Appendix
Significant outcomes (p<.000)
1. scale and river (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)
absent present
région 38 46,9% 43 53,1%
département 115 90,6% 12 9,4%
ville 113 85,6% 19 14,4%
2. scale single historic building (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)
absent present
région 81 100,0% 0 0,0%
département 124 97,4% 3 2,4%
ville 117 88,6% 15 11,4%
3. scale and natural site (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)
absent present
région 39 48,1% 42 51,9%
département 116 91,3% 11 8,7%
ville 123 93,2% 9 6,8%
4. scale and hot air balloon (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)
absent present
région 70 86,4% 11 13,6%
département 124 97,6% 3 2,4%
ville 326 100,0% 0 0,0%
2
5. actor and river (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)
absent present
Conseil géneral
88 66,2% 45 33,8%
tourisme 126 82,4% 27 17,6%
chambagri 24 96,4% 1 4,0%
cci 28 96,6% 1 3,4%
6. actor and single historic building (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)
absent present
Conseil géneral
132 99,2% 1 0,8%
tourisme 136 88,9% 17 11,1%
chambagri 25 100,0% 0 0,0%
cci 29 100,0% 0 0,0%
7. actor and other building (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)
absent present
Conseil géneral
130 97,7% 3 2,3%
tourisme 153 100,0% 0 0,0%
chambagri 24 96,0% 1 4,0%
cci 23 79,3% 6 20,7%
8. actor and natural site (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)
absent present
Conseil géneral
90 67,7% 43 32,3%
tourisme 135 82,2% 18 11,8%
chambagri 24 96,0% 1 4,0%
3
cci 29 100,0% 0 0,0%
9. actor and wine or associations with wine (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)
absent present
Conseil géneral
133 100,0% 0 0,0%
tourisme 148 96,7% 5 3,3%
chambagri 21 84,0% 4 16,0%
cci 29 100,0% 0 0,0%
10. actor and arable farming (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)
absent present
Conseil géneral
133 100,0% 0 0,0%
tourisme 153 100,0% 0 0,0%
chambagri 20 80,0% 5 20,0%
cci 29 100,0% 0 0,0%
11. actor and stock farming (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)
absent present
Conseil géneral
133 100,0% 0 0,0%
tourisme 152 99,3% 1 0,7%
chambagri 20 80,0% 5 20,0%
cci 29 100,0% 0 0,0%
12. actor and horticulture (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)
absent present
Conseil géneral
132 99,2% 1 0,8%
tourisme 152 99,3% 1 0,7%
chambagri 22 88,0% 3 12%
cci 29 98,5% 0 1,5%
4
13. actor and other associations with farming (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)
absent present
Conseil géneral
133 100,0% 0 0,0%
tourisme 153 100,0% 0 0,0%
chambagri 21 84,0% 4 16,0%
cci 29 100,0% 0 0,0%
14. actor and other (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)
absent present
Conseil géneral
112 84,2% 21 15,8%
tourisme 128 83,7% 25 16,3%
chambagri 24 96,0% 1 4,0%
cci 14 48,3% 15 51,7%
5 Crosstabs (elements and Scale Level) River & Scale level
Crosstab
38 43 81
46,9% 53,1% 100,0%
14,3% 58,1% 23,8%
11,2% 12,6% 23,8%
115 12 127
90,6% 9,4% 100,0%
43,2% 16,2% 37,4%
33,8% 3,5% 37,4%
113 19 132
85,6% 14,4% 100,0%
42,5% 25,7% 38,8%
33,2% 5,6% 38,8%
266 74 340
78,2% 21,8% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
78,2% 21,8% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin riv er
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin riv er
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin riv er
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin riv er
% of Total région
département
v ille scale
Total
absent present riv er
Total
Chi-Square Tests
62,193a 2 ,000
56,048 2 ,000
35,131 1 ,000
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
0 cells (,0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17,63.
a.
6 Castle & Scale level
Crosstab
62 19 81
76,5% 23,5% 100,0%
21,4% 38,0% 23,8%
18,2% 5,6% 23,8%
114 13 127
89,8% 10,2% 100,0%
39,3% 26,0% 37,4%
33,5% 3,8% 37,4%
114 18 132
86,4% 13,6% 100,0%
39,3% 36,0% 38,8%
33,5% 5,3% 38,8%
290 50 340
85,3% 14,7% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
85,3% 14,7% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin cast le
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin cast le
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin cast le
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin cast le
% of Total région
département
v ille scale
Total
absent present castle
Total
Chi-Square Tests
7,088a 2 ,029
6,668 2 ,036
2,797 1 ,094
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
0 cells (,0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11,91.
a.
7 Church, Cathedral & Scale level
Crosstab
78 3 81
96,3% 3,7% 100,0%
24,0% 20,0% 23,8%
22,9% ,9% 23,8%
126 1 127
99,2% ,8% 100,0%
38,8% 6,7% 37,4%
37,1% ,3% 37,4%
121 11 132
91,7% 8,3% 100,0%
37,2% 73,3% 38,8%
35,6% 3,2% 38,8%
325 15 340
95,6% 4,4% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
95,6% 4,4% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin churchcath
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin churchcath
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin churchcath
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin churchcath
% of Total région
département
v ille scale
Total
absent present churchcath
Total
Chi-Square Tests
8,866a 2 ,012
9,887 2 ,007
3,807 1 ,051
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
1 cells (16,7%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 3,57.
a.
8 Historic site & Scale level
Crosstab
70 11 81
86,4% 13,6% 100,0%
22,9% 32,4% 23,8%
20,6% 3,2% 23,8%
123 4 127
96,9% 3,1% 100,0%
40,2% 11,8% 37,4%
36,2% 1,2% 37,4%
113 19 132
85,6% 14,4% 100,0%
36,9% 55,9% 38,8%
33,2% 5,6% 38,8%
306 34 340
90,0% 10,0% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
90,0% 10,0% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin hissite
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin hissite
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin hissite
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin hissite
% of Total région
département
v ille scale
Total
absent present hissit e
Total
Chi-Square Tests
10,607a 2 ,005
12,381 2 ,002
,454 1 ,501
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
0 cells (,0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,10.
a.
9 Historic Building & Scale level
Crosstab
81 0 81
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
25,2% ,0% 23,8%
23,8% ,0% 23,8%
124 3 127
97,6% 2,4% 100,0%
38,5% 16,7% 37,4%
36,5% ,9% 37,4%
117 15 132
88,6% 11,4% 100,0%
36,3% 83,3% 38,8%
34,4% 4,4% 38,8%
322 18 340
94,7% 5,3% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
94,7% 5,3% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin hisbuilding
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin hisbuilding
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin hisbuilding
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin hisbuilding
% of Total région
département
v ille scale
Total
absent present hisbuilding
Total
Chi-Square Tests
16,404a 2 ,000
18,947 2 ,000
14,651 1 ,000
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
1 cells (16,7%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 4,29.
a.
10 Other buildings & Scale level
Crosstab
81 0 81
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
24,5% ,0% 23,8%
23,8% ,0% 23,8%
119 8 127
93,7% 6,3% 100,0%
36,1% 80,0% 37,4%
35,0% 2,4% 37,4%
130 2 132
98,5% 1,5% 100,0%
39,4% 20,0% 38,8%
38,2% ,6% 38,8%
330 10 340
97,1% 2,9% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
97,1% 2,9% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin otherbuild
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin otherbuild
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin otherbuild
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin otherbuild
% of Total région
département
v ille scale
Total
absent present otherbuild
Total
Chi-Square Tests
8,412a 2 ,015
9,781 2 ,008
,043 1 ,837
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
3 cells (50,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 2,38.
a.
11 Natural Site & Scale level
Crosstab
39 42 81
48,1% 51,9% 100,0%
14,0% 67,7% 23,8%
11,5% 12,4% 23,8%
116 11 127
91,3% 8,7% 100,0%
41,7% 17,7% 37,4%
34,1% 3,2% 37,4%
123 9 132
93,2% 6,8% 100,0%
44,2% 14,5% 38,8%
36,2% 2,6% 38,8%
278 62 340
81,8% 18,2% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
81,8% 18,2% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin natsite
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin natsite
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin natsite
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin natsite
% of Total région
département
v ille scale
Total
absent present natsite
Total
Chi-Square Tests
80,740a 2 ,000
70,233 2 ,000
58,268 1 ,000
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
0 cells (,0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14,77.
a.
12 Navigation & Scale level
Crosstab
71 10 81
87,7% 12,3% 100,0%
22,0% 55,6% 23,8%
20,9% 2,9% 23,8%
126 1 127
99,2% ,8% 100,0%
39,1% 5,6% 37,4%
37,1% ,3% 37,4%
125 7 132
94,7% 5,3% 100,0%
38,8% 38,9% 38,8%
36,8% 2,1% 38,8%
322 18 340
94,7% 5,3% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
94,7% 5,3% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin nav igat ion
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin nav igat ion
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin nav igat ion
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin nav igat ion
% of Total région
département
v ille scale
Total
absent present nav igation
Total
Chi-Square Tests
13,178a 2 ,001
13,851 2 ,001
3,146 1 ,076
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
1 cells (16,7%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 4,29.
a.
13 Hot air balloon & Scale level
Crosstab
70 11 81
86,4% 13,6% 100,0%
21,5% 78,6% 23,8%
20,6% 3,2% 23,8%
124 3 127
97,6% 2,4% 100,0%
38,0% 21,4% 37,4%
36,5% ,9% 37,4%
132 0 132
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
40,5% ,0% 38,8%
38,8% ,0% 38,8%
326 14 340
95,9% 4,1% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
95,9% 4,1% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin hotairballo
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin hotairballo
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin hotairballo
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin hotairballo
% of Total région
département
v ille scale
Total
absent present hotairballo
Total
Chi-Square Tests
25,030a 2 ,000
23,973 2 ,000
21,105 1 ,000
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
1 cells (16,7%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 3,34.
a.
14 Accessibility, Transport & Scale level
Crosstab
80 1 81
98,8% 1,2% 100,0%
24,2% 11,1% 23,8%
23,5% ,3% 23,8%
120 7 127
94,5% 5,5% 100,0%
36,3% 77,8% 37,4%
35,3% 2,1% 37,4%
131 1 132
99,2% ,8% 100,0%
39,6% 11,1% 38,8%
38,5% ,3% 38,8%
331 9 340
97,4% 2,6% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
97,4% 2,6% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin acct ransp
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin acct ransp
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin acct ransp
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin acct ransp
% of Total région
département
v ille scale
Total
absent present acctransp
Total
Chi-Square Tests
6,500a 2 ,039
6,413 2 ,040
,343 1 ,558
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
3 cells (50,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 2,14.
a.
15 Other & Scale level
Crosstab
75 6 81
92,6% 7,4% 100,0%
27,0% 9,7% 23,8%
22,1% 1,8% 23,8%
95 32 127
74,8% 25,2% 100,0%
34,2% 51,6% 37,4%
27,9% 9,4% 37,4%
108 24 132
81,8% 18,2% 100,0%
38,8% 38,7% 38,8%
31,8% 7,1% 38,8%
278 62 340
81,8% 18,2% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
81,8% 18,2% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin other
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin other
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin other
% of Total Count
% wit hin scale
% wit hin other
% of Total région
département
v ille scale
Total
absent present other
Total
Chi-Square Tests
10,498a 2 ,005
11,632 2 ,003
2,465 1 ,116
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
0 cells (,0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14,77.
a.
16 Crosstabs (Elements & type of Actor)
River & type of Actor
Crosstab
88 45 133
66,2% 33,8% 100,0%
33,1% 60,8% 39,1%
25,9% 13,2% 39,1%
126 27 153
82,4% 17,6% 100,0%
47,4% 36,5% 45,0%
37,1% 7,9% 45,0%
24 1 25
96,0% 4,0% 100,0%
9,0% 1,4% 7,4%
7,1% ,3% 7,4%
28 1 29
96,6% 3,4% 100,0%
10,5% 1,4% 8,5%
8,2% ,3% 8,5%
266 74 340
78,2% 21,8% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
78,2% 21,8% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin riv er
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin riv er
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin riv er
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin riv er
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin riv er
% of Total conseil général
tourisme
chambagri
cci actor
Total
absent present riv er
Total
Chi-Square Tests
23,250a 3 ,000
26,347 3 ,000
21,264 1 ,000
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
0 cells (,0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5,44.
a.
17 Castle & type of Actor
Crosstab
115 18 133
86,5% 13,5% 100,0%
39,7% 36,0% 39,1%
33,8% 5,3% 39,1%
123 30 153
80,4% 19,6% 100,0%
42,4% 60,0% 45,0%
36,2% 8,8% 45,0%
24 1 25
96,0% 4,0% 100,0%
8,3% 2,0% 7,4%
7,1% ,3% 7,4%
28 1 29
96,6% 3,4% 100,0%
9,7% 2,0% 8,5%
8,2% ,3% 8,5%
290 50 340
85,3% 14,7% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
85,3% 14,7% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin castle
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin castle
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin castle
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin castle
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin castle
% of Total conseil général
tourisme
chambagri
cci actor
Total
absent present castle
Total
Chi-Square Tests
8,291a 3 ,040
9,963 3 ,019
1,743 1 ,187
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
2 cells (25,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 3,68.
a.
18 Church, Cathedral & type of Actor
Crosstab
130 3 133
97,7% 2,3% 100,0%
40,0% 20,0% 39,1%
38,2% ,9% 39,1%
141 12 153
92,2% 7,8% 100,0%
43,4% 80,0% 45,0%
41,5% 3,5% 45,0%
25 0 25
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
7,7% ,0% 7,4%
7,4% ,0% 7,4%
29 0 29
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
8,9% ,0% 8,5%
8,5% ,0% 8,5%
325 15 340
95,6% 4,4% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
95,6% 4,4% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin churchcath
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin churchcath
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin churchcath
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin churchcath
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin churchcath
% of Total conseil général
tourisme
chambagri
cci actor
Total
absent present churchcath
Total
Chi-Square Tests
8,230a 3 ,041
10,147 3 ,017
,056 1 ,813
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
2 cells (25,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 1,10.
a.
19 Historic building & type of Actor
Crosstab
132 1 133
99,2% ,8% 100,0%
41,0% 5,6% 39,1%
38,8% ,3% 39,1%
136 17 153
88,9% 11,1% 100,0%
42,2% 94,4% 45,0%
40,0% 5,0% 45,0%
25 0 25
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
7,8% ,0% 7,4%
7,4% ,0% 7,4%
29 0 29
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
9,0% ,0% 8,5%
8,5% ,0% 8,5%
322 18 340
94,7% 5,3% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
94,7% 5,3% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin hisbuilding
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin hisbuilding
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin hisbuilding
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin hisbuilding
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin hisbuilding
% of Total conseil général
tourisme
chambagri
cci actor
Total
absent present hisbuilding
Total
Chi-Square Tests
18,817a 3 ,000
22,303 3 ,000
,202 1 ,653
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
2 cells (25,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 1,32.
a.
20 Other buildings & type of Actor
Crosstab
130 3 133
97,7% 2,3% 100,0%
39,4% 30,0% 39,1%
38,2% ,9% 39,1%
153 0 153
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
46,4% ,0% 45,0%
45,0% ,0% 45,0%
24 1 25
96,0% 4,0% 100,0%
7,3% 10,0% 7,4%
7,1% ,3% 7,4%
23 6 29
79,3% 20,7% 100,0%
7,0% 60,0% 8,5%
6,8% 1,8% 8,5%
330 10 340
97,1% 2,9% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
97,1% 2,9% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin ot herbuild
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin ot herbuild
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin ot herbuild
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin ot herbuild
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin ot herbuild
% of Total conseil général
tourisme
chambagri
cci actor
Total
absent present otherbuild
Total
Chi-Square Tests
36,955a 3 ,000
23,581 3 ,000
17,235 1 ,000
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
4 cells (50,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is ,74.
a.
21 Natural site & type of Actor
Crosstab
90 43 133
67,7% 32,3% 100,0%
32,4% 69,4% 39,1%
26,5% 12,6% 39,1%
135 18 153
88,2% 11,8% 100,0%
48,6% 29,0% 45,0%
39,7% 5,3% 45,0%
24 1 25
96,0% 4,0% 100,0%
8,6% 1,6% 7,4%
7,1% ,3% 7,4%
29 0 29
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
10,4% ,0% 8,5%
8,5% ,0% 8,5%
278 62 340
81,8% 18,2% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
81,8% 18,2% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin nat site
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin nat site
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin nat site
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin nat site
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin nat site
% of Total conseil général
tourisme
chambagri
cci actor
Total
absent present natsite
Total
Chi-Square Tests
31,885a 3 ,000
36,323 3 ,000
27,116 1 ,000
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
1 cells (12,5%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 4,56.
a.
22 Gastronomy & type of Actor
Crosstab
133 0 133
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
39,9% ,0% 39,1%
39,1% ,0% 39,1%
146 7 153
95,4% 4,6% 100,0%
43,8% 100,0% 45,0%
42,9% 2,1% 45,0%
25 0 25
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
7,5% ,0% 7,4%
7,4% ,0% 7,4%
29 0 29
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
8,7% ,0% 8,5%
8,5% ,0% 8,5%
333 7 340
97,9% 2,1% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
97,9% 2,1% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin gastronom
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin gastronom
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin gastronom
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin gastronom
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin gastronom
% of Total conseil général
tourisme
chambagri
cci actor
Total
absent present gastronom
Total
Chi-Square Tests
8,735a 3 ,033
11,359 3 ,010
,197 1 ,658
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
4 cells (50,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is ,51.
a.
23 Wine associated & type of Actor
Crosstab
133 0 133
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
40,2% ,0% 39,1%
39,1% ,0% 39,1%
148 5 153
96,7% 3,3% 100,0%
44,7% 55,6% 45,0%
43,5% 1,5% 45,0%
21 4 25
84,0% 16,0% 100,0%
6,3% 44,4% 7,4%
6,2% 1,2% 7,4%
29 0 29
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
8,8% ,0% 8,5%
8,5% ,0% 8,5%
331 9 340
97,4% 2,6% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
97,4% 2,6% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin wineasso
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin wineasso
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin wineasso
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin wineasso
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin wineasso
% of Total conseil général
tourisme
chambagri
cci actor
Total
absent present wineasso
Total
Chi-Square Tests
21,931a 3 ,000
17,102 3 ,001
4,112 1 ,043
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
4 cells (50,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is ,66.
a.
24 Hot air balloon & type of Actor
Crosstab
121 12 133
91,0% 9,0% 100,0%
37,1% 85,7% 39,1%
35,6% 3,5% 39,1%
151 2 153
98,7% 1,3% 100,0%
46,3% 14,3% 45,0%
44,4% ,6% 45,0%
25 0 25
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
7,7% ,0% 7,4%
7,4% ,0% 7,4%
29 0 29
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
8,9% ,0% 8,5%
8,5% ,0% 8,5%
326 14 340
95,9% 4,1% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
95,9% 4,1% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin hotairballo
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin hotairballo
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin hotairballo
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin hotairballo
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin hotairballo
% of Total conseil général
tourisme
chambagri
cci actor
Total
absent present hotairballo
Total
Chi-Square Tests
13,484a 3 ,004
14,796 3 ,002
9,360 1 ,002
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
2 cells (25,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 1,03.
a.
25 Arable farming & type of Actor
Crosstab
133 0 133
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
39,7% ,0% 39,1%
39,1% ,0% 39,1%
153 0 153
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
45,7% ,0% 45,0%
45,0% ,0% 45,0%
20 5 25
80,0% 20,0% 100,0%
6,0% 100,0% 7,4%
5,9% 1,5% 7,4%
29 0 29
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
8,7% ,0% 8,5%
8,5% ,0% 8,5%
335 5 340
98,5% 1,5% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
98,5% 1,5% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin arablef arm
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin arablef arm
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin arablef arm
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin arablef arm
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin arablef arm
% of Total conseil général
tourisme
chambagri
cci actor
Total
absent present arablef arm
Total
Chi-Square Tests
63,940a 3 ,000
27,101 3 ,000
8,489 1 ,004
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
4 cells (50,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is ,37.
a.
26 Stock farming & type of Actor
Crosstab
133 0 133
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
39,8% ,0% 39,1%
39,1% ,0% 39,1%
152 1 153
99,3% ,7% 100,0%
45,5% 16,7% 45,0%
44,7% ,3% 45,0%
20 5 25
80,0% 20,0% 100,0%
6,0% 83,3% 7,4%
5,9% 1,5% 7,4%
29 0 29
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
8,7% ,0% 8,5%
8,5% ,0% 8,5%
334 6 340
98,2% 1,8% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
98,2% 1,8% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin stockf arm
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin stockf arm
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin stockf arm
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin stockf arm
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin stockf arm
% of Total conseil général
tourisme
chambagri
cci actor
Total
absent present stockf arm
Total
Chi-Square Tests
51,954a 3 ,000
23,265 3 ,000
7,464 1 ,006
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
4 cells (50,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is ,44.
a.
27 Horticulture & type of Actor
Crosstab
132 1 133
99,2% ,8% 100,0%
39,4% 20,0% 39,1%
38,8% ,3% 39,1%
152 1 153
99,3% ,7% 100,0%
45,4% 20,0% 45,0%
44,7% ,3% 45,0%
22 3 25
88,0% 12,0% 100,0%
6,6% 60,0% 7,4%
6,5% ,9% 7,4%
29 0 29
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
8,7% ,0% 8,5%
8,5% ,0% 8,5%
335 5 340
98,5% 1,5% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
98,5% 1,5% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin horticulture
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin horticulture
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin horticulture
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin horticulture
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin horticulture
% of Total conseil général
tourisme
chambagri
cci actor
Total
absent present horticulture
Total
Chi-Square Tests
20,741a 3 ,000
9,947 3 ,019
1,931 1 ,165
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
4 cells (50,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is ,37.
a.
28 Other farm related & type of Actor
Crosstab
133 0 133
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
39,6% ,0% 39,1%
39,1% ,0% 39,1%
153 0 153
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
45,5% ,0% 45,0%
45,0% ,0% 45,0%
21 4 25
84,0% 16,0% 100,0%
6,3% 100,0% 7,4%
6,2% 1,2% 7,4%
29 0 29
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
8,6% ,0% 8,5%
8,5% ,0% 8,5%
336 4 340
98,8% 1,2% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
98,8% 1,2% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin ot herf arm
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin ot herf arm
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin ot herf arm
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin ot herf arm
% of Total Count
% wit hin actor
% wit hin ot herf arm
% of Total conseil général
tourisme
chambagri
cci actor
Total
absent present otherf arm
Total
Chi-Square Tests
51,000a 3 ,000
21,510 3 ,000
6,771 1 ,009
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
4 cells (50,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is ,29.
a.
29 Industrial activities & type of Actor
Crosstab
132 1 133
99,2% ,8% 100,0%
39,2% 33,3% 39,1%
38,8% ,3% 39,1%
153 0 153
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
45,4% ,0% 45,0%
45,0% ,0% 45,0%
25 0 25
100,0% ,0% 100,0%
7,4% ,0% 7,4%
7,4% ,0% 7,4%
27 2 29
93,1% 6,9% 100,0%
8,0% 66,7% 8,5%
7,9% ,6% 8,5%
337 3 340
99,1% ,9% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
99,1% ,9% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin industrial
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin industrial
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin industrial
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin industrial
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin industrial
% of Total conseil général
tourisme
chambagri
cci actor
Total
absent present industrial
Total
Chi-Square Tests
13,604a 3 ,003
8,027 3 ,045
5,063 1 ,024
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
4 cells (50,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is ,22.
a.
30 Other & type of actor
Crosstab
112 21 133
84,2% 15,8% 100,0%
40,3% 33,9% 39,1%
32,9% 6,2% 39,1%
128 25 153
83,7% 16,3% 100,0%
46,0% 40,3% 45,0%
37,6% 7,4% 45,0%
24 1 25
96,0% 4,0% 100,0%
8,6% 1,6% 7,4%
7,1% ,3% 7,4%
14 15 29
48,3% 51,7% 100,0%
5,0% 24,2% 8,5%
4,1% 4,4% 8,5%
278 62 340
81,8% 18,2% 100,0%
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
81,8% 18,2% 100,0%
Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin ot her
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin ot her
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin ot her
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin ot her
% of Total Count
% wit hin act or
% wit hin ot her
% of Total conseil général
tourisme
chambagri
cci actor
Total
absent present other
Total
Chi-Square Tests
26,113a 3 ,000
22,126 3 ,000
9,166 1 ,002
340 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
1 cells (12,5%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 4,56.
a.