• No results found

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator treatment : benefits and pitfalls in the currently indicated population Borleffs, C.J.W.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Implantable cardioverter defibrillator treatment : benefits and pitfalls in the currently indicated population Borleffs, C.J.W."

Copied!
9
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator treatment : benefits and pitfalls in the currently indicated population

Borleffs, C.J.W.

Citation

Borleffs, C. J. W. (2010, September 30). Implantable cardioverter defibrillator treatment : benefits and pitfalls in the currently indicated population. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/16004

Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version License:

Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/16004

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if

applicable).

(2)

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Treatment:

Benefits and Pitfalls in the Currently Indicated Population

Carel Jan Willem Borleffs

(3)

The studies described in this thesis were performed at the Department of Cardiology of the Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Cover: Daniël Samama

Lay-out and print: Optima Grafische Communicatie, Rotterdam, the Netherlands ISBN: 978-90-8559-063-7

Copyright © C. Jan Willem Borleffs, Leiden, the Netherlands. All right reserved, No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior permission of the author.

Financial support to the costs associated with publication of this thesis from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca BV, Biotronik Nederland BV, Boehringer Ingelheim BV, Boston Sci- entific BV, GE Healthcare, J.E. Jurriaanse Stichting, MEDA Pharma BV, Merck Sharp &

Dohme BV, Novartis Pharma BV, Sanofi-Aventis BV, Schering-Plough BV, Servier Nederland BV, Siemens Nederland NV, St. Jude Medical Nederland BV, Toshiba Medical Systems Nederland, is greatly acknowledged.

(4)

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Treatment:

Benefits and Pitfalls in the Currently Indicated Population

Proefschrift

ter verkrijging van

de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van Rector Magnificus prof. mr. P.F. van der Heijden,

volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties te verdedigen op donderdag 30 september 2010

klokke 16.15 uur

door

Carel Jan Willem Borleffs geboren te Pijnacker in 1981

(5)

Promotiecommissie

Promotores: Prof. dr. M.J. Schalij Prof. dr. J.J. Bax

Co-promotor: Dr. L. van Erven

Overige leden: Dr. M. Bootsma

Prof. dr. R.N.W. Hauer (UMC Utrecht)

Dr. A. Mosterd (Meander Medisch Centrum Amersfoort) Prof. dr. F.R. Rosendaal

Prof. dr. E.E. van der Wall

(6)

Ik ben misschien wat minder kind Dan destijds aan de start Maar alle dingen die ik doe Die doe ik met mijn hart.

Toon Hermans

Aan mijn ouders en aan Kim

(7)

Table of contents

Chapter 1 General introduction and outline of the thesis

Part I: Long-term follow-up and baseline risk stratification of ICD patients Chapter 2 Structured Care for Patients after Acute Myocardial Infarction: Sudden

Cardiac Death Prevention. Data from the Leiden MISSION! AMI study.

Europace 2010; 12: 378-384

Chapter 3 Recurrence of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Ischemic Secondary Prevention ICD Recipients: Long-term Follow-up of the Leiden Out-of- Hospital Cardiac Arrest Study (LOHCAT).

Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 1621-1626

Chapter 4 Prognostic Importance of Atrial Fibrillation in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients.

J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 879-885

Chapter 5 Clinical Importance of New-onset Atrial Fibrillation after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Heart Rhythm 2009; 6: 305-310

Chapter 6 Mortality Risk Score in Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Recipients with Non-ischaemic or Ischaemic Heart Disease.

Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 712-718

Chapter 7 Prediction of Non-Benefit from Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Treatment in Primary Prevention Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease.

Submitted

Part II: New parameters in risk stratification

Chapter 8 Infarct Tissue Heterogeneity Assessed with Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Spontaneous Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 2:183-190

Chapter 9 Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation Assessed with 123-Iodine

Metaiodobenzylguanidine Imaging Predicts Ventricular Arrhythmias in Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Patients.

J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2769-2777

(8)

Chapter 10 Predicting Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease: Clinical Application of the ECG derived QRS-T Angle.

Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009; 2: 548-554

Chapter 11 Right Ventricular Stimulation Threshold at ICD implant Predicts Device Therapy in Primary Prevention Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease

Europace 2010; in press

Part III: Mechanical aspects and complications of device therapy Chapter 12 Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks:

Incidence, Predictors and Impact on Mortality.

J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; in press

Chapter 13 Requirement for Coronary Sinus Lead Interventions and Effectiveness of Endovascular Replacement during Long-term Follow-up after Implantation of a Resynchronization Device.

Europace 2009; 11: 607-611.

Chapter 14 Risk of Failure of Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Leads.

Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009; 2: 411-416 Chapter 15 Implementation of Lead Safety Recommendations.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2010; 33: 431-6

Chapter 16 Recurrent Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Replacement Is Associated with an Increasing Risk of Pocket-Related Complications.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2010; in press

Summary, Conslusions and Future Perspectives Samenvatting, Conclusies en Toekomstperspectief List of publications

Dankwoord Curriculum Vitae

(9)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

In the current study on the long-term follow-up and the construction of an easy-to-use mor- tality risk score in non-ischemic and ischemic primary prevention ICD patients, the findings

In the current study on the identification of primary prevention ICD patients with ischemic heart disease who do not benefit from ICD treatment, the findings can be summarized as

Methods and results: Ninety-one patients (65±11 years) with previous MI scheduled for ICD implantation underwent cine-MRI to evaluate left ventricular (LV) function and volumes

Univariable analyses demonstrated that ICD indication (secondary vs. primary preven- tion), ischemic cardiomyopathy, early 123-I MIBG SPECT defect score, late 123-I MIBG SPECT

In patients with ischemic heart disease, currently indicated for primary prevention ICD therapy, a baseline spatial QRS-T angle > 100º is associated with a sevenfold risk for the

In this cohort of ICD treated patients with ischemic heart disease and a primary prevention indication for ICD treatment, a post-implant right ventricular stimulation threshold

The main findings of the current study on the incidence, predictors and outcome of inappro- priate shocks can be summarized as follows: (1) the cumulative incidence of inappropriate

The current study aimed to specifically describe the need for CS lead intervention during long-term follow-up and to assess the successfulness of endovascular repositioning. The