• No results found

Significant outcomes (p<.000) Appendix

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Significant outcomes (p<.000) Appendix"

Copied!
30
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Appendix

Significant outcomes (p<.000)

1. scale and river (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)

absent present

région 38 46,9% 43 53,1%

département 115 90,6% 12 9,4%

ville 113 85,6% 19 14,4%

2. scale single historic building (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)

absent present

région 81 100,0% 0 0,0%

département 124 97,4% 3 2,4%

ville 117 88,6% 15 11,4%

3. scale and natural site (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)

absent present

région 39 48,1% 42 51,9%

département 116 91,3% 11 8,7%

ville 123 93,2% 9 6,8%

4. scale and hot air balloon (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)

absent present

région 70 86,4% 11 13,6%

département 124 97,6% 3 2,4%

ville 326 100,0% 0 0,0%

(2)

2

5. actor and river (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)

absent present

Conseil géneral

88 66,2% 45 33,8%

tourisme 126 82,4% 27 17,6%

chambagri 24 96,4% 1 4,0%

cci 28 96,6% 1 3,4%

6. actor and single historic building (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)

absent present

Conseil géneral

132 99,2% 1 0,8%

tourisme 136 88,9% 17 11,1%

chambagri 25 100,0% 0 0,0%

cci 29 100,0% 0 0,0%

7. actor and other building (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)

absent present

Conseil géneral

130 97,7% 3 2,3%

tourisme 153 100,0% 0 0,0%

chambagri 24 96,0% 1 4,0%

cci 23 79,3% 6 20,7%

8. actor and natural site (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)

absent present

Conseil géneral

90 67,7% 43 32,3%

tourisme 135 82,2% 18 11,8%

chambagri 24 96,0% 1 4,0%

(3)

3

cci 29 100,0% 0 0,0%

9. actor and wine or associations with wine (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)

absent present

Conseil géneral

133 100,0% 0 0,0%

tourisme 148 96,7% 5 3,3%

chambagri 21 84,0% 4 16,0%

cci 29 100,0% 0 0,0%

10. actor and arable farming (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)

absent present

Conseil géneral

133 100,0% 0 0,0%

tourisme 153 100,0% 0 0,0%

chambagri 20 80,0% 5 20,0%

cci 29 100,0% 0 0,0%

11. actor and stock farming (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)

absent present

Conseil géneral

133 100,0% 0 0,0%

tourisme 152 99,3% 1 0,7%

chambagri 20 80,0% 5 20,0%

cci 29 100,0% 0 0,0%

12. actor and horticulture (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)

absent present

Conseil géneral

132 99,2% 1 0,8%

tourisme 152 99,3% 1 0,7%

chambagri 22 88,0% 3 12%

cci 29 98,5% 0 1,5%

(4)

4

13. actor and other associations with farming (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)

absent present

Conseil géneral

133 100,0% 0 0,0%

tourisme 153 100,0% 0 0,0%

chambagri 21 84,0% 4 16,0%

cci 29 100,0% 0 0,0%

14. actor and other (A two-tailed p-value of < 0,000)

absent present

Conseil géneral

112 84,2% 21 15,8%

tourisme 128 83,7% 25 16,3%

chambagri 24 96,0% 1 4,0%

cci 14 48,3% 15 51,7%

(5)

5 Crosstabs (elements and Scale Level) River & Scale level

Crosstab

38 43 81

46,9% 53,1% 100,0%

14,3% 58,1% 23,8%

11,2% 12,6% 23,8%

115 12 127

90,6% 9,4% 100,0%

43,2% 16,2% 37,4%

33,8% 3,5% 37,4%

113 19 132

85,6% 14,4% 100,0%

42,5% 25,7% 38,8%

33,2% 5,6% 38,8%

266 74 340

78,2% 21,8% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

78,2% 21,8% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin riv er

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin riv er

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin riv er

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin riv er

% of Total région

département

v ille scale

Total

absent present riv er

Total

Chi-Square Tests

62,193a 2 ,000

56,048 2 ,000

35,131 1 ,000

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (,0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17,63.

a.

(6)

6 Castle & Scale level

Crosstab

62 19 81

76,5% 23,5% 100,0%

21,4% 38,0% 23,8%

18,2% 5,6% 23,8%

114 13 127

89,8% 10,2% 100,0%

39,3% 26,0% 37,4%

33,5% 3,8% 37,4%

114 18 132

86,4% 13,6% 100,0%

39,3% 36,0% 38,8%

33,5% 5,3% 38,8%

290 50 340

85,3% 14,7% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

85,3% 14,7% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin cast le

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin cast le

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin cast le

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin cast le

% of Total région

département

v ille scale

Total

absent present castle

Total

Chi-Square Tests

7,088a 2 ,029

6,668 2 ,036

2,797 1 ,094

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (,0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11,91.

a.

(7)

7 Church, Cathedral & Scale level

Crosstab

78 3 81

96,3% 3,7% 100,0%

24,0% 20,0% 23,8%

22,9% ,9% 23,8%

126 1 127

99,2% ,8% 100,0%

38,8% 6,7% 37,4%

37,1% ,3% 37,4%

121 11 132

91,7% 8,3% 100,0%

37,2% 73,3% 38,8%

35,6% 3,2% 38,8%

325 15 340

95,6% 4,4% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

95,6% 4,4% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin churchcath

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin churchcath

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin churchcath

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin churchcath

% of Total région

département

v ille scale

Total

absent present churchcath

Total

Chi-Square Tests

8,866a 2 ,012

9,887 2 ,007

3,807 1 ,051

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

1 cells (16,7%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 3,57.

a.

(8)

8 Historic site & Scale level

Crosstab

70 11 81

86,4% 13,6% 100,0%

22,9% 32,4% 23,8%

20,6% 3,2% 23,8%

123 4 127

96,9% 3,1% 100,0%

40,2% 11,8% 37,4%

36,2% 1,2% 37,4%

113 19 132

85,6% 14,4% 100,0%

36,9% 55,9% 38,8%

33,2% 5,6% 38,8%

306 34 340

90,0% 10,0% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

90,0% 10,0% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin hissite

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin hissite

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin hissite

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin hissite

% of Total région

département

v ille scale

Total

absent present hissit e

Total

Chi-Square Tests

10,607a 2 ,005

12,381 2 ,002

,454 1 ,501

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (,0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,10.

a.

(9)

9 Historic Building & Scale level

Crosstab

81 0 81

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

25,2% ,0% 23,8%

23,8% ,0% 23,8%

124 3 127

97,6% 2,4% 100,0%

38,5% 16,7% 37,4%

36,5% ,9% 37,4%

117 15 132

88,6% 11,4% 100,0%

36,3% 83,3% 38,8%

34,4% 4,4% 38,8%

322 18 340

94,7% 5,3% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

94,7% 5,3% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin hisbuilding

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin hisbuilding

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin hisbuilding

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin hisbuilding

% of Total région

département

v ille scale

Total

absent present hisbuilding

Total

Chi-Square Tests

16,404a 2 ,000

18,947 2 ,000

14,651 1 ,000

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

1 cells (16,7%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 4,29.

a.

(10)

10 Other buildings & Scale level

Crosstab

81 0 81

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

24,5% ,0% 23,8%

23,8% ,0% 23,8%

119 8 127

93,7% 6,3% 100,0%

36,1% 80,0% 37,4%

35,0% 2,4% 37,4%

130 2 132

98,5% 1,5% 100,0%

39,4% 20,0% 38,8%

38,2% ,6% 38,8%

330 10 340

97,1% 2,9% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

97,1% 2,9% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin otherbuild

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin otherbuild

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin otherbuild

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin otherbuild

% of Total région

département

v ille scale

Total

absent present otherbuild

Total

Chi-Square Tests

8,412a 2 ,015

9,781 2 ,008

,043 1 ,837

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

3 cells (50,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 2,38.

a.

(11)

11 Natural Site & Scale level

Crosstab

39 42 81

48,1% 51,9% 100,0%

14,0% 67,7% 23,8%

11,5% 12,4% 23,8%

116 11 127

91,3% 8,7% 100,0%

41,7% 17,7% 37,4%

34,1% 3,2% 37,4%

123 9 132

93,2% 6,8% 100,0%

44,2% 14,5% 38,8%

36,2% 2,6% 38,8%

278 62 340

81,8% 18,2% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

81,8% 18,2% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin natsite

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin natsite

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin natsite

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin natsite

% of Total région

département

v ille scale

Total

absent present natsite

Total

Chi-Square Tests

80,740a 2 ,000

70,233 2 ,000

58,268 1 ,000

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (,0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14,77.

a.

(12)

12 Navigation & Scale level

Crosstab

71 10 81

87,7% 12,3% 100,0%

22,0% 55,6% 23,8%

20,9% 2,9% 23,8%

126 1 127

99,2% ,8% 100,0%

39,1% 5,6% 37,4%

37,1% ,3% 37,4%

125 7 132

94,7% 5,3% 100,0%

38,8% 38,9% 38,8%

36,8% 2,1% 38,8%

322 18 340

94,7% 5,3% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

94,7% 5,3% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin nav igat ion

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin nav igat ion

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin nav igat ion

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin nav igat ion

% of Total région

département

v ille scale

Total

absent present nav igation

Total

Chi-Square Tests

13,178a 2 ,001

13,851 2 ,001

3,146 1 ,076

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

1 cells (16,7%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 4,29.

a.

(13)

13 Hot air balloon & Scale level

Crosstab

70 11 81

86,4% 13,6% 100,0%

21,5% 78,6% 23,8%

20,6% 3,2% 23,8%

124 3 127

97,6% 2,4% 100,0%

38,0% 21,4% 37,4%

36,5% ,9% 37,4%

132 0 132

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

40,5% ,0% 38,8%

38,8% ,0% 38,8%

326 14 340

95,9% 4,1% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

95,9% 4,1% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin hotairballo

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin hotairballo

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin hotairballo

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin hotairballo

% of Total région

département

v ille scale

Total

absent present hotairballo

Total

Chi-Square Tests

25,030a 2 ,000

23,973 2 ,000

21,105 1 ,000

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

1 cells (16,7%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 3,34.

a.

(14)

14 Accessibility, Transport & Scale level

Crosstab

80 1 81

98,8% 1,2% 100,0%

24,2% 11,1% 23,8%

23,5% ,3% 23,8%

120 7 127

94,5% 5,5% 100,0%

36,3% 77,8% 37,4%

35,3% 2,1% 37,4%

131 1 132

99,2% ,8% 100,0%

39,6% 11,1% 38,8%

38,5% ,3% 38,8%

331 9 340

97,4% 2,6% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

97,4% 2,6% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin acct ransp

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin acct ransp

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin acct ransp

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin acct ransp

% of Total région

département

v ille scale

Total

absent present acctransp

Total

Chi-Square Tests

6,500a 2 ,039

6,413 2 ,040

,343 1 ,558

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

3 cells (50,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 2,14.

a.

(15)

15 Other & Scale level

Crosstab

75 6 81

92,6% 7,4% 100,0%

27,0% 9,7% 23,8%

22,1% 1,8% 23,8%

95 32 127

74,8% 25,2% 100,0%

34,2% 51,6% 37,4%

27,9% 9,4% 37,4%

108 24 132

81,8% 18,2% 100,0%

38,8% 38,7% 38,8%

31,8% 7,1% 38,8%

278 62 340

81,8% 18,2% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

81,8% 18,2% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin other

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin other

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin other

% of Total Count

% wit hin scale

% wit hin other

% of Total région

département

v ille scale

Total

absent present other

Total

Chi-Square Tests

10,498a 2 ,005

11,632 2 ,003

2,465 1 ,116

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (,0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14,77.

a.

(16)

16 Crosstabs (Elements & type of Actor)

River & type of Actor

Crosstab

88 45 133

66,2% 33,8% 100,0%

33,1% 60,8% 39,1%

25,9% 13,2% 39,1%

126 27 153

82,4% 17,6% 100,0%

47,4% 36,5% 45,0%

37,1% 7,9% 45,0%

24 1 25

96,0% 4,0% 100,0%

9,0% 1,4% 7,4%

7,1% ,3% 7,4%

28 1 29

96,6% 3,4% 100,0%

10,5% 1,4% 8,5%

8,2% ,3% 8,5%

266 74 340

78,2% 21,8% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

78,2% 21,8% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin riv er

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin riv er

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin riv er

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin riv er

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin riv er

% of Total conseil général

tourisme

chambagri

cci actor

Total

absent present riv er

Total

Chi-Square Tests

23,250a 3 ,000

26,347 3 ,000

21,264 1 ,000

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (,0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5,44.

a.

(17)

17 Castle & type of Actor

Crosstab

115 18 133

86,5% 13,5% 100,0%

39,7% 36,0% 39,1%

33,8% 5,3% 39,1%

123 30 153

80,4% 19,6% 100,0%

42,4% 60,0% 45,0%

36,2% 8,8% 45,0%

24 1 25

96,0% 4,0% 100,0%

8,3% 2,0% 7,4%

7,1% ,3% 7,4%

28 1 29

96,6% 3,4% 100,0%

9,7% 2,0% 8,5%

8,2% ,3% 8,5%

290 50 340

85,3% 14,7% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

85,3% 14,7% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin castle

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin castle

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin castle

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin castle

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin castle

% of Total conseil général

tourisme

chambagri

cci actor

Total

absent present castle

Total

Chi-Square Tests

8,291a 3 ,040

9,963 3 ,019

1,743 1 ,187

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (25,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 3,68.

a.

(18)

18 Church, Cathedral & type of Actor

Crosstab

130 3 133

97,7% 2,3% 100,0%

40,0% 20,0% 39,1%

38,2% ,9% 39,1%

141 12 153

92,2% 7,8% 100,0%

43,4% 80,0% 45,0%

41,5% 3,5% 45,0%

25 0 25

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

7,7% ,0% 7,4%

7,4% ,0% 7,4%

29 0 29

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

8,9% ,0% 8,5%

8,5% ,0% 8,5%

325 15 340

95,6% 4,4% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

95,6% 4,4% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin churchcath

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin churchcath

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin churchcath

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin churchcath

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin churchcath

% of Total conseil général

tourisme

chambagri

cci actor

Total

absent present churchcath

Total

Chi-Square Tests

8,230a 3 ,041

10,147 3 ,017

,056 1 ,813

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (25,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 1,10.

a.

(19)

19 Historic building & type of Actor

Crosstab

132 1 133

99,2% ,8% 100,0%

41,0% 5,6% 39,1%

38,8% ,3% 39,1%

136 17 153

88,9% 11,1% 100,0%

42,2% 94,4% 45,0%

40,0% 5,0% 45,0%

25 0 25

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

7,8% ,0% 7,4%

7,4% ,0% 7,4%

29 0 29

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

9,0% ,0% 8,5%

8,5% ,0% 8,5%

322 18 340

94,7% 5,3% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

94,7% 5,3% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin hisbuilding

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin hisbuilding

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin hisbuilding

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin hisbuilding

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin hisbuilding

% of Total conseil général

tourisme

chambagri

cci actor

Total

absent present hisbuilding

Total

Chi-Square Tests

18,817a 3 ,000

22,303 3 ,000

,202 1 ,653

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (25,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 1,32.

a.

(20)

20 Other buildings & type of Actor

Crosstab

130 3 133

97,7% 2,3% 100,0%

39,4% 30,0% 39,1%

38,2% ,9% 39,1%

153 0 153

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

46,4% ,0% 45,0%

45,0% ,0% 45,0%

24 1 25

96,0% 4,0% 100,0%

7,3% 10,0% 7,4%

7,1% ,3% 7,4%

23 6 29

79,3% 20,7% 100,0%

7,0% 60,0% 8,5%

6,8% 1,8% 8,5%

330 10 340

97,1% 2,9% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

97,1% 2,9% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin ot herbuild

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin ot herbuild

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin ot herbuild

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin ot herbuild

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin ot herbuild

% of Total conseil général

tourisme

chambagri

cci actor

Total

absent present otherbuild

Total

Chi-Square Tests

36,955a 3 ,000

23,581 3 ,000

17,235 1 ,000

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (50,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is ,74.

a.

(21)

21 Natural site & type of Actor

Crosstab

90 43 133

67,7% 32,3% 100,0%

32,4% 69,4% 39,1%

26,5% 12,6% 39,1%

135 18 153

88,2% 11,8% 100,0%

48,6% 29,0% 45,0%

39,7% 5,3% 45,0%

24 1 25

96,0% 4,0% 100,0%

8,6% 1,6% 7,4%

7,1% ,3% 7,4%

29 0 29

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

10,4% ,0% 8,5%

8,5% ,0% 8,5%

278 62 340

81,8% 18,2% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

81,8% 18,2% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin nat site

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin nat site

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin nat site

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin nat site

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin nat site

% of Total conseil général

tourisme

chambagri

cci actor

Total

absent present natsite

Total

Chi-Square Tests

31,885a 3 ,000

36,323 3 ,000

27,116 1 ,000

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

1 cells (12,5%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 4,56.

a.

(22)

22 Gastronomy & type of Actor

Crosstab

133 0 133

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

39,9% ,0% 39,1%

39,1% ,0% 39,1%

146 7 153

95,4% 4,6% 100,0%

43,8% 100,0% 45,0%

42,9% 2,1% 45,0%

25 0 25

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

7,5% ,0% 7,4%

7,4% ,0% 7,4%

29 0 29

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

8,7% ,0% 8,5%

8,5% ,0% 8,5%

333 7 340

97,9% 2,1% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

97,9% 2,1% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin gastronom

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin gastronom

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin gastronom

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin gastronom

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin gastronom

% of Total conseil général

tourisme

chambagri

cci actor

Total

absent present gastronom

Total

Chi-Square Tests

8,735a 3 ,033

11,359 3 ,010

,197 1 ,658

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (50,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is ,51.

a.

(23)

23 Wine associated & type of Actor

Crosstab

133 0 133

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

40,2% ,0% 39,1%

39,1% ,0% 39,1%

148 5 153

96,7% 3,3% 100,0%

44,7% 55,6% 45,0%

43,5% 1,5% 45,0%

21 4 25

84,0% 16,0% 100,0%

6,3% 44,4% 7,4%

6,2% 1,2% 7,4%

29 0 29

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

8,8% ,0% 8,5%

8,5% ,0% 8,5%

331 9 340

97,4% 2,6% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

97,4% 2,6% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin wineasso

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin wineasso

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin wineasso

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin wineasso

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin wineasso

% of Total conseil général

tourisme

chambagri

cci actor

Total

absent present wineasso

Total

Chi-Square Tests

21,931a 3 ,000

17,102 3 ,001

4,112 1 ,043

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (50,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is ,66.

a.

(24)

24 Hot air balloon & type of Actor

Crosstab

121 12 133

91,0% 9,0% 100,0%

37,1% 85,7% 39,1%

35,6% 3,5% 39,1%

151 2 153

98,7% 1,3% 100,0%

46,3% 14,3% 45,0%

44,4% ,6% 45,0%

25 0 25

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

7,7% ,0% 7,4%

7,4% ,0% 7,4%

29 0 29

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

8,9% ,0% 8,5%

8,5% ,0% 8,5%

326 14 340

95,9% 4,1% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

95,9% 4,1% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin hotairballo

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin hotairballo

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin hotairballo

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin hotairballo

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin hotairballo

% of Total conseil général

tourisme

chambagri

cci actor

Total

absent present hotairballo

Total

Chi-Square Tests

13,484a 3 ,004

14,796 3 ,002

9,360 1 ,002

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (25,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 1,03.

a.

(25)

25 Arable farming & type of Actor

Crosstab

133 0 133

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

39,7% ,0% 39,1%

39,1% ,0% 39,1%

153 0 153

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

45,7% ,0% 45,0%

45,0% ,0% 45,0%

20 5 25

80,0% 20,0% 100,0%

6,0% 100,0% 7,4%

5,9% 1,5% 7,4%

29 0 29

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

8,7% ,0% 8,5%

8,5% ,0% 8,5%

335 5 340

98,5% 1,5% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

98,5% 1,5% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin arablef arm

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin arablef arm

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin arablef arm

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin arablef arm

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin arablef arm

% of Total conseil général

tourisme

chambagri

cci actor

Total

absent present arablef arm

Total

Chi-Square Tests

63,940a 3 ,000

27,101 3 ,000

8,489 1 ,004

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (50,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is ,37.

a.

(26)

26 Stock farming & type of Actor

Crosstab

133 0 133

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

39,8% ,0% 39,1%

39,1% ,0% 39,1%

152 1 153

99,3% ,7% 100,0%

45,5% 16,7% 45,0%

44,7% ,3% 45,0%

20 5 25

80,0% 20,0% 100,0%

6,0% 83,3% 7,4%

5,9% 1,5% 7,4%

29 0 29

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

8,7% ,0% 8,5%

8,5% ,0% 8,5%

334 6 340

98,2% 1,8% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

98,2% 1,8% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin stockf arm

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin stockf arm

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin stockf arm

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin stockf arm

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin stockf arm

% of Total conseil général

tourisme

chambagri

cci actor

Total

absent present stockf arm

Total

Chi-Square Tests

51,954a 3 ,000

23,265 3 ,000

7,464 1 ,006

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (50,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is ,44.

a.

(27)

27 Horticulture & type of Actor

Crosstab

132 1 133

99,2% ,8% 100,0%

39,4% 20,0% 39,1%

38,8% ,3% 39,1%

152 1 153

99,3% ,7% 100,0%

45,4% 20,0% 45,0%

44,7% ,3% 45,0%

22 3 25

88,0% 12,0% 100,0%

6,6% 60,0% 7,4%

6,5% ,9% 7,4%

29 0 29

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

8,7% ,0% 8,5%

8,5% ,0% 8,5%

335 5 340

98,5% 1,5% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

98,5% 1,5% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin horticulture

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin horticulture

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin horticulture

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin horticulture

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin horticulture

% of Total conseil général

tourisme

chambagri

cci actor

Total

absent present horticulture

Total

Chi-Square Tests

20,741a 3 ,000

9,947 3 ,019

1,931 1 ,165

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (50,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is ,37.

a.

(28)

28 Other farm related & type of Actor

Crosstab

133 0 133

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

39,6% ,0% 39,1%

39,1% ,0% 39,1%

153 0 153

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

45,5% ,0% 45,0%

45,0% ,0% 45,0%

21 4 25

84,0% 16,0% 100,0%

6,3% 100,0% 7,4%

6,2% 1,2% 7,4%

29 0 29

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

8,6% ,0% 8,5%

8,5% ,0% 8,5%

336 4 340

98,8% 1,2% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

98,8% 1,2% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin ot herf arm

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin ot herf arm

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin ot herf arm

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin ot herf arm

% of Total Count

% wit hin actor

% wit hin ot herf arm

% of Total conseil général

tourisme

chambagri

cci actor

Total

absent present otherf arm

Total

Chi-Square Tests

51,000a 3 ,000

21,510 3 ,000

6,771 1 ,009

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (50,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is ,29.

a.

(29)

29 Industrial activities & type of Actor

Crosstab

132 1 133

99,2% ,8% 100,0%

39,2% 33,3% 39,1%

38,8% ,3% 39,1%

153 0 153

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

45,4% ,0% 45,0%

45,0% ,0% 45,0%

25 0 25

100,0% ,0% 100,0%

7,4% ,0% 7,4%

7,4% ,0% 7,4%

27 2 29

93,1% 6,9% 100,0%

8,0% 66,7% 8,5%

7,9% ,6% 8,5%

337 3 340

99,1% ,9% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

99,1% ,9% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin industrial

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin industrial

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin industrial

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin industrial

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin industrial

% of Total conseil général

tourisme

chambagri

cci actor

Total

absent present industrial

Total

Chi-Square Tests

13,604a 3 ,003

8,027 3 ,045

5,063 1 ,024

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (50,0%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is ,22.

a.

(30)

30 Other & type of actor

Crosstab

112 21 133

84,2% 15,8% 100,0%

40,3% 33,9% 39,1%

32,9% 6,2% 39,1%

128 25 153

83,7% 16,3% 100,0%

46,0% 40,3% 45,0%

37,6% 7,4% 45,0%

24 1 25

96,0% 4,0% 100,0%

8,6% 1,6% 7,4%

7,1% ,3% 7,4%

14 15 29

48,3% 51,7% 100,0%

5,0% 24,2% 8,5%

4,1% 4,4% 8,5%

278 62 340

81,8% 18,2% 100,0%

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

81,8% 18,2% 100,0%

Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin ot her

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin ot her

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin ot her

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin ot her

% of Total Count

% wit hin act or

% wit hin ot her

% of Total conseil général

tourisme

chambagri

cci actor

Total

absent present other

Total

Chi-Square Tests

26,113a 3 ,000

22,126 3 ,000

9,166 1 ,002

340 Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

1 cells (12,5%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 4,56.

a.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

[r]

The ultramodern aluminium sand casting foundry recently installed by the Eurotech Group is unique in the world because of its high level of automation combined with the low-pressure

The minimum expected count is

Checklist for evaluating licensees for possible use of the Paques SMM (Submerged Membrane Module). This to get a feeling of the market. 1) LEGISLATION (re-use, TSS, high

 Kota Padang Panjang memiliki luas wilayah yang terbatas, dan hanya sekitar 21 % lahan yang efektif untuk dibangun ( kemiringan 0 – 15 %), akibatnya penduduk yang hanya memiliki

[r]

Frahm and Memmel [24] promoted the global minimum variance portfolio using a shrinkage estimator for the variance matrix due to expected value accounting for most of the

He brought with him what was quickly castigated as a reformist 'dream team' composed of Martin Oduor-Otieno, a former banker at Barclays Bank Kenya who was appointed permanent