• No results found

Europe and extraterritorial asylum Heijer, M. den

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Europe and extraterritorial asylum Heijer, M. den"

Copied!
11
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Europe and extraterritorial asylum

Heijer, M. den

Citation

Heijer, M. den. (2011, April 7). Europe and extraterritorial asylum. Meijers-reeks.

Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/16699

Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown)

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/16699

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

Europe and Extraterritorial Asylum

(3)
(4)

Europe and

Extraterritorial Asylum

PROEFSCHRIFT

ter verkrijging van

de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden,

op gezag van Rector Magnificus prof. mr. P.F. van der Heijden, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties

te verdedigen op donderdag 7 april 2011 klokke 16.15 uur

door

Maarten den Heijer

geboren te Voorburg in 1979

(5)

Promotiecommissie:

Promotores: prof. mr. P. Boeles prof. dr. R.A. Lawson

Overige leden: prof. mr. H. Battjes (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) prof. mr. R. Fernhout (Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen) prof. mr. C.A.P. Hillion (Universiteit Leiden en

Stockholm University, Sweden)

prof. dr. G. Noll (Lund University, Sweden)

prof. dr. P.A. Nollkaemper (Universiteit van Amsterdam) prof. mr. N.J. Schrijver

prof. mr. P.R. Rodrigues

Lay-out: Anne-Marie Krens – Tekstbeeld – Oegstgeest

© 2011 M. den Heijer

Behoudens de in of krachtens de Auteurswet van 1912 gestelde uitzonderingen mag niets uit deze uitgave worden verveelvoudigd, opgeslagen in een geautomatiseerd gegevensbestand of openbaar gemaakt, in enige vorm of op enige wijze, hetzij elektronisch, mechanisch, door fotokopieën, opnamen of enige andere manier, zonder voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van de uitgever.

Het reprorecht wordt niet uitgeoefend.

No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, made available or communicated to the public, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the publisher, unless this is expressly permitted by law.

(6)

Table of contents

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS IX

1 INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 Thesis of the study 1

1.2 Genesis of the study 1

1.3 Scope of the study 5

1.4 Goal of the study 7

1.5 Research questions and structure of the study 9

1.6 Delimitations of the study 12

1.7 Sources of the study 15

1.8 Scientific context of the study 16

1.9 Terminology 18

2 THE EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICABILITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS 21

2.1 Introduction 21

2.2 The concept of jurisdiction in international law 25 2.3 The concept of jurisdiction in human rights law 28 2.4 On the different functions of jurisdiction in general international law and

human rights law 32

2.5 International case law on the extraterritorial applicability of human rights 35 2.5.1 Jurisdiction resulting from control over territory 35 2.5.2 Jurisdiction resulting from control over persons 41

2.5.3 Jurisdiction and positive obligations 52

2.6 Human rights treaties not containing a jurisdictional clause 55

2.7 Final remarks 60

3 THE RESPONSIBLE ACTOR 65

3.1 Outline of the chapter 65

3.2 Independent responsibility 69

3.2.1 Attribution and the act of state 69

3.2.2 Attribution of acts of natural persons and groups of persons to

the state 70

3.2.2.1 Attribution of acts of de jure and de facto state organs to the state 71 3.2.2.2 Attribution of acts of private persons or entities 74 3.2.2.3 Attribution of conduct directed or controlled by a state 75

(7)

VI Table of contents

3.2.2.4 Positive obligations and due diligence 83 3.2.3 Attribution of state conduct to another state 90 3.2.4 Attribution of joint conduct to the state 94

3.2.4.1 Multiple state responsibility 94

3.2.4.2 Attributing joint conduct to a state 96

3.3 Derived responsibility for aiding and assisting another state 100

3.3.1 Derived responsibility 100

3.3.2 Aid and assistance 102

3.4 Final remarks 110

4 EXTRATERRITORIAL ASYLUM UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW 113

4.1 Outline of the chapter 113

4.2 The right to grant asylum 115

4.2.1 State sovereignty and extraterritorial asylum 115 4.2.2 Extraterritorial asylum as humanitarian exception to state

sovereignty 120

4.2.3 Immunities and extraterritorial asylum 124

4.2.4 Interim conclusion 128

4.3 The right to obtain asylum 129

4.3.1 Extraterritorial application of the prohibition of refoulement

under the Refugee Convention 132

4.3.1.1 The judgments in Sale and Roma Rights 134

4.3.1.2 Interim conclusion 141

4.3.2 Extraterritorial application of the prohibition of refoulement

under the Convention Against Torture 142

4.3.3 Extraterritorial application of the prohibition of refoulement

under the ECHR and ICCPR 145

4.4 The right to seek asylum 155

4.4.1 The right to seek asylum in international law 155 4.4.2 The right to leave in international law 153 4.4.3 The right to leave and the right to enter 158 4.4.4 Extraterritorial migration control and the right to leave 160 4.4.5 Permitted restrictions to the right to leave 162

4.4.6 Asylum-seekers and the right to leave 165

4.5 A right to be protected but no right to protect? 167

4.6 Final remarks 173

5 EXTRATERRITORIAL ASYLUM UNDEREUROPEANUNION LAW 175

5.1 Outline of the chapter 175

5.2 The EU’s external dimension of asylum and migration 177 5.2.1 The external dimension as a policy strategy of the Union: from

Tampere to Stockholm 177

5.2.2 Integrated Border Management and pre-border controls 181

5.2.2.1 The EU visa regime 182

5.2.2.2 Carrier sanctions 184

(8)

Table of contents VII

5.2.2.3 Immigration Liaison Officers 187

5.2.2.4 Frontex 190

5.2.3 The EU’s external asylum policy 195

5.3 The territorial scope of EU law on border control and asylum 198 5.3.1 Some observations on the territorial scope of European Union

law 199

5.3.2 The territorial scope of the Schengen border control regime 204

5.3.2.1 Council Decision 2010/252/EU 210

5.3.3 The territorial scope of the asylum acquis 214

5.4 Final remarks 217

6 INTERDICTION AT SEA 221

6.1 Introduction 221

6.2 The European interdiction programme 223

6.3 Migrant interdiction and the Law of the Sea 227

6.3.1 The right to interdict 229

6.3.1.1 The territorial sea 229

6.3.1.2 The contiguous zone 233

6.3.1.3 The high seas 234

6.3.1.4 The problem of stateless vessels 235

6.3.1.5 The UN Protocol on Migrant Smuggling and extraterritorial

criminal jurisdiction 239

6.3.2 Obligations of search and rescue 242

6.3.2.1 The duty of search and rescue 244

6.3.2.2 Disembarkation and a ‘place of safety’ 247

6.4 Human rights at sea 252

6.4.1 Non-refoulement obligations arising out of interdiction at sea 254

6.4.2 The right to leave at sea 258

6.4.3 The right to liberty at sea 262

6.5 Issues of attribution and allocation of responsibility 267

6.6 Final remarks 270

7 EXTERNAL PROCESSING 273

7.1 Introduction 273

7.2 The logic of external containment under US and Australian practices 277

7.2.1 The US offshore programme 277

7.2.2 Australia’s excised territories and offshore processing 280

7.3 The feasibility of procedural containment 282

7.4 The feasibility of physical containment 287

7.5 Issues of attribution and allocation of responsibility 292

7.6 Final remarks 294

(9)

VIII Table of contents

8 CONCLUSIONS 297

8.1 Sovereignty, territory and human rights: towards a general proposition 299

8.1.1 Conflicting sovereignties 303

8.1.2 Conflating sovereignties 304

8.2 The implementation of a human rights strategy: towards

recommendations 306

8.2.1 Clarifying the law 308

8.2.2 Clarifying reality 311

8.2.3 Clarifying political aims 313

8.3 The European Union as a panacea for upholding refugee rights? 316

SAMENVATTING 319

BIBLIOGRAPHY 323

LIST OF CASES 335

INDEX 341

CURRICULUM VITAE 347

(10)

List of abbreviations

ACHR American Convention on Human Rights AJIL American Journal of International Law BYIL British Yearbook of International Law

CAT Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination against Women

CESCR United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights CERD United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial

Discrimination

ComAT United Nations Committee against Torture

ComRC United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child COREPER Committee of Permanent Representatives

CPT European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

CRC Convention on the Rights of the Child

EC European Community

ECHR European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

ECJ Court of Justice of the European Communities/European Union EComHR European Commission of Human Rights

ECOSOC United Nations Economic and Social Council ECtHR European Court of Human Rights

EEC European Economic Community EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone

EJIL European Journal of International Law EJML European Journal of Migration and Law EP European Parliament

ETS European Treaty Series

EU European Union

EUROSUR European Border Surveillance System EWCA England and Wales Court of Appeal EWHC England and Wales High Court

EXCOM Executive Committee of the High Commissioner’s Programme FRY Federal Republic of Yugoslavia

Frontex European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union HRC United Nations Human Rights Committee

IAComHR Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

(11)

X List of abbreviations

IACtHR Inter-American Court of Human Rights ICC International Criminal Court

ICCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

ICERD International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination

ICESCR International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights ICJ International Court of Justice

ICLQ International & Comparative Law Quarterly

ICTY International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia IDP Internally Displaced Person

IJRL International Journal of Refugee Law ILC International Law Commission ILO Immigration Liaison Officer ILO International Labour Organization IMO International Maritime Organization IOM International Organization for Migration LNTS League of Nations Treaty Series

NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization OAS Organization of American States PCIJ Permanent Court of International Justice PEP Protected Entry Procedure

RABIT Rapid Border Intervention Teams RPP Regional Protection Programme

SAR International Convention on Maritime Search and Rescue SBC Schengen Borders Code

SIA Schengen Implementing Agreement

SOLAS International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea TFEU Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union TRNC Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus

UDHR Universal Declaration of Human Rights UKHL United Kingdom House of Lords UN United Nations

UNCLOS United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

UNTOC United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organised Crime UNTS United Nations Treaty Series

UNRIAA United Nations Reports of International Arbitral Awards VCCR Vienna Convention on Consular Relations

VCDR Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations VCLT Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

VRS Army of the Republika Srpska (Vojska Republike Srpske)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

But the question of applicability of human rights treaties to occupied foreign territory is more often addressed from the perspective of the obligations flowing from treaties

This is different with a third and the most controversial rule on attribution of conduct of persons or entities to a state, the attribution of conduct to a state on account of a

Instead of defining the scope of a contracting state’s duties under the ECRH in accordance with that principle, the Court referred to the principles set out in its earlier case law

It is suggested however that the policy freedom of the European Union in devising external forms of border control is limited. Firstly, several issues will presumably be a matter of

24 The Council Decision for maritime Frontex operations stipulates, as a general rule of thumb, that in respect of rescue operations taking place in the context of border

The summary conclusion is that the programmes of offshore processing carried out in Nauru, Guantánamo Bay and Christmas Island failed to deliver sufficient guarantees in the sphere

Firstly, human rights bodies and the International Court of Justice have accepted as a general rule that de facto exercises of power (or control), regardless of whether the

Het eerste deel (hoofdstukken 2 en 3) verschaft het algemene internationaalrechtelijke en mensenrechtelijke kader dat van toepassing is op atypische situaties van statelijk optreden,