• No results found

An instrumental approach to deception in bargaining Koning, L.F.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "An instrumental approach to deception in bargaining Koning, L.F."

Copied!
7
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Citation

Koning, L. F. (2011, June 15). An instrumental approach to deception in bargaining.

Dissertatiereeks, Kurt Lewin Institute. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/17711

Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown)

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/17711

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

An instrumental approach to deception in bargaining

Lukas Frederik Koning

(3)

Cover design: Lukas Frederik Koning

Printed by: Ipskamp Drukkers B.V., Enschede

This research was supported by a grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), grant number 400-04-030.

(4)

An instrumental approach to deception in bargaining

PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van

de graad Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden,

op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. mr. P.F. van der Heijden, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties

te verdedigen op woensdag 15 juni 2011 klokke 11:15 uur

door

Lukas Frederik Koning geboren te Burgervlotbrug

in 1978

(5)

Prof. Dr. N. Ellemers Universiteit Leiden Prof. Dr. P. A. M. van Lange Vrije Universiteit Dr. S. F. Harinck Universiteit Leiden

Dr. M. J. J. Handgraaf Universiteit van Amsterdam Dr. W. W. van Dijk Universiteit Leiden

(6)

Contents

1. Introduction 7

2. Power and Deception 17

Experiment 2.1: Power and deception by recipients 22

Experiment 2.2: Comparing allocators and recipients 25

General discussion 31

3. Goals and Deception 37

Experiment 3.1: Social value orientation and deception 40 Experiment 3.2: Expectations about the opponent and deception 44

General discussion 49

4. Reactions to Deceit 51

Experiment 4.1: Social values and deception 56

Experiment 4.2: Suspicion and reactions to revealed Deceit 61

General discussion 67

5. Deception and False Expectations 71

Experiment 5.1: Reactions to deception in a scenario setting 75 Experiment 5.2: Reactions to deception in ultimatum bargaining 76

Experiment 5.3: Use of deceptive strategies 79

General discussion 84

6. General Discussion 87

References 93

Samenvatting 99

Dankwoord 103

Curriculum Vitae 104

(7)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

In our experiments, recipients used deception more readily when their low power position made their alternative means of rejecting the offer less effective.. As

We argue that the (assumed) social value orientation of the opponent may play a crucial role in the selection of deceptive strategies, especially for

strongly affected by their power position; participants were more likely to reject the offer when the consequences of doing so were large for the opponent.. This was different when

When only the contents of the own envelope were disclosed at the end of bargaining, participants clearly favored telling the recipient that both envelopes contained €1.. Note that in

The studies in this chapter showed that proself bargainers use deception more readily than prosocial bargainers when deception was presented as a means to

Social value orientations and the strategic use of fairness in ultimatum bargaining.. A social functional approach to emotions in bargaining: When communicating anger pays and when

Eigenbelang blijkt niet het enige motief te zijn waarom mensen misleiden en misleiding kan ook gebruikt worden voor andere doelen dan het vergroten van de

Tijdens mijn scriptie wekte Ilja mijn interesse voor de wetenschap en daarmee stond hij aan het begin van mijn wetenschappelijke carrière.. De vele discussies