{
a.CQ^-*JL
hrlqrr;^^
@
?
?
t{}5
Katholieke
Universiteit
Leuven
Ministerie
van
de
Vlaamse Gemeenschap
Instituut voor
Bosbouw en
V/ildbeheer
r./r"eiding
van
de
zwemblaasparasiet
,rlrrorin
Vlaanderen
+
Audenaert
V.',
Huyse
T.',
Belpaire
C.2,
Volckaert
F.A.M.l
I
Katholieke
Universiteit
Leuven,
Laboratorium voor
Aquatische
Ecologie,
Ch.
de
Bériotstraat
32,3000
Leuven
'
Ministerie
van
de
Vlaamse Gemeenschap,
Instituut voor Bosbouw
en
V/ildbeheer,
A.
Duboislaan
14,
1560
Hoeilaart
Onderzoeksopdracht
TWOL
AMINALIBG/IB
W/2
00
0
-
5
Ontwerpverslag
08 november
2001
Polluenten
in
paling
-
Actuele
Anguillicola
r)
Ltr
The
temporal
dynamics
of
Anguillicola
crossus
and
the
adaptation
of
its
host,
Anguilla
anguilla,
in
Flanders.
\F'Y
b,!J**
IIntroduction
Anguillicola
crassus Kuwahara,
Niimi
and
Itagaki,
1974 §ematoda,
Dracunculoidea,
Anguillicolidae)
is
a
parasitic
nematode
that lives
in
the
swimbladder
of
the
European
eel
Anguilla anguilla
L.
(Belpaire et
al.,
1989).
This
parasite
was introduced
in
Europe
in
the
early
1980s
through
uncontrolled
intercontinental
transfer
of
live
eels
from
Taiwan for
consumption
(Koie,
1991
; Paggi et
al.,
1982; Neuman,
1985).
Since
then
it
has spread
rapidly
among
European
eel
populations
(Koie, l99L;
Peters
and Hartman, 1986; Koops
and
Hartmann
,
1987;
Kennedy and
Fitch, 1990).
This quick
expansion
is
due
to
both
a
human
assisted
dispersion
of
the
final
host
and
the
efficient
dispersion
mechanisms
of
the
parasite
itself
using
non-specific
intermediate hosts (Belpaire et
aL.,1990;
Kennedy and
Fitch,
1990).
The
eels become
infected
with Anguillicola
crasszs
through
the food
chain.
The
female
nematodes
produce a large amount
of
eggs
containing
first-
or
second-stage larvae
that
leave
the
swimbladder
through the
pneumatic duct
and pass
with
the
faeces
into
the
water.
The
larvae
use
freshwater
copepods as intermediate hosts
in
which they
develop
into
third-stage
larvae.
Some
fish
species
may act
as
paratenic hosts where
the
parasite doesn't
develop
any
further
and
which,
together
with
the plankton, belong
to
the
eels
diet.
In
the
final
host
the
third-stage
larvae migrate through
the
intestinal
wall
and
the
body cavity
into
the
swimbladder
wall
where
they
develop
into
fourth-stage larvae
and later
into
adults, when
reaching
the lumen
of
the swimbladder.
At
a
temperature
of
20oC
the
development
of
A.
crassus eggs
into
adults
can
be
completed
in
less than
two
months (Belpaire
et
al.,
1989; De
Charleroy
et
al.,
1990; Kennedy and
Fitch,
1990)
The
genus
Angutlla includes
16
species
of
which
only
three occur
in
the
Northern
hemisphere:
the
European,
American
and
Japanese
eel.
The natural habitat
of
the
European
eel reaches
from
the
North
European
to
the
North African
coastal
countries.
Eels present
in
Central
and
Eastern Europe are
assumed
to
have
been
mainly
imported
from
these coastal
areas
(O.V.B.,
1988).
Sexually mature
European
eels migrate
to
the
Sargasso
Sea
for
spawning
after
which
the
larvae start migrating back
to
the
continental
waters. During
the
latter migration period the
young eels
grow
and mature coupled
with
great
internal
and
external
physical
(Belpaire and
Ollevier,'1987;
Degani and Gallagher,
1995). I
+
known
that
migrating
eels
show
a
vertical migration
pattern
for
which
the swimbladder
is
of
great importance.
In
contrast
to
the
Japanese
eel, the nematodes
original
host, the European eel can
suffer
severe
damage
by
the
parasite
due
to
its
higher susceptibility
(Koie, l99l
).
Damage
to
the
gas
glands
in
the
swimbladder
wall
can
cause a
serious drop
in
swim
activity
of
the eel
preventing
the
fish
from migrating,
but
infection with ,4.
crossus
also
benefits
secundary
bacterial
infections
which
are
often lethal,
causing mass
mortalities
in
eel populations
(Boon et
al.,
1990;
Mólnar
et
al.,
l99l).
The
eels seem
to
show
some
kind of
immunological reaction to
this parasite.
Many
dead and disintegrated adult nematodes
as
well
as
encapsulated
larvae
are
seen
that
are the
result
of
a concentration
of
fagocytes. Moreover,
infected swimbladders can
be
encapsulated
by
connective
tissue.
Heavy
infection
lead
to
very
thickened swimbladder
walls,
creating
poor
conditions
for
reinfection (Hartmann
and Peters,
1989).
Nowadays
eels
can easily be
treated
with
nematicides
and bactericides
(which
affect
the symbiotic
bacteria
Wolbachia)
or
chemicals
that
affect
the
intermediate
host
of
the
nematodes
to
avoid
completion of it's
life
cycle
(Taraschewsky et
al.,
1988;
Kamstra,
1989).
This
study
analyses
population
data
of
Anguillicola
crassus
collected
in
Flanders
in
the
year
2000
and
compares
the
results
with historic
data
from
1987
and
1997
(Huyse,
1999).
The
aims are
to
detect an
evolutionary
pattern
in
the parasite characteristics and
to
find
indications
for
a
growing
equilibrium
in
the parasite-host relationship.
Materials
and methods
From
May
2000
untill
October
2000,
1084 eels were sampled
from
141
different
sites
and
11
..
river
basins
in
Flanders
(Addendum
t
).
The eels were
measured
and weighted
and
swimbladders
\ryere
stored at
4Yo
formol.
For
dissection
the
swimbladders rvere transferred
to
70%
ethanol. Adult
nematodes
were
sexed
and counted
macroscopically
whereas
the
larvae
were identified and
counted
using
a
binocular
with
transmitted
light, easily
detected by
pressing
the swimbladder
wall
between
two
glass
plates.
The thickness
as
well
as
rupture
of
the
swimbadder
wall
and
the
presence
and colour
of
fluid
in
the
lumen was
registrated.
According to
the thickness
of
the
wall,
the
swimbladders
were
divided into
three categories.
In
the
absence
of
parasites
(adults
as
well
as
larvae and
capsules),
swimbladders
with
thin
walls
(<
I
mm)
were recorded
to
be
not
infected, where
as
thick
walls (thicker than
I
mm
and
thinner than
3 mm)
were
assumed
to
be
infected''due
to
the
presence
of
great amounts
of
connective tissue and
if
tissue
proliferation could
be
observed. Very
thick walls (> 3
mm)
L
t.
pointed
towards
former
infection.
Brown
fluid in
the
swimbladder lumen results
from
the
desintegration
of
adult
nematodes and
thus
indicates
infection.
Rupture
of
the swimbladder
can be
the result
of
a
severe
infection
but
can
also be due
to
damage
during dissection
of
the
eel.
Again
the thickness
of
the swimbladder
wall
v/as considered.
Prevalence,
mean
intensity
of
infection
and
abundance rvere estimated
over
all
sites
where
more
than
7
eels
were
captured,
as
well
as
per
basin.
Statistics were carried
out
by
SAS
Results
Pregel-enge..+nd.intenqitv-gf
.ipfectipnof
lr?gn-iiligolír.crg§{usinElqpders
The mean prevalence
in
Flanders
in
2000 is estimated
at
88,
L
% witha
rninimum
of
A
Yo
(
at a
single
site along the
Boudewijnhanaal
in
the Brugse
Polders)
and a ma*ximum
of
100%.
The
mean
intensity
of
infection is
about 5,5 ranging
from
0
to
13,3.
The
mean
prevaience,
intensity
and abundance per basin are given
in
the table below.
Table
1:
The
mean prevalence
{o/o),
m€an
intensity
of
infection
and
abundance per
river
basin
of
e.
crassu§.
Ns
:
number
of
sites saurpletl,
Ne
:
number
of
eels collected.
River
basin
Ns
Ne
Prevalence
{%)
Intensiry
Abundance
Bekhen yan de Brugse Polders
Bekken
van
de Gentse Kanalen
Benedenscheldebekken
Bovenscheldebekken
Demerbekken
Denderbekken
Dijle-
en Zennebekken
Ijzeibekken
Leiebekken
Maasbekken
Netebekken
11
11
1l
14
J
2
4
7
r1
I8
I
t07
104
103
138
28
17
42
69
98
174
74
72,7
93,2
82,9
90,0
89,3
100,0
86,2
97,1,
gg,2
92,8
83,4
418
4,5
5,9
5,7
6,7
7,6
718
6,9
5,8
4,3
5,8
3r7
,4$r3
5,2
5,1
6,2
716
7rl
6,,'T
5,2
4,0
4,8
The mean
prevalence
in
the Brugse Polders
is
rather
low which
might
be explained
by
the
vsry
low
prevalences
at the three
sites
that were
sampled
nlong the Boudewijnkanaal, whish
arc
20Ya,20% and
07q
with
an intensity
of
respectively
11
,5,
t
and 0 (Addendum
2).
\ilhen
excluding
this
canal
the
mean prevalence
would
rise
to
95% and
the
mean
intensity
and
abundance
to
5,0 and
4,8.
In only
one basin, the Denderbekken, the mean prevalence reached
100?4,
but
this
is due to the very
low
number
of
sites
(5) that
has been sampled,
of
which only
two
contained enough samples to calculate the chara,stEristics mentioned above.
q
J.
The
second
highest
prevalence
was obtained
in
the
ljzerbekken, where
the
intensity
was
neitJrer
very
high
nor
low.
The
greatest
intensity
was
found
in
the
Dijle-
and
Zennebekken
(7,8),
where the prevalence reached
86,20/0.
A Kruskal-lilallis
test
showed a
significant
difference
in
the
total
arnount
of
parasites
that
is
due
to
a
difference
in
the
nurnber
of
adult
nematodes
and
not in
the
rrumber
of
larvae or
capsules
(Table
2).
A
lVilcoxon
test
on
the totat
number
of
parasites was
carried
out to
see
whic,h basins
differed
the
most.
The Demer-
and
Denderbekken
are
left
out
in this
analysis
because
of
too few observations.
The results are shown
in
Table
3.
Table
2:
Kruskal-Wallis
test
for
significant
differences
of
the
total
number
of
nernatodes and
on
the different
developmental
stages
between basins;
o
:
lo/o.
Signifïcant
values
are
irdicated
in
bold.
p-value
0,5116
0,5044
0r{x}49
010021
Larvae
Capsules
Adults
Total
Tabts 3:
lVilcoxon
test
for
differences
between
specific
basins, based
on the totat
number
of
parasites;
only
p-values
signiÍicant
at
cÍ.:
17o
are
glven.
In
general,
all
basins are
quite
similar
in
the
infection af
Anguilla
unguilla with Anguillieala
crussus.
Most differences
occur between ttre Brugse Polderbekken and the other
basins. This
is
probably due
to
the
Boudewijnkanaal where
the
abundance
was
very
low.
Another
difference
ís
seen
between the Netebekken anri the Leiebekken.
Thg-tg.lalive p.ropg#.ons
pf
the
different
dpvqlop"rUefrtalstages
and.the nat$ral.distrib'ution
of
Ary#tiÍ{ilplg
cr,as*W
in
Anguillq
ang,uilla
Table
3:
The
abundan§.e, standard
deviation,
minimum, maximum,
variance and
dispersal
coëffïc,iënt per developmental
stage
of
Anguilliuia
{.:ruàslÍ'u*Í'
in
Flanders 2000.
Abundance
§td. Dev.
Min.
Ma,x
Var.
Disp.coëff.
I
L3
L4
Caps
Pre*adult
M
Vr
Rernnants
TOT
54,O0
17,00
32,00
20,00
19,00
15,00
3,flo
87,00
5,94
3,43
5,32
2,29
3,45
2,,42
0,06
52,52
0,68
I,01
1,05
0,71
0,89
0,75
0,04
5,?7
2,44
tr,85
2,31
1,5
I
1,86
1,56
0,24
7,25
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
8,?6
3,41
5,06
3,21
3,85
3,20
1,39
9,10
As
can be
seen
in figwe
I
o
which
gives
the relative
proportíoru
of all
developmeutal skges,
the
greatest
amount
of
nernatodes belongs
to
the
trarval stages,
present
in tlre
swimbladder
wall.
The
maximun
number
of
thirdstage larvae
is
almost
twice
the
number
of
male
and
female adults
(34).
Fourth-stage
larvae
and encapsulated
larvae,
which
are
equally divided,
are
even
rnore a,bundant,
however
their
maxima
are less
high.
The proportions
of
male and
female
adults are
nearly
equal and there
\Mere
alrnost
no
renulants
found.
A
Spearman
Rank
é
The
nurnber
of
parasites
per
eel
investigated (abundance)
was
calculated
for
each
developmental
stage
of
the
nematode,
together
with
the
range and
coefficient
of
dispersal.
The latter
is
calculated
by
divitting
the
variance
by
the
mean.
Coefficients
greater
than
one
índicare overdispersion.
correlation
test
showed
positive
correlations between
the
larvae,
capsules
anrJ
adults
(0,35,
0,29 and 0,16) ttmt are
all
weak,
but significant
at a
signiÍicance level
of
5%.
1aío 2lolo
Bl5-stages
inthewall
Bl4-sl"tgcs in
thl, rvallfCapnrÍed
Ïanae
ElPru-adulrstlÀ4ail
dults
EÍF.eÍnaleadultstr&sintrgatrd
a&dts 17oloFig
1:
Relative proportions
of
ths dif[erent
developmental
stages
of
Anguillicala
crasrsus
in
tlrs
swimbtadder
of
European eels
from
Flanders 2000.
The
last
column
of table
3
shows
that
all
developrnental
stages
in the
swimbladders
of
eÈls
sre
chaÍaÉdËnzed
by
overdispersion. Fig.
2
illusfiates tlrat most eÈl
populations
are
hardly
infected
while only
a
sffill
number
is
heavily furfected.
About
&3,7Y+
of all
eels are
infected
with
less
than
10
parasites,
while only
14 upon
961
swimbladders contained mor€
tltan
30
The
swimblacÍders
with
thickened
walls
greater
than
3 mm
and
c.ontaining no
paÍasitÉs ïvere not considered here.
À^^
r5%
tff/6
V.r
140tza
í00
zoFig. 2:
Frequency
2000.
!t
Eao
oè
Ë60
2
10o 2 4 6 C ÍO12Í4reÍ820?2242A2E
30323417 4Í5667
Number oÍ nematodes
fr?1
tr»
3Ë 14 t1t
I
13111r1
7 0 6 35 3 2 2o22 oo0 2dis§bution of
nematodes
in
g6l
eels
from
141
different
sites
in
Flanders
in
Host
resistance
The
great number
of
encapsulated
larvae
in
Fig.
2
indicates
àn
increased resistance
of
the
host.
Fig.
3 shows
a
decrease
of
the uumber
of
larvae as
well
as the number
of
capsules
and
adult
nenratodes
in
swimbladders
with
a
thíckened
wal1.
o 5
I
o (, 1g 2 0 4lmrn <Ëmm Swtmbladder tlÍckneos l9mmFig.
3:
Proportion of
all
developmerrtal
stages
of
the nematode
Anguillicalu
crasse*r
for
swimbladders
with
a
different wall
thickness.
A
Kruskal-IVallis
test
for
significant
differenoes
(o:
0,01)
in
the
abunrJance
of
seÍnatodes
in
swimbladders
*ith
a
different raall
thickness showsd
a
highly
significant
p-value
(p
.
0,000001). The
Wilcoxon
test results
(er
=
0,0U
are
given
in
table
4.
The
swimbladders
with
a
thicknees
<
1
mm differed
from
those
with
a
thickness between
1
and
3
mm
only in
the
arnount
of
larvae
(p
:
0,0080)
but not
in
the amount
of
capsules
(p
:
0,10)
or
adults
(p
:
0,23).
Tlre number
of
adults does
differ
between ths swirnbladders
with
thickness
<
lmm
and
betwesn
I
and 3 mrn at the one hand and swimbladders
with
a
thickness
between
t
and 3
mm
and
sthickness <
3
mmattheother(respectivelyp:0,00001I
andp:0,00019).
Since the
presffIce
of
larvae
or
capsules
in
very
thic.kened
swimbladder
walls
was hard
to
verífy,
tro
comparison could be
made
for
these
developmental stages
in
swimbladders
with
a thickened
wall
geater than 3 mm.
fahle
4: ïWilcoxon
test
for
significant differences
at
u
:
0,01
betwern swimbladdsrs, infected
with
Anguilliwla
Í;rutlstt§,
with
a
different wall
thickness.
Larvae
Capsules
Adutts
Bel+tioqshig_betrryeen the ifrfection.and
thelglÈrh
and vyeight.gf
their
hqst
The
ryean
lengh and weight
of
the captur«Í
eels
are
given
in
table
5
together
with
their
ranges"
A
frequency
distribution of
the eels
lengÍh
is
given
in
Fig.
4
where
the graph
in
the
upper
dght
corner allowed
us
to identifr two
individuals
with
measurement
errors
for
the
weight
or the
length
Those
individuals
were excluded
frorn further
analysis
Table 5: The
mean, §tandaÍd
deviation, minimurn and
ma"xirnum
of
the length and weight
of
1084 European eels
sampl«Í
from 14ï
sites
in
Flanders
from lvÍay
untill
October 2000.
Gern
Stdev
Var
Min
Ài{ax
Lemgte
(cm)
Gewicht (g)
4t,74
139,87
9,24
114,57
67,82
13126,29
21,70
21,40
81,00
e663A
a I 12@. 1000 80s mo 400 zqo oB
.Ë .P atF
0
20 &
60 80
.100 LengÉh (crnl 175 34S 270fie
e6 30&
t9
1,)I
400
s50
t00
250
na
Í50
100 ,506
{,
g
*-o
É-a, .Í1tr
:,
z,
0,pP
sq9
.oP tq?
,trl9
,.P
4xP
d# 69
".9
,rà?
rs$
.p§'
6P'
àÈ9'
6S' pS'
op$'
pS'
4c$'
6$' 6§'
,1sS'
nt9'
Length
{cm}
Fig, 4:
Frequency
distribution
of
the length
of
European eels
in
Flanders 2000.
There
was
only
a
weak
but
still
significant positive
correlatí""&ï*
at
a
signifïcance level
of
5olo)
between
the
length
of
the
eels
and
the
number
of
adult nematodes.
This
could
be
partly
explained
by the fact
that adult
nematodes
can
only
develop
in
suffrcientely
large
swimbladders, however
adult
nematodes
fit
their
lenglh
to the
space
available (Banning
and
fIaeRen,
1990;
Moravec,1994).
The
mair
cause
however
is the
diet
of
larger eels
containing
t
@
*r-rl"-c
hosts
for
Anguillicalu
*usst&s(Molruír
er
al.,
1994),
{"
{cqn,
^
{+cnfu,a*,
/lgfl/
larger
Íish
that
serve
as
EAdulb
ElCapsules
]ï-awaa
gI
7
6
À4
.'
2
I
0Abundance
nI?
.,,q?
"É
.p?
op-$
B?
+?
"*?
6F
E?
tn? o§
,s§'
4,§'-+n'
+§'
§!'
#§'
oF9'
og9'
6,?'
&?'nt§'
^b§'
Length
(cml
Fig.
5:
Frequency
distribution
of
all
developemental stages
of
Anguitticaíu
cïa#su# ín
Europan
eel
in
Flanders 2000.
llo
Discussion
The current spatial pattern of
Anguillicola
cfqssu§
rnJlanderË
This
study shows that Anguillicola
crassus
has invaded
all
Flemish basins since
its
introduction
in
1986.
Eel populations
are
infected
at
all
l4l
sites included
in
the
study;
in
only four
of
the
l4l
sites
did
the prevalence
not
reach
25%.
Three
of
these sites are located
along
the
Boudewijn
Canal,
which
belongs
to
the basin
of
the
Brugse
Polders.
The
other
site
is
located at the
Fort
of
Oelegem
(Vriesel), which
belongs
to
the basin
of
the Benedenscheldt.
Statistical analysis
showe{
a
general
similarity
in
abundance
of Anguillicola
crassus
in
all
basins
in
Flanders.
The
main significant
difference occurred between the Brugse Polders and
the basins
of
the
Gentse
kanalen, Benedenschel
dt,ljtzer,
Leie
and
Maas.
These are
the result
of
the
low
prevalence and mean
intensity
of
infection in
the
Boudewijnkanaal.
The
cause
of
these
low
values
is
still
unknown
since
this
canal
is
connected
with
many
other waters
of
the
Brugse
Polder-s.
Therefore
it
might
be interesting
to look for
correlations
with
differences
in
water
temperature
or
salinity and
pH
in
an
attempt
to
explain
the
causality.
V/ater
temperature is
known to
be an
important
external
factor influencing
the
hatching, sunrival
and
transmission
of
the infective
stages
of Anguillicola
crassus
(Thomas
and
Ollevier,
1993; De
Charleroy
et
al.,
1989; Kennedy and
Fitch, 1990).
Höglund et
al.
(1991)
observed
higher
prevalences
at
Swedish sites
with
thermal
discharges
from
pourer
plants.
Since
Anguillicola
species
are adapted
to
tropical or
subtropical
conditions,
their
natural
distribution
is
restricted
to
those
areas
and infected
eels observed elsewhere
in
Sweden are
the result
of
restocking.
Salinity
may influence
the presence
of
copepods
that
are necessary
for
the completion
of
the
life
cycle
of
Anguitticola
rrassus.
Kirk
and
Kennedy (2000) quantified the
suvivorship
and
transmission
of
the parasite
in
50% seawater.
The copepod
Eurytemora affinÍs is
a
dominant
species
in
most
estuaries
of
the Northern
hemisphere
and
is very
susceptible
to
infection
by
Anguillicola
crassus.
However
the infection level
in high
salinity
waters
is
lower
(Dekker
and
Van ïWilligen,
1989).
From
field
observations
they
concluded
that
eels
infected
in
marine
or
brackish
seawater
ïuere probably
originally infected
in
freshwater.
Huyse
(1998)
concluded
that the
CaCOs
content probably
does
not
restrain
the
parasite
distribution in
The evolution
of
the
Ansuillicola
crassus
infection
of
E
uropean
eel during the last
two
Anguillicola
crassus
was
fïrst
detected
in
Flanders
in
the early
80's.
The
first
systematic
investigation (Belpaire
et
a|.,1987),
only
monitored the presence
of
adult nematodes.
ln
1997
a
second
study lvas
carried
out
by
Huyse,
who
included
the larval
stages
embedded or
encapsulated
in
the swimbladder
wall
(Huyse,
1998).
Table
6
shows the results
of
the
mean
prevalence and mean
intensity
of
infection in
Flanders
of
the situation
since
the introduction
of
A.
crdssus,
in
1987, 1997 and 2000.
Table
6:
The
evolution
of
mean prevalence and mean
intensity
of
Anguillicola
crassus
over
the last
two
decades
in
Flanders
Year
Number of
eels Prevalence Range Intensity
Range
before
1986
(all
stages)
1987
(adutrts)
1997 (adults)
1,997
(all
stages)
2000
(adults)
,:.1 .,-''" =t:,)lnf ir'z*:..'/ ":'''.'. i':'J2000
(all
stages)
0
0
88,1
34,1
62,5
86,2
0
0-l
00
45-83
64-1
00
0-1
00
5,45
3,91
7,15
5,50
0
0
,t. l:. l:,l-14,7
2,5-6,!
"
3,3-11,7
,:f
;,0,2-13,3
266
266
9s6
The
mean prevalence and mean
intensity
in
1997
and 2000 were
calculated
based
on
all
developmental
stages
(to obtain
a
more
correct result
of
the
current
state
of infection)
and the
adults
only, to
compare the results among
all
years sampled.
The mean
intensity
increased faster than the prevalence and reached
a
maximum f,rrst.
At
the
next
point
of
investigation (1997),
prevalence
had
increased
considerably
while the
mean
intensity
started
to
level
off.
Three
years
later
this
trend
is still
visible.
Such
a
rise
of
the
prevalence
and
decrease
of
the
mean
intensity
is
also
observed
by
Ashworth (1995)
in
a
longitudinal study
of
five
years and
by
Thomas
(1993)
in
a
one
yeaÍ
investigation.
It
is
possible
that
in
Flanders
both the
prevalence and mean
intensity
\
dll
stabilize
due
to
density
dependent
regulation
of
the
parasite
population and
overdispersed
distribution
of
the
nematodes
in
the
host
population,
which
is
a strong
stabilizing factor
(Ashworth, 1995).
Still
some
slight
annual fluctuations as
observed
in
the
lJsselmeer
and
the
Waddenzee
in
the
Netherlands
(Haenen
et
al.,
1994) can be
expected. The
quick
rise
in
prevalence
in
Flanders
might be
explained
by
restocking
of
non-infected area
with
infected
eelso
followed
by
a
4L
T
t
naturan spread
of
"4rugulJJfcsJm
Ërfl,r§a{.§
in
opËn
waters.
This
was also
the
sase
in
the
Netherlands (Van Banning
eÍ sJ.,
tr986) and Dennaark urhere the
distrihutiun
of,
tLre
nematodes
seemed
tr
he a
ËomsequenËe
of
trade and eel restoaking than
of
matural
spreading (tsnetius,
l
eEe).
The reaction of
Anwtilla
angui,
lla
on
Ansuillicola
crassus
In
1979 Egusa
warned
for
the
damage
tha/'
Anguillicola
crassus
affects
to
the
European eel
and
stated
that
the
introduction
of
the
parasite
into
Europe should
be
prevented.
Unfortunately the introduction
\r/as
a
fact
in
the
early
80's
and
the
spread
over
Europe
was
inevitably
enhanced
by
eel trading
and
restocking. Already
in
1985
the
first
report
of
Banning
et
al.
in
the
Netherlands showed
the reduction
of
body
weight and condition
of
heavily
infected
eels.
Together
with
the
destruction
of
the swimbladder, the eel's
chances
to
reach
the
Sargasso Sea
for
spawning
was reduced
considerably.
In
Lake Balaton (Hungary)
mass
mortalities of
eels were recorded
in
1991
by Mólnar
et
al..
However,
a
few
years later,
in
1994,
the
development
of
fïbrotic
swimbladder
walls
\Mas
observed
in
the
same
eel
population
(Mólnar
et
al,
1994),
which
reflected an
immunological
reaction
to
the nematodes.
Fibrosis
of
the
swimbladder
wall is
due
to
repeated
infection
and reflects
a
severe stage
of
anguillicolosis
(Hartmann and Peters, 1989;
Möller
et
al.,
l99l;
Molnar
et
a|.,1994).
Also
in
our
study
the relative
proportions
of
the
various developmental
stages
in
Flanders
point
to
a
large
increase
in
the
number
of
encapsulated
larvae.
This
number
is, unlike
the
number
of
adult
nematodes,
not
correlated \,'rith
the length
of
the
eels.
The large amount
of
swimbladders
with
a
thickness
greater
than
3 mm
where
no
lumen
is
present, also points
towards
an increased resistance
of
the host, since
poor conditions
for
reinfection
aÍe generated
(Hartmann
and Peters,
l9S9).
Furthermore there seems
to
be
a tendency
towards a
decrease
of
abundance
in
eels
with
thickened
swimbladder
walls
in
all
developmental
stages,
however
an increase
of
encapsulated
larvae could be expected.
Treatment
of
aneuillicolosis
First
of
all,
anguillicolosis
can be prevented
by affecting the
intermediate host
to
intemrpt
the
life-cycle
of
the
parasite.
As
numerous intermediate hosts
of
Anguillicola
crassus have been
reported (Thomas, 1993),
this
is
not
very effective
in
nature.
Another
approach
is
the
chemical treatment
of
the
parasite. Grisez (1988) tested several
concentrations
of
diflubenzuron,
which
appeared
effective.
However;the
effect
on the host should also be taken
anthelmintics.
The
drug should
be
proven effective
against bloodsucking
nematodes.
Furthermore
it
should be resorbed easily
by
the
fish
without
leaving
residues and causing any
toxic effects. An
easy
way
to
treat infected
fish is
by
bathing them
in
water
with
a
certain
concentration
of
the
drug,
because
the
fish
do not
have
to
feed
to
absorb
it.
Taraschewsky eÍ
al.
(1988)
tested several
chemicals,
including
HCl,
levamisole
and
metrifonate
of
which
the
latter
two
seemed
the most effective.
In
general a
non-specific morphological reaction
in
the
nematodes
irreversibly
resulted
in
death.
A
third
strategy
is to
treat
the symbiotic
bacteria
Wolbachia in
A.
crassrzs. The presence
of
the bacteria
is
essential
for
the survival
of
the
host
(Casiraghi
et
al.,
2001).
Hence treatment
with
bactericides
(antibiotics)
effectively kills
symbiont
and the Àost parasite (Hermans et a1.,2001).
However
easy
the
treatment
of
anguillicolosis
might be on
a
small
scale,
it
is
far
more
difficult to
treat complete eel populations
in
ponds and
river basins.
The
best
way
to
deal
with
such a massive
infection
is
to
prevent the parasite
frorn spreading. This
includes a sound
'
management
of
eel restocking.
Acknowledgements
The
ministry
of the
Flemish
Community
(AMINAL
contract
TV/OL
2000
AMINAL/BG/IB\I//2000-5)
funded
the project.
G.
Goemans
kindly
assisted
with the
data
management.
References
(incomplete)
Casiraghi
M,
Anderson
TJC,
Bandi C,Bazzocchi
C, Genchi C
(2001)
A
phylogenetic
analysis
of
filarial
nematodes: comparison
with
the
phylogeny
of
Wolbachia
endosymbionts.
PARASITOLOGY,
I
2?:
93-103
Hermans PG,
Hart
CA,
Trees
AJ
(2001)
In vitro activity of
antimicrobial
agents against the
endosymbiont V/olbachia pipientis.
JOURNAL
OF
ANTIMICROBIAL
CHEMOTHERAPY,
47: (5)
6s9-663.
A1
o
@
o
o
\
(
\
I
\
o
f
,[."J
v
eqrÈ?
l-
2-f
_
LG
F
?>
'#'nd
qo
o
4
trt
Appendix
2:
Prevalence, intensity and abundance oÍ Anguillicola crassus per basin
in
Flanders
2000.
" indicates the
number
of samples that
are infected
Basin Sampling site Code
Date N
Prev.
G.l.
AbundBekken van de Brugse Polders Bekken van de Brugse Polclers Bekken van de Brugse Polders Bekken van de Brugse Polders Bekken van de Brugse Polders Bekken van de Brugse Folders Bekken van de Brugse Polders Bekken van de Brugse Polders Bekken van de Brugse Polders Bekken van de Brugse Polders Bekken van de Brugse Polders Bekken van de Brugse PoÍders Bekken van de Brugse Polders Bekken van de Gentse Kanalen Bekken van de Gentse Kanalen Bekken van de Gentse Kanalen Bekken van de Gentse Kanalen Bekken van de Gentse Kanalen Bekken van de Gentse Kanalen Bekken van de Gentse Kanalen Bekken van de Gentse Kanalen Bekken van de Gentse Kanalen Bekken van de Gentse Kanalen Bekken van de Gentse Kanalen Bekken van de Gentse Kanalen Bekken van de Gentse Kanalen Bekken van de Gentse Kanalen Bekken van de Gentse Kanalen Benedenscheldebekken Benedenscheldebekken Benedenscheldebekken Benedenscheldebekken Benedenscheldebekken Benedenscheldebekken Benedenscheldebekken Benedenscheldebekken Benedenscheldebekken Benedenscheldebekken Benedenscheldebekken Benedenscheldebekken Benedenscheldebekken Benedenscheldebekken Benedenscheldebekken Benedenscheldebekken Bovenscheldebekken Bovenscheldebekken Bovenscheldebekken Bovenscheldebekken
Damse Vaart (Apertje) Damse Vaart - Oostkerke brug Noordgeleed - Oudenburg Noordede - KlemskErk+De Haan Elankenbergse vaart - Zuienkerke tr-0ssewegevaart - Lissewege Waggelwater-Brugge
Hoge Dijken - Ettelgem-Oudenburg Lippensgoed - Bulskampveld Boudewijnkanaal Boudewijnkanaal Boudewijnkanaal Leopoldkanaal Hollandergatkreek - St. Laureins Zuídlede - Mendonk
Klaverbladvijvers (afiratering) - Wachtebeke Bosdamvijver - Wachtebeke Moervaart Daknam B[aarnreersen - Drongen Watersportbaan - Drongen Malem-stadsv'rjvers - Gent Bourgoyen - Gent Boerekreek - §t.
Jan-in-Eremo È
Oost-Polderkreek - St. Jan-in-Eremo Roeselarekreek - St. Jan-in-Eremo Gemeentevuver Zelzate - ZelzaleDurme-Lokeren Leopoldkanaal Het Broek-vijver 1 Het Broek-vijver 3 Het Broek+ijver 4 Hazewinkel-roeivijver -
Willebroek
O
Fort uan Oetegem -
Vriesel-Oelegem
r]
I
Rivierenhof-grote hengelvijver - Deurne
Galgen'*eel -,4ntwerpen L.O.
Appendix
1: Glossary
Prevalence,
expressed
as a
percentage, is the number
of individuals
of
a host species infected
with
a
particular
parasite species
divided by
number
of
hosts examined.
Intensity
is
defïned
as
the
number
of
individuals
of
a
particular
parasite species
in
each
infected
host.
Mean
intensity
is the
total
number
of
parasites
(of
one
particular
species)
in
a sample
of
host
species
divided by
the number
of
infected individuals
of
the host
species
in
that
sample, i.e.
the mean number
of
parasites
per infected host.
Ahundance
is defined
as
the
total
number
of
a
particular
parasite species
in
a
sarmple
of
hosts
divided
by
the total
number
of
individuals
of
the host
species
examined, infected
and
uninfected.
If
the prevalence
is
l}}yo,the
mean
intensity
equals the abundance.
The dispersal coefÍicient
is
calculated as
the division
of
the
variance
by
the
rnean
and
provides
an iridex
for
the
degree
of
overdispersion
of
the
parasite
species
within its
host
Leiebekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Maasbekken Netebekken Netebekken Netebekken Netebekken Netebekken Netebekken Netebekken Netebekken Netebekken Netebekken Netebekken Netebekken Netebekken Netebekken Netebekken Lei+St. Martens-Leerne Zuid-Wllemsvaart - Rekem Zuid-\Mllemsvaart - Lanklaar Zuid-Willemsvaart - Rotem-Dilsen Zuid-\Mllemsvaart - Bree Zuid-\Mllemsvaart - Bocholt
Den Aerd-Eí0-put - Minderhout
Warmbeek - Achel-Kluis Dommel- Overpelt Dommel- Neerpelt Abeek - Bocholt Abeek - Kinrooi Itterbeek - Kinrooi Bosbeek - Opoeteren Maas - ltteren Maas - Meeswijk Maas - Stevensweert Maas - Lixhe Albertkanaal - Vroenhoven Albertkanaal- Briegden Benltrinne - Moelingen HochterbampÈNeerharen
Steenberg tss plas 1 & 2- Kessenich Fort van Walem - Walem
Spildoomvijver
Kleine Nete - Dessel Kleine Nete - Olen Kleine Nete - Bouwel Netekanaal
Grote Nete - Hulsen-Meerhout Grote Nete - Westerlo
Grote Nete - Bevel Beneden Nete - Duffel
Bovenscheldebekken Bovenscheldebekken Bovenscheldebekken Bovenscheldebekken Bovenscheldebekken Bovenscheldebekken Bovenscheldebekken Bovenscheldebekken Bovenscheldebekken Bovenscheldebekken Bovenscheldebekken Bovenscheldebekken Bovenscheldebekken Bovenscheldebekken Demerbekken Demerbekken Demerbekken Denderbekken Denderbekken Denderbekken Denderbekken Denderbekken Dijle- en Zennebekken Dijle- en Zennebekken Dijle- en Zennebekken Dijle- en Zennebekken ljzerbekken ljzerbekken ljzerbekken ljzerbekken tjzerbekken ljzerbekken ljzerbekken ljzerbekken ljzeöekken ljzerbekken ljzerbekken ljzerbekken ljzerbekken Leiebekken Leiebekken Leiebekken Leiebekken Leiebekken Leiebekken Leiebekken Leiebekken Leiebekken Leiebekken Leiebekken Leiebekken Leiebekken Leiebekken Oude Schelde-Heuvel Oude Schelde-Nederzwalm Oude Schelde-Grootmeers Oude Schelde-Meilegem Oude Schelde-Meilegem Oude Schelde-Semmezake Oude Schelde-Melsen Oude Scheld+Zwijnaarde Oude Scheld+Zevergem Kalkevaart-Kalken D riesesloot-Schel le belle Bellebeek-Uitbergen Schelde-Pottes Schelde - Oudenaarde Albertkanaal-Lan gerlo Albertkanaal-Hasselt Albertkanaal-Tervant De Gavers-Geraardsbergen Dender-ldegem Dender-Ninove Dender-Liederkeke Dender - Appels Ganzepoot Groenendaal Ganzepoot Groenendaal
Hen gelvijver Groenendaal Meer van Weerde
Steengracht - Steenkerke Proostdijkvaart - Booitshoeke Grote Beverd'rjk - LoReninge
Grote Beverdijk - Stuivekenskerke Yzer - Nieuwpoort Yzer - Diksmuide Yzer - Roesbrugge leperkanaal- leper Groot Geleed-Zevekote Kanaal Nieuwpoort-Plassendale Kanaal Nieuwpoort-Flassendale Kreek van Nieuwendamme - Nieuwpoort
Madslovaart - Keiem
Oude Leie-St. Ellois-vijve
Oude Leie-St. Baafs-vijve
Oude Leie-Bavikhove
Oude Leie-Wevelgem
Oude Leie-Machelen
Oude Leie-Gottem
Oude Leie - \Melsbeke
Appendix
3:
Complete dataset
oi Anguillicola
crassus.
Length of
the eel
in cm,
Weigth of
the
eel
in g; Wal! =
thickness
of
the
swimbladder wall where 1=
<
I
mm,
2=
1-3 mm, 3= >
3
mm; Moist = presence and colour of the moisture in the lumen; L2
=second-stagelarvae; L3=third-stagelarvae;Caps=encapsulatedlarvae; P=pre-adults;
M=maleadults;
F=femaleadults;
Rem
=
remnants;
Total
=
total
number
of
nematodes
where
*
indicates
infection.
Sample Basin