss Mary E sth er K ropp's 1964 p ap er on "The Morphology of th e Adangme Verb Complex". U n fo rtu n a te ly , she drew on b o th th e Krobo and th e Ada d ia le c ts fo r 8. The School o f O rien ta l and A frioan S tu d ie s, London U n iv e rs ity . 9. See Ward (1949), p . 59..

(22) 20. th e study and th e re b y exposed here s e lf a t many p o in ts to th e danger of assuming more homogeneity in th e l i n g u i s t i c m a te ria l than i s th e c a s e .. The f a c t th a t one of her inform ants spoke. Adangme w ith an Ewe accent was an a d d itio n a l co m p licatio n .. Below. i s an i l l u s t r a t i o n of the oonfusion th a t arose due to th e se f a c t o r s . In d e a lin g w ith n eg ativ e morphemes in A . I . 2 2 ., she says th e re are two, namely { - l } and ^wej .. This i s tr u e enough, but th e y. are d is tr ib u te d in d i s t i n c t l y d if f e r e n t ways in th e two d i a l e c t s , c f.. Ada /d u /. /d d f/. (b a th e ). but Krobo /d u /. /dd w e/. (b a th e ).. Furtherm ore, her s ile n c e on th e m atter o f the phonetic a lte r n a n ts of. i s l i k e l y to make a tran sfo rm atio n such as: /d d - b /. / d d - |/. (sharpen). u n in te lli g ib le to a non-Adangrae re a d e r.. On th e d is tr ib u tio n of. <£we] , she says th a t i t occurs a f te r d is s y lla b ic and a f t e r mid tone m onosyllabic v e r t* .. The form er statem ent is tr u e of n e ith e r Krobo. nor Ada, c f . /^iAwd/. /hbvrtS/. (w orry), in b o th d ia le c ts ;. and th e l a t t e r statem ent i s only p a r t i a l l y tr u e o f Krobo, fo r in s ta n c e : /s u /. /s d w e/. (k in d le ). / J e/. /& /. ( e a t). f o r which th e corresponding Ada forms are.

(23) 21. «nd. /»«/. Mi/. /$«/. /a /. An adequate account of th e se fe a tu re s i s p o s s ib le only when one t r e a t s each d ia le o t as a se p a ra te homogeneous whole and when one pays a t te n t io n to to n a l v a r ia tio n s in th e word c la s s e s o f each d a i le c t.. D espite a few more in sta n c e s of s im ila r shortcom ings,. Miss K ropp's paper brought to l ig h t f o r th e f i r s t tim e many s tr u c tu r a l f e a tu r e s of Admgme th a t had a p p a re n tly not been in v e s ti­ gated b e fo re . The l a s t sc h o la r of Adangme to be mentioned in t h i s review i s P ro fe sso r Eugene Rapp.. Of two papers he p u b lish ed in B e rlin in. 1% 2 and 1% ^ (see B ib lio g rap h y ), th e f i r s t i s a c o lle c tio n of Adangme p roverbs w ith tr a n s la tio n s and comments in German, and th e second i s a summary of the p h o n etics of th e language as spoken in Agotime in Togo follow ed by an Agotim e-German and German-Ago tim e le x ic o n .. P ro fe ss o r Rapp i s re p o rte d to be c u r r e n tly d ire c tin g work. in oonneotion w ith the t r a n s l a ti o n of the B ible in to Adangme. T his b r i e f review w ill have shown how l i t t l e has been done on Adangme so f a r , and, by im p lic a tio n , how much rem ains to be done..

(24) 1*3*. Score o f th e P resen t Study. This th e s is p re s e n ts a d e s c rip tio n of th e p h o n etics and phono1°gy of a g ram m atically -d elim ited p o rtio n of th e Ada d ia le c t of Adangme which i s d esig n ated th e Nominal P iece o r NP, and i s d efin e d in Chapter 2.. The statem ent i s th e re fo re a t th e th re e l i n g u i s t i c. le v e ls of grammar, p h o n etics and phonology in th a t o rd e r. The, phonetic d e s c rip tio n draws on k in a e s th e tic evidence o f my a r tic u la t io n of a v a r ie ty of Adangme u tte ra n c e s , supported by d a ta d eriv ed from th e study of d ir e c t and in d ir e c t palatogram s; kymoAV/ grams ; spectrogram s and tonograms of s e le c te d u tte ra n c e s . The in stru m e n ta l tech n iq u es th a t are used f o r th e p ro v isio n of th e se d a ta enable th e in v e s tig a to r to make a b s tra c tio n s o f v arious k inds <. o. illu m in a te asp e c ts of th e phonetic d e s c r ip tio n , give i t an. a d d itio n a l dimension and involve in many cases th e a p p lic a tio n of th e methods of n a tu r a l science to th e study o f human speech. A g rid f o r the in d ir e c t palatogram s i s p ro v id ed in th e ja c k e t in sid e the back cover of the apnendix, and a c h a rt f o r th e physio­ lo g ic a l ex p lan atio n o f th e g r id i s to be found in F ir th (l% ila, fa c in g p . 860).. Besides wide band spectrogram s w ith am plitude. d is p la y s , narrow band in te g ra te d se c tio n s are a lso provided f o r many of th e speech sounds d escrib ed and the advantages o f the one 10.. I t has been found n ecessary to show some kymograms more th an once in th e Appendix, sin ce th e y are d isc u sse d in more th an one place in th e t e x t . The o rd er i n which th e kvmo^r th e Appendix follow s th a t of the te x t in. as far as Possibly..

(25) over th e o th e r are o u tlin e d .. The phonetio tr a n s c r ip tio n employ*. th e I.P .A . symbols, w ith s lig h t m o d ific atio n s;. th e se are in d io a te d. in the re le v a n t s e c tio n s o f th e t h e s i s . Sinoe th e r e i s a t th e moment no standard orthography fo r Adangme, th e l i n g u i s t i c m a te ria l has been p re se n te d in th e form o f phonetic tr a n s o r ip tio n s and phonological form ulae only. to n e marks used — th e acute accen t. The. fo r h ig h to n e , th e grave. accent [%] f o r low tone and no tone mark fo r mid t o n e —a re of l i n g u i s t i c s ig n ific a n c e f o r th e to n a l s u b - c la s s if ic a tio n of wordc la s s e s .. N ative speakers of Adangme would re q u ir e f a r fewer tone. marks than are provided;. b u t sin c e the m a jo rity o f read e rs o f t h i s. th e s i s are l i k e l y to be non-Adangmes, i t has been thought b e s t to in d ic a te to n es in a l l c a se s . The phonological a n a ly s is employs the te ch n iq u e of prosodic a n a ly s is i n i t i a t e d by P ro fesso r J.R . F ir th and developed by h is stu d e n ts and c o lle a g u e s in th e School o f O rie n ta l and A frioan S tu d ie s. T his i s a polysystem ic r a th e r th a n monosystemic approach to phonology, and i t i s d isc u sse d a t some le n g th in Chapter 5» The l i n g u i s t i c m a terial i s la r g e ly of my own c o n s tru c tio n and i s d eriv ed from tr a n s c r ip tio n s of fo lk t a l e s t o ld and recorded by me, from spontaneous u tte ra n c e s I have oaught m yself using in conver­ s a tio n s w ith o th e r Adangme speakers and from c i t a t i o n s made, f o r example, f o r names of o b je o ts in th e oourse of th e c o lle c tio n o f le x io a l item s f o r a p ro je c te d d ic tio n a ry .. Care was taken in a l l. oases to ensure th e a u th e n tic ity of th e u tte ra n c e s , and most of them.

(26) 24. have from tim e to tim e been te s te d on o th e r sp eak ers o f th e Ada d ia le c t o f Adangme f o r t h e i r reac tio n s* For th e grammatical a n a ly s is which i9 p re se n te d in Chapter 2, a la rg e number of Adangme NP c o n stru c tio n s were c o lle c te d , as w ell from spontaneous u tte ra n c e s I have heard Adangraes use as from th e few Adangme pam phlets (m ostly w ritte n by R.P. D jabanor, see B ib lio ­ graphy) a v a ila b le during th e p re p a ra tio n o f th e t h e s i s .. These. gave me access to a g reat v a r ie ty o f Adangme u tte ra n c e s of d is s im ila r s y n ta c tic com plexity;. i t is th e re fo r e hoped th a t th a t. ch a p te r covers v i r t u a l l y a l l major and minor s y n ta c tic types of Nominal P ie c e . A m a tte r of major concern to the a u th o r, b u t one th a t s t r i c t l y l i e s o u tsid e th e scope of t h i s t h e s i s , i s the d e v isin g of an adequate orthography f o r Adangme.. In th e p a s t, each o f th e s ix or so Adangme. au th o rs who have p u b lish ed pampKL£s or books have used t h e i r own m o d ific atio n s o f th e Ga orthography f o r t h e i r p urpose.. These took. account o f only t h e i r own p a r tic u la r d ia le c ts and th e re fo re had l i t t l e •hanoe o f being accepted by speakers of o th e r d i a l e c t s .. These. o rth o g rap h ies were f u r th e r weakened by a d ep lo ra b le la c k of c o n sis­ te n cy ty p if ie d by a f r e e a lte r n a tio n — sometimes on th e same page — between, f o r in sta n c e , dsua and dzwa fo r m arket.. Puplanpu was the. only Adangme author who had a c o n s is te n t orthography b u t none of th e o th e r a u th o rs employed i t , and i t has the d isad v an tag e, on the one hand, o f proposing too many major d e p a rtu re s from th e Ga orthography w ith which a l l l i t e r a t e Adangmes are f a m ilia r (fo r in s ta n c e , he uses.

(27) 9 rJ. and ± fo r th e a f f r i c a t e t£ and dz_ of th e Ga orthography) and, on th e o th e r hand, of proposing th e adoption of o b so lete forms wherever th e re were d ia le c ta l v a r ia tio n s in , say, le x ic a l item s. The problems involved in t h i s m atter o f an orthography f o r a language w ith many d ia le c ts none of which i s lo c a lly recognized as a S tandard a re , indeed, v a s t.. I t would seem th a t th e most p r a c t i­. cable course would be the undertaking o f sep arate s tu d ie s o f each d ia le c t follow ed by a review of th e e x te n t and n atu re of d ia le c ta l v a r ia tio n as a b a s is fo r the form ulation of a Standard Orthography. The p o in t has o ften been made (e .g . Ward, 19U5, p assim ). and q u ite r i g h t l y to o , th a t what i s e s s e n tia l in an orthography i s not so much o v e ra ll p h o n etic accuracy as a w ritin g system which w ill be p h o n e tio a lly in te r p r e te d in d if f e r e n t ways by speakers of d if f e r e n t d ia le c ts of one langu ag e.. What must be e q u a lly emphasized i s th e f a c t th a t a. d e ta ile d knowledge o f what v a r ia tio n s of p ro n u n cia tio n any p ro je c te d orthography i s to accommodate cannot but help in th e adoption of the most s u ita b le o rth o g rap h ic conventions.. T his th e s is w ill, i t is. hoped, narrow th e gap t h a t must be f i l l e d b e fo re an adequate ortho­ graphy can be devised f o r Adangme as a whole, and is o ffe re d as a small c o n trib u tio n to our knowledge in th is a re a of A frican l i n g u i s t i c s ..

(28) DEFINITION OF THE NOMINAL PIECE. 2.. 2 .1 .1 .. "The Nominal P iece (NP) in Adangme" i s an a b s tra c tio n 1 made a t the grammatical le v e l o f d e s c rip tio n to subsume elem ents o f s tr u c tu r e th a t , b ro ad ly speaking, fu n c tio n e i th e r as independent se n te n c e s, or as s u b je c ts (and/or o b je c ts , in th e case o f t r a n s i tiv e v e rb s) o f verbal p ie c e s (VPs) in Adangme se n ten c es.. T his means th a t. any s tr e t c h of u tte ra n c e tr e a te d as an NP in th e th e s i s p lay s one Cv CCtwrao* of th e th r e e s y n ta c tic r o le s mentioned above. T his i s w e defending c h a r a c t e r i s t i c of a l l Adangme NPs and i t i s th is f a c to r t h a t , above a l l , j u s t i f i e s th e c o - id e n tif ic a tio n as NPs of s tr u c tu r e s th a t evince a wide range o f v a r ia tio n in th e com plexity of t h e i r in te rn a l s tr u c t u r e s .. These common sy n ta c tic fu n c tio n s sire c o l le c tiv e ly. c e n tr a l to th e a n a ly s is p re se n te d in th e th e s is and i t cannot be overem phasized th a t th e u n ity of the NP depends on them. The Sentence i s taken as th e la r g e s t u n it — l a r g e s t , th a t i s , not n e c e s s a r ily in terms of th e tim e i t ta k e s to u tte r i t , but w ith regard to i t s c o n s titu e n t s tr u c tu r c — w ith in th e framework of which t h i s gram m atical a b s tra c tio n i s made.. I t i s b eliev e d th a t t h i s. framework i s adequate fo r a statem en t o f th e in te r n a l s tr u c tu r e o f th e Adangme NP and, where d e s ire d , of th e e x te rn a l r e la tio n s o f th e NP with th e VP.. A d e ta ile d d isc u ssio n o f th e s tr u c tu re o f th e. 1 . F irth (1957), p . 7..

(29) I'O Adangme Sentence i s , however, o u tsid e the scope of t h i s t h e s i s . As a p o in t o f d e p a rtu re , i t w ill be s u f f i c i e n t to l i s t some of th e major sentence types of Adangme and to d isc u ss the r o l e o f NPs i n them.. Examples w ill be numbered only in t h i s c h a p te r.. 2 .1 .? .. Some Adangme Sentence Types.. An Adangme Sentence may c o n s is t o f: (a) a VP only, as in th e coasands 1•. Come 1. 2. h6. Go^l. o f (b) an NP only, as in th e exolamation 3. k&ff. Kofi |. o r in th e answer (Sentenoe 3) t o th e q u estio n: / / km mini p i p l l o 2 (what - sounded - j u s t now?) What made t h a t noise? Answer:. 3» Ikpb o. The dove. o r (c) a VP and an NP,as in the commands 6. j£ n l 3. F in ish your m e a l!. (eat - food - th e ) 7. b£ we o ml. Come in d o o rs!. (come - house - th e - in ) o r (d) an NP and a VP as in th e statement 8. bkpfc. o ba. The dove has come..

(30) 22. or (e) an NP and a VP and an NP, as in the statem ents 9« 10.. i n ! bkp& o.. I saw th e dove.. d e ja lo o gb£ d^Atd.. The hunter has k ille d a lio n .. (hunter - th e - k i l l e d - l i o n ) In a l l sentence types save th e f i r s t two, th e NP as su b je c t i s d is tin g u is h e d from the NP as o b ject as well by grammatical o rd er (the former always precedes the VP w h ilst th e l a t t e r always follow s th e VP) as by in to n a tio n s ! p a t t e r n s p e c u lia r t o t h e i r r e s p e c tiv e stru c tu ra l p o sitio n s. Only the f i r s t sentence type f a l l s e n t i r e l y o u tsid e th e scope of th is th e sis;. th e v ario us NPs in the o th e r sentenoe ty pes f a l l. w ith in the purview of our su b je ct o u tlin e. and w ill be disc u sse d below:. an. w ill f i r s t be given of the NPin i t s s t a t u s as Sentenoe. ( 2 . 1 . 3 1 .) , as Object ( 2 .1 .3 2 .) and as Subject ( 2 . 1 .3 3 . ) , follow ed by a d e ta ile d d isc u ssio n o f NPs having s tr u c tu r e s o f varying i n t e r n a l complexity. ( 2. 2. and 2. 3*)«. 2 .1 .3 1 .. Nominal Sentence. A sentenoe t h a t c o n s is ts of only an NP may be c a lle d a Nominal Sentence.. A comparison of Tgm 18 f o r th e Nominal Sentence. 5. ik pb o. The dove. with Tgms 23 to 25 f o r th e follow ing NP-plus-VP sentenoes 11. bkpo% 0. (Tgm 23). The dove oooed.. (Tgm 21+). The dove has come.. 12. Mcpi o d3» (Tgm 25). The dore has l e f t .. 8 . &kp£ o ba.

(31) 29 shows t h a t a Nominal Sentenoe has as an e s s e n t i a l p a r t of i t s s tr u c tu r e an in to n a tio n a l p a t t e r n p e c u lia r to i t s s ta tu s as an independent sentence t h a t i s bounded on both s id e s by s il e n c e . In i n t e r n a l s t r u c t u r e , a nominal sentence may o o n sist of any of th e fo llo w in g : (a) one word, as in Sentence 3» [k & fl].. Such an NP may be. c a l l e d a Nominal Wor d . (b) more than one word, but excluding a d eterm in ativ e as in 1%. rabtft flAkd.. Morning porridge (o f. Tgm 15). IV#. nbmlo n£ne.. Human le g (o f. Tgm 1 0 ).. Such an NP may be o a lle d a Nominal Croup.. As i s shown in 7.V#2. below,. NPs made up a nominal and a determ inative (see 2.11. on determ ina­ t i v e s ) are among th e v e ry few NP types t h a t are r e g u la r ly c h a r a c te r ­ is e d by s p e c if ic in to n a tio n a l f e a t u r e s .. I t would seem d e s ira b le. to take account of t h i s f a c t in a d e s c r ip tio n of NP s t r u c t u r e , hence th e esta b lish m e n t of Nominal Groups (above) in c o n t r a d i s t i n c t i o n to ( c ) Nominal Phrases which o o n sist of more than one word and include a d e te rm in a tiv e . 3. bkpb o. \. 15# mi no.. Examples a re : The dove (o f. Tgm 18). This town ( c f . Tgm 20)..

(32) 30 NP as o b je c t to a VP.. 2 .1 .3 2 .. NPs in t h i s s y n ta c tic p o s itio n e x h i b it in to n a tio n s p e c u lia r. to t h a t p o s itio n and, of course, to t h e i r in te r n a l s t r u c t u r e (c f. Nominal P hrases ) .. They may be nominal words, nominal groups or. nominal p h rase s, as exem plified r e s p e c tiv e ly by: 16. bd hio. Come h e re .. \. 1 7 . 1 nS bkpfr &gb&. I s i* a big dove,. (I - saw - dove - b ig ) 13. 1 n \ Mcpb d. 2 .1 .3 3 .. 1 saw th e dove (cf. Tgm 26).. TIP as su b je ct to a VP.. These are again c h a ra c te riz e d by in to n a tio n s p e c u lia r to t h e i r s y n ta c tic p o s itio n and. to t h e i r in te r n a l s t r u c t u r e s .. They may be. nominal, words, nominal. groups or nominal p h ra se s, as exem plified. r e s p e c tiv e ly by: 19. wo. 06 p.. 20* n8 \gbb b£ pig o ml (big - cow - i s not 21. p g l i no 13c. Honey i s sweet. There i 3 no b ig. cow in th e e n c lo su re .. - enclosure - the - i n ) ^ h is bird's^-wing is b e a u tif u l. ( b i r d 's wing - t h i s - i s - b e a u t i f u l ). 2 . 1 . Vf.. Designated here th e Nominal Clause i s ano th er kind of. NP which i s somewhat r e l a t e d in s tr u c tu r e to th e Nominal Phrase but. from which i t d i f f e r s in re s p e c ts th a t w ill become c l e a r e r a f t e r the.

(33) 31. s tr u c tu r e of th e Simple NP has been d escrib ed below in 2 . 3 . A. S y n ta c tic a lly , a Nominal Clause may be one of the follo w in g: (a) An Independent Sentence, as in 22. mb Agbb no o ?. A b ig fellow l i k e you?. (y o u (sg .) - big - t h i s ?) (b) An antecedent to the su b je ct of a VP, as in 23, mb Agbb no. 0. , o 13 * ja f6 o,. (you ( s g .) - b ig - t h i s , you ( s g ,) - are - t e a r s - weep - in g ) . You are too b ig to c ry , where th e Nominal Clause i s antecedent to [ o ] , th e su b je ct of th e VP [ge j a f6 o ] , ( c ) An antecedent to the objeot of a VP, as in // / / / 2/f, mb Agbb no o, dMkfll pRfTT no gbb b. (you (sg. ) - b ig - t h i s , c h ild - t i n y - t h i s - b e a t - you ( s g . ) ) . Big though you a r e , t h i s t i n y o h lld beat you. where th e Nominal Clause i s antecedent to [ b ] , the o b je c t of the verb [g b b ]. The in te r n a l s tr u c t u r e of /the Nominal Clause i s d escrib ed in 2 .3 .5 .. 2 .2 .1 .. TYPES OP NOMINAL PIECE. 2 .2 .1 1 .. I n tro d u c tio n .. The examples c i t e d above are r e p r e s e n ta tiv e of th e sy n ta o tie s c a t t e r of NPs but th ey do not in themselves provide more th an an.

(34) 3 in k lin g o f the degree of s tru c tu re d com plexity to be observed in th e i n t e r n a l s tr u c tu r e s of some NPs.. Thus, while f o r c e r t a i n. purposes i t might be s u f f i c i e n t merely to la b e l as Nominal Phrases th e two su b ject NPs of th e follow ing sentences: 25* n& t66 no klfc. This c p w 's-ea r i s b ig .. (oow-ear - t h i s - i9 b ig ) ?6. n?. no tu e kl&. This cow's e a r i s b ig .. (cow - t h i s - e a r - i s b ig ) im portant s tr u c t u r a l f e a t u r e s of Adangme would be obscured i f one did n ot go beyond t h a t and account f o r th e d i f f e r e n t s y n ta c tic r o le s of th e d eterm in ative [no] in the two NPs.. Account needs to be taken. too of NPs th a t are lin k e d by the a d d itiv e co njun ctio n [kc] and or by th e a l t e r n a t i n g conjunctions [A166] and [166] o r, as in 27. 1 0* gb6 k* &nb.. I have a dog and a c a t .. (I - have - dog - and - o a t ) 28. b h6 bbf6 166 jc?. Did you buy oorn or yams?. (you ( s g . ) - bought - corn - or .yams ?) To account s a t i s f a c t o r i l y fo r the s tr u c tu r e o f th e se examples, i t w ill be n ecessary to a b s tra c t. a Nominal Head. (2.5*) or core of. each NP and to a b s tr a c t NP types by re fe re n c e to f a c t o r s such a s : how many Nominal Heads eaoh contains*. What are the r e l a t i o n s of. i t s p a r t s to the whole - i . e . does i t c c n ta in a co n jun ctio n?. If. i t c o n ta in s more than one Nominal Head, are t h e i r r e l a t i o n s those of a p p o s itio n or th ose of p ossessio n?. The c l a s s i f i c a t i o n to be. a r r iv e d a t w ill d i f f e r from, but w ill run more or l e s s p a r a l l e l.

(35) 33 2. t o , th e one p re se n te d above since a t t e n t i o n w ill now be focused l e s s on th e sy n ta c tic p o s i t i o n o f th e NP in r e l a t i o n to the VP and more on th e i n te r n a l s tr u c tu r e of the NP.. 2 .2 .1 2 .. Compound NPs. NPs t h a t c o n ta in Nominal Heads t h a t are lin k e d by one of the c o n ju n c tio n s: k«. and. 166. o£. &166. or. w ill be c a lle d Compound NPs i r r e s p e c tiv e of t h e i r s y n ta c tic p o s itio n in th e Sentenoe. 27. 28. 29.. t. Examples a re :. gb6 k t 6nS. I have a dog. and a c a t .. 6 h6 b6f6 166 j s ? Did you buy corn or yams? % v gb6hl kg 6n5hl ba we o mi. (dogs - an d -cats - came - house - th e - i n ) Dogs and o a ts en tered the house.. .. Where a Compound NP c o n s is ts of more th an two i t ems, th e co nju n ction preoedes a l l but the f i r s t item , as in 29a.. 1 l l gb6hl kc dnfrhl kc to h l kc n&hl.. *. (I - b red - dogs - and - o a ts - and - g oats - and - c a t t l e ) I bred dogs, c a ts ,. goats aid c a t t l e .. I t w ill be neoessary th e r e f o r e. to adopt the convention t h a t in. Compound NPs, a l l but th e f i r s t Simple NP (see 2 .2 .1 4 .) w ill have an in tr o d u c to ry c o n ju n ctio n . 2,. This statem ent i s q u a lif ie d in 2 .3 .5 . below..

(36) 34 2.2.13*. Complex NPs,. NPs t h a t co n tain more than one Nominal Head but c o n ta in no co nju n ctio n w ill be o a lle d Complex NPs i r r e s p e c t i v e o f t h e i r s y n ta c tic p o s it io n , examples being: 13. m&td flAkA'. Homing p o rrid g e. lif. nSSmlo nine \ 25. nX ttie no k l#. Human le g .. T his cow s -e a r i s b ig .. A su b -d iv isio n of Complex NPs in to those whose Nominal Heads are in a p p o s itio n a l r e la tio n s h i p and th o se whose Nominal Heads are in g e n i tiv a l r e la t i o n s h i p i s achieved by a simple t e s t :. i f th e. in s e r t io n between two such Nominal Heads of th e copula [dM] o r o f /. th e verbal phrase [ n l dM] who i s or which is y ie ld s a sentence t h a t might occur in Adangme, th e Nominal Heads concerned are in a p p o s itio n a l rela tio n sh ip ;. i f n o t, th ey. are in g e n i tiv a l r e l a t i o n s h i p .. Thus,. th e Nominal Heads in each of the th r e e examples above are a l l in g e n i t i v a l r e la t i o n s h i p since none of th e follow ing occur in Adangme: * mbtfc dM flAkd;. • mbth n i dM flAku;. * n2olo d3l nSne;. • nSmlo n l dM nine;. * nS dM tdA;. * nfi n l dM t(ie.. /. But i n :. 30.. nlgdnb slk A t/« o.. The r ic h Ningoman. (Ningoman - richman - th e ) th e two Nominal Heads [nlgdnb] and [ aikA t/c] are in a p p o s itio n a l r e l a t i o n s h i p since J l . nigdnb n i dM sik A t/e o The Ningoman who i s r i c h . i s an acceptable Adangme u tte ra n c e ..

(37) 35 The i n t r i c a c y of the s t r u c t ’ore of c e r ta in Complex NPs i s i l l u s t r a t e d by 32. AdMsd. jAA AsRntAwA. Queen Yaa Asantewa of E jisu. (EJisu - queen - Yaa - Asantewa) which c o n ta in s fo u r Nominal Heads.. The f i r s t two are c o l l e c t i v e l y. in a p p o s itio n a l r e la tio n s h i p t o the l a s t two, since the follow ing i s an Adangme Sentence: 3 3 .. AdMsd mSjii n l dM jAA AskntAwA (E jisu - queen - who-is - Yaa - Asantewa) The Queen of E.Usu whoi s o a lle d Yaa Asantewa.. The f i r s t two Nominal Headsare in g e n i tiv a l r e l a t i o n s h i p sin c e , n e i t h e r *[AdMsd dM mSjil] nor *[AdMsii n l dM mAjii] ooours in Adangme. On the o th e r hand, the l a s t two Nominal Heads [jAA] and [AsRntAwA] are in a p p o s itio n a l r e l a t i o n s h i p , since 3^. jAA n l dM AslntAwA. Yaa. who i s Asantewa. i s an Adangme sentence. The Chinese-box-type s tr u c tu r e of Complex NPs i s i l l u s t r a t e d by the c o n tra s t between th e Complex NPs of 25. nR td e no klA. This. oow's-e&r i s b ig .. and 26. n l no t6A klA. This. cow's e a r i s b ig .. In th e former, th e determ inative [no] q u a l if i e s th e j o i n t Nominal Heads [nS] and (ttiA];. in th e l a t t e r th e determ inative [no] q u a l i f i e s. only the f i r s t Nominal Head [nR ], so th a t th e Complex NP [n^notdA ] may be sa id to be composed of a tw o-place Simple NP (see 2 .3 .1 . below).

(38) 3li and a one-place Simple NP. An examination of sqm o th e r NPs l a t e r in th e t h e s i s w ill confirm th e v i a b i l i t y o f co n sidering Complex NPs as being composed of Simple NPs.. 2 .2 .1 4 .. Simple NPs.. The t h i r d type of NP i s the Simple NP which con tains only one Nominal Head, with or without i t s q u a l i f i e r s . 5.. bkpb o.. The dove.. 6.. j£ n^ 3.. F inish your meal.. Examples a r e :. IQ. wo T]b o.. Honey i s sweet.. 21, p c l i no n< f$ 6 .. This b i r d ' sowing i s b e a u t i f u l .. As s ta te d in 2 .2 .1 1 . above, th e s u b - c l a s s i f i c a t i o n of NPs 3. in to t h r e e ty pes i s d i f f e r e n t from, but runs p a r a l l e l to , the sub­ d iv is io n of NPs on th e bftsis of Sentence-syntax p re se n te d i t o 2 .1 .3 4 . above.. 2.1.51•. Thus of th e NPs c i te d in th e above examples of. Simple NP s t r u c t 'i r e , the f i r s t i s a Nominal Sentence and has an in to n a tio n a p p ro p ria te to i t s s t a t u s , the second i s an NP in objeot p o s it io n t o th e verb [ j £ ] , the t h i r d i s an NP in su b je c t p o s itio n to th e VP [i}b o] and th e l a s t i s an NP in su b ject p o s i t i o n to the VP [o« f W ] .. I t may a ls o be said th a t th e t h i r d i s a Nominal Word w h ils t. th e o th e r th re e are Nominal P h rases. Nominal Head has so f a r remained an undefined term;. a fu ll. d is c u s s io n of th e term i s provided in 2*5. below hence i t w ill s u f f i c e ?. This statem ent i s q u a lif ie d in 2 .3 .5 . below..

(39) here to. designate i t as th e core of each NP around which are b u i l t. q u a l i f i e r s t h a t are s u b - d iv is ib le on account o f t h e i r s y n ta c tic p ro p e rtie s.. These w ill now be discu ssed in r e l a t i o n t o the. s tr u e t u r e of th e Simple NP.. 2 .3 .1 .. S tru o tu re of the Simple NP. The d efin in g c h a r a c t e r i s t i c of a Simple NP as opposed to a Complex or a Compound NP i s the f a c t th a t i t has only one Nominal Head.. The l a t t e r may or may not be accompanied by v ario u s pre-Head. o r post-Head q u a l i f i e r s .. Thus th e NPs in th e follo w in g sentences. a re a l l Simple NPs (the Nominal Heads are u n d e rlin e d ): 35. d33ma dadkflj S 36. wk d3Sm& worn! t/ u t / U &gbb o.. That o h ild . That big red book of ours,. (our - t h a t - book - red - b ig t h e ) 37. 6 kdkld b*f6 f titi k t/b w i cm* fdil p « (your (sg. ) - f i r s t - corn - white - small ( p i . ) - the ( p i . ) p le n ty - grew). Many of those f i r s t small white grain s of corn of yours have sprouted. 38. 6 dSSml kdkle/ om3 5 k l i .. That f i r s t farm of yours i s b ig .. (your ( s g . ) - t h a t - f i r s t - farm - th e - i s b ig ) As th e se examples show, a c e r t a in grammatical order c h a ra c te r ­ i s e s both pre-Head and post-Head q u a l i f i e r s . discu ssed in tu r n .. These two w ill be.

(40) 33. 2.3*2.. Pre-Head Q u alifie rs*. 2. 3. 21.. Example. 33 i l l u s t r a t e s th e maximum number of p la ces. t h a t has been encountered in pre-Head q u a l i f i e r s ;. th e re are th re e. p la c e s which can be co n v e n ien tly la b e ll e d "a", "b" and "c" and which are a l l o p tio n a l in Simple NP s t r u e t u r e .. 2 .3 .2 2 .. They are f i l l e d as follows:-. POSSESSIVTCS (3 .2 .2 5 ) alone f i l l p la c e "a";. th e y do. so only when a noun i s Head (place "d") o f the Simple NP canoerned. Thus senten ces 3 3 7. and 3® have the follo w in g in p la c e s Ma H and. "d": a_. d_. 36.. wA. • • • • • • •. worn!. our . . . . . . .. book. 37.. 6. •••••*•. b h f6. your. corn. 38.. 6. •••••••. gmS. your . . . . . .. farm. Another example i s : 39.. a d g 6 womi o klA.. Your book i s b ig .. ( your ( s g . ) - book - th e - i s b ig ). 2.3*23.. P lace "b" i s f i l l e d by one of the follow ing pre-Head. q u a lifie rs: d3&jn3. t h a t , those. d^Smddie. t h a t kind of, those kinds of. klkfaS. t h i s , th e se. kikim&d3e t h i s kind o f , th e se kinds of.

(41) 39 The Nominal Heads th e y o o lli g a te with are nouns, a d je o tiv e s and numerals;. th ey do not c o l l i g a t e with pronouns or w ith q u a n tif ie r s. when th e se operate as Head.. For examples of [d3&m5] o o lli g a ti n g. w ith nouns as Head see Sentenoes 35, 3^ and examples are : a a 40. d33m8d3e t/u t/u. g ami. , hi. above;. o th er. Those kinds o f red ones are bad.. (those kinds of - red - th e ( p i , ) - are not good) where th e a d je c tiv e [ t / u t / u ] o p e ra te s as Head; a £ \ /, 41. d33m&jiSrjmS &mlh l i Those te n are s u f f i c i e n t . (those - te n - th e ( p i . ) - are s u f f i c i e n t ) „ > / where th e Head i s the numeral LJTJhjm&J.. 2.3*24.. P lace Mc" i s f i l l e d by e i t h e r of th e pre-Head o rd in a l. numeral [kdkle] f i r s t and [k£kl££kl£1( t h e ) v ery f i r s t .. These are. th e only pre-Head numerals in Adangme (see 2 .1 0 . below), and th e y c o l l i g a t e w ith nouns, a d je o tiv e s and numerals o p eratin g as Head, b ut not w ith pronouns or q u a n t i f i e r s in t h a t p o s itio n ,[k £ k l£ ] appears in an NP w ith a noun as Head i n : 38.. 6 do am5. kdkl£ qm3 5 klfc.. That f i r s t farm of yours i s b ig .. (your (sg. ) - t h a t - f i r s t - farm - th e - i s b ig ) Other examples a re : 42. kdkl£ ftit&d a ptlX. The f i r s t white one i s s p o i l t .. ( f i r s t - white - th e - i s s p o i l t ) where th e a d je c tiv e [fdtdd] i s Head; 4*3* kdkld dwlfr ami b£. The f i r s t fo u r have passed. ( f i r s t - fo ur - th e ( p i . ) - have passed).

(42) where th e numeral. i s Head.. As s t a t e d above, these pre-Head q u a l i f i e r s are o p tio n a l in Adangme NP s t r u c t u r e , hence th e re may be a l l tlire e in an NP ( c f . Sentence 38), or only two (c f. Sentenoe 36) or only one ip f. Sentences *0- ^ 3 ) or none (c f . Sentence 3 : t 5kp5 0] The dove. ). 2 .3 .3 .. Post-Head Q u a lifie rs. 2 .3 .3 1 .. The post-Head q u a l i f i e r s , l i k e the pre-Head q u a l i f i e r s ,. are a l l optional elements of Simple NP S tru c tu r e .. Five p laces may. be se t up to account f o r them, namely: (i). Place He H, f i l l e d by A d jectiv es;. ( i i ) Place Hf M, f i l l e d by Numerals; ( i i i ) Place. wgM, f i l l e d by D eterm inatives;. ( iv ) Place Mh M, f i l l e d by Q u a n tifie rs , (v) As. and. Place * i " , f i l l e d by I n t e n s i f i e r s .. exp lain ed in 2.9* below, an NP may co ntain morethan. Head a d j e c t iv e , out in 2 .9 .. onep o s t-. in which case the a d je c tiv e s follow anorder. se t. Only one s tr u c t u r a l p la ce "e" has been s e t up fo r. a d j e c t iv e s , n o n e th e le ss. A simple NP may c o n tain a l l f iv e post-Head q u a l i f i e r s , or any fo u r post-Head q u a l i f i e r s , or any th re e post-Head q u a l i f i e r s . . . . . e t c • o r, of course, none of th e se f iv e .. In NPs in which th e se post-Head. q u a l i f i e r s appear, th e y always follow th e order in which they have been l i s t e d above. as Heads:. Here are i l l u s t r a t i o n s , a l l having Nouns o p e ra tin g.

(43) 41. 2.3*32.. Simple NPs w ith fiv e Post-Head Q u a li f ic r s . d. In UU.. e. f. g. h. i. i je Akbdfl fttfttl flcpA aa I krilAA p6 (I - a te -banana - r ip e - six - the ( p i . ) - a l l - even). I have even eaten a l l th e six rip e bananas. // th e post-Head q u a l i f i e r s are th e ad jectiv e [ f tif tir ] , the numeral [dkpA], th e d eterm in ativ e [am i], th e q u a n t i f i e r [kdlAA] and th e i n t e n s i f i e r [p 6 ].. 2 . 3«33*. Simple NPs w ith fo ur Post-Head Q u a lif ie r s. A Simple NP may co n tain any four of th e f i v e post-Head q u a l i f i e r s , but always in th e o rd er describ ed above, a s in : a. e t/u t/u. f. ^ i s35 p 6 s 8. (garment - red -. -. six - p le n ty - even - b u r n t). Nven as many as s ix red garments flot b u r n t. Htre th e post-Head q u a l i f i e r s are th e a d je c tiv e [ t / u t / u ] , the ✓ /. numeral [£kp8], th e q u a n t if i e r [ s55] and the i n t e n s i f i e r [p<5]. Another example of a Simple NP with four post-H ead q u a l i f i e r s is: if 6.. $>V. f. s. h,. 8mfa&g sg sg l &cp& ami kdlaa pQI. ( p la n ta in - to a s te d - six - th e ( p i . ) - a l l - s p o i l t ) . A ll th e s ix to a s te d p la in ta in s have ftone bad. \. \. /. where the post-Head q u a l i f i e r s are the ad jeo tiv e [ s l s l l ] , th e numeral [dkpA], th e determ inative [ami] and th e q u a n t i f i e r [kdlAA].

(44) 42 2.3.3-k.. Simple NPs with th re e Post-Bead Q u a li f ie r s ,. A Simple NP may con tain any th r e e post-Head q u a l i f i e r s .. Here. i s one example: If.6 .. *. wIlgb^. e. f. 8. n l lgb& £kp& ami.. (me - k i l l e d - cow - b ig - s ix - th e ( p i . ) ) . We have k i l l e d the six big cows. Here th e post-Head q u a l i f i e r s are the a d je c tiv e [Agbb], th e numeral [£kpl] and the determ in ativ e [am i].. 2 .3 .3 5 .. Simple NPs with two Post-Head Q u a lif ie r s .. A Simple NP may co n tain any two post-Head q u a l i f i e r s , as in th e second NP of Sentence 24: dMkfll J t f f t r n o. & -f/. 9.. 8. ". . . . . t h i s t i n y c h ild . . . . / // where th e post-Head q u a l i f i e r s are th e a d je c tiv e LPlfTT] and th e d eterm in ativ e [n o ].. 2 .3 .3 6 .. Simple NPs with one Post-Head Q u a lif ie r .. F in a lly , a simple NP may co n tain any one post-Head q u a l i f i e r , as in 3.. d g fckpb 0 e no. The dove. 13.. d» ml. 17.. % d e 1 n l 6kpA Aghl. This town I saw a b ig dove.. where the r e s p e c tiv e post-Head q u a l i f i e r s are th e d eterm in ativ es [ 0] and [n o ], and th e a d je c tiv e [Agb&]..

(45) 2*3.4.. Summary o f the S tru o tu re of the Simple NP.. A Simple NP can, th e r e f o r e , have anything from p la c e s f i l l e d. in i t s s t r u c t u r e .. Where nine p la c e s. one to nine are f i l l e d ,. th e f i r s t th r e e are pre-Head q u a l i f i e r s , the f o u rth i s th e Nominal Head (which, in t h i s ca se, i s always a noun, see 2 .3 .2 2 . above), and the l a s t f iv e are post-Head q u a l i f i e r s .. A ll p laces save p la c e. "d* fo r th e Nominal Head ( 2 . 5 . ) are op tio n al in Simple NP s tru c tu re ? t h a t i s , every Simple NP has one Nominal Head which may or may not be preceded by pre-Head q u a l i f i e r s and may or may not be follow ed by post-Head q u a l i f i e r s .. R e s tr ic t io n s th a t o p erate. s tr u c t u r e s in which Nouns are not Heads w ill be. in Simple NP. more f u l l y d isc u sse d. in 2 .5 . below where the c la s s e s of words t h a t fu n c tio n as Nominal Nouns, Heads — i . e . Subject P ro n o u n s,/A d jectiv es, Numerals and some Quanti­ f i e r s — are review ed. Examples of v a r'o u s Simple NP s tr u c t u r e s have been given above, but none has yet appeared. in which a l l n in e p la c e s. The example which follow s f i l l s t h a t gap;. are f i l l e d .. w hile i t i s h a rd ly. conceivable t h a t t h i s u tte r a n c e could i n i t i a t e a co n v e rsa tio n , i t i s a sentence th a t oould q u ite e a s i l y ooour in th e middle of one. . a b c d e f g h i 47. m& h6 6 dSinS kdkld qnS Agbb 4 t j Sm» kdlAd p6 . (I s h a ll - buy - y o u r ( s g .) - those - f i r s t -. farm - b ig - th r e e -. th e ( p i . ) - a l l - even). I should even l i k e to buy a l l those f i r s t th re e b ig farms of yours. The o p e ra tio n o f th e ca teg o ry of number in a l l th r e e ty pes of NP (Simple, complex and Compound) i s d isc u sse d in 3 .3 . below..

(46) 44 2 .3 .5 .. S tru c tu re o f th e Nominal Clause# The Nominal Clause was t r e a t e d in 2 .1 .3 4 . above as an NP t h a t. oocurs e i t h e r as a Sentenoe or as the p re lim in a ry p a r t of a sentence to whose su b je c t o r o b je ct i t i s an a n te c e d e n t.. It is , stric tly. speaking, d i f f e r e n t from a l l o th e r NPs and stan ds o u tsid e the t r i ­ p a r t i t e d iv is io n of NPs in to Simple, Complex and Compound*. This. c a l l s f o r a q u a l i f i c a t i o n of statem ents made in 2. 2*11. and 2. 2. I k . above to th e e f f e c t th a t th e t r i p a r t i t e d iv is io n o f NPs p a r a l l e l s th e e a r l i e r one based p r im a r ily on the Syntax of th e Sentence: th e l a t t e r in clu d es Nominal d a i s e s , w h ilst the former does n o t. The f a c t of the Nominal Clause being d isc u sse d alo n g sid e o th e r NPs a t a l l was prompted by th e p a r t i a l resemblance between i t s in t e r n a l s tr u c t u r e o ru c ia l. and t h a t of the Nominal Phrase ( 2 . 1 . 3 1 .) :. one. d if fe re n c e between th e two i s th a t Eominal Phrases have a. maximum o f f i v e post-Head q u a l i f i e r s. ( c f . S tru c tu re o f th e Simple. NP, 2 . 3 . 4 . ) w h ils t nominal c la u se s have a s ix t h whose s ta tu s remains ambiguous, f o r reasons t h a t w ill be explained p r e s e n tly . I t w ill be agreed th a t in the term inology proposed above, the follow ing c o n ta in Simple NPs: d 8 5. fckpb o The dove 15.. $ no5 ma. This town. d , e ,, f g h i 44. i Je Sdcbdfl fflfttl &cp> ami tollLL pd (I - a te -. banana - rip e - s ix - the ( p i . ) - a l l - even). I have even eaten gill the s ix r ip e bananas..

(47) In connection w ith th e l a s t example, i t w ill be r e c a l l e d th a t the d eterm in ativ e i s th e t h i r d of f iv e post-Head q u a l i f i e r s (see 2 . 3 . 3 1 . ) . When one co n sid ers th e Nominal Clause 22. mb Agbb no o7. A b ig fello w l i k e you?. however, i t becomes c le a r t h a t th e r e i s a s ix th post-Head element o f s tr u c t u r e . o th e r NPs;. This i t i s t h a t s e ts Nominal Clauses ap a rt from. i t i s sim ila r in phonetic form to th e sin/palar d e f i n i t e. a r t i c l e (see 2 .1 1 .) and always comes l a s t in Nominal Clause S tru c tu r e , as in : x d e n lg b ll ami. 48.. h. i p6 o, A jA a wb.. (Ningomen - the ( p i . ) - p le n ty - even,. th e y - go - do - sea). As fo r many of th e Ningo people I mentioned, th ey go to sea. d e gbl Agbbhl 5,. 49«. a he qc gb£jb.. (dog - b i g ( p l . ) ,. th ey - se lv es - have - f e a r ). As f o r b ig dogs, they are f e a r f u l . Although th e l a b e l l i n g of places in the Nominal Clauses above may not he j u s t i f i e d , i t serves to p o in t out th e s ix th post-Head elem ent.. I n to n a ti o n a ll y , th e Nominal Clause i s always marked by. a p re-p au sal f i n a l low tone and a f a i r l y s u s ta in e d a r t i c u l a t i o n of th e f i n a l vowel, as i s. shown on Tgm 27 fo r [mb Agbb no 0] .. These. in to n a tio n a l f e a t u r e s are furtherm ore rem in isce n t of those found in c e r t a i n in tr o d u c to ry ad v e rb ial phrases, e . g . /. 49&•. mbnb o,. 49b.. hbgbA a,. i b a. i b£.. Today, I have come. On Sunday, I did not cone..

(48) 4G. The s tr u c tu r e of th e Nominal Clause re q u ire s f u r t h e r i n v e s t i ­ g a tio n b efo re i t s r e l a t i o n to o th e r NPs can be adequately ex p lain ed .. 2.if.l«. Nouns d ! s t ingulshed from Other Nominal Heads.. As a prelude to th e review of Nominal Heads in 2 . 5 . t t h i s seotio n summarizes the f e a t u r e s t h a t d is tin g u is h Nouns from o th e r types o f Nominal Head, namely Pronouns (2 .A .2 . ) , A djectives (2A .3*)» Numerals (2.A .A .) and Q u a n tifie rs (2 .if .? .). 2 .A. 2. 2 .A.21.. "Noun" d is tin g u is h e d from "Pronoun": Unlike pronouns, nouns can c o l l i g a t e independently w ith. th e follow ing to form simple NPs t h a t ere not s y n t a c t i c a l l y BOUND (see b elow ): (a) w ith d e te rm in a tiv e s, v iz . 5.. &kp&o. The dove. 15.. mk no. This town;. 0>) with i n t e n s i f i e r s , v iz . ^9• k b f i o6 (c). Uven Kofi has l e f t .. with a d j e c t iv e s , v iz . 17.. \. 1 nS &kpb Agbb.. I saw. B esides, nouns are an open w o rd -class, and. a b ig dove. most nouns are in f le c te d. fo r number (5. 3*)•. 2 .if. 22.. Unlike nouns, Pronouns are a closed se t t o which a. th re e -te rm categ o ry of person a p p lie s (3 * 2 .)..

(49) Pronouns do not c o l l i g a t e independently w ith d ete rm in a tiv e s. ^ ^. w ithout an in te rv e n in g a d je c tiv e * £ Thus • [mb no] does not occur in Adangme, but d e g 50. mb n3 dM t o j e l o o2 (you(sg. ) - l i t t l e - t h i s - i s - shepherd - th e ) How can a l i t t l e fe llo w l i k e. you. be th e 3hcpherd7. does.. Such NPs can be in 3itoject p o s it io n only to the copula [dM] but not t o any o th e r v e rb .. They occur, of course, (and always with in to n ­. a tio n s a p p ro p ria te to t h e i r s y n ta c tic p o s i t i o n ) as o b je c ts to t r a n s i t i v e v erb s, as in 51. 1 na nb p R ftf no (I - saw - you(sg. ) - l i t t l e - t h i s ) Small though you a re , I saw you. Subjeot NPs t h a t c o l l i g a t e with amly th e copula [dM] may be termed ( s y n t a c t i c a l l y ) BOUND NPs in c o n t r a d i s t i n c t i o n to ( s y n ta c t­ i c a l l y ) FREE NPs t h a t are not so r e s t r i c t e d .. In th e s e term s, two-. word NPs t h a t comprise a pronoun and an i n t e n s i f i e r are a lso BOUND NPs,as in d i 52. mb p6 dM mftt/« o n t (y o u (sg .) - even - are - c h i e f - the - in f a c t ) Though you may not r e a l i z e i t , you are th e c h i e f . d i 53» i l e mb p6 I know even you. However a sentence l i k e *[mb p6 &5b] does not occur in Adangme; [ d3b] means t o le a v e . Also bound are NPs c a n p ris in g su b je ct pronouns of S e rie s One ( 3« ? .f i ~ ) t as in 18.. Tik bkpb o.. 53. i, l e mb p6.. I saw the I. know even you.. The fo llo w ing a r e , th e r e f o r e , th e NPs t h a t are bound: ( i ) an NP of s tr u c t u r e - * • , f i l l e d by a Pronoun of S e r ie s Oae ( j . 2 . 2 * . ).

(50) 43. (ii). an NP of s tr u c tu r e Md, e , g”, "d” being a Pronoun of S eries Two ( 3 . 2 . 2 3 .) ;. ( i i i ) an NP of s tr u o tu r e "d, i " , "d" being a Pronoun of S e rie s Two ( 3 .2 .2 3 ).. 2 .4 .3 .. "Noun" d is tin g u is h e d from "A d je ctiv e”.. 2 .4 .3 1 .. While Nouns and A djectives can be Heads of Simple NPs,. f o r example th e noun [bkp&] i s Head in d * bkpb o. 3. and. The dove. th e a d je c tiv e [Agbb] i s 34.. d g Agbb o l l i. Head in The bin one. a noun can be the Heado f. a Simple NPt h a t. is lo s t . c o n tain s aA> a d j e c t iv e ,. as in % d e 17. 1 nSL 6k? & Agb6 b ut noun.. I saw a big dove.. an a d je c tiv e cannot be the Head of a Simple NP Thus:. A. th a t c o n tain s a. ,k a. 55. pgf t r $ tu e ka The ear of th e t i n y one i s lo n g , I I ( t i n y - th e - e a r - i s lon g) d g d and S6# *>gb6 p njlne ka The leg of the big one i3 lon g. (big - the - le g - i3. long). are Complex NPs each c o n ta in in g two Heads ([jiSfTT] and [td£] in 55^ and [Agb6] and [nSne] in 56) in g e n i t i v a l r e l a t i o n s h i p , since u tte r a n c e s such as.

(51) 40. •ram dM tts# and. • Agbb dM n&ne. do n o t occur in Adangme.. I t i s to be noted th a t NPs of which. a d j e c t iv e s are Heads always r e f e r to something ( f e l t , heard, seen, e tc * ) e a r l i e r in th e extended l i n g u i s t i c c o n te x t. I t would be e n t i r e l y wrong t o s a y of an a d j e c t i v e th a t o p erates as th e Head of a Simple NP th a t i t "has become a noun" or th a t i t " fu n ctio n s as a noun", f o r (as explained in 2 .5 . below) on th e fa o t of i t s remaining an a d je c tiv e in a l l environments depend the o th e r word c la s s e s t h a t may appear in th e same Simple NP w ith i t . Sentences 55 and 56, the. (in. only o th e r p la c e s f i l l e d in the Simple. NPs having th e a d je c tiv e s. and [&gb&] as t h e i r Heads are. p la c e "g" f o r the d e te rm in a tiv e s ).. The p i a re -o r d erin g th a t is b a sic. t o th e s tr u c tu r e of the Simple NP has t h i s as one o f i t s major consequences.. 2A .3?«. A noun can be the Head of an NP co n tain in g a P ossessive,. but an a d je c tiv e cannot, as in ft d g 6 womi o k l fe. 39*. Your book i s b ig ,. (your ( s g .) - book - th e - i s b ig ) U tte ra n ces such as th e follow ing do not occur in Adangme: a. • •. d. g. 6 t /u t /u o klfc a d g 6Agbb o kl4. [ t / u t / u ] and [Agbb] being a d je c tiv e s meaning red and b ig re sp ectiv e ly.

(52) 50 ?.4.33«. Unlike nouns, a d je c tiv e s are commonly re d u p lic a te d f o r. emphasis in Adangme, as in 57.. tid £ futAA. White d re ss.. (dress - w h ite ) Very white d r e s s .. tf<StA-nSt. 58.. tid. 59.. t i d * fd tS b l. White d resses. 60.. tlid i fd td -fd t& h l. Very white d resse s. F in a l l y , i t i s worth mentioning t h a t NPs having a d je c tiv e s as t h e i r Head. are u n lik e those having Nouns or Pronouns as t h e i r Head. in never having human r e f e r e n t s .. 2 .If. 1*... "NounM d is tin g u is h e d from "Numeral".. A noun can be t h e Head o f a sim p le NP th A t o o n ta in s a numeral, o f . t h e noun ^tLd^J o p e r a t i n g as Head in : d e f h i x tAd4 t / u t / u 4kp& s5? r6 sX. 45.. Fven as many as s ix red garment s got h u rn t^ But a numeral oannot be Head of a dimple NP t h a t c o n ta in s a Noun; th e fo llow in g u tte ra n c e does n o t o c cu r i n Adangme: •. 4kpX t&d4. Unlike nouns, numerals e x h ib it a th re e -te rm morphological. system of C a rd in al, Ordinal and D is tr ib u tiv e (see 2.10. below) exampl es being: kdke \. 4jt3. one. k4kl4. two. 4n3nc. X. firs t second. VAkAAkX / /. \. 4ji5bnb. in ones in p a i r s.

(53) 2 .4 .5 .. "Noun" d i s t i n g u i s h e d from " Q u a n tifie r" ,. A noun may b e t h e Head o f a Sim ple NP o b t a i n i n g a q u a n t i f i e r , as i n : n t m l i fdd ba. 61.. Many p e o p le oaroe. (p e o p le - many - came) b u t a q u a n t i f i e r o a n n o t be t h e Head o f a Simple NP c o n t a i n i n g a noun, *. ftid n l m l i b a. W h ils t nouns a r e an open w o r d - c la s s. any member o f which may. f u n c t i o n a s t h e Head o f an NP, q u a n t i f i e r s (2 .1 2 .) a r e a c lo s e d w o r d - c la s s some o f whose members do n o t f u n c t i o n as Heads o f NPs, Most nouns a r e i n f l e c t e d f o r number ( 3 .3 .) b u t no q u a n t i f i e r i s so i n f l e c t e d ,. 2 .5 .. NOMINAL HEADS. 2 .5 .1 .. As was s t a t e d i n 2 .3 A . above, th e Nominal Head ( a t p l a c e. " d " ) i s th e o n ly o b l i g a t o r y e lem en t o f Simole NP s t r u c t u r e ;. th e. pre-H ea d q u a l i f i e r s and t h e p o st-H e ad q u a l i f i e r s a r e a l l o p t io n a l e le m e n ts o f s t r u c t u r e .. The word c l a s s e s t h a t f u n c t i o n as Nominal. Head a r e :. Subject p ronouns (3*-*)» Nouns. (2 .7 .),. A d je ctiv e s. (2 .9 .),. Numerals. ( 2 . 1 0 . ) , and. Q u a n tifie rs. (2 . 1 2 .)..

(54) The r e s t r i c t i o n s th a t o p erate in NPs not h a v in g p Noun as Head w ill serve to un d erlin e th e f a c t th a t p ia c e -o rd e rin g is c r u c i a l in Simple NP s t r u c t u r e :. i t i s the j u s t i f i c a t i o n fo r assig n in g a. maximum of nine p la ces Ma M to Hi M to Simple NP s t r u c t u r e s , and f o r saying t h a t only p lace nd H i s o b lig a to ry . "When p la ce *’dH i s not f i l l e d by a Noun, i t may be f i l l e d by a Subjeot Pronoun, or an A djective or a Numeral or a Q u a n tifie r, with ^td * t h a t o rd er of p r i o r i t y ^ (Note t h a t a Simple NP may <x>raprise combinations o f th e s e c la s s e s of words as w e ll, and see r e s t r i c t i o n s b e lo w .). 2,5«2*. Nouns as Head.. A Simple NP w ith a noun as Head may c o n t a i n a l l o r any o f th e p re-H ea d or p o st-H e a d q u a l i f i e r s ,. as in t h e exam ple given in 2 . ? . ^ .. above w ith a l l n in e places f i l l e d : . a b c d e f 2 f? .. rift. 6 k 6 k l< f r j. 5 K ybb £t%. (I s h a ll. g. h. i. otne kuil&A p 6. - buy - y o u r ( s g • ) - those - f i r s t - farm - b i g -. th r e e -. t h e ( p i . ) - a l l - even ). I s h o u ld f»vcn l i k e t o buy all t h o s ^ f‘ir3+ th re e b i g farms of y o u ri. Such NPs are not s y n t a c t i c a l l y bound;. th e y and those having Pronouns. as Heads a re the only NPs t h a t may have human r e f e r e n t s .. 2.5#?. 2 .5 .3 1 .. Pronouns as Head Then the Head o f a Simple NP i s a Subject Pronoun of.

(55) 53. S e rie s One (3 * 2 .2 ? .), no o th e r places can be f i l l e d , 5%. i, l e mb p6.. a s in :. I know even you.. Such NPs are always Nominal Words ( i* e . one-word NPs) and they c o l l i g a t e only with non-copula verbs.. 2.5*32.. When the Head of a Simple NP i s a Subject Pronoun of. S e rie s 2 (3*2.23*), th e NP i s s y n t a c t i c a l l y bound (o f. 2.A .22. above) i r r e s p e c t i v e of whether q u a l i f i e r s are p re se n t o r n o t, cf* • d i 52* p6 dM mRt/e o n Though you may not r e a l i z e i t . you are the c h i e f , d 62. mb d*5i n Z t/« o nS Youare th e c h i e f . U tteran ces such as the follow ing do not occur in Adangme. ( [ le ]. means to know): * *. 2.5**f*. d i mb pd l e m at/c o d mb l e m&t/e o. A djectives as Head. When an a d je c tiv e i s th e Head of a Simple NP, th e only wordc la s s e s t h a t may NOT occur in th e same Simple NP are Nouns ( 2 .A .31*) and P o sse ssiv e s (2 .if. 3 2 .) .. Any or a l l of th e o th e r r e le v a n t word-. c la s s e s may rep re se n te d in the NP, as in \* 63. 1 sG3 dSSinfl^ b b o I l i k e th a t. big one.. 5if.. is lo tt.. Agbb 0 lb £. The b ig one. r fe rtt hike no p6 hlb Even t h i s l i t t l e one would be enough, ( l i t t l e - one - t h i s - even - i s enough).

(56) NP3 having a d je c tiv e s as t h e i r Head never have human re fe re n ts#. 2•5• 5«. Numerals as Head.. When a numeral fu n c tio n s as the Head o f a Simple NP, th e only o th e r elements of s tr u c t u r e th a t may form p a r t of th e same Simple NP are the pre-Head q u a l i f i e r s and those post-Head q u a l i f i e r s th a t occur a f t e r th e numeral, namely d eterm in ativ es (place Hg " ) , q u a n t i f i e r s (place "h") and i n t e n s i f i e r s (plaoe ni M) as in : h d / g U1 . d3am& h li Those te n are enough# 65#. 3*r> p61 l&i (ten - rannv - even - got l o s t ). l^ven as many as te n got lo B t.. NPs having Numerals as t h e i r Head never have human r e f e r e n t s .. 2 .5 .6 .. j n a n t l f i e r s as Head.. >/ Of the q u a n t i f i e r s l i s t e d in 2.12. below, only [pMke] alo n e. [ t6 ] p le n ty of and [«53] many, appear nesrer to fu n c tio n as Beads o f any NP.. When any of th e o th e rs f a c t i o n s as Head of a Simple. NF, th e only o th e r word c l a s s whose members may appear in the same Simple NP i s t h a t of I n t e n s i f i e r s - i . e . th e only (post-Head) wordc la s s t h a t fo llow s q u a n t i f i e r s in the com position of th e Simple NP as d escribed in. This i s another m a n ife sta tio n of the. importance of pi ace-ordering in the s tr u c t u r e o f the NP. Examples o f q u a n t if i e r s o peratin g as Heads of 3 in p ie jjps are.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

In addition, there are no expressions performing the type of semantic operations familiar from degree modification in the adjectival domain that would indicate the existence of

In sum, the investigation of modified N 1 s has shown that, when an adjective can license a noun in this position, which otherwise would not be able to occur here, the sufficient

b. He is such an idiot that no one will hire him. However, it needs to do this relying solely on the lexical meaning of the noun in correlation with the result clause. In the case

As the study was concerned with the production of similar categories, the specific categories chosen for investigation mostly comprised pairs of similar Mandarin and English

has two different types of sentences: one with a VP category and the other without a VP category at any level of its syntactic representation and that both

This is due to the fact that Arabic has either lost the roots of these names, or they could be Arabic loans from other Semitic languages such as Aramaic, Syriac

iKowmjthesixLGK’»

&#34;Egburu m agwo”. Smith calls them) are preposition- embedded. They are intransitive verbs in deep structure, but in the surface structure, because of the absence of