• No results found

The dark side of quiescent galaxies: secondary correlations between halo mass and galaxy properties at fixed stellar mass

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The dark side of quiescent galaxies: secondary correlations between halo mass and galaxy properties at fixed stellar mass"

Copied!
14
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

The dark

matter

side of quiescent

galaxies

(2)

Why is dark matter important?

● Key ingredient in galaxy formation and evolution

● Crucial for mapping observations to simulations

Dark

matter

Galaxies

● Gas infall rate and temperature

● Merger rate

● Adiabatic contraction (inflowing gas)

(3)

The stellar-to-halo mass relation (SHMR)

(4)

The generalized SHMR. Star formation activity

(5)

Weak gravitational lensing

(6)

Weak gravitational lensing

(7)

Weak gravitational lensing

(8)

The Kilo Degree Survey (KiDS)

● ESO public imaging survey from the 4m VLT Survey Telescope (VST) ● 1,350 square degrees in u,g,r,i. Completed in 2019.

● Full overlap with VISTA Kilo degree INfrared Galaxy Survey ● Overlap with GAMA

● Highlights:

○ Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear

○ Galaxy alignments

○ Strong lensing

(9)

SDSS massive (M* > 10^11) elliptical galaxies

● Why SDSS?

○ Spectroscopy is important: spec-z, velocity dispersion, line indices

● Why massive ellipticals?

○ Easier to model, stellar masses are more robust, mostly centrals (easier to interpret weak

(10)

Questions

How does halo mass depend on:

● Stellar mass density profile

● Stellar velocity dispersion, at fixed stellar mass

(11)

Questions

How does halo mass depend on:

● Stellar mass density profile

● Stellar velocity dispersion, at fixed stellar mass

(12)

Stellar mass measurements

● r-band flux from Sersic profile fitting (Roy et al. in prep.)

● M*/L from SED fit to u,g,r,i,Z colors from matched-aperture photometry

Weak lensing measurements

● Forward modeling of population of galaxies and halos, described by a few parameters

● Bayesian hierarchical inference formalism (Sonnenfeld & Leauthaud 2018)

Stellar age proxies

(13)

Results (preliminary)

(14)

Summary

● Dark matter halo mass measurements allow us to draw connections between galaxy properties and their assembly history

● KiDS weak lensing observations of SDSS ellipticals put upper limit on the spread in halo mass between younger and older galaxies at fixed M*

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

We used HSC imaging and weak lensing measurements for a set of ∼ 10, 000 galaxies from the CMASS sample to constrain 1) the stellar mass-size relation, 2) the stellar mass-Sérsic

Although the cur- rent GAMA optical photometry is derived from the SDSS imaging data, there are systematic differences between the galaxy colours – as measured using the GAMA auto

We compare this to the median light-weighted stellar age t * (z * = 2.08, 1.49, 0.82 and 0.37 ) of a sample of low-redshift SDSS galaxies (from the literature) and find the

Bottom panel: Fraction of slow rotators us- ing the classification of Cappellari (2016) as a function of stellar mass in the Ref-L025N0376 (solid line) and Recal-L025N0752 (dashed

(v) The observed ψ ∗ –M ∗ relation for central disk galaxies (both field and group centrals) over the full redshift range of our sample (z ≤ 0.13) can be made compatible with

We assume a burst timescale of 150 Myr, although note that this gives a conservative estimate since typical burst timescales of SMGs are estimated to be around 100 Myr (e.g., Simpson

● Implications for size evolution of massive quiescent galaxies: ratio between major and minor mergers is a weak function of halo mass. Potential for

The scatter in the relationship between the flattening and the ratio of the rotation and dispersion velocities (v/σ) correlates strongly with the anisotropy of the stellar