Lecture 1 Lecture 2 Lecture 3 Lecture 4
Current constraints
on Reionization Physics of the
21cm probe EoR radio
experiments Expected
Scientific outcome
i. CMB Polarization.
ii. Lyman-a forest data.
iii. Opacity of ionizing photons (`Bolton et al).
iv. Temperature
evolution (Theuns etal, Haiman&Hui) v. Soft Xray BG
(Dijkstra ..) vi.IR BG (HESS
results) vii.HST WPC3
results
i. Basic Formulae (Field 1958) ii. Excitation
mechanisms (Ly- a, collisions,..) iii. Global evolution
of the spin temp.
iv. Patchy evolution v. Simulation results
i. Current & future experiments.
ii. Key parameters in experiments.
iii. Observational issues: uv coverage, foregrounds, ionosphere,
instrument, noise.
iv. Extraction issues.
v. Calibration.
vi.Polarization.
i. Cosmology:
Density field, ionization frac.
Redshift distort, power spect.
ii. First sources iii. Ionization history iv. Dark ages and
history of spin temperature.
v. The future.
Lecture 2:
Physics of the 21cm line probe
i. Historic overview
ii. Basic Formulae (Field 1958) iii.Excitation mechanisms (Ly-a,
collisions,..)
iv. Global evolution of the spin temp.
v. Patchy evolution
vi. Simulation results
CMB (integral constraint)
Redshifted 21 cm emission (absorption)
21 cm forest at high z
Gamma ray bursts: How many we should have to constrain reionization?
Luminosity function of first objects, e.g., Galaxies:
Recent results from the new WFC3 aboard HST.
Key Probes of Reionization
Background detections: IR, soft x-ray.
Lyman-a absorption system:
ionization, metallicity, thermal history, UV background,
proximity effect.
Lyman alpha emitters
Metals at high redshift.
Using the local volume to
study reionization.
Historic overview
H.C. van de Hulst (inspired by J. Oort) showed the potential of the 21 cm transition in astronomy - 1945
The frst astronomical observation of the 21 cm: H.I. Ewen & E.M.
Purcell (1951, Nat. 168, 356)
C.A. Muller & J.H. Oort (1951, Nat. 168, 357-8)
Excitation mechanism Wouthuysen (1952). Field (1958, 1959) gave the proper framework.
Importance for cosmology was inspired by Zel'dovich's top down scenario.
Scott & Rees (1992) pointed out that a signal could detected from high z 21 cm.
Madau, Meiksin & Rees (1997) were the frst to consider the interplay between the frst sources and the 21 cm transition.
Over the years many observational attempts failed. It is only now that we think that we can observe high redshift 21 cm radiation.
5
21-cm Physics
1420 MHz Mechanisms
??
Lifetime of ~10 Myrs
The 21 cm transition
• The value of the T
sis given by:
n0, g0 n1, g1
21 cm
Field 1958 Madau et al 98
Ciardi&Madau 2003
Lyman-a Coupling
• The Wouthuysen- Field effect, also known as Lyman- alpha pumping.
Dominant in both in the case of stars and Black- holes, due to photo and collisional excitations,
respectively.
Wouthuysen 1952 Field 1958
Collisional Coupling
H-H collisions that excite the 21 cm
transition. This interaction proceeds through electron exchange.
H-e collisions. Especially important around primordial X-ray sources (mini-quasars).
–
This effect might also excite Lyman-alpha transition which adds to the T
s- T
CMBdecoupling effciency.
dT
b, The Brightness Temperature
T
gT
ST
bWhere the optical depth is given by:
A
10= 2.85x10
-15s
-1is the spontaneous emission coefficient.
N
HIis the column density of HI; 4 accounts for fraction in singlet state f(n) is the line profile.
An accurate calculation of the optical depth at a given redshift, which
takes into account line profile broadening due to Hubble expansion and
casts the relation in terms of number density, yields:
δT b : Brightness temperature
Cosmology Astrophysics
The Interpretation might be very complicated
Notice that the signal in absorption can be
much smaller
The Global evolution of the Spin Temperature
Loeb & Zaldarriaga 2004,Pritchard & Loeb 2008, Baek et al. 2010, Thomas & Zaroubi 2010
At z~20 T
sis tightly coupled to T
CMB. In order to observe the 21 cm radiation
decoupling must occur.
Heating much above the CMB temp. and
decoupling do not
necessarily occur together.
This drives the Compton heating rate to almost zero Compton heating
rate
Compton cooling time
The redshift of thermal decoupling is about 200
(proper calculation could be done with the publicly available code RECFAST)
The Spin Temperature Prior to the EoR
Loeb &
Zaldarriaga 04
Only feasible from the Moon
Ionization sources
Mean free path
Bound-free Cross section
n
H= 2.2 x 10
-7cm
-3(1+z)
3
0= 6 x 10
-18cm
2E
0= 13.6 eV
At z = 9: For E = E
0l
E ≈ 2 kpc comoving
For E = 1 keV l
E ≈ 1 Mpc comoving
X-ray photons UV photons
Large cross section but ejected electron has low energy
Low cross section but ejected electron has high energy
e-
e-
The fraction of photon energy that goes to reionization, heating and excitation is roughly 1:1:1 as calculated with Monte-Carlo radiative transfer code by Shull & van
Steenberg (1986) and Valdes et al. 2009.
The signal: Stars vs. Miniqsos
Thomas &
Zaroubi 2008
Kinetic temperature is greatly
heated just beyond the HII region, but further out it has been
adiabatically cooled.
21cm absorption strongly dominates over the inner emission core
Redshift x-ray source
Thomas & Zaroubi 2008
Simulations of the EoR
Cosmological Hydro simulations:
1- High enough resolution to resolve halos in which ionization sources form. 2- Span Large Scales as well as small scales, especially since designed arrays have small 1' res. 3- In certain cases DM only simulations are suffcient.
Out of equilibrium Radiative Transfer:
1- Source and their fux. 2- Ionization of H and He (not always done). 3- Heating due to the radiative processes. 4- Spin temp decoupling (Lya RT).
It is very diffcult to account for all the physical aspects of the problem and approximations are normally made.
Results from 3D RT
Iliev et al. 2008
At half ionization the signal rms is about 8mK
~12mK
Results from approximate methods
Thomas & zaroubi 2008
Full vs. approximate simulations
Full 3D RT simulations are more accurate but
computationally expensive.
They provide crucial insight about the physical processes (especially on small scales).
Approximate methods are less accurate but easier to
produce and allow for an
exploration of the parameters space. This is especially
important for interpretation of the data
Thomas et al 2009
Spin Temperature issues
In case the spin temp. is of the order the CMB temp.
or smaller an absorption signature is expected at high redshifts.
Thomas & Zaroubi 2010 See also Baek et al. 2010
The 21 cm forest
Simulated spectrum from 100 MHz to 200 MHz of a source with S120
= 20 mJy at z=10 using the Cygnus A spectral model and SKA noise
Summary
21 cm line is a very promising probe of the EoR and the Dark Ages.
It tracks the evolution of reionization and the thermal history of the IGM in time and space.